Title: rt-3.4.2 - Problem with rt-mailgate - POSTFIX
Hi!
I have a problem with executing the script rt-mailgate. I get a Command died with status 1 message. Please help me.
Maillog:
Oct 24 10:06:30 linuxtest postfix/smtpd[28935]: connect from gw1.cpb-software.ag[193.41.232.141]
Oct 24
Hello,
when I try to edit a ticket with a custom field Combobox RT outputs an
error. Other custom fields work well. Can someone give some advice what can
be wrong? RT version 3.4.6.
Thanks for any help,
Kazimieras
error:could not find component for path 'EditCustomFieldCombobox'
Hello List,
I received a request from our users: They'd like to have another watcher type
called Solver (like Cc, AdminCc, Requester) to tickets. I could not find any
hints in the documentation -- can it be configured somewhere? Any pointers
appreciated.
tia
Thomas Dietmaier.
--
Dataphone
Make it a custom field .. that way you wont have to tinker with the base
code.
Roy
Thomas Dietmaier wrote:
Hello List,
I received a request from our users: They'd like to have another watcher type called
Solver (like Cc, AdminCc, Requester) to tickets. I could not find any hints
in the
This is the directory where I have my RTSoap.pm, I wanted to have the
SOAP related modules independent.
you can easily place it in local/lib/RT and remove that line or modify
it to /opt/rt3/local/lib/RT
Regards;
Roy
Torsten Brumm wrote:
Hi Roy,
in your SOAP Perl Scrip, you do: use lib
So, I've got this really befuddling permissions problem now with my
RT 3.6.1 setup. I've got two queues, and four classes of users. The
queues are Customer/Production and Internal IT. The four classes of
users are Users, Customers, Product Managers, and Operations.
Customers should not be
hi ,
I have recently installed RT 3.6.1 on fedora 4. am not able to view mails in Quick
search
menu.What might be likely cause for this problem?
thx
raghav
___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
Well, I went back and rechecked my cut 'n paste job, and it appears
that whatever I changed a week ago is working now. I'm going to write this
one down to PBKAC.
Wish I could go back and apply this to all of our closed tickets
(for my manager's reports). Would you happen to know of a solution
The unprivileged user has currently the following rights:
- ReplyToTicket
- ShowTicket
- ModifySelf
But the user is still able to view *all* tickts from *any* user by
changing the ticket-id in the request url.
How can I fix this security issue, so that the user can only see his own
tickts?
Here is another query that takes 6.95 secs
Count: 198 Time=6.95s (1377s) Lock=0.00s (0s) Rows=1.1 (224),
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SELECT DISTINCT main.* FROM (((Tickets main JOIN Groups Groups_1
ON ( Groups_1.Instance = main.id)) LEFT JOIN CachedGroupMembers
CachedGroupMembers_2 ON (
Some questions about displaying custom fields in search results:
1) Is this possible to do for queue-specific custom fields without code
modifications?
2) What's the syntax for use in $DefaultSearchResultFormat in
RT_SiteConfig.pm?
3) What about if the field name has a space in it?
My
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have a REALLY strange problem going on.
There are a few tickets in the database that cant be located with Query
Builder and don't show up on the quick search results page for the
queue. It also doesn't show up if I do a Query Builder search on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AFAIK, inetOrgPerson doesn't exist in Active Directory.
I've changed it to user, which is one of the choices I can see in
ADSIEdit (the others are organizationalPerson, top, person.)
Use the LDAPAttrMap I posted to the Wiki at
J.D.
What are the status's of those tickets? I believe that Deleted tickets
don't show in a search, unless when searching by ticket #.
Kenn
LBNL
J.D. Meek wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have a REALLY strange problem going on.
There are a few tickets in the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Both were new. I opened one of them and checked the search again to
test and it still doesn't show up.
Thanks.
J.D.
- -Original Message-
From: Kenneth Crocker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 2:27 PM
To: J.D. Meek
ver 3.4.5
Hello,
We would like to get rid of this button (towards the top of the screen)
for users that have no rights. We would like for our
'customers/requestors' not to be able to randomly punch in ticket
numbers to see cases that they are not involved in...
Thanks.
--
Jim Bureau
IMHO, there are much better ways (and more secure ways) of fixing this
problem. In my case customers have secure queues and are members of groups
that only have access to their secure queues. The only difficulty is that
users must be added to the ticket system in order to gain access to their
This is mysql bug that wouldn't be fixed in 4.1 branch, but is fixed
in 5.x. I know how to fix this on RT side, but it's quite hard to
implement a solution and I don't think we'll have enough time for
this. Sorry. See also http://bugs.mysql.com/?id=20182
On 10/24/06, Asif Iqbal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I'm having a problem with my install of RT on Ubuntu 6.06. I've followed the
directions here: http://wiki.bestpractical.com/index.cgi?UbuntuInstallGuide
The problem I'm having is that remote users who access my RT installation
often do not get the entire page. Instead, they get the
Selfservice uses the same layout templates as the
base RT. Is it possible to use an alternate stylesheet set for Selfservice? If
yes, how?
___
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rt-users
Community help:
The unprivileged user has currently the following rights:
- ReplyToTicket
- ShowTicket
- ModifySelf
At least in my testing of v3.6.1 ShowTicket turned out to be Show ANY
Ticket. :-)
What I did was set up the Requestor to have the ability to view their
own ticket. Go into Configuration,
I'm trying to upgrade from RT 3.4.2/RTFM 2.0.2
to RT 3.6.1. Seems I need to upgrade RTFM as well,
so I tried 2.2.0RC4, since the dates seems to be similar.
Kinda works, but not really. (I'm using the 3.4-retro css
if that matters.) I never see the content of the articles,
unless I view the
I've added to our development server one of the custom field validations
that was posted to the mailing list a while ago by Nick Metrowsky. The
particular validation I've added is
'(?#DateDDMM)^(0[1-9]|[12][0-9]|3[01])[-/.](0[1-9]|1[012])[-/.](19|20)\d\d',
The question I have is whether or
The file says it will be removed from 3.6. I'm using 3.6.1. Is this
going to be a problem for me?
Mathew Snyder
Ruslan Zakirov wrote:
html/Ticket/Elements/EditDates and you should hide this CF in
html/Ticket/Elements/EditCustomFields
On 10/25/06, Mathew Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
The file says it will be removed from 3.6. I'm using 3.6.1. Is this
going to be a problem for me?
Mathew Snyder
Ruslan Zakirov wrote:
html/Ticket/Elements/EditDates and you should hide this CF in
html/Ticket/Elements/EditCustomFields
On 10/25/06, Mathew Snyder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
25 matches
Mail list logo