Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 10.4.beta3 released

2024-04-14 Thread Henri Girard
I forget to write en english , chat gpt translation : I updated to WSL2 as soon as it became available (around October/November). I ran |update-manager -d| because it works now, and then switched to SageMath dev with |git checkout dev|. I haven't had any issues so far. I created an icon so I

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 10.4.beta3 released

2024-04-14 Thread Henri Girard
J'ai mis à jour wsl2 dès la mise à disposition de celle ci (octobe/novembre) je fais update-manager -d puisque ça marche maintenant et je suis passé à sagemath dev par git checkout dev J'ai eu aucun problème à ce jour, j'ai fait une icone donc je peux le démarrer comme une application normal

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 10.4.beta2 released

2024-04-09 Thread Henri Girard
The same on wsl2, build fine  on 24.04 , but impossible to get it build on 24.04 ubuntu dualboot, error with numpy and cypari I got cypari working wwith pip but numpy is the right version but not found ! Le 09/04/2024 à 21:02, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit : FWIW, upgrading 10.4.beta1 to

Re: [sage-release] Sage 10.0.beta0 released

2023-02-12 Thread Henri Girard
Thanks :) I have been waiting for this version 10, already sage-9 has many improvment I found very useful (though I use sage in a very special way, since I can make %run .ipynb) I call it   Voie sage =dao de sage =Tao sage =道 sage Best Henri Le 13/02/2023 à 00:54, Volker Braun a écrit :

Re: [sage-release] Sage 9.7.beta2 released

2022-06-14 Thread Henri Girard
build on AMD ryzen 16 coeurs 16 Go RAM 1Tera ssd with ubuntu dev 22.10 (beta)  no problem -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

[sage-release] just for info

2022-01-19 Thread Henri Girard
Hi, I noticed a change in sage 9.5rc2, sage is already link /usr/bin/sage in ubuntu 22.04 in a |./sage/local/var/lib/sage/venv-python3.10/lib/python3.10/site-packages is it in all sage or only ubuntu ?| |thanks| |Henri | -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.rc1 released

2022-01-14 Thread Henri Girard
I just compiled it without any problems... rc0 I couldn't compile doc rc1 works fine in ubuntu 22.04 (out in april) rizen 16 16Go RAM ubuntu 22.04 Le 14/01/2022 à 11:41, Samuel Lelièvre a écrit : 2022-01-14 10:00 UTC, Dima Pasechnik: On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 9:10 AM Eric Gourgoulhon: On

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta7 released

2021-11-22 Thread Henri Girard
For a few months i couldn't compile sage but today from a fresh ubuntu 20.04, it succeded, from a rizen 16 cors and 16 Go RAM Henri Le 22/11/2021 à 13:16, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit : On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM: - incremental build (-j16) from 9.5.beta6, with system

[sage-release] Sage 9.3.beta0 released

2020-11-02 Thread Henri Girard
Hi, I build it with ubuntu 20.10 (Hirsute hippo next coming) build complete AMD rizen 16 cores 16 Go and ssd 250. best Henri -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,

[sage-release] info

2020-10-24 Thread Henri Girard
Hi, Yesterday no one pip version worked ? I am on ubuntu 20.10 which should get out in few days, I did a do-release-upgrade -d , this morning I was trying pip : My sudo -H pip3 install sage got for answer : Requirement already satisfied: sage in /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages (9.2b12) I

[sage-release] Sage 9.2.beta14 released

2020-10-01 Thread Henri Girard
On Ubuntu 20.04 running AMD 16 core +16 Go and SSD, Every thing passed. As I didn't compile sage for a certain time I notice it was quick about 30 mns. I few some messages indicating I should install few libs (new and very important, that a good idea !). Best Henri -- You received this

[sage-release] Sage 9.0.beta4

2019-11-09 Thread Henri Girard
I am using Focal Fossa ubuntu next 20.04 (very early). They have sage-8.9 for them 8.9-1 in the repo. I compile Sage 9.0.beta4 using python3.7.3 with an AMD 8core 32 RAM ssd 240 Go(it is quiet fast), make -j9, no problem. In fact there is no much difference between 19.10 eoan and 20.04

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9.beta9 released

2019-09-02 Thread Henri Girard
Ubuntu 19.10 (+1) beta, AMD 8x 64 bits 16 Go RAM Le 26/08/2019 à 08:18, Henri Girard a écrit : Ubuntu 19.10 (+1) beta, AMD 8x 64 bits 16 Go RAM Compilation ok works fine (from beta 7 to 8) Le 26/08/2019 à 00:37, Volker Braun a écrit : As always, you can get the latest beta version from

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9.beta8 released

2019-08-26 Thread Henri Girard
Ubuntu 19.10 (+1) beta, AMD 8x 64 bits 16 Go RAM Compilation ok works fine (from beta 7 to 8) Le 26/08/2019 à 00:37, Volker Braun a écrit : As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.9.beta4 released

2019-07-31 Thread Henri Girard
No problem on ubuntu 19.10 amd64 8x cores 16 Go RAM Le 31/07/2019 à 16:02, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit : On Ubuntu 18.04 running on bi-Xeon E5-2623 (8 cores) + 16 GB RAM: *- python2: *   - build (-j16) from a fresh git clone completed, with the mirror issue for gap-4.10.2.tar.bz2 reported by

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.9.beta3 released

2019-07-20 Thread Henri Girard
From ubuntu 19.10, fresh install AMD8x 64 bits 16Go  SSD 250Go (very speedy), all works, Before I had problem with doc-html, even with a fresh git, but as I reinstalled from distro fresh one , no problem. Le 20/07/2019 à 00:59, Volker Braun a écrit : As always, you can get the latest beta

[sage-release] square root very strange in 8.5.beta3

2018-11-14 Thread Henri Girard
HI, I am calculating a square root sqrt(9)=3 But at 10 and over I got this answer sqrt(10)= sqrt(10) except sqrt(16)=4 when it's a right square but sqrt(10.0)=3.16... Is it a normal answer ? sqrt(16)=4 works Any explaination ? Regards Henri -- You received this message because you are

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.5.beta1 released

2018-10-30 Thread Henri Girard
LANG to en_US.UTF-8 before running sage -n jupyter solves the problem. Not for me I only have french (I don't mind i use french now), same firefox version ubuntu 18.10 cosmic. But jupyterlab is only in english Le 30/10/2018 à 12:11, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit : Le mardi 30 octobre 2018 00:08:52

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.5.beta1 released

2018-10-30 Thread Henri Girard
I have jupyter lab and it's in english ! jupyter in french and jupyterlab in english ? Le 30/10/2018 à 00:19, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit : Le mardi 30 octobre 2018 00:08:52 UTC+1, William Stein a écrit : Just curious, but what is navigator.languages in the Javascript console of your

[sage-release] Re: only sage-8.5 in jupyter notebook not 8.5.beta1 ?

2018-10-27 Thread Henri Girard
my answer : I forget I changed sage path setting it in /usr/bin/sage correct the problem Sorry for the noise :) Le 27/10/2018 à 18:28, Henri Girard a écrit : After compiling I got this right version in shell SageMath version 8.5.beta1, Release Date: 2018-10-27 │ │ Type "not

[sage-release] only sage-8.5 in jupyter notebook not 8.5.beta1 ?

2018-10-27 Thread Henri Girard
After compiling I got this right version in shell SageMath version 8.5.beta1, Release Date: 2018-10-27   │ │ Type "notebook()" for the browser-based notebook interface.    │ │ Type "help()" for help. sagenb has the right version but not sage -=jupyter I reboot and will see if

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.4.beta2 released

2018-08-26 Thread Henri Girard
Ubuntu cosmic 18.10 (version beta) AMD 64 16 Go RAM, every thing well :) Le 26/08/2018 à 01:53, Volker Braun a écrit : As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at

[sage-release] sage-8.4

2018-08-06 Thread Henri Girard
Hi, I have an old computer intel dual core with 4 Go RAM, I have cosmic (ubuntu +1 =18.10) installed and I tried compiling the sage 8.4 version, no problem after a night compilation... ok. Thanks Henri -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

[sage-release] flint absent

2018-08-06 Thread Henri Girard
ubuntu Bionic AMD 64 8x 16Go RAM, while compiling gave an error "no flint", I ./configure and make -j8 ant this second time was ok. real    99m6,278s user    296m28,526s sys    17m9,810s Sage build/upgrade complete! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.3.beta1 released

2018-05-16 Thread Henri Girard
Bionic 18.04 AMD x8 64 bits, compile perfect. I started from fresh git sage because upgrading from 8.2 failed. It couldn't find many libs. By the way I found my crash problem while compiling : I had to config the bios allowing warmer processing. Le 15/05/2018 à 21:24, Sébastien Labbé a écrit 

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.3.beta0 released

2018-05-10 Thread Henri Girard
On ubuntu I recently had a problem because curl didn't install properly I think with bionic I think it's ok Le 09/05/2018 à 22:11, John H Palmieri a écrit : Volker, it must be a conscious decision on your part to not include curl, git, gcc, and perhaps others in the upstream directory of the

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.2 released

2018-05-06 Thread Henri Girard
I use bionic AMD 64 and I compiled sage-8.2 git without any problem (but openssl was lacking). Le 06/05/2018 à 20:30, John H Palmieri a écrit : Some version of gcc is in the prerequisites for linux, but if the existing version is not good enough, Sage will build its own. On OS X, Sage builds

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.2.rc2 released

2018-04-13 Thread Henri Girard
On linux sage 8.1 jupylab install perfect. But as I have a problem with my sage in user location (without sudo) I do sage -sh and then pip install jupyterlab upgrade (normal installation) Le 13/04/2018 à 20:34, Samuel Lelièvre a écrit : 2018-04-13 0:28 GMT+02:00 Samuel Lelièvre

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.rc0

2017-11-10 Thread Henri Girard
I am a bit in future : Bionic beaver 18.04 with AMD 64 16 RAM, everything ok. I have a problem with my computer, at the end of compiling my computer halt in a bad way !  (this was already from sage-8.0 and with other flavor of ubuntu, 17.04,17.10) maybe my RAM or my SSD ? -- You received this

[sage-release] sage 8 beta 11

2017-06-20 Thread Henri Girard
Build on AMD 8x core 16 Go RAM, ubuntu 17.10 (ubuntu +1), very good. This looks like the first time you are running Sage. Updating various hardcoded paths... (Please wait at most a few minutes.) DO NOT INTERRUPT THIS. Done updating paths. Yes, Sage starts. make[2] : on quitte le répertoire «

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.0.beta5 released

2017-05-05 Thread Henri Girard
ubuntu xenial ok Le 05/05/2017 à 12:06, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit : On Debian testing running on Core i7+16 Gb RAM, same results as those reported for beta4. HTH, -- Emmanuel Charpentier Le jeudi 4 mai 2017

Re: [sage-release] Sage 8.0.beta3 released

2017-04-26 Thread Henri Girard
I tried to compile both git and sources tarball, but the same result. I tried too what Eric said, compiling sage 8.0 beta 2 gave me an error (like mentionned on last message) I had not the first time I compiled sucessfully this later one. I can't compile sage-8.0 beta 2 .3. I use sage-8.0

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.0.beta3 released

2017-04-23 Thread Henri Girard
same problem here :ubuntu 16.04.4 lcalc failed Le 24/04/2017 à 02:43, François Bissey a écrit : On 24/04/17 12:18, tsc...@ucdavis.edu wrote: Does this help? | ld -v GNU ld (GNU BinutilsforUbuntu)2.26.1 | Let me know what else I can get or do to help debug this. I am not sure how to find

[sage-release] About matplotlib 2

2017-04-01 Thread Henri Girard
Hi, I wonder if sage-8.0 is using matplotlib 2.0, because the color I get are looking like it ? How can I know which matplotlib I use and which python I use (2 or 3) ? Regards Henri -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.0.beta0 released

2017-03-31 Thread Henri Girard
Hi, ubuntu 16.04 , make doc-clean, make -j9 build after 7.6 any, I am compiling it on a fresh sage 8 regards Henri I got this error : make[2] : on quitte le répertoire « /home/pi/sage/build/make » Makefile:922 : la recette pour la cible « all » a échouée make[1]: *** [all] Erreur 2 make[1]

Re: [sage-release] Sage 7.2.beta0 released

2016-03-25 Thread Henri Girard
Ubuntu 16.04 AMD X8 16 RAM :ok Le 25/03/2016 09:26, Volker Braun a écrit : As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html 930e35e Updated Sage version to

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 7.1 released

2016-03-23 Thread Henri Girard
I wonder if it's not a problem with doc I would do : make doc-clean && make -jxx (number of cores +1) but you must know it will take some time !!! Maybe someone will give you a better suggestion Le 23/03/2016 16:11, Enrique Artal a écrit : I am new in this group, and I would like to thanks

Re: [sage-release] Sage 7.1.rc1 released

2016-03-19 Thread Henri Girard
ok build fine Le 17/03/2016 22:24, Volker Braun a écrit : As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html 50ac030 Updated Sage version to 7.1.rc1 d28accb Trac

Re: [sage-release] Re: recent woes with relocation of SageMath installation directory

2016-02-04 Thread Henri Girard
Thanks... Very good :) As I said I compile develop version so I just compile sagemanifolds with it. But I can imagine how annoying it can be, before I used for a long time your deb. Best, Henri Le 04/02/2016 11:42, Jan Groenewald a écrit : Hi On 4 February 2016 at 12:20, HG

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 7.0.rc1 released

2016-01-15 Thread Henri Girard
Thanks... Because each time I get a new develop version. Try it next version. Henri Le 15/01/2016 11:40, Johan S. R. Nielsen a écrit : If you already have a nice compiled version of latest develop, you can merge in your old branch *into* develop. With latest develop checked out, run the

Re: [sage-release] error: Cannot perform incremental update

2016-01-14 Thread Henri Girard
I used to have this problem too... So I didn't know how to correct it now I create a new git to each version and I have no more problem... (but that's not a way to improve correcting problems ! ) Henri Le 14/01/2016 08:41, Nathann Cohen a écrit : Yo, This should if and only if you upgrade

Re: [sage-release] Sage 7.0.beta3 released

2016-01-08 Thread Henri Girard
Compilation successfull, I guess my ubuntu was broken. Le 08/01/2016 09:30, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit : On 2016-01-08 08:04, Henri Girard wrote: I have compiled sage-7.0 beta 2 allright. But beta 3 doesn't compile. Log files please... -- You received this message because you are subscribed

Re: [sage-release] Sage 7.0.beta3 released

2016-01-07 Thread Henri Girard
I have compiled sage-7.0 beta 2 allright. But beta 3 doesn't compile. It's just for information because I am on ubuntu 16.04 alpha and a recent update may have cause this. I have ppl1.1 but curiously I can't compile sage 6.10 neither, at the moment I use sage-7.0 I compiled successfully. Kind

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 7.0.beta1 released

2015-12-26 Thread Henri Girard
Thanks you ... Happy Christmas Henri Le 25/12/2015 22:21, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit : Le vendredi 25 décembre 2015 15:05:16 UTC+1, HG a écrit : How did you pull change ? I have the zip it can' t do it ? $ git checkout develop $ git trac config --user --pass $ git fetch git

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 7.0.beta1 released

2015-12-25 Thread Henri Girard
How did you pull change ? I have the zip it can' t do it ? beta0 works beta1 no because no ecl and other Le 25/12/2015 13:52, Emmanuel Charpentier a écrit : FWIW, after pulling changes in a 7.0beta0 tree, passes ptestlong with no errors on Debian testing running on Core i7 + 16 GB. HTH, --

Re: [sage-release] Sage 7.0.beta0 released

2015-12-23 Thread Henri Girard
Build on ubuntu 16.04 with sagemanifold (daily build) Le 23/12/2015 17:13, Nathann Cohen a écrit : I failed to build this latest release because of the 'R' package (see logfile [1]). It fails at this step: configure: error: --with-readline=yes (default) and headers/libs are not available

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.10.rc2 binaries test

2015-12-18 Thread Henri Girard
Yes I wrote the same problem on 16.04. I run sage -n=ipython and then I opened firefox. I noticed for me it's even better I just created an icon with sage -n=ipython (as application) so I don't see any terminal running and I run firefox. I noticed that file can be relocated in any dir, which

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.10.rc2 binaries test

2015-12-18 Thread Henri Girard
yes... But not fun :) Le 18/12/2015 11:16, Francois Bissey a écrit : Fun! Your distro is built with a gcc that is more recent than the one your sage binary has been built with - and the libstdc++ from your distro is masked by the one from sage. François On 18/12/2015, at 23:10, Eric

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.10.rc2 binaries test

2015-12-18 Thread Henri Girard
I noticed too, that sagemanifolds compiled perfect on the rc2 version. I think I have gcc 5xx. Le 18/12/2015 11:16, Francois Bissey a écrit : Fun! Your distro is built with a gcc that is more recent than the one your sage binary has been built with - and the libstdc++ from your distro is

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.10 released

2015-12-18 Thread Henri Girard
6.9 or 6.10 ? Le 18/12/2015 20:18, Volker Braun a écrit : The "master" git branch has been updated to Sage-6.9. As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.10 released

2015-12-18 Thread Henri Girard
Yes... After compilation everything fine :) Thanks for this excellent work all :) Regards Henri Le 18/12/2015 20:31, leif a écrit : Henri Girard wrote: 6.9 or 6.10 ? 6.10 of course; see http://git.sagemath.org/sage.git/ -leif Le 18/12/2015 20:18, Volker Braun a écrit : The "master

[sage-release] Sage-6.10.rc2 released

2015-12-17 Thread Henri Girard
HI, I got this problem building rc2 rc1 was ok : The following package(s) may have failed to build (not necessarily during this run of 'make all'): * package: atlas-3.10.2 log file: /home/riri/Téléchargements/sage-develop/logs/pkgs/atlas-3.10.2.log build directory:

[sage-release] Re: Sage 6.10.rc2 binaries test

2015-12-17 Thread Henri Girard
Sorry I just read your message... http... works Le 18/12/2015 00:55, Henri Girard a écrit : Hi, I have these annoying message with ./sage -n=ipython I does work well on ./sage -n Any help ? Regards Henri ./sage -n=ipython

[sage-release] Sage 6.10.rc2 binaries test

2015-12-17 Thread Henri Girard
Hi, I have these annoying message with ./sage -n=ipython I does work well on ./sage -n Any help ? Regards Henri ./sage -n=ipython ┌┐ │ SageMath Version 6.10.rc2, Release Date: 2015-12-16 │ │ Type "notebook()" for the

Re: [sage-release] Sage-6.10.rc1 binaries test

2015-12-14 Thread Henri Girard
Sorry I found it :) regards Henri Le 15/12/2015 08:06, Henri Girard a écrit : I only get 6.9 with your links ? Le 15/12/2015 00:43, Volker Braun a écrit : Here is a final test for the binaries, using the new binary packaging. That is, now binaries are patched automatically on first run

Re: [sage-release] Re: Anticipating ubuntu 15.10

2015-10-09 Thread Henri Girard
Yes I read this ticket and thaught I wouldn't have this problem again ? Have I something to do ? Le 09/10/2015 13:43, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit : Le vendredi 9 octobre 2015 13:04:10 UTC+2, HG a écrit : I recompiled and now it works (in between I installed libssl-dev, but now i have no

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.9.rc3 released

2015-10-07 Thread Henri Girard
In fact after trying many things (cleaning compiling again) my system is broken ! Coming back to sage 6.8 doesn't work any more ! I think I messed muy computer ! Fortunatly we might have SMC working waiting better time ! Henri Le 07/10/2015 21:01, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit : Le mercredi 7

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.9.rc2 released

2015-10-06 Thread Henri Girard
Well, the tree/develop gives sage-develop in zip but in git clone it's sage.git, I am compiling it and will see if it's sage 6.9 maybe I used to make a mistake ? But last time I did it I had sage6.8 Le 06/10/2015 05:23, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : On Monday, 5 October 2015 18:15:23 UTC-7, HG

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.9.rc2 released

2015-10-06 Thread Henri Girard
I can't say now as I have 15.04. To get sage-6.9 rc2 I got the zip on the git sage-develop. I tried sage.git (version 6.8 apparently) before but I couldn't compiled it because an error. After compiling sage-develop I did in the repertory ./bootstrap ./configure make -j9 After about 2 hours I

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.9.rc2 released

2015-10-06 Thread Henri Girard
I noticed something which blocked me for a lot of time, maybe you know it ? After using different sage versions, I faced a problem in .local numpy ? Not knowing why and being blocked with all what I used I decided to delete .local ! And everything works again... If it can help Henri Le

[sage-release] latex

2015-10-06 Thread Henri Girard
Hi, I just compiled sage-6.9 rc2 and running x^2 i got this writing \newcommand{\Bold}[1]{\mathbf{#1}}x^{2} with frame ? what is the problem ? regards Henri -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

Re: [sage-release] latex

2015-10-06 Thread Henri Girard
any errors? On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Henri Girard <henri.gir...@gmail.com <mailto:henri.gir...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi, I just compiled sage-6.9 rc2 and running x^2 i got this writing \newcommand{\Bold}[1]{\mathbf{#1}}x^{2} with frame ? what is the problem ?

Re: [sage-release] latex

2015-10-06 Thread Henri Girard
? On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Henri Girard <henri.gir...@gmail.com <mailto:henri.gir...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi, I just compiled sage-6.9 rc2 and running x^2 i got this writing \newcommand{\Bold}[1]{\mathbf{#1}}x^{2} with frame ? what is the problem ? regar

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.9.rc2 released

2015-10-05 Thread Henri Girard
I compiled it on ubuntu 15.04 successfully, sage --notebook=ipython worked, but I had no latex displaying, raw one. Le 05/10/2015 09:46, kcrisman a écrit : That's not good either. Also, just setting the env var to blank didn't seem to negate it, currently trying with unsetting it.

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 6.9.rc2 released

2015-10-05 Thread Henri Girard
Hi, I build sage 6.9.rc2 on ubuntu 15.04 and got it working but then latex was n't working in ipython notebook command ouput was between frame like a table. By the way a question : Sage 6.9 rc2 can't be otbain with git clone ? I could get only the tar download. Otherwise with git it have

Re: [sage-release] Sage 6.9.rc1 released

2015-10-02 Thread Henri Girard
is there a binary somewhere ? regards Henri Le 02/10/2015 18:32, Daniel Krenn a écrit : fresh clone on Linux Mint 17.1 successful with make ptestlong. On 2015-10-01 21:03, Volker Braun wrote: As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch. Alternatively, the

Re: [sage-release] Re: Ubuntu PPA package and Jupyter notebook

2015-09-23 Thread Henri Girard
of right or directory than ssl as I have put all lib ?) Kind regards Henri Le 23/09/2015 11:42, Jan Groenewald a écrit : Hi On 23 September 2015 at 10:40, Henri Girard <henri.gir...@gmail.com <mailto:henri.gir...@gmail.com>> wrote: I just test it, ssl is always lacking

Re: [sage-release] Re: Ubuntu PPA package and Jupyter notebook

2015-09-23 Thread Henri Girard
Sorry this one (ubuntu) http://www-ftp.lip6.fr/pub/math/sagemath/linux/64bit/Ubuntu_14.04_LTS_sage-6.8-x86_64-Linux.tar.lrz I don't know if it's the same ? Le 23/09/2015 18:43, Jan Groenewald a écrit : Hi What is Sage 6.8 LTS? Regards, Jan On 23 September 2015 at 18:42, Henri Girard

Re: [sage-release] Re: Ubuntu PPA package and Jupyter notebook

2015-09-23 Thread Henri Girard
Weird ... Le 23/09/2015 18:50, Jan Groenewald a écrit : Yes, that is the package we use to build the PPA deb. The latest PPA version is supposed to be the same. Regards, Jan On 23 September 2015 at 18:45, Henri Girard <henri.gir...@gmail.com <mailto:henri.gir...@gmail.com&g

Re: [sage-release] Re: Ubuntu PPA package and Jupyter notebook

2015-09-23 Thread Henri Girard
ssl Le 23/09/2015 18:43, Jan Groenewald a écrit : Hi What is Sage 6.8 LTS? Regards, Jan On 23 September 2015 at 18:42, Henri Girard <henri.gir...@gmail.com <mailto:henri.gir...@gmail.com>> wrote: I noticed something : Your version compile python sage -f python sage 6.

Re: [sage-release] Re: Ubuntu PPA package and Jupyter notebook

2015-09-23 Thread Henri Girard
http://sagemath.mirror.ac.za/linux/64bit/Ubuntu_14.04_LTS_sage-6.8-x86_64-Linux.tar.lrz Le 23/09/2015 18:43, Jan Groenewald a écrit : Hi What is Sage 6.8 LTS? Regards, Jan On 23 September 2015 at 18:42, Henri Girard <henri.gir...@gmail.com <mailto:henri.gir...@gmail.com>> wr

Re: [sage-release] Re: Ubuntu PPA package and Jupyter notebook

2015-09-23 Thread Henri Girard
that it now works because our latest PPA package includes all the build/bin folder in /usr/lib/sagemath. Then when you have libssl-dev installed and do sudo sage -f python it is installed with ssl. I'm guessing though. Regards, Jan On 23 September 2015 at 17:00,

[sage-release] Re: Ubuntu PPA package and Jupyter notebook

2015-09-23 Thread Henri Girard
Installing the LTS 6.8 manually solved the problem waiting for AIMS deb Le jeudi 10 septembre 2015 22:28:39 UTC+2, Eric Gourgoulhon a écrit : > Hi, > > While testing the Ubuntu package sagemath-upstream-binary-full from AIMS PPA > (cf. this thread), I've tried to run sage in Jupyter notebook

Re: [sage-release] Re: Ubuntu PPA package and Jupyter notebook

2015-09-23 Thread Henri Girard
age 6.8 trimmed and full in the stable PPA, we will enable weekly automated uploads to the dev PPA, so you'll want to stop using that. Regards, Jan On 23 September 2015 at 09:10, Henri Girard <henri.gir...@gmail.com <mailto:henri.gir...@gmail.com>> wrote: Installing the