Hi,
you might also want to work on better integrating CVXOPT into Sage.
Currently very little of its functionality is exposed in Sage.
(let's move this thread to sage-gsoc, by the way)
Dmitrii
On Saturday, 17 March 2012 18:32:57 UTC+8, Animesh Garg wrote:
Hello Nathann and Team,
Greetings
On 02/16/12 12:22 AM, rjf wrote:
IMHO, a native port of Sage to Windows could not be done in a week or two.
Perhaps a Cygwin port could, but I'm talking of a native port, where the
code runs directly on Windows, without any Linux virtual machines,
emulators or similar.
I see no reason to
On Feb 18, 3:50 am, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
On 02/16/12 12:22 AM, rjf wrote:
IMHO, a native port of Sage to Windows could not be done in a week or two.
Perhaps a Cygwin port could, but I'm talking of a native port, where the
code runs directly on Windows,
On Feb 15, 5:10 pm, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, February 15, 2012 4:32:36 PM UTC-8, rjf wrote:
The number of downloads on windows is about 216,000 since August.
The number of downloads on Linux is about 675.
Many distributions ship with a maxima package, for
On Feb 15, 6:31 pm, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 15, 7:22 pm, rjf fate...@gmail.com wrote:
IMHO, a native port of Sage to Windows could not be done in a week or two.
Perhaps a Cygwin port could, but I'm talking of a native port, where the
code runs directly on Windows,
Then you haven't tried to actually do this, which of course we know.
Unfortunately, even getting Maxima to work right on Cygwin with ECL
... maybe because running ECL is the wrong choice, dictated by a
misguided policy about what software is politically acceptable.
Perhaps; I have no horse
In gmane.comp.mathematics.sage.devel, you wrote:
On Feb 15, 6:31 pm, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 15, 7:22 pm, rjf fate...@gmail.com wrote:
IMHO, a native port of Sage to Windows could not be done in a week or
two.
Perhaps a Cygwin port could, but I'm talking of a
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
In gmane.comp.mathematics.sage.devel, you wrote:
On Feb 15, 6:31 pm, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 15, 7:22 pm, rjf fate...@gmail.com wrote:
IMHO, a native port of Sage to Windows could not be done in a
In gmane.comp.mathematics.sage.devel, you wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
In gmane.comp.mathematics.sage.devel, you wrote:
On Feb 15, 6:31 pm, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 15, 7:22 pm, rjf fate...@gmail.com wrote:
IMHO, a
IMHO, a native port of Sage to Windows could not be done in a week or two.
Perhaps a Cygwin port could, but I'm talking of a native port, where the
code runs directly on Windows, without any Linux virtual machines,
emulators or similar.
I see no reason to reject MinGW, Cygwin, or other
On Feb 13, 10:05 pm, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, February 13, 2012 9:34:17 PM UTC-8, rjf wrote:
shame on you for turning your back on what is still the
most wide-spread operating system (or family of systems) on home
and office computers.
The most common home
On Wednesday, February 15, 2012 4:32:36 PM UTC-8, rjf wrote:
The number of downloads on windows is about 216,000 since August.
The number of downloads on Linux is about 675.
Many distributions ship with a maxima package, for example Fedora.
Microsoft is not distributing maxima with
In gmane.comp.mathematics.sage.devel, you wrote:
On 02/15/12 01:40 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
While it would be an funny retro-computing exercise,
No, it would be a painful one. Even if you could install it, most modern
software would not run on it.
I don't think Windows
NT 3.51 can run on
On Feb 15, 7:22 pm, rjf fate...@gmail.com wrote:
IMHO, a native port of Sage to Windows could not be done in a week or two.
Perhaps a Cygwin port could, but I'm talking of a native port, where the
code runs directly on Windows, without any Linux virtual machines,
emulators or similar.
On 2/15/12 7:10 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
Many distributions ship with a maxima package, for example Fedora.
Microsoft is not distributing maxima with Windows. Hence only windows
users will download maxima from sourceforge.
Not to mention that the sf number doesn't count, for example, Sage
On 02/16/12 01:44 AM, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
In gmane.comp.mathematics.sage.devel, you wrote:
On 02/15/12 01:40 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
While it would be an funny retro-computing exercise,
No, it would be a painful one. Even if you could install it, most modern
software would not run on it.
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 07:05, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote:
The most common home computer is a game console.
in 2012, i think it's the posix-world of smartphones and tablets,
namely android and iOS. porting to or supporting a growing ecosystem
(i.e. tablets) has more long term
On 14 February 2012 06:05, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote:
The most common home computer is a game console. While techincally an
XBox is a windows PC, very few normal Windows programs run on it.
Some of my code has been run on a Sony Playstation 3, as well as a Cray
supercomputer.
In gmane.comp.mathematics.sage.devel, you wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 13:34, rjf fate...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 13, 6:10 pm, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
(RJF) This is not a problem if you drop the requirement that every
recipient
of Sage must be able to COMPILE stuff
Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com writes:
In gmane.comp.mathematics.sage.devel, you wrote:
This is a bit strange, isn't it? Shouldn't it say something like
Keshav Kini keshav.k...@gmail.com wrote:
or similar?
-Keshav
P.S. Testing sending this mail via Gnus, hopefully this works :) (shut
up
Oops. Reply-To header got me there...
Sorry for the noise, still trying to wrap my head around Hardcore
Email (tm) and Hardcore Editor (tm) :)
-Keshav
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 22:14, Keshav Kini keshav.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com writes:
In
On 2/14/12 8:14 AM, Keshav Kini wrote:
P.S. Testing sending this mail via Gnus, hopefully this works :) (shut
up about mismatched parentheses, emacs...)
Thunderbird: +1.
Jason
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an
On 13 February 2012 17:22, rjf fate...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 13, 12:51 am, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
On 02/12/12 03:06 PM, rjf wrote:
Microsoft and Google/Motorola are suing each other.
Do you get money from Microsoft?
Just a thought.
You could
On Tuesday, February 14, 2012 3:16:04 AM UTC-8, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
is one such example. I was recently speaking to one of their engineers,
who said some customers had simultions taking weeks, so they would get
Ansys (the vendor) to simulate them on more powerful hardware, reducing the
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:01:59 Volker Braun wrote:
On Tuesday, February 14, 2012 3:16:04 AM UTC-8, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
is one such example. I was recently speaking to one of their engineers,
who said some customers had simultions taking weeks, so they would get
Ansys (the vendor) to
IBM discontinuing AIX? Is this some kind of joke? IBM is more than happy to
sell Power7 systems with AIX. But if you have the hardware lying around and
no money to buy a recent AIX version then there are also plenty of linux
options. The only thing that is for sure is that you can't run Windows
On 02/14/12 11:39 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
IBM discontinuing AIX? Is this some kind of joke? IBM is more than happy to
sell Power7 systems with AIX. But if you have the hardware lying around and
no money to buy a recent AIX version then there are also plenty of linux
options. The only thing that
On 02/14/12 11:01 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
On Tuesday, February 14, 2012 3:16:04 AM UTC-8, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
is one such example. I was recently speaking to one of their engineers,
who said some customers had simultions taking weeks, so they would get
Ansys (the vendor) to simulate them
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:39:20 Volker Braun wrote:
IBM discontinuing AIX? Is this some kind of joke? IBM is more than happy to
sell Power7 systems with AIX. But if you have the hardware lying around and
no money to buy a recent AIX version then there are also plenty of linux
options. The only
While it would be an funny retro-computing exercise, I don't think Windows
NT 3.51 can run on Power7. It is binary compatible under certain conditions
but i'd be surprised if a whole OS can escape all caveats.
I actually know one or two Windows-based HPC clusters in academic research.
In the
On 02/15/12 01:40 AM, Volker Braun wrote:
While it would be an funny retro-computing exercise,
No, it would be a painful one. Even if you could install it, most modern
software would not run on it.
I don't think Windows
NT 3.51 can run on Power7. It is binary compatible under certain
On Tuesday, February 14, 2012 10:13:26 PM UTC-8, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
So Windows Vista, and all the free Linux distributions like Ubuntu are not
supported. Neither is OS X.
If you have a cluster you obviously don't put Ubuntu on the nodes (there
are special cluster distributions like
On 02/12/12 03:06 PM, rjf wrote:
Microsoft and Google/Motorola are suing each other.
Do you get money from Microsoft?
Just a thought.
You could propose to Google to port Sage to run on Windows/ natively,
not.
I believe a complete native port would be an almost impossibility. I don't think
On Feb 12, 7:12 am, Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.com wrote:
On 02/12/2012 01:33 AM, John H Palmieri wrote:
I can see it getting hairy if we try to generalize periodic functions,
too, but period/interval are easy enough to work with.
There are a whole bunch of challenging problems,
On Feb 13, 12:51 am, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
On 02/12/12 03:06 PM, rjf wrote:
Microsoft and Google/Motorola are suing each other.
Do you get money from Microsoft?
Just a thought.
You could propose to Google to port Sage to run on Windows/ natively,
not.
I
On Feb 13, 6:10 pm, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
.
GMP and MPFR is only a small part of the story. There are huge packages
in Sage (not developed by Sage people) that do not run natively under
Windows and are quite non-trivial to port (as they might have their own
tricky GC,
On Monday, February 13, 2012 9:34:17 PM UTC-8, rjf wrote:
shame on you for turning your back on what is still the
most wide-spread operating system (or family of systems) on home
and office computers.
The most common home computer is a game console. While techincally an XBox
is a windows
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 13:34, rjf fate...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 13, 6:10 pm, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
(RJF) This is not a problem if you drop the requirement that every
recipient
of Sage must be able to COMPILE stuff locally. Just have one person
compile the stuff once
Microsoft and Google/Motorola are suing each other.
Do you get money from Microsoft?
Just a thought.
You could propose to Google to port Sage to run on Windows/ natively,
not.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email
On 02/12/2012 01:33 AM, John H Palmieri wrote:
On Saturday, February 11, 2012 8:39:32 PM UTC-8, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
I've started this:
http://wiki.sagemath.org/PiecewiseSymbolicSEP
http://wiki.sagemath.org/PiecewiseSymbolicSEP
It's basically a brain dump at this point,
I've started this:
http://wiki.sagemath.org/PiecewiseSymbolicSEP
It's basically a brain dump at this point, but I can go back and clean
up specific ideas now with less overhead.
I've also added a link and a few paragraphs to the GSoC proposal.
--
To post to this group, send an email to
On Saturday, February 11, 2012 8:39:32 PM UTC-8, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
I've started this:
http://wiki.sagemath.org/PiecewiseSymbolicSEP
It's basically a brain dump at this point, but I can go back and clean
up specific ideas now with less overhead.
I've also added a link and a few
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 10:33 PM, John H Palmieri
jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, February 11, 2012 8:39:32 PM UTC-8, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
I've started this:
http://wiki.sagemath.org/PiecewiseSymbolicSEP
It's basically a brain dump at this point, but I can go back and
On Feb 8, 4:12 pm, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
since its clear some don't have a clue.
Perhaps that's not the wisest thing to state in public.
Rob
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
Well, to be fair, it's generally less wise to state in public how much
others suck than to state in public how much we ourselves suck :)
-Keshav
Join us in #sagemath on irc.freenode.net !
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this
Continuing nontrivial Geogebra integration could
be another very appropriate one.
- kcrisman
Big +1 to that.
* webwork/sage integration
I would also add integration with moodle (maybe that would include
ldap?)
There is also some mathematical stuff that i would like to see in
Sage, but
I've started to write a GSOC 2012 application on the day we got rejected in
2011. Whoever wants to help, i'll add you to the google docs document. I'm
fine with any contributions or even submitting this as the notebook and
not sage itself. I also got some feedback from the last submissions
On 02/07/2012 11:20 PM, kcrisman wrote:
I hesitate to say I would be a good mentor, but there are a lot of
things in symbolics and graphics that would be appropriate for this
that I'd like to try with some of my students. Especially piecewise
functions and such. Continuing nontrivial Geogebra
I thought I would not that, to whomever is going to write the application,
be sure to list me down as a Google supporter, since I think it would be
great to have a Sage GSoC project. There should be a section along the
lines of vouchers from Google and other large organizations.
If I had a bit
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Christopher Swenson
ch...@caswenson.com wrote:
I thought I would not that, to whomever is going to write the application,
be sure to list me down as a Google supporter, since I think it would be
great to have a Sage GSoC project. There should be a section along
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 20:43, Christopher Swenson ch...@caswenson.com wrote:
There should be a section along the lines of vouchers from Google and other
large organizations.
yes, there is in deed such a section. thanks for your support :)
H
--
To post to this group, send an email to
On 2/7/12 9:48 PM, William Stein wrote:
Hi,
Does anybody want to help put together a GSoC application for Sage for 2012?
http://code.google.com/soc/
The application deadline is March 9.
So far, I think we've applied 5 times to have Sage as a mentoring
organizing, and been denied every
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 7:55 PM, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 2/7/12 9:48 PM, William Stein wrote:
Hi,
Does anybody want to help put together a GSoC application for Sage for
2012?
http://code.google.com/soc/
The application deadline is March 9.
So far, I think
I'd be willing to mentor, for example, a notebook project, since that's what
I'll be working on most of the summer. I'll already have several students
hopefully working with me on the notebook, or graphics (webgl, here we come
:), etc.
Excellent. I am also willing to mentor a project
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe we can tie the Android app into the notebook work? I could help mentor
a student working on Android stuff, maybe that would help our GSOC
application.
That's an *extremely* good idea!
Maybe we should have The Sage
Maybe we can tie the Android app into the notebook work? I could help
mentor a student working on Android stuff, maybe that would help our GSOC
application.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
On 2/7/12 10:15 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 8:11 PM, Volker Braunvbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe we can tie the Android app into the notebook work? I could help mentor
a student working on Android stuff, maybe that would help our GSOC
application.
That's an *extremely*
* overhaul 2d graphics to be consistent, take advantage of matplotlib
much more, etc. Introduce svg or html5 frontends for matplotlib that
make interactive browser graphics easier (like interacts)
These would be really cool.
* webwork/sage integration
There are real people already working
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 11:17 PM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
* overhaul 2d graphics to be consistent, take advantage of matplotlib
much more, etc. Introduce svg or html5 frontends for matplotlib that
make interactive browser graphics easier (like interacts)
These would be really
+1
I had to go look up what GSOC was first ...
Jt
On Feb 7, 2012 11:27 PM, Jason Aubrey aubre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 11:17 PM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
* overhaul 2d graphics to be consistent, take advantage of matplotlib
much more, etc. Introduce svg or
60 matches
Mail list logo
