Does anyone think it would be possible to run sage on the T-Mobile G1?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
Here are the sites searched by the original sage search:
trac.sagemath.org
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-announce/*
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-newbie/*
https://sage.math.washington.edu/*
https://sage.math.washington.edu:8102/*
sage.math.washington.edu
sagemath.org
sagenb.com
+1 for Carl's proposal with the addition that it should mention the
unevaluated if functionality if/when it becomes available in sage
(heck, maybe it should just point to the relevant threads or trac
tickets in the interim...)
On Apr 12, 7:33 pm, Carl Witty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 12,
+1 for firefox website architecture style
On Apr 10, 12:08 pm, Harald Schilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 10, 4:40 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The right thing to do is to make Sage easier
to install.
Yes, of course, I wanted to point out where the problem is and how it
Since x=0 returns unevaluated, the problem seems like it is with the
if statement, which is turning maybe into false. In Mathematica, the
if statement would return unevaluated (for symbolic input into g).
On Apr 9, 9:18 pm, Carl Witty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to reopen discussion of
Perhaps one day I will learn to spell congratulations.
On Apr 8, 11:58 am, Chris Chiasson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is really positive and impressive, on both the parts of Google
Sage (and the people behind them). Congratualtions.
On Apr 8, 8:05 am, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
It seems that supplying a server different than the hostname to allow
remote connections causes a backtrace in the notebook.setup() routine.
My hostname file wasn't setup, so the choice was between localhost
(for local connections) and localhost.localdomain (for remote
connections). I supplied
a guess:
sage answer = you write documentation to do this and then submit it to
sage
alternative:
if the documentation already exists, you could find it via the search
functionality linked from the main page
On Mar 9, 5:05 pm, Philippe Saade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry to bother with such
My guess is that the 2 million users estimate is inflated by students
who do not really learn these systems. When I was in undergraduate
school, most people barely scratched the surface of Mathematica.
On Mar 9, 11:38 am, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 8:31 AM,
I like to compare the Sage's Google Groups activity to Mathematica's.
Recently there was a big jump in MMA's, but Sage was kicking butt for
a while there.
On Mar 9, 11:38 am, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 8:31 AM, mhampton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree;
the full traffic history of the sage cse:
http://chris.chiasson.googlepages.com/2008-03-09SAGESearchEngineStats4074T.png
4074 is the total number of queries in the life of the custom search
engine
On Mar 9, 5:56 pm, Chris Chiasson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like to compare the Sage's Google
One other thing that I think is relevant in a situation like this:
software like Mathematica will have a major economic damping factor
applied to its growth, so that after it reaches a large number of
users, it will effectively saturate its market (since others can't pay
for it)
sage will be
I forgot to mention, the vertical axis is the number of queries per
day. I think the spike is from when sage was featured on slashdot.
On Mar 9, 6:09 pm, Chris Chiasson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the full traffic history of the sage cse:
http://chris.chiasson.googlepages.com/2008-03
I just noticed this as well. This is good because of /.'s large
programmer audience.
On Nov 18, 11:37 am, Mike Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all,
I just noticed that there is an article on the front page of slashdot
about William and David's AMS opinion piece
What about a virtualized system for each user?
On Oct 6, 3:43 pm, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de wrote:
On Oct 6, 9:27 pm, Michel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I helps a little, but getting from non-privileged shell to root shell
provided you have compilers isn't very hard.
Hello
The download directory on the website says 2.8.5 instead of 2.8.6. I'm
confused. :-[
On Oct 6, 2:33 am, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Sage-2.8.6 (http://sagemath.org) has been released!
Many people including (but not limited to) Nils Bruin,
Yi Qiang, Craig Citro, Joel
There should be a warning on this article. I was drinking milk when I
read supported by the megalomania of Stephen Wolfram and I almost
snorted it out of my nose.
On Sep 28, 11:35 am, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
If you read Spanish, you might enjoy reading this aritlce that was
that isn't processed by MakeExpression.
On Sep 27, 6:57 am, Jason Grout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Chiasson wrote:
It might be worth pointing out that adding new syntax in Mathematica
is (usually) done by assignments to the function that transforms
general two dimensional input
It might be worth pointing out that adding new syntax in Mathematica
is (usually) done by assignments to the function that transforms
general two dimensional input into source code. That isn't really the
same thing as adding a new operator to the language itself.
On Sep 26, 2:07 pm, Jason Grout
since you asked for reactions:
* every bug fixed should result in a doctest: Example Zombie det()
problem with LinBox, considered fixed twice, but reopened in both
cases.
^^^ this should be first (even though this is an unordered list)
* tickets are kind of like homicides: They either get
http://documents.wolfram.com/v5/Demos/Notebooks/Step-by-StepDifferentiation.html
just wanted to write this here for future reference
(i saw this mentioned on mathgroup today)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
On Sep 17, 10:55 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And, if anybody out there thinks adding the above to the preparser
would make you positively cringe in disgust, please speak up!
(It doesn't mean we won't add it anyways...)
If you ask me, my opinion would be not to change it.
If
On Sep 18, 2:10 pm, Mike Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about providing a sum function that would behave like, say, the
integrate function. It could detect the argument types so if you
passed it a list, it'd behave the same as the builtin sum function.
sage: integrate(x, x, 0, 10)
50
:50 pm, Chris Chiasson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... wait until you actually start pushing Mathematica, it gets
sluggish on you, produces wrong results and/or crashes, and you
receive apathy and blame dodging instead of tech support and bug
fixing.
On Sep 14, 3:31 pm, Hamptonio [EMAIL PROTECTED
... wait until you actually start pushing Mathematica, it gets
sluggish on you, produces wrong results and/or crashes, and you
receive apathy and blame dodging instead of tech support and bug
fixing.
On Sep 14, 3:31 pm, Hamptonio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Recently I started using Mathematica 6
what you mean there as well.
But I am committed to using and improving sage over the long haul,
don't get me wrong. I think the superiority of the development model
will win on most fronts eventually.
Cheers,
Marshall
On Sep 14, 5:50 pm, Chris Chiasson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
)
On Sep 13, 12:48 am, Chris Chiasson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the other hand, sometimes Mathematica makes assumptions in order
to return useful results that are sometimes wrong and then people
complain about it on the mailing list. It is probably much easier to
ask the user to declare
On the other hand, sometimes Mathematica makes assumptions in order
to return useful results that are sometimes wrong and then people
complain about it on the mailing list. It is probably much easier to
ask the user to declare something as real than it is to ask the user
to figure out that the
method of selection?
http://logo-contest.gnupg.org/results.html
http://www.cs.cornell.edu/andru/civs.html
On Sep 6, 12:07 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree that we should have an iconic logo to go next to the word SAGE, and
this is my first attempt at making one. Comments? The SVG
On Aug 9, 2:54 am, Chris Chiasson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I officially donate the contents ofhttp://test.chris.chiasson.name/sage/
to the SAGEproject. :-)
http://test.chris.chiasson.name/sage/
http://test.chris.chiasson.name/sage-search-engine.zip
^^^ this has the required copyrights
there are good discussions about creating a two dimensional math input
system in the old w3c mailing list archives for (what became) mathml
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-math-erb/
On Aug 27, 12:48 am, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/25/07, Jurgis Pralgauskis [EMAIL
Missing verb:
Funding for work on SAGE
minimal and we need much more funding
Also, Mathematica 6.1 isn't out yet. 6.0.1 is, though. (check $Version
and $ReleaseNumber (ReleaseNumber gives the third digit))
Perhaps you meant 5.1?
On Aug 17, 10:20 am, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
New
Usually
about 30 people get patches accepting into SAGE every month
s/accepting/accepted
On Aug 17, 10:20 am, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
New version here:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/lj/talk/talk.pdfhttp://sage.math.washington.edu/lj/talk/demo.txt
On 8/17/07, David Joyner
On Aug 10, 6:47 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wykobi has no documentation, is very new (version 0.0.03), and
I'm pretty sure the author(s) are totally confused about what the
GPL is. The claim to make Wykobi available under the GPL but
only for non-commercial use -- which
On Aug 14, 11:37 am, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/14/07, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whatever the fact of the case, I find the tone of this email
offensive. I'm sure I am not the only one. I think an apology is
called for.
I'm very sorry for not carefully
On Aug 11, 11:46 am, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
It would be great if people who are fairly knowledgeable about
both SAGE and any of the above systems could add some content.
snip/
Hint taken. I'll wait until I have expertise in the same areas of SAGE
that I have in
I added this and the bug tracker to the search engine.
Sadly, it won't let me add something like http://www.sagemath.org:*/*
If people forgot the URL:
http://test.chris.chiasson.name/sage/sage-search-engine.html
(plugin)
or
http://www.google.com/coop/cse?cx=002411183662849495023:ymym1qazpm4
If you want to designate a wiki page or something, I will be glad to
write out the deficiencies of Mathematica as I see them...
On Aug 11, 1:18 am, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Josh Kantor just pointed this out to me:
The only thing I would add is that it might be prudent to
automatically add the test cases that trigger bugs to the regression/
unit testing system. That way, SAGE will prevent regressions going
forward. Mathematica has problems where code breaks over and over
again as things are changed.
On Aug
Strangely, Google Groups converted my em dash into a regular dash. The
em dash character can be easily found elsewhere, though.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
, sometimes, and it could be helpful.
Paul
(*) This is backed up: for a while I was the first hit when searching
for chocolate mousse (without quotes) ! Unfortunately I have come
down to 10th since moving to Oxford. :)
On Aug 8, 9:14 am, Chris Chiasson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is kinda off
What you should have told them was that SAGE is going to eat their
lunch, then spun on your heels, and walked out.
Just kidding.
On Aug 9, 2:41 am, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I substantially updated the 1-hour SAGE colloquium-style talk I posted earlier
today (thanks for
This is kinda off the wall:
Mathematica, Maple, and Matlab don't have a lot of competition for
their keywords on Google, Yahoo, or MSN.
By offering a **very low bid** on each of the names, you could
probably put a message about the SAGE open source project on each of
their names. In addition,
of more quickly growing the community.
Perhaps it would make more sense to advertise on terms such as AMS
or python or whatever else people who would make good candidate
programmers search for.
On Aug 8, 3:14 am, Chris Chiasson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is kinda off the wall:
Mathematica, Maple
- right now, there is a huge hype surrounding AJAX, Web 2.0, user created
content and such. SAGE fits in there because of the SAGE notebook which is a
good example of AJAX actually being useful. Use the hype, let the AJAX crazy
dotcom world know about it: techcrunch.com, mashable.com,
On Aug 8, 3:59 am, Tim Lahey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I presented software I wrote to
symbolically derive
mass and stiffness matrices from first principles for finite element
analysis at
Maple's user conference in 2005.
That's cool. I wrote similar stuff in Mathematica when I had to take
On Aug 8, 12:03 pm, Ted Kosan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It might even be possible to actually use Google analytics to track
global Sage notebook usage.
If this is implemented, could this please be restricted to
sagemath.org?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to
I have been resisting a mention of this, but I finally gave in:
Do you think the second author is a bit awkward, especially right
after mentioning a bunch of mathematical software? It is possible that
readers could become confused.
Ways to deal with this:
1. Use Your second author... or One of
Other minor English usage suggestions:
(repairs: em dash, em dash spacing, and run-on sentence)
various mathematical facts - no code is given, and the programs
are proprietary software some of which only run on hardware many
years out of date.
-
various mathematical facts-no code is given.
Pick an organization or department that uses Mathematica or Maple or
MATLAB. Find out what they use it for. Put the same capabilities into
SAGE. Give SAGE to them, possibly with a turnkey demonstration.
Rinse and repeat??
On Aug 7, 5:22 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Sage-Devel,
http://test.chris.chiasson.name/sage/sage-search-engine.html
Feedback is welcome. Should I cross post this to sage-forum?
If you want, I will donate the contents of this directory to the SAGE
project:
http://test.chris.chiasson.name/sage/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Does anyone else think it's a good idea?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
On Aug 6, 2:37 pm, Martin Albrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip/
Not every computer (e.g. a notebook) does have such a key. I really like
Shift-Enter btw.
It would be in addition to the regular shift+enter. I think many
people here are of the you can take my shift+enter when you pry it
from
On Aug 4, 8:36 pm, Fernando Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a minor comment...
snip/
Philosophy--why do it?
WaveLab implements the concept of reproducible research.
snip/
If I had a +1 to give to one of the suggestions, this would be the one
that I gave it to.
Also, it would perhaps be
what were the criteria?
On Aug 4, 3:48 pm, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi:
William Stein and I have written a
drafthttp://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wdj/research/oscas-ams-notices4.pdf
which seems suitable (based on suggestions and criteria given to us by
the editor
Andy
of about 800
On 8/4/07, Chris Chiasson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what were the criteria?
On Aug 4, 3:48 pm, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi:
William Stein and I have written a
drafthttp://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wdj/research/oscas-ams-notices4.pdf
which seems
On Jul 25, 1:29 pm, Michael Abshoff
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SAGE already uses a MoinMoin Wiki installation.
So I should amend my comment by asking:
Why not place the documentation in a MoinMoinWiki?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to
o yea, if you do go this route, don't forget about:
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:OpenID
On Jul 25, 1:00 pm, Chris Chiasson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone has to be evil and mention this:
MediaWiki
If you are willing to sacrifice absolute editorial control, the wiki
It should be qualified that the user base for the site is small
because Mathematica already has a fair amount (actually, it is a
massive amount, but it isn't nearly enough for my taste) of
documentation.
On Jul 25, 1:16 pm, Alec Mihailovs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MediaWiki
There is already
Is conversion to LaTeX a requirement or merely a nice-to-have?
On Jul 25, 1:16 pm, Timothy Clemans [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
That is already available by creating Wiki-books. Wiki-books can not
be easily converted to LaTeX documents.http://en.wikibooks.org
On 7/25/07, Chris Chiasson [EMAIL
60 matches
Mail list logo
