Thats a clever suggestion,
Another way (more brute force procedural), is to use agenda-groups.
So most of your rules are in an agenda-group called calculateDate or
similar.
You then have a group called deftault which just has the rule that checks
if the date is still null, and sets it.
You
If you assert engine as a seperate fact, you can then access the engine
directly.
In the next version, you will be able to do
Car(engine.running == true) and it will be converted to a predicate (sugar)
- but always less efficient in RETE terms then accessing a field directly on
a fact.
On
Not in 3.0.
In the new version, which is now being worked on in trunk of SVN, yes you
can use connective operators (all of them I think).
On 1/31/07, nicolae oana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everybody,
There are in JBoss Rules other connective field constraints, except for
comma ?
Regards,
hmmm.. in an eval it *should* work - I assume there is a compile error that
mentions the L ?
well this should not be a problem in 3.2, but for 3.0.x we can certainly
look at it if you have a unit test.
A literal outside of an eval shouldn't be needed - as the type is inferenced
from the facts
that sounds correct.
No you can't really depend on things happening in a certain order. of course
it will be consistent between executions for the same data, but you can't
count on that. It would mostly be effected by the order in which you assert
facts.
I guess the question is why are you
so in your consequence a NPE is happening? yes it wraps it up.
I think there has been some talk of modifying the trace (if posisble) to
show exactly where it happens, but at the moment its just that unpleasant
wrapped exception from the consequence.
On 2/13/07, Matthew Shaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
contains works on the Collection interface. So if parnerList is a ArrayList
of String, then you could do:
parnerList contains 2900
On 2/13/07, jdepaul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Still having trouble with the contains operator... I have the following
rule
in place:
rule Shipper List Match
the salience can work fine, or else you can use agenda-groups and then
something like:
workingMemory.fireAllRules();
workingMemory.setFocus(cleanup);
workingMemory.fireAllRules();
On 2/8/07, Justine Hlista [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Need some instruction for retraction strategies. We have an
yeah, very much so. Hopefully have a demo of it in M2 or M3.
I have been meaning to update the blog with the latest on package
management, but haven't found time, I will do ASAP.
On 2/15/07, Anstis, Michael (M.) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Just a note to enquire as to the status of the
it should - as it just generates rules, it doesn't interpret them when
processing the DTs.
On 2/15/07, Olenin, Vladimir (MOH) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I wonder if new syntax (specifically – 'accumulate' keyword) works
correctly with Decision Tables? Can the new keywords be used in
you should be able to do that - just leave the constraint cells empty, or
put some comment in them.
On 2/14/07, Martin Weidner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Maybe I have overlooked something, but I couldn't find a way to generate a
simple rule from an excel decision table, where the left
activation-group may be what you are looking for. For things in the one
activation group, only one rule is guaranteed to fire.
eg: activation-group NIKE
its an attribute like no-loop etc.
On 2/14/07, jdepaul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have several rules defined in groups by Customer,
The answer is:
42.
Or, perhaps, the length of a piece of string.
It really varies with how much memory you want to throw at it, thats all
really. The effectiveness of the RETE network may also add some overhead.
I have heard of people pushing in millions of facts into one working memory,
but
yes, in the mapping use an eval (... your code here ...) and you can take
the mapping from the DSL sentence.
On 2/28/07, kingston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to write a rule in DSL to check for a value that is
returned
by a calls to a java method in the Condition part ?
Are
thats not quite valid DRL.
But you can do that sort of thing,
you have a cell that spans all the field columns, and in that cell put
p: Person
age status
etc.
On 2/28/07, Vargas, Michael E [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently trying to convert this Rules
sounds like the classes that are visible to axis are not visible to rules -
depends how you are packaging up your application - war or ear?
On 3/7/07, Jones, Alan R [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way to deploy JBoss Rules so that it's exposed as a web service
in Axis2? I keep
no in 3.0 version unfortunately. You can tell the parser to print out the
DRL - but it will just write it out the System.out (only for debuggin). Look
in RuleParser for that option.
In trunk - which will be the new version - there is a seperate step which
outputs DRL - but I don't think that
hi Kris.
Well, you can't bind a variable to a new instance on the LHS - on the LHS
you have no control over when conditions are evaluated, so the value of
now would not necessarily be what you think.
Nevertheless, I can see what you want:
rule CanDoHisStuff
activation-group permissions
when
Hi Joe.
Actually that example is showing off truth maintenance and logical
assertions.
That rule should not be fired if Hope was a normal stated assertion, but
it is not, it is a logical assertion (ie it depends on the truth that
supported it). In that example the truth that it is based on is
hmmm.. interesting problem.
Well - how are the IDs mapped in now? as part of the rule name? you can
definately access the rule name in the consequence of a rule. Yes in the
BRMS each rule has a unique ID (UUID in fact - but that may not be that
helpful for you). It sounds like you want more of a
well, the execution should happen when the agenda is processed, and the
action should take effect immediately. This happens when you fireAllRules().
If you are talking a single thread, then the GUI can't update until control
is returned to it presumably.
On 3/20/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
thats a bit of a how long is a piece of string question really.
I would say that it may or may not be a problem ;)
For really large volumes of data, people normally may filter it if they have
some basic criteria they can use, and the data comes from a database etc.
Relational databases are good
you are close ;)
Yes, it is a challenge, thats what the examples are for etc.
but try this (FYI I think you mean or):
*rule* UCCnet_DVE_Depth_All
*when*
catalogObject : CatalogObject( )
eval( catalogObject.getElementValue(depth) == *null* ||
OK you are really bending what you would use rules for, I really wouldn't
recommend that. flattening the object model would allow you to write rules
over it, but as it stands, its just going to be a bit difficult for you.
catalogObject : CatalogObject( )
*eval*(
could you paste an example of this as a new bug in JIRA? if it did work with
previous, it should work with trunk.
Michael.
On 4/10/07, John Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm getting an ANTLR exception when parsing a DRL file. The expression
is:
eval(Distribution.getDistributionHex(5332).
that a fairly broad request. Rules can certainly be used for UI tier
validation. The interface for rules is very simple, you pass it lots of
facts, and your rules, and then let it do its thing (fireAllRules), there
really is not much more to it then that.
Michael.
On 4/9/07, Sebastien Degardin
definately upgrade to latest 3.0.x version (3.0.6).
Also, those methods are were most of the work happens, its a common
misconception that all the work happens lazily when you call fire all
rules but that is not the case, as you assert each object, it propagates
through the RETE network, so that
Its interesting, Conways game of life was created to demonstrate a
determinisitc universe - if you think as the little critters as life
forms its pretty cool. A good example of how very very simple rules (and
only a small number) can create complex behaviour.
On 4/17/07, Mark Proctor [EMAIL
not sure off the top of my head for examples, I am sure there are (its easy
to do anyway, just take a look at the API).
As for JMS - sure that can be done. I guess the one caution would be to do
with performance: if you are accessing a remote JMS destination, then the
engine may be blocking on a
. The validation of a large rule base can take some time and randomly
results in exceptions much of the time. Once I've tested and verified a set
of rules I could (optionally) exclude them from validation.
I'll write this all up in the JIRA this evening.
Thanks again,
Bree
On 4/17/07, Michael Neale
Really truly ;) , try this with junit, and JR 1.2.2 (1.3 also does it):
public void testIt() throws Exception {
Repository repo = new TransientRepository();
Session sess = repo.login(new SimpleCredentials(foo,
password.toCharArray()));
Node root = sess.getRootNode();
ignore that, wrong mailing list ;)
On 4/24/07, Michael Neale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Really truly ;) , try this with junit, and JR 1.2.2 (1.3 also does it):
public void testIt() throws Exception {
Repository repo = new TransientRepository();
Session sess = repo.login(new
all the jsr94 jars, I mean ;) (there is the drools one, plus the JSR one).
On 4/27/07, Michael Neale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you need the drools-jsr94 jar in your classpath
On 4/25/07, fakhfakh ismail [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hello,
when I exucute my code of rules an error is affiched
should already be done - mvel may be using the wrong one.
Can you tell me what class it is that gives the nosuchmethod? (ie what the
target class is) and we can make sure all references are to inlined one so
this won't happen again.
Michael.
On 4/27/07, Mark Proctor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, as discussed, you need to add import statements for the types you want
the BRMS to be aware of - if you like, create a feature request jira for
auto importing. I deliberately didn't do it cause I thought it would cause
more confusion, but perhaps I was wrong.
Also, the video on the blog:
yes that was a deliberate decision at this stage. May reconsider if there is
good reason. Its not something we want to expose directly in a GUI, at least
not without some formula pallette to help people build and validate simple
formula like expressions.
On 5/23/07, Chris Woodrow [EMAIL
Errors like that are not normal, and definitely indicates a bug (ie not a
compile error or anything - not something you should have to debug). So some
more information is needed like versions, how you are running it, where the
example came from etc (as there are a few versions floating around).
ideally there is only one instance of a rulebase, and you create new
sessions as needed - presumably with session beans you will have a few
instances (which is not ideal, but you can live with it).
On 6/24/07, Philip Reimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash:
Hi Mike.
Sorry for the late reply, been flat out finishing things off ;)
yes you can do that, you can import it into a package from the web GUI.
On 6/16/07, Shepherd, Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Can I import an existing set of JBoss rules (Drools 3) into BRMS?
Thanks,
Mike
Hi Matt.
yeah mapping deep hierarchies in a way that anyone can understand is not
that easy. You can have helper methods on your objects to give you
functionality. eg if you don't care which address you are talking about,
then you could do something like:
Person ( , (hasAddress(blah)) )
hmm.. there is a problem with the action of the 2nd rule, so, converting it
to vanilla DRL:
rule SpeCodeSpeValProdPlan12
salience 50
when
...
then
if(common.getProd() == {prodCode1} || common.getPlan() ==
{planCode1}){System.out.println(Error);}
end
That doesn't look quite right - you are
If you see the error out of PermSpace you can increase perm space.
Another strategy, is to build the rules, in chunks, say 1000 at a time, take
the Package object, and *then* add it to the rulebase. That may make it
easier.
You will need more then the default space on the heap for this I would
In a sense, yes - but its the result of the comparison that is cached
really.
In the case you described, it is subrule generation. So either side of the
or is like a separate rule.
In version 3, the result of isSameAmount (ie if it was true or false) is
cached.
Things will only be re-checked if
Hi Arjun - I wouldn't recommend re-using session unless there is some
expensive state you wish to reuse. Pooling them will use up far more
resources then freeing them. You should only pool expensive to obtain
resources.
On 7/21/07, Arjun Dhar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stateless sessions should
Hi Steven - can you provide the background on this? (I didn't see any other
info - perhaps gmail has gone nuts or my brain has, I have been on
holidays).
Michael.
On 8/13/07, Barfield Steve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jesse/Fernando/anybody
Do you know if this problem has been resolved – I
I think because the stream has reached the end once you load it the first
time. Get a fresh reader from a fresh stream and it should work.
On 8/13/07, hypnosat7 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But why the expand methode in DrlParser.parse(final String source, final
Reader dsl) can't build the
Hi Rod.
The documentation for it is in the manual chapter on the BRMS (which did not
make it into the TOC - that has been corrected for the next maintenance
release). But it follows the same idea.
Unfortunately there is no easy to build/test the rules with it at the moment
(also being
Well the sheet can do with deciding the plan - in code if none is decided
then the default one applies (ie the default is not part of the rules).
As for the rest - well think of columns as fields and rows as rules, and you
will get the idea with some practice.
On 9/4/07, Rajeev Dave [EMAIL
Hi Irving. That is a very interesting and kind of cool problem.
Happily, Mike Brock who built MVEL, which is part of drools, embeded soundex
into it.
So you can do (and I just tried this):
rule Hello World
when
c : Cheese( eval(type soundslike foobar) )
then
Also, there is strsim: http://mvel.codehaus.org/String+Similarity+Check
so you can do
Something( eval( (field strsim blah) 0.9 ) )
(or something like that anyway - to look for similarity rating). But I think
soundex is what you really want.
On 9/4/07, Michael Neale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Hi Edgardo.
Well it shouldn't leak like that.
Looking at your code, I am not sure how it works (as I am not sure of the
Web Service component you are using).
But if the web service is creating a new instance of the ValidaLlamadaWS
class for EACH call, then yes that woudl be the problem. What
If it still happens - it would be good if you could attach some code to
reproduce it to a JIRA.
On 9/4/07, Michael Neale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Edgardo.
Well it shouldn't leak like that.
Looking at your code, I am not sure how it works (as I am not sure of the
Web Service component
Tue, 04 Sep 2007 01:44:47 -0400, Michael Neale
[EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
If it still happens - it would be good if you could attach some code to
reproduce it to a JIRA.
On 9/4/07, Michael Neale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Edgardo.
Well it shouldn't leak like that.
Looking
Yeah I am getting rid of that legacy content page as we speak - thanks for
pointing it out.
On 9/5/07, Manukyan, Sergey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On a page :
http://labs.jboss.com/projects/download
There is a broken link pointing to :
http://labs.jboss.com/jbossrules/downloads
If anyone is using rules and you work in an insurance company/domain -
please contact me off list.
Michael
Red Hat.
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
On the RHS, if you put = it will allow you to type in that calculation.
I guess that is not as intuitive as it shoudl be (on the LHS it makes you
tell it what you want to do), I am open to considering changing that so it
is more obvious.
Yes, you can only access setters this way (at the moment).
Excellent work Paul !
As an Australian, I am quite proud that it is RuleBurst ! I have met a few
of them and they are great people with an interesting product.
On Nov 15, 2007 7:07 AM, Paul Haley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hope it is interesting to the community to consider the second
Hi Len.
Yes the main challenges I see are to do with the sheer numbers of rules you
see yourself happening, and how to manage that in any sort of BRMS. ie are
there 100's of packages, or a few uber packages etc. How do you break it up
so its manageable? etc... even simple things, like if there is
well 4.0.1 is a bit old - try the latest - it did have a few issues.
On Jan 8, 2008 1:30 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to run the BRMS GUI on the Jboss 4.0.1sp1 AS but I'm getting
the following errors after I login and click 'Packages'. I'm working in
a Windows environment using
The manual has a chapter or 3 on the BRMS specifically.
Chapter 9 in:
http://downloads.jboss.com/drools/docs/4.0.3.15993.GA/html/index.html
On Jan 8, 2008 3:44 AM, John Verhaeg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Massi Gmail mmquelo at gmail.com writes:
http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=JBRMSjsfdependencies may provide
some tips.
Post 4.0.1, this problem goes away (4.0.1 is a tad old now).
Michael.
On Jan 5, 2008 4:15 PM, Rahul Upadhyay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I Think you don't have full permission of JBOSS or BRMS war. Go to
I think you need java 5 for the ide even though the engine can run
with 1.4
Sent from my iPhone
On 08/01/2008, at 5:57, Keith Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am having problems using functions in my .drl file. When I add a
function, I get the following two errors:
ImportError:
The only specific dogs would be the javadocs for the drools-repository
(and of course the source for that module ).
Sent from my iPhone
On 05/01/2008, at 8:02, John Verhaeg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone point me to some documentation that explains how to
populate a
drools repository
this environment working.
On 1/8/08, Michael Neale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you need java 5 for the ide even though the engine can run
with 1.4
Sent from my iPhone
On 08/01/2008, at 5:57, Keith Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am having problems using functions in my .drl file. When I add
Sophie are you still seeing this?
Do you see this with regular use or just sitting there ?
Michael.
On Jan 11, 2008 4:56 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, I haven't, because initially I wanted it to be deployed in an
environment distinct from my client classes, which are in jboss
application
Hi Sophie - how is the jboss runtime server querying this? via the rule
agent (and a URL)?
just trying to work out what the usage pattern is so we can reproduce it.
Michael.
On Jan 11, 2008 12:20 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am using Drools BRMS 4.0.3 with tomcat 5.5.25, and I get
Something has gone awry, 4.0.4 BRMS seems to have been packaged badly
somehow. So please be patient while we sort it out.
Michael.
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/rules-users
If you have any more details - and confidential, feel free to send them to
me direct (currently I am working on some stress tests to see if I can make
it happen more quickly ;)
On Jan 17, 2008 9:52 AM, Michael Neale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Sophie - how is the jboss runtime server querying
Hmm... if you look in BRMSPackageBuilder in the BRMS source code, you can
see you can add DSL files together (you just have one expander statement -
the expander statement is for the IDE) - however, I think that may not work
in eclipse to make it content assistance pick up the other DSL file.
On
@lists.jboss.org
From: Michael Neale [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 01/17/2008 12:52AM
Subject: Re: [rules-users] OutOfMemory with BRMS 4.0.3
Hi Sophie - how is the jboss runtime server querying this? via the
rule
agent (and a URL)?
just trying to work out what the usage pattern
to the server version ...?
Regards,
Sophie
Michael Neale [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
22/01/2008 11:31
Please respond to
Rules Users List rules-users@lists.jboss.org
To
Rules Users List rules-users@lists.jboss.org
cc
Rules Users List rules-users@lists.jboss.org
Subject
Re: [rules
hmmm... have you tried setting dialect 'mvel' for the rule/package?
I am not sure if you can do that even in java 5 (but in MVEL we can make it
happen if it doesn't already).
On Jan 25, 2008 11:19 PM, José Arrarte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
First of all, I'd like to thank all the people
Hi len. Yes I think if you create you own in annotation and if you
recompile that may work. If not recompiling, I am not sure. But if you
hack source, we could refactor so the seam stuff is not in the main
class. Another approach is to have the brms as a self contained war,
and have the
Details are here:
http://blog.athico.com/2008/07/svn-url-changes-funny-video.html
--
Michael D Neale
home: www.michaelneale.net
blog: michaelneale.blogspot.com
___
rules-users mailing list
rules-users@lists.jboss.org
Hi Vikrant.
In the version 4 - no the security was basically only around
authentication (so you either had access or you didn't).
Now in the upcoming 5 version (I don't think this was in M1, but will
be in M2): http://blog.athico.com/2008/08/product-update-guvnor-security.html
This allows fine
Vikram - I am making the assumption that on the RHS of a rule you want
to kick off a rule process.
If this is the case, then in 4.0.x here is now way to do that with the
rule model stuff. In 5, it is possible (as you can put an arbitrary
expression on the RHS and it will render it out).
On Fri,
Hi Vikrant.
well the drools-guvnor/ doesn't use a filter so much as it is default
web.xml behaviour - you can specify a welcome page, which it goes to
when the root path is supplied. If Websphere 6.1 can't even do that -
I would say something is seriously wrong (may be a bad install?) - you
could
another shot at seeing the behavior after upgrading to a higher
release.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
] On Behalf Of Michael Neale
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 5:25 AM
To: Rules Users List
Subject: Re: [rules-users] RE: Deploying the BRMS on Web
Hi all.
Yes in 5 - there is webdav and a (limited) rest API - the rest API
isn't really well known or used yet, but the WebDAV one is.
Later on, we will be adding rest + atom pub interface - the atompub
means you can put metadata (eg categories, comments) remotely in the
BRMS, but at the
BRMS is more of a design time feature - what you are talking is
logging an audit trail of rules execution - you can do that with event
listeners in your code (so your rules don't even have to be aware of
it) then as rules fire, you can grab the details (from the listener
APIs) and log it as you
Thanks Steve. I have put that on the wiki.
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 2:54 PM, Steve Nunez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
These directions worked for WebSphere 6.1.0.15. Fundamentally the problem is
the lack of JAR files in the default WebSphere CLASSPATH, or the wrong
versions. Two things are neccessary
at this stage I don't think this is possible. The rules debugging
doesn't (AFAIK) implement the java debug protocol:
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/guide/jpda/jdwp-spec.html
which is what allows remote debugging (generally).
So you have 2 options:
1) (obvious !) reproduce it in process
2)
Hi Ravi - if you look at the classes in: org.drools.audit
For example: WorkingMemoryInMemoryLogger.java - you can wrap that
around a session, and it will accumulate stuff in memory that you can
print out. You will want to have good toString() methods on your
fact objects - so you can inspect the
yeah they shouldn't be anything too special - Joe in ear directly or
web apps lib? (I would think the former would work better).
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 2:40 AM, Joe White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We use JBoss and put them in an EAR and it works fine. Probably best to
treat the Drools jars the
Are you also on HPUX?
If not - any chance you can wrap it up in a unit test, attach it to a JIRA?
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 11:54 AM, Rene Wooller
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I get a similar error to pedrof's:
java.lang.StackOverflowError
at
sounds like something bad in the jar you are using?
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 5:28 AM, webdevfreak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I'm using Drools 4.0.4 and get the following error when trying to convert
from .drl to .pkg file.
Exception in thread main java.lang.VerifyError: (class:
yeah you DO NOT want to be rebuilding rules on each request - that
would really be bad.
you can load and cache them, and do a check on each request to see if
you need to update the cache - that is possible, and reasonable.
On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 4:53 AM, Chris Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
I don't recall drools 4 being able to do nested fields like that.
Drools 5 can if you want to check it out.
Sent from my iPhone
On 11/12/2008, at 19:52, Olivier THIERRY [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
We plan to use rules engine on a project because business rules will
often change and
If the number of items are small , its probably much of a muchness,
and the difference would be hard to predict. The from kind of looks
more declarative compared to the eval - its probably better.
Sent from my iPhone
On 11/12/2008, at 13:29, steve.vance [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
Well the exact semantics or otherwise or else are never really
agreed upon,
As there is more to it then meets the eye.
A global style otherwise is not too hard to do.
But else is what a lot of people want.
Sent from my iPhone
On 11/12/2008, at 3:41, Ravi Krishnamurthy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It stores the data on XML - do yes you could programmatically generate
the XML and the poke it in via webdav.
Sent from my phone.
On 11/02/2009, at 16:47, Vikrant Yagnick vikra...@mastek.com wrote:
Hi all,
I had a question with regards to the Web Based Decision Tables
functionality in
So from the filesystem it won't pick up changes? (does it throw the
same exception).
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 5:34 AM, Dan Seaver dan.sea...@ge.com wrote:
Mark,
I have some more information for you. The exception occurs when I issue:
agent.monitorResourceChangeEvents(true|false)
If I
no that doesn't sound correct ? can what you mean by import into
guvnor - you mean using the guvnor plugin ? or re-importing it by
creating a new package?
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 5:02 AM, J Michael Dean mdea...@comcast.net wrote:
When I declare a very simple object in Guvnor and validate, save,
Well - the editor doesn't have a switch to edit it as text (do you
want one)? but if you add something to it that the GUI can't render,
it reverts to a text editor (which may be what is happening). Could
you possibly share your model text?
Hey if you could reproduce it, open a JIRA here:
no there isn't at the moment. Really it just means that the value
someone enters must be a calculation.
eg: amount * 2
Would like to at some point add in a function pallette of common
things people do that can popup and provide assistance (like open
office has for its formulas) - including all
Indeed - consider them pre-deprecated ;) but AFAIK should work fine.
2009/9/9 Macon Pegram mpegram...@gmail.com
It is my understanding that the Rule apis are being discouraged in favor
of the Knowledge APIs. They do still work in Drools 5 however, so you
should be ok just using that Jar
that describes their relationship.
In this case, what the positive constraint favors is the reduction or
elimination of the negative constraint, so subtracting the positive
constraint makes sense. (A classic interference pattern situation.)
--- On Thu, 1/7/10, Michael Neale michael.ne
There was some work done to inherit LHS conditions from a certain
named category - but that seems diferent to what Michael described.. I
am confused too. (and from what I remember, it was an attribute, not
in the header, but this might be a new experimental thing?).
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 7:49
you will probably need to get maven (somehow) to generate a jar of the
classes that would be in WEB-INF/classes - and upload that as a model.
The groovy jar will probably also need to be added either as a model
or to the classpath of Guvnor.
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 1:47 AM, HonorGod
(refer to dev list thread about this)
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 4:09 AM, HonorGod
jagadeesh.motama...@barclayscapital.com wrote:
How do I resolve this issue in Guvnor. I have imported my model jar and it
seems to have some generated class file package-info.class and drools is
complaining about
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
