[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta5 released

2021-11-30 Thread 'axio...@yahoo.de' via sage-release
fixes for the fricas and findstat failures (fff) are now available on https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32886 and https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32694, in need of (very easy) review. On Thursday, 4 November 2021 at 15:54:10 UTC+1 Sébastien Labbé wrote: > On Ubuntu 18.04 with few optional and

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta5 released

2021-11-05 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
FWIW, on another machine running Debian testing on core i5 + 8 GB RAM, *upgrading* from 9.5.beta2 to 9.5.beta5 succeeded, but ptestlong left 6 permanent failures, all of which being numerical noise or cosmetic booboos : Test Result P/T Comment src/sage/functions/other.py 1 doctest failed P

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta5 released

2021-11-04 Thread Sébastien Labbé
> In the second case it looks to me as if it is only that the list has > the same matrices in a different order. > The ordering failure in src/sage/dynamics/arithmetic_dynamics/projective_ds.py is dealt here: https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/32817 (currently needs review) -- You received

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta5 released

2021-11-04 Thread Dima Pasechnik
failed test in src/sage/tests/cmdline.py indicates you need squlite binary installed, not only library. this is an old bug in squlite spkg-configure, I thought it was fixed. On Thu, 4 Nov 2021, 15:02 John Cremona, wrote: > I upgraded from a previous beta and there were no problems with

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta5 released

2021-11-04 Thread John Cremona
I upgraded from a previous beta and there were no problems with make, just two failures with make ptestlong: sage -t --long --warn-long 133.0 --random-seed=133126240855796926255098246501347092842 src/sage/tests/cmdline.py # 3 doctests failed sage -t --long --warn-long 133.0

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta5 released

2021-11-04 Thread Sébastien Labbé
On Ubuntu 18.04 with few optional and external packages, I get: Using

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta5 released

2021-11-03 Thread William Stein
On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 9:30 AM Matthias Köppe wrote: > On Tuesday, November 2, 2021 at 10:13:14 PM UTC-7 William Stein wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 9:00 PM Matthias Köppe >> wrote: >> >>> It's really just the command "tox -e >>> docker-ubuntu-groovy-standard-arm64v8" - try it >> >> >>

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta5 released

2021-11-03 Thread Matthias Köppe
On Tuesday, November 2, 2021 at 10:13:14 PM UTC-7 William Stein wrote: > On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 9:00 PM Matthias Köppe > wrote: > >> It's really just the command "tox -e >> docker-ubuntu-groovy-standard-arm64v8" - try it > > > Thanks. Some more details I figured out in a few moments, in case

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta5 released

2021-11-03 Thread Jaap Spies
Hi William, I'm using a Raspberry Pi 8GB with Raspberry OS 64 bit: [dochtml] [thematic_] dumping search index in English (code: en)... done [dochtml] [thematic_] The HTML pages are in local/share/doc/sage/html/en/thematic_tutorials. [dochtml] Build finished. The built documents can be found in

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta5 released

2021-11-02 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 9:00 PM Matthias Köppe wrote: > It's really just the command "tox -e > docker-ubuntu-groovy-standard-arm64v8" - try it Thanks. Some more details I figured out in a few moments, in case anybody else is interested: 1. What is tox? Answer: it is a Python package you can

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta5 released

2021-11-02 Thread Matthias Köppe
It's really just the command "tox -e docker-ubuntu-groovy-standard-arm64v8" - try it On Tuesday, November 2, 2021 at 8:37:54 PM UTC-7 William Stein wrote: > What did you do exactly? For example did you install tachyon systemwide? > > > Thanks! > > On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 8:02 PM Matthias

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta5 released

2021-11-02 Thread William Stein
What did you do exactly? For example did you install tachyon systemwide? Thanks! On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 8:02 PM Matthias Köppe wrote: > I just built for this architecture successfully using "tox -e > docker-ubuntu-groovy-standard-arm64v8" (on my Intel MBP). That's slightly > newer than

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta5 released

2021-11-02 Thread Matthias Köppe
I just built for this architecture successfully using "tox -e docker-ubuntu-groovy-standard-arm64v8" (on my Intel MBP). That's slightly newer than ubuntu-focal (20.04) sage -t --random-seed=0 src/sage/algebras/quatalg/quaternion_algebra_cython.pyx [10 tests, 0.17 s]

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta5 released

2021-11-02 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 6:03 PM William Stein wrote: > I just want to add that I don't trust Docker desktop on M1 yet, and it > could easily be responsible for these problems. > E.g., I've found that often wget sometimes segfaults in this exact > container, and that has nothing to do with Sage. >

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta5 released

2021-11-02 Thread William Stein
I just want to add that I don't trust Docker desktop on M1 yet, and it could easily be responsible for these problems. E.g., I've found that often wget sometimes segfaults in this exact container, and that has nothing to do with Sage. Does anybody do test builds of Sage on other aarch64 linux

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta5 released

2021-11-02 Thread William Stein
Here's how "make test" ended: sage -t --random-seed=225297532770316936918573996029610176361 src/sage/groups/class_function.py # Timed out sage -t --random-seed=225297532770316936918573996029610176361 src/sage/groups/perm_gps/symgp_conjugacy_class.py # Timed out sage -t

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta5 released

2021-11-02 Thread William Stein
On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 10:21 AM Matthias Köppe wrote: > On Tuesday, November 2, 2021 at 9:13:25 AM UTC-7 William Stein wrote: > >> This is a quick update about building the 9.5.beta5 version of Sage on an >> M1 Mac under Docker aarch64 Linux. >> >> > A quick remark: Sage developers who want to

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta5 released

2021-11-02 Thread Matthias Köppe
On Tuesday, November 2, 2021 at 9:13:25 AM UTC-7 William Stein wrote: > This is a quick update about building the 9.5.beta5 version of Sage on an > M1 Mac under Docker aarch64 Linux. > > A quick remark: Sage developers who want to help on this issue do not need this specific hardware. Using

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta5 released

2021-11-02 Thread William Stein
This is a quick update about building the 9.5.beta5 version of Sage on an M1 Mac under Docker aarch64 Linux. After installing Tachyon system wide, the build completes. This Cython module won't import due to an issue with libgomp, which is evidently some openMP parallel computing library,

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta5 released

2021-11-01 Thread William Stein
On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 4:35 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 11:28 PM William Stein wrote: > >> Great idea. Thanks Dima! >> >> On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 3:37 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 10:18 PM William Stein wrote: >>> I tried to

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta5 released

2021-11-01 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 11:28 PM William Stein wrote: > Great idea. Thanks Dima! > > On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 3:37 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 10:18 PM William Stein wrote: >> >>> I tried to build sage-9.5.beta5 on a very clean Linux Ubuntu:20.04 image >>> with

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta5 released

2021-11-01 Thread William Stein
Great idea. Thanks Dima! On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 3:37 PM Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 10:18 PM William Stein wrote: > >> I tried to build sage-9.5.beta5 on a very clean Linux Ubuntu:20.04 image >> with standard dev packages (in Docker) but on an ARM aarch64 architecture >>

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta5 released

2021-11-01 Thread Dima Pasechnik
On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 10:18 PM William Stein wrote: > I tried to build sage-9.5.beta5 on a very clean Linux Ubuntu:20.04 image > with standard dev packages (in Docker) but on an ARM aarch64 architecture > instead of Intel. It fails with Tachyon simply saying "Error: Sorry, your > platform

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta5 released

2021-11-01 Thread Isuru Fernando
Hi William, tachyon and sage work just fine on conda where we have an aarch64 build. We use the `linux-64-thr` option for aarch64. See https://github.com/sagemath/sage/blob/a89f81d7783df2d4e4a187bf209e94d128301f83/build/pkgs/tachyon/spkg-install.in#L19-L36 Isuru On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 5:18 PM

Re: [sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta5 released

2021-11-01 Thread William Stein
I tried to build sage-9.5.beta5 on a very clean Linux Ubuntu:20.04 image with standard dev packages (in Docker) but on an ARM aarch64 architecture instead of Intel. It fails with Tachyon simply saying "Error: Sorry, your platform isn't supported by Tachyon and/or Sage. Exiting...". I don't know

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta5 released

2021-10-30 Thread Samuel Lelievre
2021-10-30 18:34:21 UTC, Emmanuel Charpentier: > > After rebuilding and reinstalling the same (really) > optional packages, `ptestlong` gets exactly one > (reproducible) failure, i. e. the one reported by > Samuel Lelièvre. > > I am at loss as to why I needed to rebuild 9.5 > from sratch instead

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta5 released

2021-10-30 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
After rebuilding and reinstalling the same (really) optional packages, `ptestlong` gets exactly one (reproducible) failure, i. e. the one reported by Samuel Lelièvre. I am at loss as to why I needed to rebuild 9.5 from sratch instead of upgrading from 9.3. Ideas ? HTH, Le samedi 30 octobre

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta5 released

2021-10-30 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
Aaaarghhh : cypari2 is installed by Sage itself : after (some operations amounting to removing Python packages, then) make distclean && make : charpent@zen-book-flip:/usr/local/sage-9$ sage -optional | grep -v ot_instal

[sage-release] Re: Sage 9.5.beta5 released

2021-10-30 Thread Emmanuel Charpentier
I tried to upgrade 9.5.beta3 to 9.5.beta5 ith the following packages installed : cmdstanpy...? (0.9.77) cypari2.? (2.1.2) dot2tex.2.11.3.p0 (2.11.3.p0) fricas..1.3.7.p1