Hi everybody,
I have created updates for Ruby in all Fedoras. The Ruby 3.3.1 has
already landed and here are Bodhi links for the older releases:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-14db7b21a2
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-31cac8b8ec
Thanks for the heads up. I assume you are going to land this just for
Rawhide, right? And we should also watch Ruby. So far, there is 2.7.2 in
master and 2.7.1 in Ruby 3.3.
Checking Rails, there seems to be some patches around such as:
https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/51510
For
Thx for the heads up and the updates.
Not sure if you are aware or you just prefer the old way, but it is not
possible to use side-tag together with `%_with_bootstrap` macro:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Update_Guide/#_using_macros_in_a_side_tag
Thx for heads up. This breakages starts to be new standard it seems,
because even 5.21.0 broke Railties:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-railties/c/b0803e996eee177c7b1a20255f755aa28522ea01?branch=rawhide
Oh well.
Vít
Dne 08. 02. 24 v 11:23 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Hello,
Dne 15. 01. 24 v 11:02 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
On Mon, Jan 15, 2024 at 10:57 AM Pavel Valena wrote:
On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 10:29 AM Vít Ondruch
wrote:
Dne 11. 01. 24 v 23:10 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 4:38 PM Vít Ondruch
wrote
Dne 11. 01. 24 v 23:10 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
On Thu, Jan 11, 2024 at 4:38 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
Working on Puma 6.0, I have hit this [1] issue rebuilding
rubygem-shoulda-matchers:
~~~
1) shoulda-matchers integrates with Rails in a project that
uses Spring
Dne 11. 01. 24 v 16:37 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Working on Puma 6.0, I have hit this [1] issue rebuilding
rubygem-shoulda-matchers:
~~~
1) shoulda-matchers integrates with Rails in a project that uses Spring
Failure/Error: run_rake_tasks!('db:drop', 'db:create', 'db:migrate
Working on Puma 6.0, I have hit this [1] issue rebuilding
rubygem-shoulda-matchers:
~~~
1) shoulda-matchers integrates with Rails in a project that uses Spring
Failure/Error: run_rake_tasks!('db:drop', 'db:create', 'db:migrate')
RuntimeError:
Command
Dne 04. 01. 24 v 9:39 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 03. 01. 24 v 19:43 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 03. 01. 24 v 18:59 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 03. 01. 24 v 18:55 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 03. 01. 24 v 18:00 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 03. 01. 24 v 17:18 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Mamoru
Dne 03. 01. 24 v 19:43 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 03. 01. 24 v 18:59 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 03. 01. 24 v 18:55 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 03. 01. 24 v 18:00 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 03. 01. 24 v 17:18 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2024/01/04 1:06:
Vít Ondruch
Dne 03. 01. 24 v 18:59 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 03. 01. 24 v 18:55 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 03. 01. 24 v 18:00 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 03. 01. 24 v 17:18 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2024/01/04 1:06:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2024/01/03 19:20:
Hi everybody,
Ruby
Dne 03. 01. 24 v 18:55 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 03. 01. 24 v 18:00 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 03. 01. 24 v 17:18 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2024/01/04 1:06:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2024/01/03 19:20:
Hi everybody,
Ruby 3.3 is out and it is time for Ruby mass rebuild
Dne 03. 01. 24 v 18:00 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 03. 01. 24 v 17:18 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2024/01/04 1:06:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2024/01/03 19:20:
Hi everybody,
Ruby 3.3 is out and it is time for Ruby mass rebuild. First of all,
I'd like to thank to Mamoru
Dne 03. 01. 24 v 17:18 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2024/01/04 1:06:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2024/01/03 19:20:
Hi everybody,
Ruby 3.3 is out and it is time for Ruby mass rebuild. First of all,
I'd like to thank to Mamoru for the preparation and lot of fixes all
around. I
Dne 03. 01. 24 v 13:50 Jarek Prokop napsal(a):
On 1/3/24 11:48, jpro...@redhat.com wrote:
On 1/3/24 11:23, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 02. 01. 24 v 21:50 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
My build succeeded everywhere. Nevertheless, there were
some reports about issues with fibers
Dne 02. 01. 24 v 21:50 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 9:07 PM Pavel Valena wrote:
On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 5:31 PM Vít Ondruch
wrote:
Dne 02. 01. 24 v 17:16 jpro...@redhat.com napsal(a):
On 1/2/24 16:41, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 02. 01. 24
Hi everybody,
Ruby 3.3 is out and it is time for Ruby mass rebuild. First of all, I'd
like to thank to Mamoru for the preparation and lot of fixes all around.
I really appreciate that.
I think we are well prepared for the rebuild, therefore I have requested
side-tag:
~~~
$ fedpkg
Dne 02. 01. 24 v 17:16 jpro...@redhat.com napsal(a):
On 1/2/24 16:41, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 02. 01. 24 v 16:15 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 3:38 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi everybody and happy new year,
Being back from holidays, here is Ruby 3.3.0.
https
Dne 02. 01. 24 v 16:15 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 3:38 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi everybody and happy new year,
Being back from holidays, here is Ruby 3.3.0.
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=86668
As some of you have noticed
Hi everybody and happy new year,
Being back from holidays, here is Ruby 3.3.0.
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=86668
As some of you have noticed, there are issues with expired certificates.
I have asked backport here:
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20106
Other
Hi again,
I am back, this time with rev e8639098ed. The build is available here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=110695618
From upstream POV, there is not much interesting to mention.
Downstream, I have applied patches to revert this PR:
Hi,
Looking at the versions of subpackages, it seems that the only
concerning package is rubygem-power_assert, where the version has not
changed between Ruby 3.2 and Ruby 3.3. Otherwise all the versions were
bumped.
Looking closer at the power_assert, it seem that
1) The content is still
Hi everybody,
I am back with yet another update, this time rev 8e6f63df47. The changes
are in my PR, while the build is running here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=110562000
I have not noticed any noteworthy from upstream POV, but downstream, I
have extracted the
Dne 21. 12. 23 v 1:23 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2023/12/21 9:04:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/12/21 0:45:
I have just hit this issue:
~~~
Error: Transaction test error:
file /usr/lib64/gems/ruby/racc-1.7.3/racc/cparse.so from install
of ruby-bundled-gems-3.3.0
I have just hit this issue:
~~~
Error: Transaction test error:
file /usr/lib64/gems/ruby/racc-1.7.3/racc/cparse.so from install of
ruby-bundled-gems-3.3.0~20231219git8e6f63df47-184.fc40.x86_64 conflicts
with file from package rubygem-racc-1.7.3-200.fc40.x86_64
file
Dne 12. 12. 23 v 15:11 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
9. rubygem-rubygems-mirror
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygem-newruby-test-3-2/build/6743512/
```
+ ruby -Ilib -e 'Dir.glob "./test/test_*.rb", (:require)'
:127:in
`require': cannot load such file -- rubygems/indexer
Dne 26. 11. 23 v 15:13 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
5. rubygem-childprocess
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygem-newruby-test-3-2/build/6695574/
Same as before.
7.
rubygem-childprocess
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygem-newruby-test-3-2/build/6576582/
Dne 20. 12. 23 v 14:22 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/12/20 18:56:
Dne 15. 12. 23 v 17:03 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 15. 12. 23 v 11:10 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 26. 11. 23 v 15:13 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
7. rubygem-railties
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs
Dne 15. 12. 23 v 17:03 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 15. 12. 23 v 11:10 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 26. 11. 23 v 15:13 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
7. rubygem-railties
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygem-newruby-test-3-2/build/6695576/
Testsuite is failing, but due to some
Hi again,
I'm back with yet another update, this time rev 8e6f63df47. The build is
running here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=110562000
From what I have noticed, there is included RubyGems 3.5.1 instead of
3.5.0.dev. And there seems to be fixed some issues with
Dne 15. 12. 23 v 17:57 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
There is one remaining issue:
~~~
* Test file: test/version_test.rb
/usr/share/gems/gems/zeitwerk-2.6.6/lib/zeitwerk/kernel.rb:38:
warning: drb/unix is found in drb, which will no longer be part of the
default gems since Ruby 3.4.0. Add drb
Dne 15. 12. 23 v 17:57 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 15. 12. 23 v 17:03 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 15. 12. 23 v 11:10 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 26. 11. 23 v 15:13 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
7. rubygem-railties
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygem-newruby-test-3-2/build
Dne 15. 12. 23 v 16:34 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 15. 12. 23 v 14:13 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 15. 12. 23 v 13:56 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/12/14 23:10:
Dear Rubyists,
As it turns out, yesterday version was not a big success, as we
learned the hard way (thx
Dne 15. 12. 23 v 17:03 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 15. 12. 23 v 11:10 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 26. 11. 23 v 15:13 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
7. rubygem-railties
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygem-newruby-test-3-2/build/6695576/
Testsuite is failing, but due to some
Dne 15. 12. 23 v 11:10 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 26. 11. 23 v 15:13 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
7. rubygem-railties
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygem-newruby-test-3-2/build/6695576/
Testsuite is failing, but due to some different reason:
```
Failure
Hi everybody,
As you might have figured from my other email, I have yet another Ruby
update. This time rev 04f7be6126 and the scratch build is available here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=110382113
There were some RubyGems/Bundler vendored gems updates and as can be
Dne 15. 12. 23 v 14:13 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 15. 12. 23 v 13:56 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/12/14 23:10:
Dear Rubyists,
As it turns out, yesterday version was not a big success, as we
learned the hard way (thx Mamoru). So here I am back with updated
version
Dne 15. 12. 23 v 13:56 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/12/14 23:10:
Dear Rubyists,
As it turns out, yesterday version was not a big success, as we
learned the hard way (thx Mamoru). So here I am back with updated
version, this time rev e3631277c3. The changes are in my PR
Dne 15. 12. 23 v 11:10 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 26. 11. 23 v 15:13 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
7. rubygem-railties
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygem-newruby-test-3-2/build/6695576/
Testsuite is failing, but due to some different reason:
```
Failure
Dne 26. 11. 23 v 15:13 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
7. rubygem-railties
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygem-newruby-test-3-2/build/6695576/
Testsuite is failing, but due to some different reason:
```
Failure:
FullStackConsoleTest#test_sandbox
Dne 26. 11. 23 v 15:13 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
rubygem-shoulda-matchers is FIXED:
With some discussion, this is fixed on ruby side:
https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/e34e8b93f8fac3ef40ab5ed8672fa003f3b4d9c0
ref: https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/pull/7128
14.
Dear Rubyists,
As it turns out, yesterday version was not a big success, as we learned
the hard way (thx Mamoru). So here I am back with updated version, this
time rev e3631277c3. The changes are in my PR and the build is here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=110328934
Dne 14. 12. 23 v 11:24 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 14. 12. 23 v 9:51 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 14. 12. 23 v 9:21 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Hello, again:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/12/14 0:30:
Hi again,
I'm back with yet another update, this time rev a7ad9f3836. The
build is running here
Dne 14. 12. 23 v 9:51 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 14. 12. 23 v 9:21 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Hello, again:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/12/14 0:30:
Hi again,
I'm back with yet another update, this time rev a7ad9f3836. The
build is running here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo
Dne 14. 12. 23 v 9:21 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Hello, again:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/12/14 0:30:
Hi again,
I'm back with yet another update, this time rev a7ad9f3836. The build
is running here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=110284699
This time, there are several
Dne 12. 12. 23 v 15:59 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 12. 12. 23 v 15:11 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
C. New failures
8. rubygem-rails-deprecated_sanitizer
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygem-newruby-test-3-2/build/6743508/
```
1) Failure:
DeprecatedSanitizerTest
Hi again,
I'm back with yet another update, this time rev a7ad9f3836. The build is
running here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=110284699
This time, there are several changes I'd like to mention.
* There is included patch fixing several of the network related spec
Dne 13. 12. 23 v 13:44 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/12/11 21:26:
Hi everybody,
Ruby 3.3 RC1 is here:
https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2023/12/11/ruby-3-3-0-rc1-released/
And therefore I have updated the PR with recent changes and the build
is running here:
https
Dne 13. 12. 23 v 13:44 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/12/11 21:26:
Hi everybody,
Ruby 3.3 RC1 is here:
https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2023/12/11/ruby-3-3-0-rc1-released/
And therefore I have updated the PR with recent changes and the build
is running here:
https
Dne 12. 12. 23 v 15:11 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
C. New failures
8. rubygem-rails-deprecated_sanitizer
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygem-newruby-test-3-2/build/6743508/
```
1) Failure:
Hi everybody,
Ruby 3.3 RC1 is here:
https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2023/12/11/ruby-3-3-0-rc1-released/
And therefore I have updated the PR with recent changes and the build is
running here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=110183096
I have not seen anything what would
Hi everybody,
Here is yet another snapshot of Ruby 3.3, this time rev 071df40495:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=110009405
From upstream POV, I have not noticed nothing particularly interesting.
But I have reverted back the `%gem_install` macro to use again the
Dne 07. 12. 23 v 15:27 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/11/24 22:17:
Hi,
I am back with yet another update of Ruby 3.3, this time rev
24e0b185ab. The changes are in my PR and the scratch build is
available here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID
Dne 28. 11. 23 v 17:04 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 26. 11. 23 v 15:13 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
5. rubygem-childprocess
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygem-newruby-test-3-2/build/6695574/
Same as before.
7.
rubygem-childprocess
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs
Dne 26. 11. 23 v 15:13 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
5. rubygem-childprocess
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygem-newruby-test-3-2/build/6695574/
Same as before.
7.
rubygem-childprocess
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygem-newruby-test-3-2/build/6576582/
Dne 09. 11. 23 v 19:09 jpro...@redhat.com napsal(a):
On 11/9/23 18:27, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 07. 11. 23 v 12:56 jpro...@redhat.com napsal(a):
Hi,
On 11/1/23 17:13, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi,
Here is yet another Ruby 3.3 snapshot, this time a1e24ab484:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji
Hi,
I am back with yet another update of Ruby 3.3, this time rev 24e0b185ab.
The changes are in my PR and the scratch build is available here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=109487230
This starting to be boring, because there is nothing what would caught
my attention.
Dne 10. 11. 23 v 16:53 Jun Aruga (he / him) napsal(a):
The PR was merged. Now Koschei passes.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/pull-request/163
But my question was if the patch was backported for Ruby 3.2 and
possibly older.
I opened the backport request ticket below in the Ruby
Dne 07. 11. 23 v 12:56 jpro...@redhat.com napsal(a):
Hi,
On 11/1/23 17:13, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi,
Here is yet another Ruby 3.3 snapshot, this time a1e24ab484:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=108418495
The respective changes are available in my PR. There is nothing
Dne 08. 11. 23 v 16:13 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/10/30 19:37:
Nice, thx for the summary and a few remarks inline.
Dne 29. 10. 23 v 9:09 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
2.
rubygem-addressable
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygem-newruby-test-3-2/build
Hi,
I am back again with yet another update, this time commit ad3db6711c.
The changes are in my PR and the build is running here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=108809158
I have not noticed anything really interesting. The most interesting
thing is actually inclusion of
Dne 09. 11. 23 v 16:41 Jun Aruga (he / him) napsal(a):
On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 10:03 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 08. 11. 23 v 18:31 Jun Aruga (he / him) napsal(a):
Hello folks in Ruby SIG.
I just want to share that right now rpms/ruby started to fail in
Fedora rawhide after the dependent
Dne 08. 11. 23 v 18:31 Jun Aruga (he / him) napsal(a):
Hello folks in Ruby SIG.
I just want to share that right now rpms/ruby started to fail in
Fedora rawhide after the dependent openssl version was upgraded from
openssl 1:3.1.1-4.fc40 to 1:3.1.4-1.fc40.
Dne 02. 11. 23 v 11:15 jpro...@redhat.com napsal(a):
On 11/1/23 11:17, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi Rubyists,
The release of Ruby 3.3 is coming close and to be ready for rebuild
after Christmas, I have submitted the Ruby 3.3 change proposal [1].
It is already in `ChangeReadyForWrangler` state
Dne 01. 11. 23 v 14:31 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 10:07 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 31. 10. 23 v 23:45 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
> Pavel Valena wrote on 2023/11/01 3:42:
>> On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 12:36 PM Vít Ondruch
>> wrote:
>>
Hi,
Here is yet another Ruby 3.3 snapshot, this time a1e24ab484:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=108418495
The respective changes are available in my PR. There is nothing
particular what would catch my attention. Happy testing and thx for all
the feedback and support.
Dne 01. 11. 23 v 11:27 jpro...@redhat.com napsal(a):
Hi
On 10/12/23 17:20, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi,
I am back again with yet another update, this time to e029375a7d. The
changes are in the PR:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/pull-request/159
And the scratch build is running here
Dne 01. 11. 23 v 12:28 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/11/01 19:17:
Hi Rubyists,
The release of Ruby 3.3 is coming close and to be ready for rebuild
after Christmas, I have submitted the Ruby 3.3 change proposal [1].
It is already in `ChangeReadyForWrangler` state, since
Hi Rubyists,
The release of Ruby 3.3 is coming close and to be ready for rebuild
after Christmas, I have submitted the Ruby 3.3 change proposal [1]. It
is already in `ChangeReadyForWrangler` state, since I don't expect any
controversy (it is mostly copy paste of Ruby 3.2 change [2]). But
Dne 31. 10. 23 v 23:45 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Pavel Valena wrote on 2023/11/01 3:42:
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 12:36 PM Vít Ondruch
wrote:
Dne 26. 10. 23 v 18:26 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 4:31 PM Vít Ondruch
wrote:
Dne 25. 10. 23 v 16:11 Mamoru TASAKA napsal
Dne 29. 10. 23 v 9:09 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
14.
rubygem-shoulda-matchers
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygem-newruby-test-3-2/build/6576601/
Lots of:
```
An error occurred while loading
./spec/unit/shoulda/matchers/action_controller/callback_matcher_spec.rb.
Nice, thx for the summary and a few remarks inline.
Dne 29. 10. 23 v 9:09 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
2.
rubygem-addressable
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygem-newruby-test-3-2/build/6576510/
Test suite segfaults constantly...
Isn't this some RegExp / GC thing seeint
Dne 26. 10. 23 v 18:26 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 4:31 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 25. 10. 23 v 16:11 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
> Hi, Vít:
>
> Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/10/24 23:07:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am back again w
Dne 25. 10. 23 v 16:11 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Hi, Vít:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/10/24 23:07:
Hi,
I am back again with updated version of Ruby, this time c44d65427e.
Please see the changes in the upstream PR and test the build
(currently in progress) here:
https
Exploring possibilities to better organize gems, I have just discovered
a `--vendor` option (after almost 10 years of existence of this flag
臘♂️):
~~~
$ gem install gem2rpm --vendor --no-user-install
Fetching gem2rpm-1.0.2.gem
ERROR: While executing gem ... (Errno::EACCES)
Permission
Hi,
I am back again with updated version of Ruby, this time c44d65427e.
Please see the changes in the upstream PR and test the build (currently
in progress) here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=108034430
Apart of fixes for the "user install gems" discussed in other
Dne 15. 10. 23 v 1:48 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/10/13 0:20:
Hi,
I am back again with yet another update, this time to e029375a7d. The
changes are in the PR:
Vít, would you take a look at this change?
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/pull/5327
In ruby.git
Dne 20. 10. 23 v 14:58 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/10/20 21:21:
Dne 20. 10. 23 v 14:13 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 15. 10. 23 v 1:48 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/10/13 0:20:
Hi,
I am back again with yet another update, this time to e029375a7d
BTW, the question also is, what is the influence of PR5327 on our settings:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/blob/5bf57b1504871230600103083d77ff3502255e2e/f/operating_system.rb#_103
In theory, we should be able to drop this.
Vít
Dne 20. 10. 23 v 14:21 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne
Dne 20. 10. 23 v 14:13 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 15. 10. 23 v 1:48 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/10/13 0:20:
Hi,
I am back again with yet another update, this time to e029375a7d.
The changes are in the PR:
Vít, would you take a look at this change?
https
Dne 15. 10. 23 v 1:48 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/10/13 0:20:
Hi,
I am back again with yet another update, this time to e029375a7d. The
changes are in the PR:
Vít, would you take a look at this change?
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/pull/5327
In ruby.git
the generators first).
Vít
Dne 16. 10. 23 v 16:19 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 12. 10. 23 v 17:20 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Next on my table is allow usage of generators on default/bundled
gems. More details on this approach is here:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de
Looking a bit into licensee, I am still not convinced that Faraday 2 is
really needed.
So far, I have reduced the number of test failures to 25 and non of them
is related to "octokit" or "faraday". So while having Faraday 2+ is nice
on itself, I don't think this is blocker for your case.
Dne 16. 10. 23 v 16:53 Benson Muite napsal(a):
On 10/16/23 14:08, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Additionally, what is the reason for having Faraday 2? It seems octokit
requires Faraday, but version 1 should be fine. I am not sure about
Licensee itself, but on the first look, it seems they are having some
Dne 12. 10. 23 v 17:20 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Next on my table is allow usage of generators on default/bundled gems.
More details on this approach is here:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/3MHROKOM53HM6NF7RGGLFBIQFG5IEIQG
Dne 16. 10. 23 v 12:58 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dear Benson,
Yeah, the situation about Faraday is a bit unfortunate. I think that
also rubygem-typhoeus depends on Faraday 1:
https://github.com/typhoeus/typhoeus/blob/f5c5751df49089da89fc2683a23df04850a45604/Gemfile#L18
Nevertheless, would you
Dear Benson,
Yeah, the situation about Faraday is a bit unfortunate. I think that
also rubygem-typhoeus depends on Faraday 1:
https://github.com/typhoeus/typhoeus/blob/f5c5751df49089da89fc2683a23df04850a45604/Gemfile#L18
Nevertheless, would you be open to rather rename the current package to
Dne 15. 10. 23 v 1:48 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/10/13 0:20:
Hi,
I am back again with yet another update, this time to e029375a7d. The
changes are in the PR:
Vít, would you take a look at this change?
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/pull/5327
It is on my
Hi,
I am back again with yet another update, this time to e029375a7d. The
changes are in the PR:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/pull-request/159
And the scratch build is running here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=107409961
From upstream POV, there is nothing
There is going to be some work to do:
https://rubyonrails.org/2023/10/5/Rails-7-1-0-has-been-released
Not sure what is the impact and when is the right moment to land this.
But my gut feeling is that we should wait with this prior we get Ruby
3.3 into Fedora. Otherwise this could lead into
Dne 25. 09. 23 v 10:17 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
I don't agree with B.
Users are free to install tzinfo-data gem instead, which might or
might not give them more freedom. Option B is quick and dirty and with
that, we have not really moved anywhere. So I am for A short term and
long term we can
at 7:50 PM Mamoru TASAKA
wrote:
Hello, ruby-sig folks:
From devel list:
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote on 2023/09/22 23:01:
On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 10:43:05AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2233281#c3
This probably answers my question. So heads up
rmat-patch` would
name it.
Vít
Dne 25. 01. 22 v 19:50 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
This has been very long sitting on my TODO list and today was the day.
Therefore I published this tool:
https://github.com/fedora-ruby/ferut/blob/main/ruby-devel-srpm.rb
If you have not heard about "ferut"
Hi,
I am back with new update, this time it is rev 3c11cdbcfe. The changes
are in the PR:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/pull-request/159
and build (in progress ATM) is here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=106474426
The main reason I have prepared this update
Dne 19. 09. 23 v 13:22 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Hello all, again:
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2023/09/17 22:42:
Okay, so with my initial builds for rubygem- packages, among 456
packages,
50 packages failed to build (1 just fixed one of them, so currently 49).
Hi,
Ruby 3.3 Preview 2 was released last week and here I am with the updated
version. You can find the changes in my PR:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/pull-request/159
and here is the associated scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=106353657
I have
Dne 17. 09. 23 v 15:42 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2023/09/14 21:13:
Hello, Vít:
Thank you for initial work for ruby 3.3 .
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/09/12 17:08:
* `%gem_spec` macro with options:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/vondruch/rpms/ruby/blob
Dne 14. 09. 23 v 14:13 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Hello, Vít:
Thank you for initial work for ruby 3.3 .
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/09/12 17:08:
* `%gem_spec` macro with options:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/vondruch/rpms/ruby/blob/77c580dfa85f921d969a8da68eaf6e88987aab8a/f
3 PM Pavel Valena wrote:
Hello,
I've checked the PR as well - all checks out :)
I'll build it in my COPR ruby-testing repo... will keep you posted.
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 10:17 AM Vít Ondruch
wrote:
Dne 12. 09. 23 v 10:08 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
>
&
rubygem-shoulda has been orphaned:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238752
I hope it stays like that.
Vít
Dne 05. 09. 23 v 12:38 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
These are the related PRs:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-webrobots/pull-request/1
https
1 - 100 of 882 matches
Mail list logo
