[sage-support] Re: Successful plots (without notebook) on Windows?

2024-04-02 Thread kcrisman
On Monday, April 1, 2024 at 3:31:44 PM UTC-4 Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: I just had to install Sage on a Windows machine (long story…) which has to be connected to a corporate VPN, whose an annoying side effect is to deprive Linux apps of network connectivity (don’t get me started…).

Re: [sage-support] bug in plot?

2024-03-16 Thread kcrisman
I'd think that matplotlib's defaults are defaults for a good reason. Agreed, but not a good *mathematical* reason. It is a good *data analysis* reason (appropriate for mpl), which is not the same thing. I can't think of a single mathematics textbook, talk, or other purely mathematical

Re: [sage-support] bug in plot?

2024-03-15 Thread kcrisman
it's not a bug, it's a feature. :-) https://discourse.matplotlib.org/t/default-format-of-axis-offset-label/23162/2 Correct. import matplotlib as mpl mpl.rcParams['axes.formatter.useoffset'] = False plot((x^2+0.0001)/(x^2+0.000101), (x,-0.1,0.1)) produces the normal labelling of y-axes,

Re: [sage-support] bug in plot?

2024-03-14 Thread kcrisman
On Thursday, March 14, 2024 at 10:35:50 AM UTC-4 dim...@gmail.com wrote: It might help seeing your graphs here, too. Try this:

[sage-support] Successful plots (without notebook) on Windows?

2024-03-04 Thread kcrisman
Has anyone successfully used the instructions at https://wiki.sagemath.org/SageWindows lately for plots? I'm reviewing https://github.com/sagemath/sage/pull/37184 and it would be nice to have that information actually in the installation guide, but for some reason it didn't work for me.

[sage-support] Re: init.sage not running anymore

2024-03-04 Thread kcrisman
Hello, Since I upgraded my SageMath to version 10.3.beta8, the init.sage script located at ~/.sage/init.sage stopped running when I start sage. I also get the following message right after the SageMath banner:

Re: [sage-support] Re: limitations of "solve"?

2023-11-29 Thread kcrisman
I wouldn't mind seeing those discussions if you have a link to send (perhaps only to me). A relatively recent one (mentioning Eric's workaround) is https://groups.google.com/g/sage-devel/c/h50LZVLVQI4/m/AieyOKHVAQAJ (Note that there were at times separate problems with the

[sage-support] Re: limitations of "solve"?

2023-11-28 Thread kcrisman
Answering part of my question: it seems that sympy and maxima have different attitudes towards fractional powers of negative numbers, which may be the source of the problem. Yes. Maxima's attitude is that the square root of negative one is an expression which might have multiple values,

Re: [sage-support] Cannot factor 71281426948143699070565 with ecm.factor()

2023-01-30 Thread kcrisman
Is there any notion that the default should be changed, or is that pretty unique to this example? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

[sage-support] Re: gridlines in 3d ?

2023-01-17 Thread kcrisman
Nice ! Would you consider a ticket adding this to Sage ? +1 to that! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

[sage-support] Automata question from CoCalc Discord

2022-12-06 Thread kcrisman
Cocalc has moved from Discord for questions, but someone has a lot of automata questions. I'm copying one here and will let them know it is here. +++ When using sagemaths automaton module, I'm encountering some weird behavior: stateTransitions = [ ('q0', 'q1', '0'), ('q1', 'q1', '1'),

[sage-support] Re: Sagecell : is it possible to install the Wolfram engine ?

2022-11-19 Thread kcrisman
Though see this: https://www.wolfram.com/engine/faq/#can-i-use-the-free-engine-in-an-open-source-project On Saturday, November 19, 2022 at 2:24:15 PM UTC-5 kcrisman wrote: > The same could also apply to Cocalc ... except that Cocalc is also a >> commercial product, therefore excl

[sage-support] Re: Sagecell : is it possible to install the Wolfram engine ?

2022-11-19 Thread kcrisman
> The same could also apply to Cocalc ... except that Cocalc is also a > commercial product, therefore excluded from Wolfram terms for the *gratis* > Wolfram engine... > Technically if someone ran a Cocalc instance (say, from a Docker image) that was not commercial, maybe that would be okay?

Re: [sage-support] New edition of undergraduate book?

2022-09-29 Thread kcrisman
> > Hello, > > Is this https://bookstore.ams.org/mbk-143/ ? > > Yes! It was finally officially released, I believe. > > Hello! > > > > Some news about the new edition of "Sage for Undergraduates"? I think it > was announced for august. > > > > Thanks! > > > -- You received this

[sage-support] Re: Pause and Play button in interactive sage demos

2022-08-22 Thread kcrisman
This is a great question, but I don't think it's currently supported. However, there appears to be a Jupyter widget which supports this: https://ipywidgets.readthedocs.io/en/stable/examples/Widget%20List.html#Play-(Animation)-widget so in principle we could add that to the Jupyter

[sage-support] Re: plotting tangent vectors to a curve

2022-04-14 Thread kcrisman
On Thursday, April 14, 2022 at 9:54:16 AM UTC-4 egourg...@gmail.com wrote: > Le mercredi 13 avril 2022 à 19:18:48 UTC+2, kcrisman a écrit : > >> Eric, if I opened a ticket, would you be willing to add a couple examples >> of this to the plot documentation? > > > Ye

[sage-support] Re: plotting tangent vectors to a curve

2022-04-13 Thread kcrisman
Eric, if I opened a ticket, would you be willing to add a couple examples of this to the plot documentation? I wasn't aware of this but it would be a great addition. (Is there a 3d version as well for space curves?) On Wednesday, April 13, 2022 at 9:12:43 AM UTC-4 egourg...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [sage-support] Re: Interact broken. SageMath 9.5 on Apple Mac OSX 12.1 . SageMath-9.5_x86_64

2022-03-31 Thread kcrisman
On Wednesday, March 30, 2022 at 2:48:15 PM UTC-4 Marc Culler wrote: > This issue is resolved in the current release of the SageMath 9.5 macOS > app. > > - Marc > >> >> Awesome. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe

Re: [sage-support] Re: Interact broken. SageMath 9.5 on Apple Mac OSX 12.1 . SageMath-9.5_x86_64

2022-03-30 Thread kcrisman
Just to follow up, did this issue get resolved satisfactorily in the 9.6 release cycle? The last emails leave this unclear. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send

[sage-support] Re: Interact broken. SageMath 9.5 on Apple Mac OSX 12.1 . SageMath-9.5_x86_64

2022-01-29 Thread kcrisman
Just for data points, which browsers did you try on this? Thanks for reporting. On Friday, January 28, 2022 at 1:02:57 PM UTC-5 alan_thoma...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: > Interact just calls the function but no Interact widgets appear. > > Example attached. It works at Cocalc. > -- You received

Re: [sage-support] Re: polyhedra with strict inequalities and Ehrhart

2021-07-09 Thread kcrisman
Thanks for these ideas; I'm not sure which one I will pursue but this gives a number of options. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: [sage-support] Re: polyhedra with strict inequalities and Ehrhart

2021-07-08 Thread kcrisman
> I presume you can enumerate vertices and facets, > Unsure on how easy it will be to do this for my use case. > or remove redundant inequalities in a more direct way. > On a case-by-case basis, in principle, yes, this is the approach taken in the particular literature I'm looking at.

[sage-support] Re: polyhedra with strict inequalities and Ehrhart

2021-07-07 Thread kcrisman
> Normaliz already supports half-open polyhedra, see section 3.12 ("open > facets") in the Normaliz manual > see https://github.com/Normaliz/Normaliz/blob/master/doc/Normaliz.pdf > Thank you! But, based on the tickets I've just been cc:ed on, probably there is no current easy Sage interface

[sage-support] polyhedra with strict inequalities and Ehrhart

2021-07-07 Thread kcrisman
Thanks to the MUCH easier install now of things like pynormaliz and latte (thanks to all who worked on those!), I can now do the following and related computations nicely. sage: n=1 sage: P =

Re: [sage-support] problems again installing Sage9.1 (and 9.2)

2021-03-18 Thread kcrisman
> 1. The version at: > > https://github.com/3-manifolds/Sage_macOS/releases/tag/v1.0-beta > >> >> > This would be great news - thanks to anyone who is working on this! -- You received this message because you are

Re: [sage-support] Apple M1 Chip

2020-12-16 Thread kcrisman
On Wednesday, December 16, 2020 at 10:46:47 AM UTC-5 dim...@gmail.com wrote: > On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 3:19 PM Thomas Judson wrote: > > > > I have a new MacBook Air with an Apple M1 chip. Does the Intel version > of Sage 9.2 work on this machine? > > 9.2 is not known to work on macOS 11

[sage-support] Re: packages

2020-11-12 Thread kcrisman
> > Why ? > > Because there ain’t no bloody option “simpy” in solve. There is an option > “algorithm”, that accepts the “sympy” value… > It would be very helpful for us to see what code you tried that does work in Sage command line that doesn't in Sage cell. As Emmanuel indicates, most

[sage-support] Re: Plot implicit polar equations

2020-10-23 Thread kcrisman
This isn't a trivial change, so I've opened https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/30817 to track this request - thanks for the idea! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,

[sage-support] Re: Plot implicit polar equations

2020-10-22 Thread kcrisman
> How can we plot implicit polar equations like r^2=5-4cos(theta) in > SageMath? > Hmm, that is a good question. We certainly support implicit plotting and polar plotting, but it doesn't seem that we do together. The way that polar plotting is supported is basically that the data is

[sage-support] Re: Sage cells

2020-09-25 Thread kcrisman
I would be pleased to have more information on sagemath cells. I do not > know to whom ask the question. > > There are two great places: * The sage-cell Google group https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/sage-cell * The Sage cell info page: https://sagecell.sagemath.org/static/about.html

Re: [sage-support] Re: solve and numerical answers

2020-09-16 Thread kcrisman
On Tuesday, September 15, 2020 at 3:20:13 PM UTC-4 Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: > sage: L[1].n() > > fails because L1 is an equation, i. e a symbolic expression whose operator > is the built-in “eq”, which has no n() method. > > However, > > sage: PP=-625/1000*t^4 + 2355/100*t^3 -

[sage-support] Re: solve and numerical answers

2020-09-15 Thread kcrisman
> I still don't know my way around the Sage documentation... Sorry for the > elementary question. > > Yeah, we are sorry that it never has gotten more organized (though it is actually quite thorough!). You may want to try the French (now in English) Sage book, or Greg Bard's AMS (but free

[sage-support] Re: Sage cells

2020-09-10 Thread kcrisman
I'd expect that with a cunning use of CSS style sheets, you can pretty much > change any aspect of the formatting. It would require that you embed > sagecell instances in your own webpage, but that is an easy and > well-documented procedure. > > Yes. You can also ask on the sage-cell Google

[sage-support] Re: macOS downloads: "py2" variants?

2020-09-02 Thread kcrisman
On Wednesday, September 2, 2020 at 1:04:09 PM UTC-4 br...@brianm.org wrote: > The macOS downloads for Sage version 9.1 include variants with and without > "py2" in the name. The installation instructions and the macOS readme in > the top level directory don't indicate what this is for. The

[sage-support] Re: You've been approved for GitHub Sponsors

2020-08-28 Thread kcrisman
That is very interesting news! Nice work. "We plan to use sponsorship income to cover infrastructure costs, and to hire software engineers for specific tasks." -> that is good. Any other details? I think that the "old" Sage Foundation at UW may be in mothballs at this point, or so I seem

[sage-support] Re: Problems opening Sage binary on MacOS 10.15

2020-08-08 Thread kcrisman
Glad you were able to fix this! See https://github.com/sagemath/website/pull/193 - I'm not sure why this >> has been held up. >> > > I might be misreading things, but Harald still has the "Do not merge" tag > because your patch's href still has no reference: > I fixed that in the second

[sage-support] Re: Problems opening Sage binary on MacOS 10.15

2020-08-07 Thread kcrisman
I recently upgraded to MacOS 10.15. I can get Sage 8.7 to work (more on > that in a moment) but Sage 9.1 doesn't. > > The first problem is the Apple "quarantine". I found the fix to that > (thanks!) but perhaps a note should be added to the download webpage, just > as there's a note about

[sage-support] Re: Nice mess in multiple derivatives...

2020-08-01 Thread kcrisman
Just for information, I believe the derivatives are all handled in Pynac. It's possible that does not have the capability of a symbolic number of derivatives. It would be worth tracing through to see why 0 is the answer. Perhaps it (Sage) interprets the syntax as being with respect to the

[sage-support] Re: cancel the content of one variable

2020-07-28 Thread kcrisman
On Monday, July 27, 2020 at 2:36:32 PM UTC-4, Bert Henry wrote: > > I declared some variables with assume > > e. g. > > assume(r, 'real') > assume(k, 'integer') > assume(j >0) > > and so on. > > During my calculation I need (in one step) j=15 > > How can I delete the number 15 for j? I tried it

[sage-support] Re: Did something change to break Sage interactives using sagecell.sagemath.org recently?

2020-07-13 Thread kcrisman
> Thanks for the report, while fixing other issues at > 6612cabb355699638b033567fc1cb1cdf7a7c43a > I've broken "default route", fixed by > https://github.com/sagemath/sagecell/commit/55ad44ca08113b078c77850b65cc20a2ad0767b0 > > and deployed! > Thanks! -- You received this message

[sage-support] Re: Did something change to break Sage interactives using sagecell.sagemath.org recently?

2020-07-11 Thread kcrisman
We've seen some other similar issues with similar errors recently. Please use sage-c...@googlegroups.com https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/sage-cell to report them - I haven't had time, unfortunately. On Saturday, July 11, 2020 at 10:10:02 AM UTC-5, Christian Seberino wrote: > > > I

Re: [sage-support] Sage 9.1 installation for OSX failing: .../giac/doc/el/casinter/Makefile not found

2020-06-24 Thread kcrisman
On Wednesday, June 24, 2020 at 1:48:27 PM UTC-4, Noah White wrote: > > Sorry, > > MacOS version 10.15.5 > dmg file: sage-9.1-OSX_10.11.6-x86_64.dmg > >> >>> You may want to use a version for 10.15, e.g.: http://mirrors.mit.edu/sage/osx/intel/sage-9.1-OSX_10.15.4-x86_64.dmg Let us know if

Re: [sage-support] No reply to my sage-trac-account request

2020-06-23 Thread kcrisman
> I made you an owner of sage-trac-account, so now things should be clearer > for you there? > >> Thanks - yes, although I haven't had a lot of time to help create accounts, this is definitely helpful for when new people can help. -- You received this message because you are subscribed

Re: [sage-support] No reply to my sage-trac-account request

2020-06-22 Thread kcrisman
On a related note, it's not quite clear who has rights on the sage-trac-account Google group to approve new members there (that is, new members who get the emails that David is trying to send). > > this method relies on few voluntor eers, which might be busy, or just gone > AWOL. > Yes, I

Re: [sage-support] I can't open sage-9.1-OSX_10.11.6-x86_64.app on macOS Catalania

2020-05-30 Thread kcrisman
As a side note, you may wish to try the binary for Catalina, 10.15 is in the name. This one is really for people with older Macs. > >> I have downloaded sage-9.1-OSX_10.11.6-x86_64.app.dmg >>

Re: [sage-support] Newbie question on Mac

2020-02-04 Thread kcrisman
Incidentally, Fernando, you should also be able to use binaries created on older versions of Mac, such as the 10.11 binaries, on your 10.13 computers. The app version may also work on those computers (Apple is locking down more and more content so in newer Mac OSes that is proving to be less

[sage-support] Re: sage 9.0: mismatch in sr-to-maxima translation

2020-01-20 Thread kcrisman
ystem. > > Smoking gun: > > sage: type(unit_step(x).operator()) > > sage: type(unit_step(x)._sympy_()._sage_().operator()) > > > Even if this is not the source of the bug you're experiencing this is > something that needs to be fixed: sympy needs to be taught about unit_st

[sage-support] Re: sage 9.0: mismatch in sr-to-maxima translation

2020-01-18 Thread kcrisman
Since it looks like you had a Sage cell instance do this, you should be able to link to the code even, using the "Share" button on Sage cell server. Thanks, that will help our team! On Saturday, January 18, 2020 at 11:55:29 AM UTC-5, Nils Bruin wrote: > > On Saturday, January 18, 2020 at

Re: [sage-support] Re: Failed Sage 9.0 build on Catalina

2020-01-13 Thread kcrisman
On Monday, January 13, 2020 at 11:15:19 AM UTC-5, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > the issue is with "improved" security settings on MacOS 10.15. > I don't have access to 10.15, so I can't give details... > So maybe it's not just the app version that is going to give problems, just prebuilt

Re: [sage-support] "SageMath is damaged and can't be opened" on macOS 10.14

2020-01-11 Thread kcrisman
> > FWIW, I am running the Sage 9.0 app on macOS 10.13.6 (it appears to have > been built for 10.11, according to the name). > That is the one I built. Glad it works there. > I will be trying later versions of the app on 10.13.6, 10.14.6 and (I > think) 10.15.x later today or this

Re: [sage-support] "SageMath is damaged and can't be opened" on macOS 10.14

2020-01-10 Thread kcrisman
See https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sage-devel/nlXP6cv4LAY On Friday, January 10, 2020 at 12:18:50 PM UTC-5, kcrisman wrote: > > > > On Friday, January 10, 2020 at 3:18:17 AM UTC-5, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> >> > >> > I just installed the app version of

Re: [sage-support] SageMath-9.0.app fails to start on macOS 10.14.6

2020-01-10 Thread kcrisman
On Thursday, January 9, 2020 at 4:25:38 PM UTC-5, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 9:18 PM phiparis19 wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > SageMath-9.0.app fails to start on macOS 10.14.6 : > > > > - the > file:///Applications/SageMath-9.0.app/Contents/Resources/loading-page.html

Re: [sage-support] "SageMath is damaged and can't be opened" on macOS 10.14

2020-01-10 Thread kcrisman
On Friday, January 10, 2020 at 3:18:17 AM UTC-5, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 8:01 AM Szabolcs Horvát > wrote: > > > > I just installed the app version of SageMath 9.0 on macOS 10.14. When I > try to launch it, I get "SageMath is damaged and can't be opened." Version >

Re: [sage-support] Re: Sage 8.8 Jupyter notebook 404: Page does not exist error

2019-07-03 Thread kcrisman
Actually I’ve just read more carefully what appeared in the terminal and it > seems that it is missing an extension, I guess I’m going to have to > rebuild? Could this be to do with the fact that I didn’t build the > documentation (because I was missing the Java development tools ?) > > Java

[sage-support] Re: Sage 8.8 Jupyter notebook 404: Page does not exist error

2019-07-02 Thread kcrisman
For what it's worth, my local Sage 8.8.rc2 still seems to correctly throw up the SageNB Export server, and Jupyter seems to work properly. Exactly what URL is giving you the 404? (Though I am not on Mojave.) > I recently compiled sage 8.8 on my Mac (macOS Mojave) and everything seems > to

Re: [sage-support] macOS Catalina

2019-06-22 Thread kcrisman
On Saturday, June 22, 2019 at 5:38:09 PM UTC-4, kcrisman wrote: > > > > On Friday, June 21, 2019 at 1:59:23 PM UTC-4, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> >> I guess we will just kill the app version, it's anyway lacking in several >> ways. >>> >>> >>&g

Re: [sage-support] macOS Catalina

2019-06-22 Thread kcrisman
On Friday, June 21, 2019 at 1:59:23 PM UTC-4, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > I guess we will just kill the app version, it's anyway lacking in several > ways. >> >> >> Wow, that is a real bummer, because there definitely are people using it. How onerous would "Gatekeeper" be? (I assume

[sage-support] Re: @interact

2019-04-27 Thread kcrisman
This does (still) work in Sage cell, and probably in sagenb (?). https://sagecell.sagemath.org/?z=eJxzyMwrSS1KTC7h5UpJTVNI03BUsFXITSwpyqzQiI421DGM1YnWBVGxmppWvFwKQFBQBNSj4aiJzCupLEgFCmkCAJITFfI==sage=eJyLjgUAARUAuQ== -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

[sage-support] Re: How to graph on Sage

2019-04-06 Thread kcrisman
This kind of question translates to "I'm too lazy to search, so do my > homework for me", and deserves a big fat RTFM , > possibly also possibly pointing to a good book > . > That's as may be, but I'll note as a data

Re: [sage-support] Print statement vs function in Sage-py3

2019-04-03 Thread kcrisman
preparser addition that would look for this and say something like "print blah should now be print(blah)" but raise an error. - kcrisman -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this gro

Re: [sage-support] Sage is extremely slow to start on macOS Mojave

2019-03-01 Thread kcrisman
On Friday, March 1, 2019 at 1:30:44 PM UTC-5, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 1:15 PM Szabolcs Horvát > wrote: > > > > I am using the app version of Sage 8.6 on macOS Mojave 10.4.3. It is > extremely slow to start up. It takes multiple minutes. > > > > Running the sage

[sage-support] Re: arrows in 3d field plots

2019-01-28 Thread kcrisman
On Monday, January 28, 2019 at 4:54:49 AM UTC-5, Eric Gourgoulhon wrote: > > Hi, > > You can use the plot functionality of vector fields on Euclidean spaces to > get better arrowheads: > > sage: E. = EuclideanSpace() > sage: v = E.vector_field((x,y,0)) > sage: xy = v.plot(max_range=1,

[sage-support] Re: Having Sage output latex for some computation

2018-11-12 Thread kcrisman
> I'm doing an assignment in Sage atm (through cocalc specifically), and one > thing I am doing is taking the derivative of a function and plugging in x = > 0 and showing that it is equal to 0. Since it is true, sage just outputs 0. > I was hoping, however, that there was some way that sage

[sage-support] Re: Integration bug?

2018-10-02 Thread kcrisman
On Monday, October 1, 2018 at 4:55:14 PM UTC-4, Simon King wrote: > > Hi! > > I get the following with sage-8.4.beta5: > sage: f(x) = cos(pi*x) > sage: (f(x)*exp(-I*pi*x)).integral(x)(x=1/2) - > (f(x)*exp(-I*pi*x)).integral(x)(x=-1/2) > 1/2 > sage:

Re: [sage-support] Sage and Canvas LMS

2018-10-02 Thread kcrisman
> > Any info on this would be appreciated! > > > > For what it is worth, we have not added any LTI integration yet to > https://CoCalc.com, but it is on our roadmap, and we've been thinking > about it recently. > > That is good news. We have tried to integrate WeBWorK locally with our LMS

[sage-support] Re: Will there be a sage-8.2 for Mac OS X 10.12.x?

2018-05-25 Thread kcrisman
On Thursday, May 24, 2018 at 3:43:59 PM UTC-4, bg chen wrote: > > The Sage 8.2 binary for 10.13 was mostly working fine for me with 10.12. > However, I had issues compiling Cython code (perhaps not a surprise), so I > upgraded my system to 10.13. > >> As a postscript, there should be a 10.11

[sage-support] Re: Will there be a sage-8.2 for Mac OS X 10.12.x?

2018-05-11 Thread kcrisman
On Friday, May 11, 2018 at 4:27:17 AM UTC-4, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > > There is no buildbot for OSX 10.12 > Thus, unless someone steps out and builds a binary to be distributed, your > best bet is > to build from source. >> >> Eventually I plan to make one for 10.11, actually, and we have

Re: [sage-support] Re: 500: Internal server error when I access the data files

2018-05-04 Thread kcrisman
> I can't believe there isn't also a similarly easy to use JupyterHub > docker image though, which is surely well maintained. Has anybody > looked? > > That's kind of why I asked. > All that said, I'm pretty optimistic that I (or somebody) will find > time to make a new cocalc Docker

[sage-support] Re: 500: Internal server error when I access the data files

2018-05-03 Thread kcrisman
> The standard solution is Jupyterhub. That's a non-trivial undertaking to > set up, though. The processes for the users run in dedicated docker > containers. sagenb was a lot easier for this, but never properly secure. I > wouldn't dare asking a sysadmin to deploy a sagenb server. Jupyterhub

[sage-support] Re: Anyone ever used sympol from within Sage?

2018-03-26 Thread kcrisman
And on a totally unrelated note, may I say that I want to be able to buy a Sage T-Shirt like polymake has: https://shop.spreadshirt.de/polymake/ Not a CoCalc one, though I wish them success too :-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support"

[sage-support] Re: Anyone ever used sympol from within Sage?

2018-03-26 Thread kcrisman
> > > I think that people are more often using polymake and/or LattE from within >> Sage nowadays ... I found out about SymPol ( >> https://www.geometrie.uni-rostock.de/software/) today, has anyone worked >> on a potential interface for that? I do realize this is probably >> abandonware to

[sage-support] Re: Anyone ever used sympol from within Sage?

2018-03-21 Thread kcrisman
> > I think that people are more often using polymake and/or LattE from within >> Sage nowadays ... I found out about SymPol ( >> https://www.geometrie.uni-rostock.de/software/) today, has anyone worked >> on a potential interface for that? I do realize this is probably >> abandonware to

[sage-support] Anyone ever used sympol from within Sage?

2018-03-20 Thread kcrisman
curious, thanks! - kcrisman -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-support+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send ema

Re: [sage-support] Re: Has Big-Endian support been deprecated yet?

2018-03-14 Thread kcrisman
I tested for quite some time on PPC old Mac OS but finally had to give it up when I had to compile a gcc to compile the gcc that compiled Sage :-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop

Re: [sage-support] Is this a bug?

2018-02-28 Thread kcrisman
> Users mistake FAR too often symbolics with polynomials Well, of course, and I'm sure rjf would say that Sage developers far too often mistake expressions for functions. But what percentage of users actually know the difference in any case? (Rhetorical.) -- You received this message because

Re: [sage-support] Is this a bug?

2018-02-28 Thread kcrisman
> I am mildly in favor of dropping this predefinition (FWIW). > > > Far be it for me to acquire the usual "hobgoblin of little minds" trope, but in this case consistency is probably good. This argument was had ~10 years ago in great detail, with several hilarious variants implemented one

[sage-support] Re: AskSage's Anti-SPAM system blocking me

2018-02-22 Thread kcrisman
nline book whose acronym is ADS had some issues with filters because some of the content it serves up is in the directory ads/ !) - kcrisman -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop recei

Re: [sage-support] Re: Setting up a sage notebook server for multiple accounts

2018-02-12 Thread kcrisman
On Saturday, February 10, 2018 at 6:05:27 PM UTC-5, William wrote: > > Another option is CoCalc Docker > > https://github.com/sagemathinc/cocalc-docker > > though the community is going to have to work on this to make it > really useful, for now. > Right, I forgot about this option because

[sage-support] Re: SageAppliance for Sage 8.1

2018-02-12 Thread kcrisman
On Sunday, February 11, 2018 at 6:56:26 AM UTC-5, Volker Braun wrote: > > I uploaded a new version, is on the way to mirrors right now. >> >> >>> Great news! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and

[sage-support] Re: Setting up a sage notebook server for multiple accounts

2018-02-10 Thread kcrisman
That is a great question. Sagenb (what you have found) does not serve up Jupyter. It would be really interesting to hear from someone who knows about Jupyterhub and whether that is a stable solution at this point. On Friday, February 9, 2018 at 9:11:21 PM UTC-5, Andrew wrote: > > Is there an

[sage-support] Re: SageAppliance for Sage 8.1

2018-02-08 Thread kcrisman
That's a good question: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sage-release/4bIUu1NECwY doesn't seem to have anything about it either unless I missed a message. On Wednesday, February 7, 2018 at 12:27:11 PM UTC-5, Vít Tuček wrote: > > Hi! > > I can't find the SageAppliance for Sage version

[sage-support] Re: integrals and algorithms

2017-11-13 Thread kcrisman
On Monday, November 13, 2017 at 4:12:36 PM UTC-5, Enrique Artal wrote: > > Thanks to you for your work! > Yes, indeed! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an

[sage-support] Fwd: How to send a sagetex file to someone who doesn't use sage?

2017-11-08 Thread kcrisman
ve to run because you provide everything for them. Unfortunately I don't have a system to test this on without sagetex, but hopefully someone else can answer if providing the (correct) style file doesn't suffice. - kcrisman -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

[sage-support] Re: Integration bug?

2017-10-27 Thread kcrisman
> integral(sqrt(1+cos(x)^2),x,0,pi) > > > > 0 > > The bug appears to be tickled by the Maxima package abs_integrate. > Without abs_integrate, integrate(sqrt(1 + cos(x)^2), x, 0, %pi) just > returns a noun expression. > > > Zero is decidedly not correct. The problem is apparently here:

Re: [sage-support] How do I use @interact with sage 8.0 jupyter notebook?

2017-10-23 Thread kcrisman
Dear Andy, If you can reliably reproduce this in a more recent Sage version, please let us know. We haven't had any other reports of this but there is always a possibility something went wrong. Which exact tar did you downloads? Thanks, - kcrisman On Sunday, October 22, 2017 at 8:36:54 PM UTC

[sage-support] Re: Broken links

2017-09-28 Thread kcrisman
On Thursday, September 28, 2017 at 1:01:50 PM UTC-4, Leonardo Luiz e Castro wrote: > > The seven last links in SageMath portuguese page are broken: > http://www.sagemath.org/pt/ > > I'm not sure that I should report that here, but I haven't found another > way. > Perfect! Reported at

[sage-support] Re: Migration of notebooks created in a old version to a new version

2017-09-11 Thread kcrisman
On Sunday, September 10, 2017 at 1:44:31 PM UTC-4, Kannan Moudgalya wrote: > > I downloaded the "App" version of the tarball and tried it. This version > has the SageMath-8.0 logo. This automatically upgraded my previous > installation and ported all the notebooks. My problem seems to have

[sage-support] Re: linear transformations (by jason Grout)

2017-09-08 Thread kcrisman
> I think the problem, at least in CoCalc, is that @interact expects every argument to the function to be an interactive device. That may well be the problem in sagemath 8.1 too. I know that Andrey had pushed some changes so this works in Sage cell (and it does on the site linked to) and it

[sage-support] Re: taylor(1/4*x-x^2,x,0.2,3)

2017-07-11 Thread kcrisman
> I had following problem: > > this gives > sage: taylor(1/4*x-x^2,x,0.2,3) > ... > typeError: ECL says: In function GCD, the value of the first argument is > -0.6003 > which is not of the expected type INTEGER > > but > sage: taylor(1/4*x-x^2,x,0.2,3) works ;-)) > > Wait, what is

Re: [sage-support] Localisation

2017-07-10 Thread kcrisman
On Saturday, July 8, 2017 at 1:54:47 PM UTC-4, William wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 11:06 PM Ingo Dahn wrote: > >> Is there a way to localise CoCalc to the language of the user's browser >> by editing a language file in the Git repo? >> > > No, we have not implemented

[sage-support] Re: How to send (import) any sage variable back to other software in Sage e.g. Maxima or R

2017-06-22 Thread kcrisman
Just in general, you should be able to do f = stuff y = maxima(f) z = y._sage_() # or maybe sage(y) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-support" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

[sage-support] Re: Merging univariate and multivariate polynomial functionality for polynomials over one variable

2017-06-21 Thread kcrisman
This seems more appropriate to sage-devel, forwarding there ... On Tuesday, June 13, 2017 at 11:06:59 AM UTC-4, Joey van Langen wrote: > > I am currently working on making an iterator for finite quotients of > polynomial rings (over the integers), i.e. R / I with R a polynomial ring > and I an

[sage-support] Re: persistent homology?

2017-05-12 Thread kcrisman
On Friday, May 12, 2017 at 10:23:43 AM UTC-4, John H Palmieri wrote: > > Sage has no interface to any persistent homology software. Please write > one! > > -- >> >> >>> +1 this would be a fantastic addition to Sage. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

[sage-support] Re: Running sage 7.6 on OS Sierra 10.12, solve is not working

2017-05-09 Thread kcrisman
On Monday, May 8, 2017 at 2:10:38 PM UTC-4, Curtis Bennett wrote: > > Reinstall fixed problem now. > >> Glad you were able to fix this - ordinarily this shouldn't be necessary - you should be able to use Sage without Command Line Tools. But I'm glad it works now - welcome to Sage! -- You

[sage-support] Re: Inequalities

2017-04-03 Thread kcrisman
On Sunday, April 2, 2017 at 5:41:48 PM UTC-4, Emmanuel Charpentier wrote: > > Sorry for the late answer. > > Symbolic inequations solving seems currently broken in Maxima, and, hence, > in Sage (at least if my interpretation of the error messages is correct...). > For other readers, I should

[sage-support] Re: Sage 7.6 installation on OS 10.12 problems

2017-04-03 Thread kcrisman
On Sunday, April 2, 2017 at 8:22:48 PM UTC-4, Ruben Zilibowitz wrote: > > Hello, > > I have Mac OS 10.12.4 on MacBook Pro. I just installed Sage 7.6 from > sage-7.6-OSX_10.12.3-x86_64.app.dmg. Unfortunately it is not working. See > the output below from my terminal window. When I launched for

[sage-support] Re: Upgrade from MacOS El Capitan to MacOS Sierra prevents connection to localhost 8000

2017-04-03 Thread kcrisman
On Monday, April 3, 2017 at 1:28:31 PM UTC-4, Volker Braun wrote: > > I don't think that old version of Sage runs on sierra, you need to get a > more recent latest version. > Yeah, I agree that a Sage binary built for 10.6 has not much chance of running on 10.12. There should be some errors

[sage-support] Re: Android app problem

2017-04-03 Thread kcrisman
> Hi, I tried to use sage android app. It is not working. Probably it > couldn't connect to server. I recorded a screen video to show the problem. > How can it be solved? Here is the video link : > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0pHQa6svAw=youtu.be > Yes, apparently something changed

[sage-support] Re: How to treat (multiple) zeta values as real symbolic constants?

2017-03-28 Thread kcrisman
On Tuesday, March 28, 2017 at 10:15:22 AM UTC-4, Brent Pym wrote: > > For a real number *s*, the value* zeta(s)* of the Riemann zeta function > is real, but SageMath does not seem to recognize this fact. Here is an > example (SageMath 7.5.1): > > sage: conjugate(zeta(3)) > conjugate(zeta(3))

[sage-support] Re: Why can't this limit be calculated?

2017-03-28 Thread kcrisman
On Tuesday, March 28, 2017 at 1:45:54 PM UTC-4, kcrisman wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, March 28, 2017 at 10:15:19 AM UTC-4, Mjx121418 wrote: >> >> limit(harmonic_number(n)/n,n=+oo) >> >> >> <https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-s1M0o8FGXyY/WNpb102hi4I/

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >