On Feb 3, 2:13 am, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Feb 2, 2:43 pm, dannychrastina danny.chrast...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jan 14, 4:04 pm, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Jan 13, 10:13 pm, DavidS davidshi...@gmail.com wrote:
But further along the compilation, I got
Hi,
Hi, I'm having the same error with 3.2.3 (on Gentoo x86_64). It seems
to me that this '-Wl,-soname,libpolybori-0.5.0.so.0' is in the form in
which options are given to the compiler in order to pass to the
linker, but since this is running the linker directly it should just
be
On Feb 3, 12:34 am, dannychrastina danny.chrast...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 3, 2:13 am, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
SNIP
* What binutils release are you running (i.e. ld --version)
GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.18.
I notice David (above) had the same problem using 2.19. Also,
On Feb 3, 12:36 am, Alexander Dreyer
jan.alexander.dre...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi Alexander,
Hi, Hi, I'm having the same error with 3.2.3 (on Gentoo x86_64). It seems
to me that this '-Wl,-soname,libpolybori-0.5.0.so.0' is in the form in
which options are given to the compiler in
Ok, that is a side effect of not setting -fno-common. I am curious
which gcc release this is.
powerpc-apple-darwin8-gcc-4.0.1
export SHAREDFLAGS=-fno-common
and restart the build.
Okay, I will try that. Apparently it is picking up where it left off
and separately doing each of that
I agree, some consistent syntax for multiple integrals is needed.
For example, to me this seems strange:
sage: x,y = var(x,y)
sage: f = y*sin(x*y)
sage: bool(diff(f,x,y) == diff(diff(f,x),y))
True
sage: bool(integral(f,x,y) == integral(integral(f,x),y))
False
At least, it is a possible source
On Feb 3, 9:36 am, Alexander Dreyer
jan.alexander.dre...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi, I'm having the same error with 3.2.3 (on Gentoo x86_64). It seems
to me that this '-Wl,-soname,libpolybori-0.5.0.so.0' is in the form in
which options are given to the compiler in order to pass to the
Sorry for replying to my own post, as I should have checked this sooner:
sage: import sympy
sage: sympy.integrate(f,x,y) == sympy.integrate(sympy.integrate(f,x),y)
True
sage: sympy.diff(f,x,y) == sympy.diff(sympy.diff(f,x),y)
True
So Sympy is consistent in terms of the diff/integrate syntax.
On Feb 3, 4:53 am, dannychrastina danny.chrast...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
Hi,
Ok, so I extracted the .spkg of polybori (having worked out that it
was just a bzipped tarball), changed SConstruct (with sonameprefix as
'-Wl,-soname -Wl,'), and repackaged it, and it didn't work:
ld -o
Well, I am much more interested in gcc -v since the above can cover 3
or so XCode releases.
Build 5370.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
On Feb 3, 3:54 am, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, that is a side effect of not setting -fno-common. I am curious
which gcc release this is.
powerpc-apple-darwin8-gcc-4.0.1
Well, I am much more interested in gcc -v since the above can cover 3
or so XCode releases.
export
On Feb 3, 8:53 am, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I am much more interested in gcc -v since the above can cover 3
or so XCode releases.
Build 5370.
Thanks.
I ran testlong on that OSX 10.4/PPC and I am seeing one surprising
doctest failure
sage -t -long
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 5:22 AM, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry for replying to my own post, as I should have checked this sooner:
sage: import sympy
sage: sympy.integrate(f,x,y) == sympy.integrate(sympy.integrate(f,x),y)
True
sage: sympy.diff(f,x,y) ==
kcrisman wrote:
Dear Devel list,
Before reading this, read the discussions at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/8ec32e4d895da60c
and tracs # 1221 and # 2787.
Since nothing has been done on this in over a year, and because I feel
fairly strongly that it is
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:21 PM, Fredrik Johansson
fredrik.johans...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:22 PM, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
So Sympy is consistent in terms of the diff/integrate syntax. However,
For plot and integrate, the syntax is slightly different:
sage:
There is quite a bit of discussion going on at ticket
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4890 about nauty's interactive
installation that demands that a user agree to a license. I originally
made that spkg and the result of the discussion at that time was that an
interactive license
On Feb 2, 9:16 pm, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
sage: integrate(sin(x),[x],[var('y')]) # double integral, x first
sage: integrate(sin(x),[x,0,pi],[y]) # one definite, one indefinite
sage: integrate(sin(x),(x,),(x,)) # double integral, using tuples
instead of lists if you like
On Feb 3, 1:27 pm, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
There is quite a bit of discussion going on at
tickethttp://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4890about nauty's interactive
installation that demands that a user agree to a license. I originally
made that spkg and the
I definitely think that a passive approach is better. Debian, for example,
has their repositories split into free and non-free. I believe that
this would be the best solution to this problem.
Click-through interactive licensing agreements are no stronger than passive
licenses. The law is the
For the bean-counters, that's a -1 to interactive crap.
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Tom Boothby tomas.boot...@gmail.com wrote:
I definitely think that a passive approach is better. Debian, for example,
has their repositories split into free and non-free. I believe that
this would be the
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
There is quite a bit of discussion going on at ticket
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4890 about nauty's interactive
installation that demands that a user agree to a license. I originally
made that spkg
Ok, thanks to Ivan who did upload some patches to trac 3.3.alpha5 out
in a couple hours will create a Sage app if you run -bdist. Check out
a screenshot of it in action at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/SageApp.png
It is based on Sage 3.3.alpha0 since I did no feel like hosing
William Stein wrote:
PROPOSAL 1: When installing official Sage spkg's, Sage should not
interactively ask the user to agree to licenses.
Justification: (1) My understanding is that interactive license
agreements are no more legally binding than non-interactive ones. (2)
Debian/Ubuntu
On Feb 3, 2:15 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com
wrote:
SNIP
Does someone (William?, mabshoff?) want to explicitly state the proposal
we are voting on?
PROPOSAL 1: When installing official Sage spkg's,
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:22 PM, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
So Sympy is consistent in terms of the diff/integrate syntax. However,
For plot and integrate, the syntax is slightly different:
sage: sympy.integrate( f, [x, 0, pi], [y, 0, pi])
pi - 1/pi*sin(pi**2)
sage: sympy.Plot( f,
Robert Dodier wrote:
On Feb 2, 9:16 pm, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
sage: integrate(sin(x),[x],[var('y')]) # double integral, x first
sage: integrate(sin(x),[x,0,pi],[y]) # one definite, one indefinite
sage: integrate(sin(x),(x,),(x,)) # double integral, using tuples
instead of
On Feb 3, 2:09 pm, Tom Boothby tomas.boot...@gmail.com wrote:
I definitely think that a passive approach is better. Debian, for example,
has their repositories split into free and non-free. I believe that
this would be the best solution to this problem.
Click-through interactive
On Feb 3, 9:33 am, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Feb 3, 8:53 am, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I am much more interested in gcc -v since the above can cover 3
or so XCode releases.
Build 5370.
Thanks.
I ran testlong on that OSX 10.4/PPC and I am seeing one
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 12:19 AM, jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
William,
Could you (or Mike) review #5141 and #5143? #5141 is a one-line fix to make
sure that tinymce is disabled on published worksheets, while #5143
implements William's feature request of shift-enter submitting a
On Feb 3, 5:36 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 12:19 AM, jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
William,
Could you (or Mike) review #5141 and #5143? #5141 is a one-line fix to make
sure that tinymce is disabled on published worksheets, while #5143
William Stein wrote:
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 12:19 AM, jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
William,
Could you (or Mike) review #5141 and #5143? #5141 is a one-line fix to make
sure that tinymce is disabled on published worksheets, while #5143
implements William's feature request of
So thanks to Karl-Dieter and Ivan for finally makeing this a reality
since we have been talking about this since ye old Sage 2.5 at least
when I posted some crummy manually assembled app.
You're welcome, and thanks to Ivan as well, as this seems to be nicer
than anything I could cook up. I
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
William Stein wrote:
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 12:19 AM, jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
William,
Could you (or Mike) review #5141 and #5143? #5141 is a one-line fix to make
sure that tinymce is disabled on
Wow, that was definitely not the direction I was anticipating this to
take...
Robert's contribution is very interesting, though I'm not sure how
indefinite integrals (without +C) fit into that framework.
As to the issue on the tracs, my view is that an indefinite integral
is not a function in
Hello,
I just wanted to point out Tim Gowers' Polymath, an experiment in
massively collaborative mathematics currently underway on his blog:
http://gowers.wordpress.com/
It seems the basic idea is that in an appropriate public setting,
mathematicians (or anyone else) may be able to organize
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Pat LeSmithe qed...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I just wanted to point out Tim Gowers' Polymath, an experiment in
massively collaborative mathematics currently underway on his blog:
http://gowers.wordpress.com/
It seems the basic idea is that in an
On Feb 3, 2009, at 7:19 PM, kcrisman wrote:
So thanks to Karl-Dieter and Ivan for finally makeing this a reality
since we have been talking about this since ye old Sage 2.5 at least
when I posted some crummy manually assembled app.
You're welcome, and thanks to Ivan as well, as this seems
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Ivan Andrus g...@macmail.com wrote:
On Feb 3, 2009, at 7:19 PM, kcrisman wrote:
So thanks to Karl-Dieter and Ivan for finally makeing this a reality
since we have been talking about this since ye old Sage 2.5 at least
when I posted some crummy manually
On Feb 3, 7:07 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
It was the only icon I could find in the (admittedly short) time I
looked. Where could I get the icon (as large as possible)? Also, if
you can tell me what to do with dropped files I could easily add
that. i.e. how does
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 7:12 PM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Feb 3, 7:07 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
It was the only icon I could find in the (admittedly short) time I
looked. Where could I get the icon (as large as possible)? Also, if
you can tell
On Feb 3, 7:16 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 7:12 PM, mabshoff mabsh...@googlemail.com wrote:
would start a notebook server if it isn't already running, and once it
is, would call basically (1) above for the default sage notebook
server running from
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 5:15 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com
wrote:
Since we have a fundamental disagreement here, this will need to be
discussed on sage-devel and possibly voted on.
The reasoning below
It was the only icon I could find in the (admittedly short) time I
looked. Where could I get the icon (as large as possible)?
I pulled it either off of sagemath.org, or from Picture2.png from the
front page of this google group. It's not particularly big,
unfortunately.
- kcrisman
And the hope is that now one could much
more easily make incremental improvements to this skeleton in order to
support e.g. dropping .sws or .sage files on it.
Hmm... there might actually be no way to do that.
What about .sage files? My understanding is that OSX apps would
support that
On Tue, 03 Feb 2009 at 06:19PM -0800, kcrisman wrote:
You're welcome, and thanks to Ivan as well, as this seems to be nicer
than anything I could cook up. I have to say that I prefer the
icosahedron icon, though :)
I happen to prefer the orange perspective-cube. Just sayin'...
And the hope
Almost two years ago, Linbox's implementation of Smith normal form was
taken out of Sage because it was too buggy. After some work, I managed
to reinstate it, hoping that the bugs might have been fixed. Here's a
partial status report:
1. I haven't tested it very broadly, but it seems to work on
46 matches
Mail list logo
