Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.rc4 released

While I agree that the Cygwin/Windows port is somewhat neglected in this current release cycle, how about a Cygwin patchbot/buildbot? I see https://patchbot.sagemath.org/?machine=CYGWIN_NT-10.0=2017-04-01%2020:47=x86_64=2.8.0(0.309/5/3)=windows-10-prof=needs_review but is it alive and

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.rc4 released

On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 6:16 PM, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: > > > Le mardi 5 décembre 2017 18:03:19 UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : >> >> The skylake wait was due to a bunch of active Sage users and devs needing >> it and asking for it. >> >> Perhaps we should aim

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.rc4 released

Le mardi 5 décembre 2017 18:03:19 UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik a écrit : > > The skylake wait was due to a bunch of active Sage users and devs needing > it and asking for it. > > Perhaps we should aim at 8.1.1 with Cygwin fix? > The attention to Cygwin is indeed justified by the hope of getting

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.rc4 released

On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 6:05 PM, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: > > > Le mardi 5 décembre 2017 10:52:14 UTC+1, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit : >> >> On 2017-12-04 19:18, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: >> > I already reported >> >

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.rc4 released

Le mardi 5 décembre 2017 10:52:14 UTC+1, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit : > > On 2017-12-04 19:18, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: > > I already reported > > > > (twice > >

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.rc4 released

On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 10:52 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2017-12-04 19:18, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: >> >> I already reported >> >> (twice >>

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.rc4 released

On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 10:52 AM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2017-12-04 19:18, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: >> >> I already reported >> >> (twice >>

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.rc4 released

On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 10:49 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote: > On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 08:04:50AM -0800, Volker Braun wrote: >> Unfortunately, Eric's happiness will have to wait for 8.2.beta like >> all the other tickets ;-) > > It's not so much about Erik's happiness than

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.rc4 released

On 2017-12-04 19:18, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: I already reported (twice !) that 8.1.rc(whatever) won't build without Trac#24121 If you find that

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.rc4 released

Hi, let me try to make everyone happy by pointing some obvious points: - realeasing and binary building are different concepts, not to be confused: - "release often" is about source code development - there is a cost in delaying the release: the longer time Sage source code stays in a

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.rc4 released

Le lundi 4 décembre 2017 15:16:39 UTC+1, Jeroen Demeyer a écrit : > > On 2017-12-04 14:35, Erik Bray wrote: > > I don't see why. What's the harm in merging a couple working branches? > > The first rc version of Sage 8.1 is now almost 1 month ago. We don't > want to delay the release of 8.1

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.rc4 released

On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 3:16 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: > On 2017-12-04 14:35, Erik Bray wrote: >> >> I don't see why. What's the harm in merging a couple working branches? > > > The first rc version of Sage 8.1 is now almost 1 month ago. We don't want to > delay the

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.rc4 released

On 2017-12-04 14:35, Erik Bray wrote: I don't see why. What's the harm in merging a couple working branches? The first rc version of Sage 8.1 is now almost 1 month ago. We don't want to delay the release of 8.1 forever. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.rc4 released

On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 5:04 PM, Volker Braun wrote: > On Saturday, December 2, 2017 at 1:54:02 PM UTC+1, tsc...@ucdavis.edu wrote: >> >> What about https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/24297? I don't know if this >> problem materializes on other platforms, but I know Erik will

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.rc4 released

We time it by actually connecting, not sending an ICMP packet for the record. So if you have a not-so-transparent proxy in front of you then its quite possible that the timings differ. On Sunday, December 3, 2017 at 4:17:29 PM UTC+1, Ralf Stephan wrote: > > What could be the reason that for

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.rc4 released

In Oxford, a.t.m. the ping to the usual UK Sage mirror in 5ms from the university network; faster than usual. On Sunday, December 3, 2017 at 5:05:05 PM UTC, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote: > > > Le dimanche 3 décembre 2017 16:17:29 UTC+1, Ralf Stephan a écrit : >> >> What could be the reason that for me

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.rc4 released

Le dimanche 3 décembre 2017 16:17:29 UTC+1, Ralf Stephan a écrit : > > What could be the reason that for me the mirror search shows >5s ping for > many mirrors, also for switch.ch which is always 20ms from here (and a > manual ping confirms this)? > > Maybe it's some issue with your internet

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.rc4 released

What could be the reason that for me the mirror search shows >5s ping for many mirrors, also for switch.ch which is always 20ms from here (and a manual ping confirms this)? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group. To unsubscribe from

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.rc4 released

With Ubuntu 16.04 x86_64 running on Intel Core i7-6700HQ + 16 GB RAM, from a fresh git clone + pull develop, parallel (-j8) build OK and make ptestlong successful ("All tests passed!"). Eric. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group.

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.rc4 released

Builds on a macbook pro with a *skylake* chip running 10.12.6. All tests pass, although there were 22 warnings for slow tests (can post details if wanted). Thanks Dima, Jeroen and everyone else who contributed to #24085. Andrew On Saturday, 2 December 2017 12:23:02 UTC+1, Volker Braun wrote:

[sage-release] Re: Sage 8.1.rc4 released

What about https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/24297? I don't know if this problem materializes on other platforms, but I know Erik will be happy with all tests passing on Cygwin. ;) Best, Travis PS - I saw that https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/24085 was not closed. On Saturday, December 2,