On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 9:39 PM, Paul Butler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been experimenting with probability and found that in Sage, a
probability space is also a random variable by inheritance. This may be
useful. Without it, creating a random variable requires two classes: a
probability
That p-adic one is actually my design! Here is another one:
http://www.usna.edu/Users/math/wdj/greeting.jpg
It's a Barnsley fractal I programmed in C long ago, though I've lost the code.
I'll try to recreate it in Sage.
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 4:56 AM, Harald Schilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello folks,
3.2.1 is about done (rc1 should be announced officially in about 2
hours once it passes my build testing and a full test run, but it is
in the usual place if you want to get going with it now). My main
request is for people to add items to the Sage Release tour at
On Dec 1, 2:47 am, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That p-adic one is actually my design! Here is another
one:http://www.usna.edu/Users/math/wdj/greeting.jpg
It's a Barnsley fractal I programmed in C long ago, though I've lost the code.
I'll try to recreate it in Sage.
On Mon, Dec
Generally, I'd be happy to help with this sort of thing.
This is the end of the semester here now though and not the best time
(lots of grading, tutoring, etc). I can try to do what I can though.
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 6:20 AM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello folks,
3.2.1 is about
Hello folks,
it took a couple hours longer than planned, but here goes 3.2.1.rc1.
The changes merged went a little deeper than planned, i.e. the two
biggest changes are massive improvements to the Magma interface by
William and the overhaul of module_list.py by Craig. The changes by
Craig will
Are there some general guidelines on how to use the namespaces in
sage. Like: which function's should be accesible from which namespace
(global v.s. local and maybe some hierachical structure in the local
namespace).
I think some guidelines on this would improve the userfriendliness of
sage a big
All tests passed on an upgrade from rc0, on an intel mac (10.5).
Three cheers for the more flexible upgrade option!
-M. Hampton
On Dec 2, 7:02 am, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello folks,
it took a couple hours longer than planned, but here goes 3.2.1.rc1.
The changes merged went a
On Dec 1, 6:53 am, mhampton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All tests passed on an upgrade from rc0, on an intel mac (10.5).
Three cheers for the more flexible upgrade option!
-M. Hampton
Yeah, for me it is the killer feature of 3.2.1 - no disrespect to all
the other great features :)
But for
mabshoff wrote:
Hello folks,
it took a couple hours longer than planned, but here goes 3.2.1.rc1.
The changes merged went a little deeper than planned, i.e. the two
biggest changes are massive improvements to the Magma interface by
William and the overhaul of module_list.py by Craig. The
David Joyner wrote:
By extend a Sage class it seems you mean add a method to a Sage class.
You want to know how to add a method to the class
matrix_complex_double_dense.pyx
at
http://www.sagemath.org/hg/sage-main/file/8b1d19463fc4/sage/matrix/matrix_complex_double_dense.pyx
?
(If you
On Dec 1, 7:27 am, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
SNIP
Upgrade from rc0 on Fedora 9 has the known issues in
sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_ideal.py
Jaap
Hi Jaap,
can you repost the output? I made another one of those GBasis over ZZ
computations optional for
Hi David,
Thanks for explaining that, I see how that causes problems when S is not a
set of numbers. Even so, would it make sense for the random variable ps to
be the identity function X(x) = x on the probability space ps? Currently the
random variable ps is the function X(x) = P(x). Is this a
Simon Beaumont wrote:
What is the recommended way to extend sage classes? - I want to add
some functionality to the complex matrix class - specifically tests
for: is_symmetric, is_hermitian, is_unitary etc... you get the idea.
As noted in other replies, you could add these methods to either
mabshoff wrote:
On Dec 1, 7:27 am, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
SNIP
Upgrade from rc0 on Fedora 9 has the known issues in
sage/rings/polynomial/multi_polynomial_ideal.py
Jaap
Hi Jaap,
can you repost the output? I made another one of those GBasis over ZZ
David Joyner wrote:
Since
sage: x,y = var(x y)
sage: plot3d(x^2-y^2, (x,-1,1),(y,-1,1))
works fine, why not just use variables
sage: f = x^2-y^2
sage: f.variables()
(x, y)
to find the missing variables in plot3d(x^2-y^2, (-1,1),(-1,1))
and then replace the arguments (-1,1),(-1,1)
This is also the unique doctest failure under RHEL5 on my 64-bit
Opteron box (upgraded from rc0).
Kiran
On Dec 1, 10:35 am, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
On Dec 1, 7:27 am, Jaap Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mabshoff wrote:
SNIP
Upgrade from rc0 on Fedora 9
On Dec 1, 7:40 am, Kiran Kedlaya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is also the unique doctest failure under RHEL5 on my 64-bit
Opteron box (upgraded from rc0).
Kiran
Jaap, Kiran,
this is basically caused by #4593. We can also make that doctest
optional for now since the failure is also due to
Jason Grout wrote:
David Joyner wrote:
Since
sage: x,y = var(x y)
sage: plot3d(x^2-y^2, (x,-1,1),(y,-1,1))
works fine, why not just use variables
sage: f = x^2-y^2
sage: f.variables()
(x, y)
to find the missing variables in plot3d(x^2-y^2, (-1,1),(-1,1))
and then replace the
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 8:50 PM, Vinzent Steinberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sage has problems with reviewing patches:
http://sagemath.blogspot.com/2008/11/sage-patch-review.html
I think our current patch review system could be improved too. So I
suggest to take part in the discussion.
Hi Paul,
Thanks for explaining that, I see how that causes problems when S is not a
set of numbers. Even so, would it make sense for the random variable ps to
be the identity function X(x) = x on the probability space ps? Currently the
random variable ps is the function X(x) = P(x). Is this
mabshoff wrote:
Hello folks,
it took a couple hours longer than planned, but here goes 3.2.1.rc1.
The changes merged went a little deeper than planned, i.e. the two
biggest changes are massive improvements to the Magma interface by
William and the overhaul of module_list.py by Craig. The
On Dec 1, 2008, at 05:02 , mabshoff wrote:
Hello folks,
it took a couple hours longer than planned, but here goes 3.2.1.rc1.
The changes merged went a little deeper than planned, i.e. the two
biggest changes are massive improvements to the Magma interface by
William and the overhaul of
Justin C. Walker wrote:
On Dec 1, 2008, at 05:02 , mabshoff wrote:
Hello folks,
it took a couple hours longer than planned, but here goes 3.2.1.rc1.
The changes merged went a little deeper than planned, i.e. the two
biggest changes are massive improvements to the Magma interface by
Hi David,
When I was referring to the probability space ps and the random variable
ps, I was referring to the fact that ps is by inheritance a probability
space and a random variable (is_DiscreteProbabilitySpace(ps) ==
is_DiscreteRandomVariable(ps) == True).
I do see that the values are
On Dec 1, 2008, at 16:59 , Jaap Spies wrote:
Justin C. Walker wrote:
On Dec 1, 2008, at 05:02 , mabshoff wrote:
Hello folks,
it took a couple hours longer than planned, but here goes 3.2.1.rc1.
The changes merged went a little deeper than planned, i.e. the two
biggest changes are
I just noticed for m4ri the package is called libm4ri-*.spkg. Any
reason this isn't m4ri-*.spkg?
- Robert
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
On Dec 1, 8:40 pm, Robert Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I just noticed for m4ri the package is called libm4ri-*.spkg. Any
reason this isn't m4ri-*.spkg?
That is the name malb gave it initially and it just stuck. The same
applies for libfplll.spkg, too.
- Robert
Cheers,
Michael
Hello folks,
Sage 3.2.1 is out - at least unofficially - so I have started building
my Sage 3.2.2.alpha0 merge tree. It will be a couple hours until I
start merging since I will catch some sleep in the meantime, so if you
have patches that are supposed to get in please make sure they apply
On Dec 1, 2008, at 8:42 PM, mabshoff wrote:
On Dec 1, 8:40 pm, Robert Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I just noticed for m4ri the package is called libm4ri-*.spkg. Any
reason this isn't m4ri-*.spkg?
That is the name malb gave it initially and it just stuck. The same
applies for
On Dec 1, 8:51 pm, Robert Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Dec 1, 2008, at 8:42 PM, mabshoff wrote:
On Dec 1, 8:40 pm, Robert Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I just noticed for m4ri the package is called libm4ri-*.spkg. Any
reason this isn't m4ri-*.spkg?
That is the name malb
On Dec 1, 2008, at 8:54 PM, mabshoff wrote:
On Dec 1, 8:51 pm, Robert Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Dec 1, 2008, at 8:42 PM, mabshoff wrote:
On Dec 1, 8:40 pm, Robert Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I just noticed for m4ri the package is called libm4ri-*.spkg. Any
reason this
On Dec 1, 9:11 pm, Robert Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Dec 1, 2008, at 8:54 PM, mabshoff wrote:
On Dec 1, 8:51 pm, Robert Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Dec 1, 2008, at 8:42 PM, mabshoff wrote:
On Dec 1, 8:40 pm, Robert Bradshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I just
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 8:46 PM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello folks,
Sage 3.2.1 is out - at least unofficially - so I have started building
my Sage 3.2.2.alpha0 merge tree. It will be a couple hours until I
start merging since I will catch some sleep in the meantime, so if you
Some random questions about the optional packages available for Sage:
Which is more up-to-date: the list obtained by 'sage --optional', or
the list on the wiki http://wiki.sagemath.org/
optional_packages_available_for_SAGE? (I'm guessing the former.)
Is the list obtained by 'sage --optional'
On Dec 1, 9:36 pm, John H Palmieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi John,
Some random questions about the optional packages available for Sage:
Which is more up-to-date: the list obtained by 'sage --optional', or
the list on the wiki http://wiki.sagemath.org/
Hi,
This is a small thing, but I was a bit discouraged when I found that
my tiny contribution of reporting ticket #4641 was ill credited to a
wrong person in the release note of Sage 3.2.1 rc0. My name is Kwankyu
Lee. Is this still correctable?
On Dec 1, 9:59 pm, Kwankyu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
This is a small thing, but I was a bit discouraged when I found that
my tiny contribution of reporting ticket #4641 was ill credited to a
wrong person in the release note of Sage 3.2.1 rc0. My name is Kwankyu
Lee. Is this still
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 5:06 PM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 1, 9:59 pm, Kwankyu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
This is a small thing, but I was a bit discouraged when I found that
my tiny contribution of reporting ticket #4641 was ill credited to a
wrong person in the
Thank you for your kindness!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URLs:
On Dec 1, 10:15 pm, Minh Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 5:06 PM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 1, 9:59 pm, Kwankyu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
This is a small thing, but I was a bit discouraged when I found that
my tiny contribution of
41 matches
Mail list logo
