please post config.log
probably https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30231 didn't do the job :-(
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 9:32 AM David Coudert wrote:
>
> I’m unable to upgrade from 9.3.beta3 on fedora 32.
> It fails during bootstrap. See attached file.
> Thank you for your help.
> David.
>
>
> --
>
t; To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/BB541F4D-41B2-4835-B34A-2D46BA98D694%40gmail.com.
>
>
> Le 15 déc. 2020 à 11:14, Dima Pasechnik a écrit :
>
> please post config.log
>
> probably https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30
also, could you run
find /usr -name pari.cfg
and post the output here - apparently Fedora hides this file somewhere
we can't find
(and total absense of this file is a Fedora bug...)
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 10:40 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> Could you replace
> the line
&g
ied
>
> I’m not root on the machine, but I can use an su account.
no, no need, it has printet what we need:
/usr/share/doc/pari/pari.cfg
just fine.
Thanks
Dima
>
> David.
>
> > Le 15 déc. 2020 à 11:44, Dima Pasechnik a écrit :
> >
> > also, could you run
>
Run
git gc --prune=now
and then try again.
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 3:34 PM Emmanuel Charpentier
wrote:
>
> On Debian testing, it turns out that I am unable to pull the current version
> starting from 9.2.beta12 :
>
> charpent@p-202-021:/usr/local/sage-9$ git status
> Sur la branche develop
> V
> Fichiers non suivis:
> (utilisez "git add ..." pour inclure dans ce qui sera validé)
> CRerrs.md
> CRerrs.org
> chkerrs.txt
> errs.txt
> optional_packages.txt
>
> aucune modification ajoutée à la validation mais des fichiers non suivis so
> u/mantepse/2_internet_doctests_failing_in_findstat_py ->
> origin/u/mantepse/2_internet_doctests_failing_in_findstat_py
> charpent@p-202-021:/usr/local/sage-9$ ls .git/refs/remotes/origin/u/dimpase/
> build docs graphs misc packages singular ticket
> coding doctests groups modules python3 s
On Wed, 23 Dec 2020, 09:40 Kenji Iohara, wrote:
> On mac OS 11.1, even after installing cython with Homebrew, it always
> claim << not installed >> when I compile sage-9.3.beta4 (this was also true
> for beta3 version).
>
this is as expected. We are not yet supporting system-wide Python package
it seems you have a conflicting install of fplll in /usr/local
On Mon, 28 Dec 2020, 11:54 David Coudert, wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On macOS 10.15.7 and fedora 32, I have an error compiling fpylll-0.5.4.
> See attached log file.
>
> This is apparently non blocking to finalize the compilation of 9.3.bet
On Wed, 10 Feb 2021, 21:29 'Justin C. Walker' via sage-release, <
sage-release@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
>
> > On Feb 7, 2021, at 14:04, Volker Braun wrote:
> >
> > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git
> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is
On Wed, 10 Feb 2021, 22:29 'Justin C. Walker' via sage-release, <
sage-release@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
>
> > On Feb 10, 2021, at 13:55, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 10 Feb 2021, 21:29 'Justin C. Walker&#x
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 5:45 AM Samuel Lelievre
wrote:
>
> 2021-02-08 02:11:22 UTC, Samuel Lelievre:
> >
> > On macOS 10.14.6 with lots of Homebrew packages,
> > [failed to build linbox]. Logs:
> >
> > https://www.math.u-psud.fr/~lelievre/t/slel-2021-02-08-s93b7-brew.zip
> >
> > I'll try #31355.
>
something is not clean in the repo
maybe run
make bootstrap-clean
On Thu, 11 Feb 2021, 15:52 'Justin C. Walker' via sage-release, <
sage-release@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
>
> > On Feb 10, 2021, at 14:41, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> >
> >
>
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 9:51 PM Samuel Lelièvre
wrote:
>
> 2021-02-17 12:05 UTC, Samuel Lelièvre:
> >
> > 2021-02-11 15:35 UTC, Dima:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 5:45 AM Samuel Lelievre:
> > > >
> > > > 2021-02-08 02:11:22 UTC, Samuel Lelievre:
> > > > >
> > > > > On macOS 10.14.6 with lot
can you review cysignals update at https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31474 ?
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 12:19 PM Samuel Lelièvre
wrote:
>
> 2021-03-16 09:24 UTC, Samuel Lelièvre:
> >
> > 2021-03-16 01:26 UTC, Matthias Köppe:
> > >
> > > On Monday, March 15, 2021 at 1:42:44 PM UTC-7 Samuel Lelievre:
>
On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 1:09 AM 'Justin C. Walker' via sage-release
wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Apr 1, 2021, at 08:04 , Matthias Köppe wrote:
> >
> > There are a number of recent tickets, not yet merged, that fix /usr/local
> > leakage.
> > First ticket to try: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31552 - si
Something is a bit broken in your toolchain.
Did you build with Homebrew packages and then forgot to
source .homebrew-build-env ?
(which might also be needed for some tests, IMHO)
On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 7:58 PM Kenji Iohara wrote:
>
> On Mac OS 11.2.3., the compilation from the first built work
On Sat, 1 May 2021, 15:20 Enrique Artal, wrote:
> I have tried to compile it in Fedora 34, I know it is a very recent
> release and problems would be expected. The first one is that F34 uses
> gcc11 and it seems to be incompatible with sage, so when installing it uses
> gcc 9.2 package. After som
On Thu, 27 May 2021, 15:34 Clemens Heuberger,
wrote:
> Also on Ubuntu 18.04 (without any optional packages apart ccache
> installed), I
> have the failing doctest with graph.py (two out of three runs) and
> consistently
>
> $ ./sage -t --long --random-seed=0 src/sage/misc/package.py
> Running doc
there is a ticket for this error, positively reviewed.
On Sun, 30 May 2021, 10:46 fchap...@gmail.com, wrote:
> hello,
>
> my patchbot petitbonum has the following error on the latest beta, never
> seen before :
>
> sage -t --long --random-seed=0 src/sage/misc/package.py
> ***
typically these hangs mean something stale in ~/.sage/
try moving it away and re-run make.
On Sat, 5 Jun 2021, 20:58 Paul Masson, wrote:
> Now having a problem with the documentation. The first run stopped at this
> point:
>
> [sage_docbuild-9.4.beta0] Installing collected packages: sage-docbu
macOS.
> On Saturday, June 5, 2021 at 1:26:44 PM UTC-7 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>> typically these hangs mean something stale in ~/.sage/
>>
>> try moving it away and re-run make.
>>
>>
>> On Sat, 5 Jun 2021, 20:58 Paul Masson, wrote:
>>
>>>
Please try https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/31498 which should also
fix gap_packages.py error.
On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 1:32 PM Emmanuel Charpentier
wrote:
>
> On Debian testing, upgrading 9.4.beta0 to beta1 and running ptestlong leads to
>
> One timeout on parigp.py (already reported numerous time
What exactly is wrong with Ubuntu system readline ?
Is it underlinked?
config.log please.
On Fri, 11 Jun 2021, 07:05 Samuel Lelièvre,
wrote:
> Le jeu. 10 juin 2021 à 21:35, Samuel Lelièvre:
> >
> > Le jeu. 10 juin 2021 à 18:30, Samuel Lelièvre:
> > >
> > > Thanks for the new release.
> > >
> >
On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 8:34 AM David Coudert wrote:
>
> Thank you for this new beta.
>
> I have a build error on a Intel MacBook Air with macOS 10.15.7, after make
> distclean, .bootstrap, source .homebrew-build-env,
> ./configure and finally make.
> I have installed numpy 1.20.3 with homebrew,
maybe also
make sagelib-clean
before
make build
On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 10:03 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 8:34 AM David Coudert wrote:
> >
> > Thank you for this new beta.
> >
> > I have a build error on a Intel MacBook Air
9.4.beta2] real 0m6.860s
> [sagelib-9.4.beta2] user 0m2.224s
> [sagelib-9.4.beta2] sys 0m1.317s
> make[4]: *** [sagelib-SAGE_VENV-no-deps] Error 1
> make[3]: ***
> [/Users/dcoudert/sage/local/var/lib/sage/installed/sagelib-9.4.beta2] Error 2
> make[2]: *** [all-build] Error 2
>
Please see https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32021 for this issue.
Did you build/install numpy in an unusual way?
On Sunday, June 20, 2021 at 5:57:44 PM UTC+1 david@gmail.com wrote:
> So I think I have to wait (and try to go back to previous beta).
> Thanks,
> David.
>
> Le 20 juin 2021 à 17:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 8:43 PM Enrique Artal wrote:
>
> I had the same error with this package and py in Fedora 34 (though in one
> computer I had no problem);
a fix is ready here: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32031
> rebuilding after make distclean was OK
>
> El martes, 22 de junio de 2
On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 12:46 PM Sébastien Labbé wrote:
>
> Doing make distclean and using system's python3.8 with ./configure
> --with-python=/usr/bin/python3.8 avoided my issue with compilation of
> python3.9.5.
>
> On Ubuntu 18.04, make ptestall with following optional and external packages
On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 12:49 PM Emmanuel Charpentier
wrote:
>
> I have the same problem (Debian testing on core i7 + 16 GB RAM, FWIW)…
>
> Workaround (at least for people having inherited a semi-functional
> $SAGE_ROOT/sage from a previous install) : open a sage -sh shell and pip
> install setu
On Mon, Jul 19, 2021 at 12:19 AM Volker Braun wrote:
>
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch.
> Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
>
> I think we are in a reasonable shape right now, so if
note that gap_package installed alters code paths of GAP code which might
not even depend explicitly on it.
On Thu, 12 Aug 2021, 17:07 Emmanuel Charpentier, <
emanuel.charpent...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry for the late answer...
>
> Le lundi 9 août 2021 à 18:16:23 UTC+2, Samuel Lelievre a écrit :
On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 9:18 PM Jaap Spies wrote:
>
> --
> sage -t --long --warn-long 356.4 --random-seed=0
> src/sage/calculus/riemann.pyx # Killed due to segmentation fault
> ---
On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 1:32 PM Simon King wrote:
>
> Hi Matthia,
>
> On 2021-08-28, Matthias Köppe wrote:
> > We actually test this platform (ubuntu xenial), and gfan builds correctly.
> > See https://github.com/sagemath/sage/runs/3392764418?check_suite_focus=true
> >
> > This failure must be ca
On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 12:10 PM Jaap Spies wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 10:53 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 28, 2021 at 9:18 PM Jaap Spies wrote:
>> >
>> > --
t; On Sunday, August 29, 2021 at 5:44:33 AM UTC-7 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> >
> >> is gfan partially taken from the system?
> >>
> >> probably. Ubuntu 16.04 has gfan version 0.5, but Sage needs 0.6.2.
> >> A system-wide install of old gfan might get in the
On Sun, Aug 29, 2021 at 8:21 PM Simon King wrote:
>
> Hi Dima
>
> On 2021-08-29, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> > I'd start by un-installing system-wide gfan (could it be that you have more
> > system-wide copies of it, e.g. in /usr/local/ ?)
> > and try building th
; > Singular vendors a part of gfan called gfanlib. Perhaps an installation
> >> of
> >> > that is leaking into your build.
> >> >
> >> > If you can share your top-level config.log and the full gfan build log,
> >> we
> >> > can take a
you can install g++7 package on Ubuntu 16.04. (google for instructions).
This should do the trick (after distclean).
On Thu, 2 Sep 2021, 14:20 Simon King, wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> On 2021-09-01, Matthias Köppe wrote:
> > OK, Simon, there is only one conclusion: Your machine is haunted and
On Monday, July 26, 2021 at 6:06:08 PM UTC+1 Matthias Köppe wrote:
> On Saturday, July 24, 2021 at 4:42:01 PM UTC-7 Volker Braun wrote:
>
>> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git
>> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
>> http://www.sag
On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 8:53 PM Emmanuel Charpentier
wrote:
>
> So far :
>
> 9.5.beta1 “naked” passes ptestlong without any failure ;
> 9.5.beta1 +Fricas fails the single fricas limit doctest ;
> reinstalling the other optional packages entails the same failures as
> reported above.
>
> The probl
mpir removal was not complete, as a result ./bootstrap etc may complain.
Fix is here:
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32727
On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 12:07 AM Volker Braun wrote:
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git
> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained so
On Thu, Oct 21, 2021 at 4:02 PM 'Jonathan Kliem' via sage-release <
sage-release@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> Starting with this release, doctests will be run with a random seed chosen
> at random. This can be reproduced as indicated by the output
>
> sage -t --random-seed=1234
>
is there a way to
Hi Nicolas,
since a while, you see the random seed prominently shown in the output:
sage -t --random-seed=0 src/sage/calculus/transforms/dwt.pxd
https://github.com/sagemath/sagetrac-mirror/runs/3942778869?check_suite_focus=true#step:7:6629
Dima
On Thu, 21 Oct 2021, 22:02 Nicolas M. Thiery,
wr
On Sat, 30 Oct 2021, 01:39 William Stein, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried building on a pretty clean Macbook Pro M1 with the new MacOS
> 12.0.1 Montery, and it didn't get very far, failing pretty quickly on GMP.
> For what it is worth, I had no trouble building GMP directly on this
> computer (nothing
please see https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32796 (upgrade to gmp 6.2.1)
On Sat, 30 Oct 2021, 09:19 Dima Pasechnik, wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 30 Oct 2021, 01:39 William Stein, wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I tried building on a pretty clean Macbook Pro M1 with the new MacOS
&g
On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 10:18 PM William Stein wrote:
> I tried to build sage-9.5.beta5 on a very clean Linux Ubuntu:20.04 image
> with standard dev packages (in Docker) but on an ARM aarch64 architecture
> instead of Intel. It fails with Tachyon simply saying "Error: Sorry, your
> platform isn't
On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 11:28 PM William Stein wrote:
> Great idea. Thanks Dima!
>
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 3:37 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 10:18 PM William Stein wrote:
>>
>>> I tried to build sage-9.5.beta5 on a
On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 6:03 PM William Stein wrote:
> I just want to add that I don't trust Docker desktop on M1 yet, and it
> could easily be responsible for these problems.
> E.g., I've found that often wget sometimes segfaults in this exact
> container, and that has nothing to do with Sage.
>
failed test in
src/sage/tests/cmdline.py
indicates you need squlite binary installed, not only library.
this is an old bug in squlite spkg-configure, I thought it was fixed.
On Thu, 4 Nov 2021, 15:02 John Cremona, wrote:
> I upgraded from a previous beta and there were no problems with mak
With the latest Python 3.9, I need to apply
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32852
Dima
On Sun, Nov 14, 2021 at 11:39 AM Enrique Artal wrote:
>
> In Fedora 35 it builds applying https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32828 and
> the proposed solution of https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32576
>
> El
Hi William,
please do
brew install pkg-config
and try again. From your log, it appears missing,for some reason,
configure:6572: checking for pkg-config
configure:6605: result: no
and this breaks everything in ./configure that relies on it.
Yes, for some packages there are workarounds for corn
On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 6:10 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> Hi William,
>
> please do
>
> brew install pkg-config
>
> and try again. From your log, it appears missing,for some reason,
>
> configure:6572: checking for pkg-config
> configure:6605: result: no
&g
PS. IM¬HO we just rise a hard error in ./configure if there is no pkg-config
On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 6:16 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> On Sun, Nov 21, 2021 at 6:10 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> >
> > Hi William,
> >
> > please do
> >
> > brew install p
On Sun, 12 Dec 2021, 14:20 Volker Braun, wrote:
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git
> branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
>
> We should probably make a release some time soon... if you ha
On Fri, Dec 24, 2021 at 9:48 PM Samuel Lelièvre
wrote:
>
> Thanks Volker for this new release.
>
> On macOS 10.14.6 Mojave with many packages from
> Homebrew: "All tests passed!"
>
> On Cygwin 3.3.3-1 on Windows 10, with many packages:
>
> - Sage 9.5.beta9 fails to build python3-3.9.7 unless
> w
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 8:52 PM 'Justin C. Walker' via sage-release
wrote:
>
> This is somewhat off-topic, but I just ran into an issue with GitHub, and I
> am not sure how to handle it.
>
> I use this command to “git” the sage tree when Volker announces a new one:
> git clone git://github.com/sa
./sage --pip install pycryptosat # (this gets the package from PyPI
and builds it)
makes
./sage -t --long --random-seed=277349812120896257585806851727004727044
src/sage/sat/boolean_polynomials.py
work for me.
On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 5:27 PM Sébastien Labbé wrote:
>
> On Ubuntu 20.04, when I ra
See
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33162
for the cause of this
On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 6:53 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> ./sage --pip install pycryptosat # (this gets the package from PyPI
> and builds it)
>
> makes
>
> ./sage -t --long --random-seed=277349812120896257
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 9:10 AM Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
>
> On Ubuntu 20.04 running on Xeon E5-2623 + 16 GB RAM:
> - incremental build (-j16) from 9.5.beta8, with system python (3.8.10): OK
> - make ptestlong --> 2 doctests failed in src/sage/game_theory/parser.py
>
> This is a permanent failure:
On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 2:44 PM Sébastien Labbé wrote:
>
> With 9.5.rc0, I modify a file in the sage library, then
>
> $ sage -b
> Nothing to (re)build / all up-to-date.
>
> does nothing. This is a new behavior. But it seems my modications are being
> considered, so it is okay.
it was fixed in r
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 10:05 AM Kenji Iohara wrote:
>
> Failed compilation from the first built, owing to r-3.6.3…
> Here is the log-file:
checking for curl-config... /usr/local/anaconda3/bin/curl-config
checking libcurl version ... 7.78.0
checking curl/curl.h usability... yes
checking curl/curl
On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 11:55 PM Volker Braun wrote:
>
> No, I'm not running a private CI service for the Sage project. I'm relying on
> you all to only positively review tickets that actually work.
>
> In the rare cases where somebody is inexperienced or there is some unexpected
> interaction b
On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 12:13 AM 'Justin C. Walker' via sage-release
wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Feb 20, 2022, at 06:30 , Volker Braun wrote:
> >
> > As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git
> > branch. Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
> > http://www.s
On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 9:32 PM 'Justin C. Walker' via sage-release
wrote:
>
> Hi, Dima, Good question. See below...
>
> > On Feb 22, 2022, at 01:32 , Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 12:13 AM 'Justin C. Walker' via sage-rel
On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 2:27 PM Emmanuel Charpentier
wrote:
>
> On the same machine, but after installing pytest (with sage -i pytest), I get
> two permanent failures :
>
> sage -t --long --warn-long 65.8
> --random-seed=270444136495851075301247037545414794286
> src/sage/tests/cmdline.py # 1 d
Errors such as
sagemath_doc_html-none] [repl ] Notebook execution failed
(exception: [Errno 2] No such file or directory:
'/home/furutaka/work/sage/sage-9.0-git-bld/local/bin/sage')
indicate that you have remains of Sage 9.0 (still instaleld in
/home/furutaka/work/sage/sage-9.0-git-bld ?) pol
/kernel.json.
In that particular case it was (on macOS)
~/Library/Jupyter/sagemath/kernel.json with the obsolete path
to sage (version 9.4.beta3)
In your case it would be pointing to sage 9.0.
On Tuesday, April 5, 2022 at 10:59:50 AM UTC+1 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> Errors such
This looks like incompatiblity with system-wide nauty (I assume Sage
installed its own nauty, right?/
Can you uninstall the system nauty and try again?
On Wed, 27 Apr 2022, 14:57 David Joyner, wrote:
> Hi:
>
> On a Ubuntu 21.10 laptop, I got this:
>
> The following package(s) may have failed to
On Wed, 27 Apr 2022, 16:26 David Joyner, wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 10:44 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> >
> > This looks like incompatiblity with system-wide nauty (I assume Sage
> installed its own nauty, right?/
> >
> > Can you uninstall the system nauty and
On Mon, 2 May 2022, 13:40 'Nasser M. Abbasi' via sage-release, <
sage-release@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> Thanks. I redid the build. It now worked.
> Changed $SAGE_ROOT in my .bashrc to point to rc3 _BEFORE_ starting
> anything (even though rc is not yet build). Then redid everything from
> scratc
Have you rebuilt from scratch after the system update? Any update of a
dynamic library used by Sage can lead to lots of errors, unless the
relevant components are rebuilt.
On Mon, 16 May 2022, 12:13 Emmanuel Charpentier,
wrote:
> Observed on two systems running Debian testing (updated daily).
>
I think there is a ticket to fix this, it's a Python 3.10 syntax that
was used at that place.
On Wed, Jun 1, 2022 at 5:53 AM Clemens Heuberger
wrote:
>
> With a Python 3.8.10 installed as a system python, I get a persistent doctest
> failure (Linux Mint 20.2 uma):
>
> Running doctests with ID 202
On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 9:57 AM David Coudert wrote:
>
> I have issues compiling this release. I have openblas 0.3.20 installed with
> homebrew, but sage searches for 0.3.19.
looks like you have a stale ./configure, otherwise I can't explain this.
Run
./bootstrap
(making sure it succeeds)
>
>
On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 10:06 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 9:57 AM David Coudert wrote:
> >
> > I have issues compiling this release. I have openblas 0.3.20 installed with
> > homebrew, but sage searches for 0.3.19.
>
> looks like you have
ers/dcoudert/sage/local/lib/ecl/maxima.fas'.
>
> Log file attached.
>
> Best,
> David.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "sage-release" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emai
ou use one from Homebrew)
Can you start it and check if
(+ 2 2)
produces 4?
>
> David.
>
> Le 15 juin 2022 à 09:20, Dima Pasechnik a écrit :
>
> errors such as
> [maxima-5.45.0.p0] ;;; Loading
> "/Users/dcoudert/sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/maxima-5.45.0.p
o redistribute it
> under certain conditions; see file 'Copyright' for details.
> Type :h for Help.
> Top level in: #.
> > (+ 2 2)
>
> 4
>
>
> Le 15 juin 2022 à 09:51, Dima Pasechnik a écrit :
>
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 8:26 AM David Coudert wrote:
>
>
&g
emails from it, send an
> email to sage-release+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/22E52DB7-4911-4423-B411-912018742DFB%40gmail.com.
>
>
> > Le 15 juin 2022 à 10:39, Dima Pasechnik a écrit :
On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 1:42 PM David Coudert wrote:
>
> I don’t have /usr/local/lisp at all.
> Should I (try to) install it ?
no, this should not be needed.
> Not sure how…
(anti)virus?
>
> David.
>
> Le 15 juin 2022 à 14:20, Dima Pasechnik a écrit :
>
&g
On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 10:05 AM 'tsc...@ucdavis.edu' via sage-release
wrote:
>
>
>> Is anyone else seeing docbuilding issues? I am getting
>>
>> [sagemath_doc_html-none] __import__(module_name)
>> [sagemath_doc_html-none] ModuleNotFoundError: No module named
>> 'sage.combinat.nu_dyck_word'
>
On Sun, 10 Jul 2022, 09:43 david@gmail.com,
wrote:
> on MacOS 12.3.1 with Xcode 13.4.1 and a recent brew upgrade, I did:
> bootstrap, source .homebrew-build-env, configure and make.
> The compilation went well, but sage is not working at all.
> - Sage looks for /usr/local/Cellar/flint/2.9.0/l
make distclean ?
On Mon, 11 Jul 2022, 11:27 Thierry Dumont,
wrote:
>
>
> Le 11/07/2022 à 09:10, Kwankyu Lee a écrit :
> >
> >
> > On Monday, July 11, 2022 at 2:53:36 PM UTC+9 tdumont wrote:
> >
> > When upgrading from beta 4 to beta5, I got the following error, which
> > persists after d
There are changes happening in how sagelib is structured in modules.
Once this is done, it should work much smoother.
On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 12:12 PM Thierry
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 12:04:55PM +0100, Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> > make distclean ?
>
> If it helps to per
did you run
./bootstrap
?
On Mon, 11 Jul 2022, 13:08 Marc Culler, wrote:
> I am not able to build beta5 after running make distclean using my
> standard build script that includes no external libraries. I am seeing
> errors about missing autoconf commands:
>
> make: `configure' is up to date.
>
> < AC_LIB_RPATH
> ---
> > #AC_LIB_PREPARE_PREFIX
> > #AC_LIB_RPATH
> 24930c24930
> < AC_LIB_LINKFLAGS_BODY(iconv)
> ---
> > # AC_LIB_LINKFLAGS_BODY(iconv)
> 24938c24938
> < AC_LIB_APPENDTOVAR(CPPFLAGS, $INCICONV)
> ---
> > # AC_LIB_APPENDTOV
>>
>>> Here are the changes I had to make to get a working configure script:
>>>
>>> 4932c4932
>>> < AC_LIB_RPATH
>>> ---
>>> > #AC_LIB_RPATH
>>> 24924,24925c24924,24925
>>> < AC_LIB_PREPARE_PREFIX
>>> <
that somehow gettext was silently removed from the list of
> bootstrap packages for beta5, which is clearly not a good idea.
>
> - Marc
>
> - Marc
>
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 9:08 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 2:21 PM Marc Culler w
On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 4:06 PM Marc Culler wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 10:01 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>>
>>
>> One way to fix it is to re-create ./configure from ./bootstrap
>
>
> The problem with this is that the bootstrap script in beta5 generates
what does top level config.log say about curl?
why the system one was not good?
On Wed, 13 Jul 2022, 06:18 Thierry Dumont,
wrote:
> A cur(l)ious problem...
>
> As I did not succeed to upgrade from 9.7beta4 to beta5, I restarted from
> scratch, from a fresh clone of the repository.
>
> My OS: Ub
On Wed, 13 Jul 2022, 09:25 Thierry Dumont,
wrote:
>
>
> Le 13/07/2022 à 09:57, Dima Pasechnik a écrit :
> > what does top level config.log say about curl?
> >
> > why the system one was not good?
>
> Note that curl was downloaded (source) and its compilation f
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 9:40 AM Thierry Dumont
wrote:
>
>
>
> Le 13/07/2022 à 10:29, Dima Pasechnik a écrit :
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 13 Jul 2022, 09:25 Thierry Dumont, > <mailto:tdum...@math.univ-lyon1.fr>> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 10:08 AM Thierry Dumont
wrote:
>
>
>
> Le 13/07/2022 à 10:57, Dima Pasechnik a écrit :
> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 9:40 AM Thierry Dumont
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Le 13/07/2022 à 10:29, Dima Pasechnik a éc
it's the -- enable-editable option which is now the default.
One advantage is that after changing a .py file, one does not need ./sage -b
One can turn it off by running ./configure
On Tue, 2 Aug 2022, 18:13 David Coudert, wrote:
> With this new beta, I see that the source code and the compil
On Tue, 2 Aug 2022, 18:17 Matthias Köppe, wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 2, 2022 at 10:13:05 AM UTC-7 david@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> With this new beta, I see that the source code and the compiled code are
>> mixed.
>> For instance
>> sapristi:sage dcoudert$ ll src/sage/graphs/
>> total 76264
>> dr
On Tue, 2 Aug 2022, 18:33 Matthias Köppe, wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 2, 2022 at 10:24:39 AM UTC-7 Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
>>
>> there is a bit of vagueness there:
>> Support for system GCC older than 6.3 dropped ¶
>> <https://trac.sagema
On Mon, Aug 8, 2022 at 10:09 AM David Coudert
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Incremental update fails on sage_numerical_backends_cplex-9.0b12
>
> I tried make distclean && make && sage -i sage_numerical_backends_cplex.
but it fails again :(
try "make" instead of "sage -i"?
>
> The main issue is:
> =
On Wed, Aug 10, 2022 at 4:01 PM Emmanuel Charpentier
wrote:
>
> H... It was simpler (and way much duber) that that : my command used a
> inadvertent paste (mouso) of a comment starting by `use`, mistakenn by
> `./configure` as an option.
> I had to `./bootstrap` anyway, but for another reaso
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 7:59 AM Thierry Dumont
wrote:
>
> When trying to compile 9.7 rc1 on Debian testing (up to date):
>
> -Some packages are installed, but not detected by the make command.
> Example: 4ti2. I mean: 4ti2 is installed, used when building sage, but
> make emits a message (you shoul
201 - 300 of 646 matches
Mail list logo
