On https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/22626
(update to GAP 4.10 with unification of libgap and GAP,
the current branch is showing signs of life...)
I am getting
sage: libgap(1)
Error, Variable: '_rich_repr_' must have a value
Error, Variable: '_ipython_canary_method_should_not_exist_' must have a\
actually, I took an old copy of 8.2.rc0, copied over the current version of
findstat.py and all tests pass.
so something has changed.
Am Mittwoch, 26. September 2018 12:56:51 UTC+2 schrieb Martin R:
>
> strange, because this line has been there since 2015.
>
> Am Mittwoch, 26. September 2018
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 10:35 AM Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> On 2018-09-24 18:00, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> > Perhaps the most tricky is 2 (or perhaps not anymore, after out
> > infamous CoC discussion fiasco we could agree it makes sense to get
> > something in place; we can have a look at
> >
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 3:14 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 10:35 AM Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>>
>> On 2018-09-24 18:00, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>> > Perhaps the most tricky is 2 (or perhaps not anymore, after out
>> > infamous CoC discussion fiasco we could agree it makes sense
On 2018-09-26 16:48, 'Martin R' via sage-devel wrote:
Indeed, it seems that the test is not actually being run.
You mean that it *was* not actually being run, but now it is. I don't
know what caused the change, but it's clearly in the good sense since
that doctest should be run.
--
You
Indeed, it seems that the test is not actually being run.
I modified it as follows, and it is still not reported:
sage: def f(pi):
: print("hi")
: return pi.saliances()[0]
sage: r = findstat(Permutations, lambda pi: f(pi)); r #
martin@convex63:~/sage-master$ cat VERSION.txt
SageMath version 8.3, Release Date: 2018-08-03
martin@convex63:~/sage-master$ ./sage -tp --long
--optional=sage,optional,external,internet src/sage/databases/findstat.py
too many failed tests, not using stored timings
Running doctests with ID
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 4:48 PM William Stein wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 3:14 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 10:35 AM Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2018-09-24 18:00, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> >> > Perhaps the most tricky is 2 (or perhaps not anymore, after out
On Wed, 26 Sep 2018, 18:04 Erik Bray, wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 4:48 PM William Stein wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 3:14 AM, Dima Pasechnik
> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 10:35 AM Jeroen Demeyer
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On 2018-09-24 18:00, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> > >> >
strange, because this line has been there since 2015.
Am Mittwoch, 26. September 2018 10:54:17 UTC+2 schrieb Jeroen Demeyer:
>
> On 2018-09-26 10:10, 'Martin R' via sage-devel wrote:
> > In https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/26348 a doctest is failing, because
> > apparently the semantics of
There was a recently fixed bug with doctest parsing. Fixing the bug
also caused some tests that were affected by that bug to suddenly
start failing (rather, because they weren't being run in the first
place). I'm not sure if it's relevant to your case or not:
On 2018-09-26 13:03, 'Martin R' via sage-devel wrote:
and all tests pass.
Which command are you using to run the tests? Something might have
changed there.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and
In https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/26348 a doctest is failing, because
apparently the semantics of "..." has changed. Here is the test:
##
sage: r = findstat(Permutations, lambda pi: pi.saliances()[0]);
r # optional -- internet, random
...
...
On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 8:15 PM William Stein wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 9:35 AM, Erik Bray wrote:
> > 5) also might be harder than you think--or at least, even if we can
> > come up with an uncontroversial list of names, it's a discussion that
> > invites questions about project
On 2018-09-26 10:10, 'Martin R' via sage-devel wrote:
In https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/26348 a doctest is failing, because
apparently the semantics of "..." has changed.
I don't think that anything has changed here. As far as I know, "..." at
the start of a line after a "sage:" line has
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 10:54 AM Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
> On 2018-09-26 10:10, 'Martin R' via sage-devel wrote:
> > In https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/26348 a doctest is failing, because
> > apparently the semantics of "..." has changed.
>
> I don't think that anything has changed here. As far
On 2018-09-24 18:00, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
Perhaps the most tricky is 2 (or perhaps not anymore, after out
infamous CoC discussion fiasco we could agree it makes sense to get
something in place; we can have a look at
https://numfocus.org/code-of-conduct
and see if we can just agree to this)
17 matches
Mail list logo
