At 09:01 13/04/2004, you wrote:
Here is an idea..
why don't you map your users to the nobody or guest account ??
(is this possible ??)
so all users are guests...
dunno how to do it, but would be a nice work around..
That wont' work.
However, there's a pseudo-NUA workaround: use MySQL-NSS to
Hi all.
We have a setup with a Samba PDC( Samba-3.0.0beta1, Linux Kernel 2.4.22-xfs
), LDAPSAM( OpenLDAP 2.1.22 ).
Everything seems to be fine, however we are afraid we can get in trouble
because of bugs which have been recently fixed in releases up to RC3,
specially panics in multibyte
We've been working with Samba for the last years. Most ( if not all ) of it
has worked as documented. Stability is much better than M$ Windows' and it
is roughly an order of magnitude better on the same hardware ( you can add
this to you customer quotes, Jerry ;) )
We have recently upgraded
At 12:47 10/09/2003 +0200, you wrote:
We have recently upgraded to RC2 from beta2, and we found this behaviour:
while the File Server functions work perfectly well ( as always ), we
have lost the ability to join machines to the domain, which get rejected
with username not found message. Using
I have installed Samba-3.0 beta1 and accomplished a migration from an W2k
mixed mode DC.
Except for some trouble with winbind, with i solved by hacking a bit in the
LDAP directory ( manually assigning UIDs and GIDs ), everything is fine now.
Thanks Samba Team for a good work, keep improving ;)
Hi, I am testing Samba-3.0.0.beta1, which we will use to migrate our
Win2000 domain ( at last ;) )
* things done:
- Configured LDAP + permissions
- Configured Samba.
pdbedit -a already creates users in LDAP ( objectclass: account;
objectclass: sambaSamAccount )
* observed
I have been forwarded this from one of our servers, which we have recently
( 2 days ) updated to Samba 3.0beta1 (Debian's 'unstable' package) from
Samba 2.2.8a
This is the second time it this happens in a period of 24h.
Everything else in this server is working fine. Any comment on this? Is
I Hate to reply myself, but since noone answered ...
We are planning to replace a quite big domain running W2K with Samba ( at
the very least, the DC ).
Though i'd love to have the extra security capabilities of W2K ( Kerberos
) as a DC, Samba/NT4 as PDC/BDC with ldapsam will more than suffice
At 17:13 18/06/2003 +0100, you wrote:
Hello!
As it happens I am having some real nightmares with this too.
Using NETGEAR ND520 NAS devices [Yes! I know - rod for own back...]
But the fact it is a Linux device sold me ahead of a W2K Appliance
[snip]
If those S-O-D figures are real ( I mean, W2K is
At 23:50 16/06/2003 +0200, Arnold wrote:
hi,
do somebody tell me, where i could find information about samba restrictions
compared with
Windows Server.
I' m trying to prepare a paper for school, which describe a comarison
between samba and Windows Server.
I heard for example, that
1-Samba is not
We are planning to replace a quite big domain running W2K with Samba ( at
the very least, the DC ).
Though i'd love to have the extra security capabilities of W2K ( Kerberos )
as a DC, Samba/NT4 as PDC/BDC with ldapsam will more than suffice for now.
The show-stopper right now is this: we need
At 18:14 19/02/2003 +, you wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 08:40:06AM +, pondiboy - wrote:
[snip]
My exchange server is my PDC and ofcourse i would like to go in for 3
Linux Boxes as my additional Domain controllers. And use my Windows PDC
(Running Exchange 2000) for mails
12 matches
Mail list logo
