On Sat, Oct 24, 2020, 10:13 Henri Girard wrote:
> My sudo -H pip3 install sage got for answer : Requirement already
> satisfied: sage in /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages (9.2b12)
>
For what it's worth, you should almost never `sudo pip install` anything on
Ubuntu, because it can break system packa
On Friday, August 14, 2020 at 1:44:38 PM UTC+2 david@gmail.com wrote:
> Same here on a fresh clone with macOS 10.15.16
>
>
> [dochtml] Building en/constructions.
> [dochtml]
> [dochtml] [construct] building [html]: targets for 16 source files that
> are out of date
> [dochtml] [construct] up
On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 8:41 PM Samuel Lelièvre
wrote:
>
> Le sam. 28 déc. 2019 à 02:12, Samuel Lelièvre:
> >
> > Computer, OS, build choices:
> >
> > - iMac, Mid 2015
> > - macOS 10.14.6 Mojave
> > - build for Python 2
> > - build Sage's `gcc` and `openssl` packages
> > - build Sage's Python with
On Sun, Dec 8, 2019 at 10:41 PM Volker Braun wrote:
>
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch.
> Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
>
>
> 87c3057957 (tag: 9.0.beta9, trac/develop) Updated Sa
On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 5:27 AM Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
>
> Surprisingly it did work after a distclean. Strange... Sorry for the noise.
Make sure that if `./configure` was re-run that it kept
`--with-python=2`. There is a bug that if configure gets re-run
needlessly sometimes it doesn't keep the
On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 12:11 PM E. Madison Bray wrote:
>
> Can I please get a review on https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28258 ?
>
> This issue has been holding me up for weeks, making testing difficult.
Thanks Volker (who reviewed). With that ticket, plus
https://trac.sagemath.org/
On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 6:50 AM John H Palmieri wrote:
>
> Broken with a Python 2 build. Do we care?
>
> In particular, SageNB is not built with Python 2, but the doctester thinks it
> should be:
We do care: Support for Python 2 is not being dropped yet. Please
open a blocker ticket.
> ./sage -
Can I please get a review on https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28258 ?
This issue has been holding me up for weeks, making testing difficult.
On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 12:15 AM Volker Braun wrote:
>
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch.
> Alternatively, the
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 2:55 PM E. Madison Bray wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 3:51 PM Sébastien Labbé wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > The first try at running make gives me this:
> >
> >
> > [sagelib-9.0.beta6] make[4] : on entre
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 3:51 PM Sébastien Labbé wrote:
>
>
>
>
> The first try at running make gives me this:
>
>
> [sagelib-9.0.beta6] make[4] : on entre dans le répertoire «
> /home/slabbe/GitBox/sage/src »
> [sagelib-9.0.beta6] cd . && export\
> [sagelib-9.0
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019 at 9:31 PM darwin doppelganger wrote:
>
> I did a "make distclean" followed by "make" on my Mac OSX 10.14.6, Xcode
> 11.2.1 and the build completed successfully:
It's not even necessary to do a full `make distclean`. Instead you
have to manually reconfigure your build to us
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 6:23 PM E. Madison Bray wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 6:15 PM E. Madison Bray wrote:
> >
> > Testing this on Windows + Python 3 for the first time in a while.
> > During the docbuild it crashes while generating one of the plots, with
> >
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 6:15 PM E. Madison Bray wrote:
>
> Testing this on Windows + Python 3 for the first time in a while.
> During the docbuild it crashes while generating one of the plots, with
> some call to maxima resulting in:
>
> RuntimeError: ECL says: #
>
> I
Testing this on Windows + Python 3 for the first time in a while.
During the docbuild it crashes while generating one of the plots, with
some call to maxima resulting in:
RuntimeError: ECL says: #
I'll see if I can get this in any other context. Has anyone else seen
problems like this on Python
On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 6:00 PM E. Madison Bray wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 5:57 PM E. Madison Bray wrote:
> >
> > When building from scratch on Cygwin I am getting some errors related
> > to OMP-related symbols being missing when linking a Sage module th
On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 5:57 PM E. Madison Bray wrote:
>
> When building from scratch on Cygwin I am getting some errors related
> to OMP-related symbols being missing when linking a Sage module that
> uses fflas-ffpack; specifically sage.libs.linbox_flint_interface:
>
> [sageli
When building from scratch on Cygwin I am getting some errors related
to OMP-related symbols being missing when linking a Sage module that
uses fflas-ffpack; specifically sage.libs.linbox_flint_interface:
[sagelib-8.9] g++ -shared -Wl,--enable-auto-image-base
-L/opt/sagemath-8.9/local/lib -Wl,-rpa
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 11:36 AM E. Madison Bray wrote:
>
> Consistently getting a test failure on Cygwin related to some oddity in GAP:
>
> sage -t --long --warn-long 109.3 src/sage/tests/cmdline.py
> **
> Fi
Consistently getting a test failure on Cygwin related to some oddity in GAP:
sage -t --long --warn-long 109.3 src/sage/tests/cmdline.py
**
File "src/sage/tests/cmdline.py", line 535, in
sage.tests.cmdline.test_executable
Failed ex
Although it might be a little late, at this point, if we want to make
sure it's well-enough tested, I think we should try to include the
following in 8.9 final:
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28356
As discussed when the first version of this code was added, it's
actually reasonably robust and m
IMO we should go forward with 8.9 for now and make the next version 9.0. By
then Python 3 support will be even more solid.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019, 16:54 Frédéric Chapoton wrote:
> The second file should have been fixed by
> https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/28312
>
> but it was probably not tested
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 6:58 PM Markus Wageringel
wrote:
>
> This also happened to me a few weeks ago. The underlying problem seems to be
> that the uninstall script fails because it tries to call sage-dist-helpers,
> but cannot find it. This file has recently been moved from src/bin to
> build
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 2:22 PM kcrisman wrote:
>
>
>> That's expected. The package build directory is under SAGE_LOCAL
>> ($SAGE_LOCAL/var/tmp/sage/build/gap-4.10.0.p0) but the file's
>> destination path ($SAGE_LOCAL) is appended to this. This is how it's
>> supposed to work (DESTDIR installati
On Thu, Mar 7, 2019 at 5:50 PM kcrisman wrote:
>
> upgrading from some early 8.6 beta, I get something weird with file
> permissions on gap. Everything seems to go well, but:
>
>
>
> pkg/laguna-3.9.0 ->
> /Users/.../sage/local/var/tmp/sage/build/gap-4.10.0.p0/inst/Users/.../sage/local/share/gap
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 2:45 PM Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
>
> Le vendredi 2 août 2019 18:07:16 UTC+2, John H Palmieri a écrit :
>>
>>
>>
>> On Friday, August 2, 2019 at 3:31:07 AM UTC-7, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Le vendredi 2 août 2019 01:00:29 UTC+2, John H Palmieri a écrit :
>>>
This ticket has also been languishing for no particular reason:
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/27724
It was previously looked upon favorably: It is a patch to GAP that has
already been accepted upstream by the GAP developers. For a time it
was only held up for me to update the patch to the exac
un 14, 2019, 13:30 Volker Braun wrote:
> I reviewed the ticket but rather not merge it at the last minute. Imho its
> quite possible that it breaks something on lesser-used platforms so we
> should merge it at the beginning of a release cycle, not the end.
>
>
> On Friday, Jun
ign-off by someone. I marked the issue as "critical" and not
"blocker" only because I can technically work around it, but shouldn't have
to.
Unless there's a serious reason to rush this release please resolve this
issue first.
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019, 10:59 E. Madis
Could somebody please review the following ticket:
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/27721
It has been stalled for weeks now for no good reason other than, I presume,
lack of availability for someone to review it.
I would really like this ticket to be resolved and merged before making an
8.8 relea
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 3:14 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 2:03 PM E. Madison Bray wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 2:46 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 1:05 PM E. Madison Bray
> > > wrote:
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 2:46 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 1:05 PM E. Madison Bray wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 11:45 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 7:52 AM E. Madison Bray
> > > wrote:
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 11:45 AM Dima Pasechnik wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 7:52 AM E. Madison Bray wrote:
> >
> > I don't know why the rush to call this a release candidate when there are
> > clearly still several outstanding problems to be resolved
I don't know why the rush to call this a release candidate when there are
clearly still several outstanding problems to be resolved before the next
release.
As usual absolutely zero communication of a plan or coordination with the
community.
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019, 02:28 Kwankyu Lee wrote:
>
>
>
The tests should make sure nothing in ~/.gap is ever loaded if at all
possible (e.g. update the GAP interfaces to add an option to disable use of
~/.gap` when running the tests, for example)
On Sat, May 25, 2019, 03:22 François Bissey wrote:
> We’ll want some kind of follow up. The test will fai
On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 3:40 PM Volker Braun wrote:
>
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch.
> Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
>
> baff1c42dd (tag: 8.8.beta5) Updated SageMath version t
Could someone have a look at, and maybe give positive-review to
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/27385. It would be lovely if we
could get this fix in 8.7, and the patch I added only affects Cygwin.
Bernard Parisse has said he will fix the issue upstream but I haven't
followed through yet on wheth
Thank Volker,
On my Ubuntu machine,
$ cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=14.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=trusty
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 14.04.5 LTS"
I got one seemingly random failure I haven't seen before:
sage -t --long
src/sage/tests/books/computational-mathematics-with-sagem
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 10:01 AM Volker Braun wrote:
>
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch.
> Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
>
$ cat /etc/lsb-release
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEA
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 12:08 PM Emmanuel Charpentier
wrote:
>
> On Debian testing running on core i7 + 16 GB RAM, ptestlong gets one
> transient failure :
>
> --
> sage -t --long --warn-long 146.8 src/sage/rings/number_field/num
w.
Of course, that could indicate a bug in the build system, but I'm not
sure now how I would reproduce the situation. This arose in part
because I was playing around with
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/27267
> Le 25/02/2019 à 15:39, E. Madison Bray a écrit :
> > On Mon, Feb 25, 20
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 3:36 PM E. Madison Bray wrote:
>
> On Ubuntu 14.04 I am getting a strange error when trying to build the
> docs. Tried `make doc-clean` to no avail:
Also, when I try running the tests for
sage.categories.finite_coxeter_groups I get the same failure at:
sage -t
On Ubuntu 14.04 I am getting a strange error when trying to build the
docs. Tried `make doc-clean` to no avail:
[dochtml] [categorie]
/home/embray/src/sagemath/sage/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sage/categories/finite_coxeter_groups.py:docstring
of
sage.categories.finite_coxeter_groups.Finit
I am getting some mysterious new segfaults with this on Cygwin.
On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 8:27 PM Volker Braun wrote:
>
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch.
> Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest
On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 1:18 AM Volker Braun wrote:
>
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch.
> Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
I am getting a hang / possible error during doc building
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 9:40 AM wrote:
>
> I have the same issue with libffi !
I will look into that ASAP. It's a similar / related problem to
https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/26996 but affecting libffi. The
install target for libffi might even depend on your compiler's
settings, which might ex
ou can just openly disagree, though I believe my suggestion
is one that requires the least work for everyone involved (since it's
merely a question of what arguments to pass to perform the tests).
> On Monday, January 14, 2019 at 11:45:20 AM UTC+1, E. Madison Bray wrote:
>>
>&
On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 9:56 PM Volker Braun wrote:
>
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch.
> Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
>
> The final 8.6 should follow real soon, so please give
On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 9:56 PM Volker Braun wrote:
>
> As always, you can get the latest beta version from the "develop" git branch.
> Alternatively, the self-contained source tarball is at
> http://www.sagemath.org/download-latest.html
>
> The final 8.6 should follow real soon, so please give
On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 5:18 PM Volker Braun wrote:
>
> Frederic, if can you make #26740 work then I'll merge it (no matter what Eric
> says ;-)
As I last pointed out on that ticket it doesn't even require any code
changes. In fact I'd argue it doesn't even require a Makefile target,
as the rel
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 5:37 AM Steven Trogdon wrote:
>
> On my Gentoo changing the ownership was not sufficient. After changing the
> ownership I had to
>
> git reset --hard HEAD
>
> which revealed that
>
> Updating f894105d0d..b36eca1990
> error: The following untracked working tree files would
50 matches
Mail list logo