On Nov 20, 2:16 pm, mhampton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any difference from 3.2.rc2?
-Marshall
Three patches in the Sage library as well as a fix for the ext repo,
so upgrading is highly recommended.
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to
On Nov 20, 6:22 pm, kcrisman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
possible since in 3.3 we will convert the docstrings to ReST. This
will likely break most patches not merged into 3.2.1.
snip
around here is telling you what to do, but since the ReST transition
will be painful otherwise please
Just to throw a number around: There are *157* tickets with patches
and that is an all time high.
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL
On Nov 21, 9:45 am, Octoploid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 20, 10:44 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
For early adopters, sage-3.2 has been released. You can get the
source from here:http://sagemath.org/src/
Or you can do sage -upgrade.
I ran sage -upgrade on my
On Nov 21, 4:55 am, Gabriel Gellner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 06:22:10PM -0800, kcrisman wrote:
SNIP
I'm sorry if this is described somewhere, but I couldn't figure out
where that would be located. A sample of before and after
docstrings would be very helpful,
On Nov 21, 11:54 am, Tim Lahey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just compiled and ran make test on Mac OS X 10.5.5
on my MacBook 2.1GHz. All tests passed except,
SNIP
The following tests failed:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/misc/sageinspect.py
One thing I noticed is that the directory,
On Nov 21, 12:42 pm, Octoploid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 21, 7:51 pm, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
This seems to indicate that you upgraded from a binary build with a C+
+ compiler using a different ABI. What did you upgrade from? Did you
upgrade the C++ compiler since
On Nov 21, 6:10 pm, Guillaume Moroz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
I'm new to sage, and so far I like it!
:)
Just my two cents here: it seems that the sage interface to singular
is not aware that Singular handles multivariate polynomial rings with
coefficients in a fraction field.
On Nov 22, 2:06 pm, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jaap Spies wrote:
William Stein wrote:
Hi,
For early adopters, sage-3.2 has been released. You can get the
source from here:http://sagemath.org/src/
Or you can do sage -upgrade.
Binaries and an official announcement should
On Nov 22, 3:08 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 3:06 PM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
Or it should truncate the no longer used spkgs to zero bytes. We
already have a ticket to do so, but I can't find it right now.
No, it shouldn't do
On Nov 22, 3:41 pm, Ronan Paixão [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It might be a very good idea to have sage -upgrade interactively ask
the user if they really want to do this if they are upgrading a binary.
If a user built from source in the first place, sage -upgrade is pretty
likely to work
On Nov 22, 6:43 pm, Ronan Paixão [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
Sure, if there actually is somebody out there who has ever used the
spkg/archive.
I'm kind of guessing nobody has ever used it, in which case it seems
completely
pointless to support.
William
A compromise option
On Nov 22, 11:46 pm, Minh Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 1:44 PM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Minh,
Hi,
For early adopters, sage-3.2 has been released. You can get the
source from here:http://sagemath.org/src/
Or you can do sage -upgrade.
On Nov 22, 11:54 pm, Minh Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 11:49 PM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
The source distro built fine on the following 32-bit system:
Machine Model: MacBook2,1
Processor Name: Intel Core 2 Duo
Processor Speed: 2 GHz
Memory
On Nov 23, 12:03 am, Kwankyu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Hi Kwankyu,
I want to make a patch for the file sage/local/bin/sage-notebook.
What is the corresponding file that I should edit in sage/devel/sage-
main tree? Perhaps I am confused.
There are several hg repos in Sage. Besides the
On Nov 23, 1:57 am, Alex Ghitza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
I remember that the question of whether Sage could be ported to CUDA and run
on nvidia's GPUs was already brought up on this list. Here's another
incentive to think about it:
On Nov 23, 2:04 am, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 23, 1:57 am, Alex Ghitza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
I remember that the question of whether Sage could be ported to CUDA and run
on nvidia's GPUs was already brought up on this list. Here's another
incentive
dmharvey
1.4Gdrake
2.9Gelliottd
3.9Ggeorgesk
11G gfurnish
20K Grammian
16G gregorybard
2.5Gjacobml
1.6Gjared
7.7Gjason
1.7Gjec
2.9Gjen
1.1Gjetchev
2.7Gjkantor
7.1Gjonhanke
1.1Gjsp
5.3Gjvoight
1.1Gkathy
13G mabshoff
2.5G
, but I would guess you have another ten days before 3.2.1 is
out. The source tarball can be found at:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.2.1/
Once I get a couple relocation bugs fixed there will be a binary
again. 3.2.1.alpha1 will hopefully be out in the next 72 hours
On Nov 23, 12:04 pm, Konrad Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/11/23 mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello folks,
we nearly ran out of space on /home for the first time in a while. The
following accounts are using more than 1GB space and on case your name
is one the list you should
On Nov 23, 12:04 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 12:02 PM, Tim Lahey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm in the process of installing the FriCAS 1.0.3p0 optional package
and I was wondering if there are tests to run to make sure everything
is built and
Hello folks,
this has been discussed a bunch of time, but now finally the first
official move: I would like to remove clisp and switch over to ecl as
the base for Maxima as well as the optional FriCAS spkgs. ecl is
faster, builds and works on way more platforms including 32 and 64 bit
MSVC and
On Nov 23, 12:32 pm, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Carl Witty wrote:
On Nov 23, 8:56 am, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
/home/jaap/work/downloads/sage-3.2.1.alpha0/devel/sage-main/sage/structure/
On Nov 23, 1:03 pm, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Before I jump on the bandwagon, are there any arguments at all against
this?
Not that I can see. The main reason we chose clisp over gcl for
example that it worked better than any other lisp implementation
supported by Maxima (and
On Nov 23, 9:30 am, Carl Witty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 23, 8:56 am, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
This is because the file sage/libs/gmp/__init__.py is missing in the
sage-3.2.1.alpha0 spkg . (The file is present in the Mercurial
repository, but it's not checked out.)
On Nov 23, 1:22 pm, Stan Schymanski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everyone,
Hi Stan,
This is not of a very high priority, but I just noticed that the
newest entry inhttp://www.sagemath.org/src/changelog.txtis:
July 09, 2008
-
Hello folks,
Sage 3.0.4 has been released on
Hello folks,
when one wants to add people to the CC field in trac one can either
use a full email address or a person's trac account name. The later
one is strongly preferred since it will prevent spam harvesters from
collecting that email address. The problem now for many people seems
to be the
On Nov 23, 2:05 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
Hello folks,
here goes 3.2.1.alpha0. Loads of merged patches all over the map. The
total number of ticket with patches is down to 144 from
On Nov 23, 2:01 pm, ahmet alper parker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Firstly, I want to use it with R and with some other packages in which I can
signal process, optimize etc (there are many opportunities I think) and I
want to exchange data with opensees. Yes it is opensource but with the
On Nov 23, 2:10 pm, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds good to me.
Isn't it correct that only account holders can view the wiki page you
are planning?
We could restrict the page to people with logins, but that doesn't fix
the privacy issue.
Cheers,
Michael
On Nov 23, 2:12 pm, Martin Albrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
We currently have in excess of 150 accounts in the Sage trac, so
before I go off and do this I wanted to hear what people think. There
is a privacy issue, so should this be opt in or opt out?
Great idea but I think it should
On Nov 23, 2:13 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 2:04 PM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We currently have in excess of 150 accounts in the Sage trac, so
before I go off and do this I wanted to hear what people think.
Damn! There are a lot of Sage
On Nov 23, 2:15 pm, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
Hi Jaap,
Jaap: do you have M2 installed and if so which release? If you don't
have M2 we have an issue with the toy implementation of Gbases over
ZZ.
Macaulay 2, version 1.1
with packages: Classic, Core
On Nov 23, 5:55 pm, Ronan Paixão [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Em Dom, 2008-11-23 às 14:15 -0800, mabshoff escreveu:
On Nov 23, 2:10 pm, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds good to me.
Isn't it correct that only account holders can view the wiki page you
are planning?
We
On Nov 23, 1:19 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 1:13 PM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
I can see the benefits, and the only cost is in someone other
than me making it work...which makes it rather easy to vote +!
Yes, I always vote +1
On Nov 24, 8:29 am, Jason Grout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jason Grout wrote:
SNIP
Can we get this patch (or an equivalent one) into Sage as soon as possible?
I assume we will upgrade to Cython 0.10.1 in Sage 3.2.1, so if Robert
either (a) releases Cython 0.10.2 or (b) feels comfortable
On Nov 24, 7:19 am, Robert Dodier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
Hi Robert,
this has been discussed a bunch of time, but now finally the first
official move: I would like to remove clisp and switch over to ecl as
the base for Maxima as well as the optional FriCAS spkgs. ecl
On Nov 24, 12:31 pm, Robert Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Nov 24, 2008, at 9:49 AM, mabshoff wrote:
SNIP
Robert: Are you working on the updated cython.spkg or is that not on
your to do list? I am sure in that case somebody else will take care
of it.
Cython 0.10.1 wasn't very
On Nov 24, 1:04 pm, Yegor Bryukhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Great! Welcome! What sort of library are you thinking of?
Magnus - a package for finitely presented groups, may be.
We have talked to Tim Daly about this and so far nothing has happened
in that directory. At least there
Saw this on sci.math.symbolic and thought it might be of interest to
Maxima users and developers.
http://esd.mit.edu/Faculty_Pages/moses/Macsyma.pdf
Ray
___
Maxima mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.math.utexas.edu/mailman/listinfo/maxima
On Nov 24, 1:59 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Jason Grout
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, good, so you are looking at these things. Securely executing
python is a subject with a long history. Recent developments include
the ast module,
Ok, I consider this vote closed and since there were only +1 votes
also a positive conclusion has been reached.
As a first step for 3.2.1.a1 I have created #4615 which makes boehm_gc
a default spkg. It is optional now and has gotten some decent build
testing via the optional M2.spkg, so things
On Nov 25, 4:36 am, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 12:37 PM, Tim Lahey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
You're welcome. Since I prefer to use Git rather than Mercurial,
I've created a Git repository for my code as I work on it. I've
put up a second test
This looks very cool and was posted on the Scipy list:
Hi scipy-ers -
Some of you may remember CorePy from previous SciPy conferences.
Feedback from those meetings was very helpful for planning the future
of CorePy.
Without further ado...
Announcing CorePy 1.0 - http://www.corepy.org
We are
On Nov 25, 12:11 pm, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jaap,
On Fedora 10, 32 bits (released today!) I got a build error:
=== =
BUILDING MATPLOTLIB
Hello folks,
at http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4567 you can find my
attempt to finally catch up with the release notes of the last three
Sage releases. I know, I know, I am rather late, but things keep
getting in the way. What is now needed to push the official button on
3.2 is a
On Nov 25, 9:42 pm, Minh Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 4:29 PM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 5:10 PM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello folks,
athttp://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4567you can find my
attempt
On Nov 25, 9:50 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 9:47 PM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 25, 9:42 pm, Minh Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 4:29 PM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 5:10
On Nov 25, 9:53 pm, Minh Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 4:45 PM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
I'm really glad you volunteered, since you have *amazing* attention
to detail. You can upload release notes to a trac ticket -- there should
be one
Oh yeah: Another thing I haven't done in ages is to get the info from
the contributors list and have them added to the Dev Map. This should
also be a ticket for each release in case we have somebody new
contributing.
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post
On Nov 25, 10:38 pm, Jason Grout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
root wrote:
Standard industry practice on half a million open source projects
does not include an I have signed over my copyright on this particular
patch button. A general copyright judgement making the current practice
illegal
On Nov 25, 10:53 pm, Jason Grout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is even more important is to do the work for the main features,
i.e. the Sage Release Tour in the wiki during development and not as
an afterthought. The best results there have always been had when the
patch authors did the
On Nov 25, 11:38 pm, Martin Rubey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
I admit, I'd be extremely interested in using Sage from FriCAS (i.e., the
other way round), because I tried Python a fair bit meanwhile (I even used it
for teaching) and I find it awful.
The main problem to get started is to
On Nov 26, 4:36 am, Tim Lahey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
My only real concern is the specific statement about GPL V2 (or later)
in
what David wrote. While my test suite I'm licensing under BSD (which is
stated at the top of each .sage file), I'm not a fan of GPL V3, so I'd
likely
On Nov 26, 4:43 am, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know of no code which in Sage which is GPLv2 only. William or Michael,
please
correct me if I am wrong.
Yes, as I mentioned above there is none.
I think that code which is GPLv2 (only) is not GPLv2+ compatible,
since GPL2+ says
On Nov 26, 4:47 am, Tim Lahey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
Nope, there isn't. We want GPL V2+ or compatible. If you prefer BSD
that if fine too, obviously. GPL V2 only code will not be merged in
the Sage library - we had that discussion a while back and all people
who submitted code
.
Sources are as usual in
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.2.1/sage-3.2.1.alpha1.tar
There are currently about 137 tickets with patches in trac, so in case
you have nothing better to do ;)
Cheers,
Michael
Merged in Sage 3.2.1.alpha1:
#3891: John Palmieri
On Nov 26, 12:56 pm, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There was a problem with the installation on an amd64 ubuntu 8.10:
...
building 'sage.libs.ntl.ntl_ZZ' extension
creating build/temp.linux-x86_64-2.5/sage/libs/ntl
gcc -fno-strict-aliasing -DNDEBUG -g -fwrapv -O3 -Wall
On Nov 26, 1:36 pm, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 26, 12:56 pm, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There was a problem with the installation on an amd64 ubuntu 8.10:
...
building 'sage.libs.ntl.ntl_ZZ' extension
creating build/temp.linux-x86_64-2.5/sage/libs/ntl
On Nov 26, 2:04 pm, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
Hello folks,
here goes 3.2.1.alpha2. This one should actually build out of the box.
alpha1 I hope? Else I'm not keeping up pace!
Well, since I screwed up alpha1 there will be an alpha2 tonight.
ERROR installing
On Nov 26, 10:43 am, Jason Grout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Joyner wrote:
This is less than what google or sun does. However, GAP does nothing like
this.
On the other hand, GAP is organized around modules (often single-authored
and sometimes with non-GPL'd licenses), with a small
On Nov 26, 2:30 pm, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
On Nov 26, 2:04 pm, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
Hi Michael,
hi Jaap,
Hello folks,
here goes 3.2.1.alpha2. This one should actually build out of the box.
alpha1 I hope? Else I'm
One more thing: Before doctesting run hg update -C on the local/bin
repo due to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/scratch/mabshoff/release-cycle/sage-3.2.1.alpha2/local/
bin$ hg sta
! ipy_profile_sage.py
I cought that on the way out, but my manual fix in the scripts spkg
was insufficient. I know the fix
On Nov 26, 4:58 pm, Carl Witty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
I'm still planning to work on this for most of the basic Sage types,
but I don't know when I'll get to it; if anybody wants to help, let me
know! (The basic framework is in place in sage/misc/sage_input.py,
and there's quite a
On Nov 26, 4:54 pm, Bill Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 12:28 AM, Tim Lahey wrote:
SNIP
Hi Bill,
In order to run these tests, it is also necessary to make some simple
additions to the 'axiom.py' interface:
[EMAIL
On Nov 26, 5:13 pm, Tim Lahey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 26, 2008, at 7:54 PM, Bill Page wrote:
Hi Tim,
One thing that I wanted to do with your code is to include comparisons
of the answers produced by both Maxima and FriCAS as well as the
comparison to the Schaum's tabulated
On Nov 26, 6:32 pm, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
The following tests failed:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_ideal.py
Mmmh, M2 installed? Maybe a 32 vs. 64 bit thing for the toy
implementation?
sage -t
On Nov 26, 7:38 pm, John H Palmieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi John,
On Intel Mac OS X.5: after jumping through all of the appropriate
hoops to make this version,
:)
sage -testall -long had four failures, two
of which are familiar:
1. #3758 sage -t -long
.alpha2 works. The
sources are in the usual place at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.2.1/
Please build, test and report issues as usual. This release stands a
chance to actually compile on Fedora Core 10, but we will see. No
binary for sage.math until someone fixes #4317
On Nov 27, 10:50 am, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
Hi Jaap,
On Fedora 10, 32 bits all tests passed!
Excellent. My FC 10 live dev image refuses to boot like a coward and
dies with a kernel oops with VMWare and Virtualbox. Oh well, I guess I
will have to do a download and real
On Nov 27, 8:25 am, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 1:34 AM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
let's forget 3.2.1.alpha1 ever happened :)
3.2.1.alpha2 fixes the build issues from its predecessor (I did a full
build cycle before announcing here
On Nov 27, 11:24 am, Jason Grout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ronan Paixão wrote:
I just found a problem with Integer(). It doesn't seem to work fine with
float strings.
Those work fine:
Integer(1)
Integer(1.)
But this doesn't:
Integer(1.)
More data:
Integer(RR('1.')) works
On Nov 27, 12:34 pm, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 12:30 PM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 27, 11:24 am, Jason Grout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ronan Paixão wrote:
I just found a problem with Integer(). It doesn't seem to work fine
On Nov 28, 7:48 am, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 4:49 AM, Simon King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear developers,
Hi,
I have a couple of basic methods (such as save part of the attributes
in some file or put some data on a to-do-list used by another
On Nov 28, 2:44 pm, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Built fine on 64-bit Suse linux, but devel/sage/sage/plot/plot.py
fails:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/plot/plot.py
**
File
Hello folks,
from time to time various issues come up where we would like to reach
all Sage developers, i.e. all people with trac accounts and various
other people closely tied to Sage development. But not all Sage
developers read sage-devel since it can be a rather high volume
mailing list. So
On Nov 28, 3:51 pm, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi David,
No objections of course, but just out of curiousity:
Would this be a sage-trac-announce list
That sounds like a much better name :)
or would there be non-trac issues as well?
I would assume that nearly all discussion
On Nov 29, 6:18 pm, Minh Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
Hi,
I know that the subject of this post is strange/trivial (is it?) --- of
course one can always determine who is/are the reviewers by looking
through the relevant ticket. But I just want to know in some detail the
On Nov 29, 6:18 pm, Minh Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
Hi Minh,
SNIP
Now, let say Jane reviews patch p_1 of ticket x, and then gives p_1 a
thumb-up, then Jane is a reviewer of x. Before x is closed by the
release manager, another patch p_2 is attached to x such that p_2 makes
/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.2.1/sage-3.2.1.rc0/
or download the new complete tarball at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.2.1/sage-3.2.1.rc0.tar
Please build, test and report issue. It would also be nice to see
reports about working and not so well working
On Nov 29, 12:28 am, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello folks,
SNIP
You can try out to upgrade from alpha2 via
./sage
-ihttp://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.2.1/sa...
Sigh - brain fart. Obviously
./sage -upgrade
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home
On Nov 29, 7:37 pm, Minh Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Michael,
Hi Minh,
mabshoff wrote:
[...]
If this sounds a bit abstract, have a look at ticket #4534, which is a
concrete example similar to what I've described above:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/4534
On Nov 29, 1:28 am, Minh Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 10:04 PM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
Exactly. It would be very nice if the release tours were consistent in
style, had plenty of examples and so on. I have always liked the Magma
release notes
Hello folks,
the time frame to get patches into 3.2.1 is nearing its end with a
planned release in 48 hours. Anything going into 3.2.1 at this point
should be well debugged and tested and be critical or blockers. Any
other tickets should automatically get assigned to the next milestone.
This
On Nov 29, 4:33 am, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jaap,
On Fedora 9, 32 bits upgrade went fine, but:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sage-3.2.1.alpha2]$ ./sage
--
| Sage Version 3.2.1.rc0, Release Date: 2008-11-29
On Nov 29, 7:19 am, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
On a 64-bit Suse I ha dthe plot.py failure which is known. No problem
with the builds.
John
Hi John,
can you open a ticket for the plot.py failure with the exact failure
from rc0?
Cheers,
Michael
On Nov 29, 10:42 am, Robert Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Nov 29, 2008, at 9:42 AM, John H Palmieri wrote:
SNIP
What goes wrong if we delete it? I mean, I deleted it and ran 'sage -
b' then 'sage -testall' (since I had a new distribution to test
anyway), and it ran without any
On Nov 29, 10:35 am, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi John,
It is now at #4655.
Thanks, I should post a patch shortly.
Cheers,
Michael
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this
On Nov 29, 10:19 am, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
sage -t devel/sage/sage/misc/functional.py
**
File
/home/jaap/work/downloads/sage-3.2.1.alpha2/devel/sage/sage/misc/functiona
l.py, line
On Nov 29, 1:55 pm, John Cremona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/11/29 Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jaap Spies wrote:
I'll apply #4575 and see.
Mike's take-two patch failed to apply
Same here.
John
Mike will rebase the patch in a little while. Also note that once the
patch is
On Nov 29, 4:03 pm, Bill Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Bill,
I have just released a new bug fix for FLINT, available
athttp://www.flintlib.org/
This fixes the following issues:
* A segfault in the division and pseudo division functions
* The bound that was being used in
On Nov 30, 1:59 am, Harald Schilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 30, 12:38 am, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We could make a modified version of AndLinux and rebrand it say
SageLinux, which would
be the above but with Sage preinstalled, and maybe a slightly larger drive.
Hello folks,
over the next couple hours we hope to fix and merge all nine
outstanding issues for 3.2.1 - see
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/query?status=newstatus=assignedstatus=reopenedmilestone=sage-3.2.1order=priority
So feel free to pop into IRC and help out if you have some time. We
SNIP
I really like
sage: finance.[tab]
I don't like explicitly forcing people to import stuff before they can use it
at all. Thus I much prefer
$ sage
sage: finance.[tab]
and I don't like
$ sage
...
sage: import sage.finance as finance
sage: finace.[tab]
I do like
Hello folks,
3.2.1 is about done (rc1 should be announced officially in about 2
hours once it passes my build testing and a full test run, but it is
in the usual place if you want to get going with it now). My main
request is for people to add items to the Sage Release tour at
On Dec 1, 2:47 am, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That p-adic one is actually my design! Here is another
one:http://www.usna.edu/Users/math/wdj/greeting.jpg
It's a Barnsley fractal I programmed in C long ago, though I've lost the code.
I'll try to recreate it in Sage.
On Mon, Dec
be found in
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.2.1/
You can also upgrade 3.2.1.alpha2 or higher via
sage -upgrade
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mabshoff/release-cycles-3.2.1/sage-3.2.1.rc1/
What is left for 3.2.1.final is to potentially fix
On Dec 1, 6:53 am, mhampton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All tests passed on an upgrade from rc0, on an intel mac (10.5).
Three cheers for the more flexible upgrade option!
-M. Hampton
Yeah, for me it is the killer feature of 3.2.1 - no disrespect to all
the other great features :)
But for
On Dec 1, 7:27 am, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
SNIP
Upgrade from rc0 on Fedora 9 has the known issues in
sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_ideal.py
Jaap
Hi Jaap,
can you repost the output? I made another one of those GBasis over ZZ
computations optional
On Dec 1, 7:40 am, Kiran Kedlaya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is also the unique doctest failure under RHEL5 on my 64-bit
Opteron box (upgraded from rc0).
Kiran
Jaap, Kiran,
this is basically caused by #4593. We can also make that doctest
optional for now since the failure is also due to
1301 - 1400 of 2594 matches
Mail list logo
