is under /usr/local/samba/bin/
i exicuted this testparm..that shows the sunfreeware samba's smb.conf
settings.
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Gaiseric Vandal
gaiseric.van...@gmail.com mailto:gaiseric.van...@gmail.com wrote:
This reminded me of something:
Solaris is bundled
disclaimer: I don't use Samba as an ADS member server. I use samba as
PDC with trusts to an ADS domain. So my observations may not be valuid.
Did you try updating nsswitch.conf
passwd: files winbind
group:files winbind
If you are using a Windows domain and have a user
/ben:/bin/sh/*
you already have a unix ben and a ADS ben defined?
Yes i defined the ben user in Unix and ADS...bcoz i don't have much
knowledge about that sorry
Hope u will help me
Thanks
Ben.T.George
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Gaiseric Vandal
gaiseric.van...@gmail.com
, Gaiseric Vandal
gaiseric.van...@gmail.com mailto:gaiseric.van...@gmail.com wrote:
Then it sounds like you need the AD integration. If the user's
also login to the linux workstation directly (or via ssh) then
you will need to configure winbind and nsswitch to support unix
logins
Are the workstations XP, Vista or Win 7?
What happens if you log in to the non-domain workstation using a
username and password that match a valid domain name and password
If you run testparm -v on the samba server do you have both ports 139
and 445 open?
Yesterday I was trouble shooting a
, 2010 at 6:16 PM, Gaiseric Vandal
gaiseric.van...@gmail.com mailto:gaiseric.van...@gmail.com wrote:
So to clarify the customer has a Sun Solaris 10 UNIX machine and a
Linux workstation?
FOR SOLARIS
I had problems with getting nsswitch+winbind working with the
samba from
I suspect Oracle won't be much help with 3rd party s/w.I had opened
a ticket with Sun last year (?) when I had with domain trusts with the
samba version they provided (the trusts worked BUT the cache would
expire and not repopulate.) They had a cookie cutter setup for joining
Samba to an
In your smb.conf did you set
security = ADS
You may want to check the man page for smb.conf and security = options.
On 09/29/2010 07:33 AM, Ben George wrote:
when i try to join the domain in UNIX (Sun Solaris 10 SPARC),i got error
message like this
bash-3.00# ./net ads -d3 join -U
-AD
synchronization..
so please help me with these,for further steps.
Again thanks for your reply
Ben.T.George
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Gaiseric Vandal
gaiseric.van...@gmail.com mailto:gaiseric.van...@gmail.com wrote:
In your smb.conf did you set
security
This is more of a Windows question (i.e. google searches windows login
scripts may be helpfull.
You scripts could use commands like
ifmember groupname
http://www.eggheadcafe.com/software/aspnet/30250014/login-script-group-membership.aspx
That should let you map drives based on group
If you want Windows 7 support, you need Samba 3.3.x.
Which Fedora repo? I found that FC6 RPM's usually installed OK on
RedHat RHEL5.x but anything above was likely to need a newer glibc or
libc (or something like that.)
On 09/28/2010 04:23 PM, scott_st...@trendmicro.com wrote:
I see
I am making some guesses...
Read the man page on idmap_rid. That might make the idmap stuff a
little simpler (it doesn't apply to my environment so I am not 100% sure.)
Does wbinfo -u and wbinfo -g list the AD domain users and groups?
Does getent passwd and getent group list those users?
Do you have an underlying unix account for the pc (eg SOMEMACHINE$)
It is possible to configure scripts that the unix account is created by
samba if necessary when samba creates the Windows account for the
machine. I don't have it set up this way, so I need to create the unix
account 1st.
account info.
On 09/27/2010 11:08 AM, Claudio Prono wrote:
Gaiseric Vandal ha scritto:
Do you have an underlying unix account for the pc (eg SOMEMACHINE$)
It is possible to configure scripts that the unix account is created
by samba if necessary when samba creates the Windows account
, Sep 27, 2010 at 12:15 PM, Gaiseric Vandal
gaiseric.van...@gmail.com wrote:
You user script may be adding a LOCAL unix account (in /etc/passwd.) Do
you see the accounts in there? You may need to custom script that adds the
accounts to ldap.
The following may help
https://gna.org/projects
street: 500 Pretroli Aiv
telephoneNumber: 888-555-1212
userPassword:
On 09/27/2010 12:15 PM, Claudio Prono wrote:
Gaiseric Vandal ha scritto:
You user script may be adding a LOCAL unix account (in /etc/passwd.)
Do you see the accounts in there? You may need to custom script that
adds
If you are starting with a clean machine, you can probably pick an OS
distribution that already has Samba included.
A fairly recent version of Fedora Core Linux (12 or 13) should have
samba bundled with it (along with OpenLDAP and kerberos.) I would
guess that most current Linux distros
This may not be related- but on Solaris there is a ngroup_max system
parameter (default is 16.) I found solaris 3.4.x would check to see if the
user's group list exceeded this and would panic (by design) if it did.
I don't know if this is to prevent using Windows to bypass Unix security?
On 09/22/2010 08:23 AM, Chris McDonald wrote:
I am trying to mount two shares on Linux box using XP windows machine.
Both shares are valid and work independently, but I want both to be
connected simultaneously. I am able to connect A but in order to
connect B i have disconnect the A
What do the following commands show?
net getlocalsid
net getdomainsid
They should be the same.
When you ran net rpc getsid did you include -S
the_name_of_the_NT4_server ? Maybe it somehow talked to another
domain controller. If your samba machine was configured as a BDC before
I would bet this isn't going to work.I used to run PC NetLink (as an
alternative to samba.) There were some registry changes (signorseal)
that would let XP machines join a PCNL domain but they never worked with
Win 2003.And that was with WIn 2003 as a domain member not a server.
If
To: gaiseric.van...@gmail.com
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] smbclient fails with NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER for
trusted domains, can't force anonymous access from Windows
DId ya check your samba pam?
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Gaiseric Vandal
gaiseric.van...@gmail.com wrote:
The samba
Is the print server a samba server or a CUPS server? If it is a CUPS server
then maybe the smbclient is not the appropriate printing tool. I believe
CUPS can share printers via several printing protocols (e.g. IPP and LPD.)
I dont know if it can make the printer appear to be a windows shared
, this share does not contain information that needs much protection.)
Thanks
From: Gaiseric Vandal [mailto:gaiseric.van...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 1:16 PM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: RE: smbclient fails with NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER for trusted
domains, ntlm_auth
relationship with a 2nd Windows domain that was no
longer active- this fixed the slow wbinfo -u response but did not fix the
smbclient authentication issue to the existing windows domain.
From: Gaiseric Vandal [mailto:gaiseric.van...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 3:55 PM
To: samba
: Gaiseric Vandal [mailto:gaiseric.van...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 9:19 AM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: smbclient fails with NT_STATUS_NO_SUCH_USER for trusted domains,
ntlm_auth succeeds, wbinfo not caching
FYI
The ntlm_auth command does work with users from
I am running Samba 3.4.7 (compiled from source) on Solaris 10 as a PDC. I
have trusted domains setup with a Windows 2003 Active Directory domain in
2003 native mode.Everything is in an LDAP backend (unix accounts for
the Samba domain, idmap entries for trusted domains.) The Solaris 10
You should only have one PDC for a domain. You can have multiple
Domain Controllers. But you can have only one Primary Domain
Controller. Any other domain controllers must be Backup Domain
Controllers.
All domain controllers provide logon functionality to clients. All DC's
use the same
Solaris 10 (with latest patches) should have samba 3.0.37 already included.
smbd -b indicates it was built with ADS support. I don't know if it
really works reliably or not, since I am not integrating with active
directory.
Sunfreeware.com samba did not include either zfs or nsswitch
. The XP workstation is
using WINS, set via DHCP (option netbios-name-servers ip address of
the PDC;)
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Gaiseric Vandal
gaiseric.van...@gmail.com mailto:gaiseric.van...@gmail.com wrote:
Is the PDC also a WINS server? Are the XP workstations using WINS
Any further insight?
Abe
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Gaiseric Vandal gaiseric.van...@gmail.com
wrote:
Did you check the event logs in Windows- they may provide some additional info.
This error sounded familiar- most of my users are in a Samba domain, but I
have one group that uses
Is the PDC also a WINS server? Are the XP workstations using WINS?
On 08/29/2010 09:01 PM, Abe Lau wrote:
Hi all,
I have recently experienced an intermittent problem of getting the error
message of Domain not available at initial logon of some XP workstations
connected to a Samba PDC. The
The localsid on a DC should be the domain sid.You should be able to
fix this with net setlocalsid command.
Generally in Windows you want to assign permissions and rights to a
group rather than directly to a user.As long as your Administrator
account is in the Domain Admins group and
30 August 2010 07:54:55 am Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
The localsid on a DC should be the domain sid.You should be able to
fix this with net setlocalsid command.
Generally in Windows you want to assign permissions and rights to a
group rather than directly to a user.As long as your
Is the existing server using tdbsam or LDAP? The pdbedit command has
options to import/export from/to various backends. Once you copy the
accounts from one server to another you could configure the new server to
temporarily be a BDC, then make it a PDC and drop the original serve.
Does the Mac
On 08/19/2010 10:33 AM, Stroh, George wrote:
I am looking for where zfsacl settings such as, zfsacl: acesort =
dontcare , are documented.
Do I need NFS settings such as, nfs4: mode = simple , if I am not using
NFS? If I do, where are they documented?
Thanks
Samba documentation seems to
Are they both using the same backend? Is the group mapping set up correctly
#net groupmap list
Also you can use samba net command to verify user's group list, and a
group's user list.
# net rpc group members some group -S yourserver -U Administrator
# net rpc user info someuser -S
On 08/19/2010 08:21 AM, Maiquel Consalter wrote:
Hi peopel, i am install the samba server version 3.5, and my Windows server
when i try connect show that error:
The device attached to the system not functioning. My client windows xp,
vista, 7 connect with out errors.
Someone help?
It can't
On 08/18/2010 09:37 PM, Hernan Caffera wrote:
Hi, folks !
Perhaps somebody can help me with a litle isuue.
I´ve got a PDC with Ubuntu+Samba 3.5 +LDAP working fine in my network.
But now I’m trying to implement a fileserver that autenticate against my domain
server.
If someone have any idea
This is why people use a domain model. You should have one machine
configured as a PDC and the other as a member server.
On 08/19/2010 12:25 AM, Techienote com wrote:
Hi,
We have one samba server in our office. Let take it as A. We have created
one new samba on another machine. Let take it
I am pretty sure that the password command and script is run as root,
not as the user changing the password.What happens if you run the
password commands on the samba server? I don't have smbldap tools on
my system (Solaris, so not provided by the Sun distro) so I had to rely
on the OS
...@lists.samba.org
[mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org]
Im
Auftrag von Gaiseric Vandal
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 18. August 2010 15:48
An: samba@lists.samba.org
Betreff: Re: [Samba] Error: You do not have permission to change your
password
I am pretty sure that the password command and script is run
You linux server need to be in one domain only. On the windows domain
controllers, you can establish trusts between the domains.
On your linux server you may need to specify separate idmap parameters
for each domain. Based on man idmap_ad it might look something like
...
idmap domains =
http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Windows7
I would be pretty sure that if Windows 7 doesn't work with Samba 3.0.x
that Windows 2008 won't either. Rather than compiling samba 3.4 or 3.5
from source I would go with Fedora Core 11 (samba 3.3.x) or some other
more up-to-date linux distro that
On 08/06/2010 10:16 AM, raveenpl wrote:
Hi!
I am currently using samba (3.5.4) with ADS domain.
Do you know if it is possible to display all members of a single group? (I
am not interested in parsing getent group/passwd output because I am using a
huge amount of users and this takes a lot of
It may depend somewhat on the domain or forest mode of the AD domain.
I had partial success with Samba 3.0.x and a Windows 2003 domain in
mixed mode. However the winbind idmap entries would expire from cache
and not refresh.I couldn't get Samba 3.0.x to trust an AD domain in
Windows
He is correct that the Windows 2003 native shd be able to trust an NT4
domain (which is what Samba pretends to be.) AD domain in Windows
mixed mode supports NT4 domain members- which is not what you are
trying to do anyway. But it suggested to me that when the AD domain
moves to native
Solaris 10 includes samba 3.0.x with zfs support. Sun backported zfs
modules from newer sun releases.If you were to download samba from
www.samba.org you would have to go with 3.4 or 3.5 for the zfs module.
In the short term, assuming you don't have Vista or Windows 7 clients
and
of more
than 16 groups and are using ZFS acls. Faced this problem and could
not solve even by compiling samba 3.5.4, adding ngroups_max=1024 in
/etc/system and doing other things.
On 08/ 4/10 04:44 PM, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
Solaris 10 includes samba 3.0.x with zfs support. Sun backported
I would suggest that putting the PDC and LDAP server on the same machine
does make sense, since they are (from the point of view of windows clients)
so closely integrated. It is correctly that if you have the both services
on the same machine, then if that machine goes down you lose both
I would consider a newer Linux distribution besides CentOS 5.x I have
worked with RHEL and Fedora. I think (not 100% sure) that Centos 5.x comes
with Samba 3.0.x If you want Win 7 client support you would want samba
3.4.x or 3.5.x.Which means either a more current linux release or
=internaltest
modifyTimestamp: 20100728230213Z
So I am not quite sure what is going on here.
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Gaiseric Vandal
gaiseric.van...@gmail.com mailto:gaiseric.van...@gmail.com wrote:
When you try to join a computer to the network, you mean you are
trying to join
When you try to join a computer to the network, you mean you are trying
to join a Windows PC (e.g. XP Pro) to the domain? Or you are trying to
join the PDC machine to the domain?
I would guess you need to manually create the PDC's unix account, even
if samba is going to create the other
On 07/27/2010 03:38 PM, Daniel Deptuła wrote:
W dniu 2010-07-27 20:05, alexan...@nautae.eti.br pisze:
Hi.
Excuse my English.
I've installed Samba+OpenLDAP as a PDC.
Everything works fine but Samba ignores completely group information.
Linux is ok.
Any clue? I'm going crazy here!
Here's
I have run into this with various Office documents.
When you save an Excel file it will delete the file and rewrite a brand
new file with the same name.If you don't have sufficient permisisons
to write the file AND set various attibrutes the save process will
fail.You will probably
Does it work if you have a simpler configure command
e.g.
./configure --prefix=/opt/samba-3.5.4
I have not tried configuring samba when specifying the include subfolder
or the actual *.h file in the ldap or krb5 option. (I always had to set
compiler and linker flags to make sure it detected
. But if you aren't doing domain trusts
and are using UFS it should also be fine.
If you don't have the Solaris 10 DVD you can download it from Sun.
On 07/19/2010 06:05 PM, Linux Addict wrote:
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 5:18 PM, Gaiseric Vandal
gaiseric.van...@gmail.com mailto:gaiseric.van...@gmail.com
vfs_zfsacl
MMM
On 07/15/10 04:32 PM, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
I compiled Samba 3.4.x on Solaris 10.(I have a Samba 3.4.x pdc
with two Samba 3.0.x BDC's.) Samba 3.0.x DCs will not support
Windows 7 clients (don't have any yet but it is probably inevitable)
and doesn't seem to support trusts
The @ sign means you are specifying the domain. With Active Directory
server you can have an internet-type domain name. Which means, as
you saw, can simplify login experience for the user.
I would guess the solution is to have your Samba server emulate an AD
server.I don't think
I compiled Samba 3.4.x on Solaris 10.(I have a Samba 3.4.x pdc with
two Samba 3.0.x BDC's.) Samba 3.0.x DCs will not support Windows 7
clients (don't have any yet but it is probably inevitable) and doesn't
seem to support trusts with Windows 2003 Native domains (at least it
didn't for
Here is the catch (at least for some people.)
This can break NFS stuff.On my PDC I made a similar change. Home
directories are not on the PDC. This fixed the problem of people
getting login failures when logging into windows if they had more than
16 groups. But if a user tries to
What does dir /x show? The /x option should give you the 8.3 version of
the name. That may be being matched by the wildcard.
-Original Message-
From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org]
On Behalf Of Jeffrey McLellan
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 8:25 PM
Is the linux client configured as a samba server? Or is the user trying to
access via console logion, ssh or nfs?
-Original Message-
From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org]
On Behalf Of Dirk Kleinhesselink
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 2:12 PM
To:
Can you post the list if this works? A while back I tried changing smb.conf
settings to require NTLM v2. I then tried logging in (via remote desktop)
to a Win 2003 machine and was unable too. This wasn't critical so changed
smb.conf back to allowing NTLM v1.
-Original Message-
Also make sure that SID returned by wbinfo -n DOMAIN\name matches the
name returned bywbinfo -s SID command.
On 07/08/2010 01:45 PM, t...@tms3.com wrote:
Hello,
I recently migrated all data and user accounts from our old Samba file
server to a new (Samba 3.4.0 on Unbuntu 9.10) one.
On 07/08/2010 03:10 PM, Gregory A. Cain wrote:
Exactly. I checked 4 or 5 other users - no problems. Also did a
spot-check of files belonging to other users in Windows Explorer. It
appears this is the only user with the problem.
I checked for duplicate UID's and found none. Using ls -l on
On 07/08/2010 05:43 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 11:32:32AM +1000, Abe Lau wrote:
Hi,
I was having problem with the tdbsam backend in which a particular user got
listed twice with pdbedit.
(http://www.mail-archive.com/samba@lists.samba.org/msg109110.html)
Without much
You can't buy extra licenses for XP- you would need to install Windows
Server instead.That doesn't really simplify things.
A fake raid card under Windows XP is useful since XP does not directly
provide disk mirroring.Otherwise- in my opinion- you might as well
stick with software
On the Windows machines, have you tried setting up an additional share?
Maybe the the issue is not specific to Administrative shares?
FYI
I did verify from an XP machine (not in the domain) that net use
\\server\ipc$ /user:mydom\administrator does work- I do get prompted for
the pw because the
Linux ext3 and ext4 file systems should support acl's, which allow for
multiple users and groups and the more fine grained controls you are
looking for.The setfacl and getfacl commands should verify if
this is working.
I am running Samba on Solaris with the zfs file system- so this is not
It works for me - Solaris 10, ZFS file system, configured as a PDC or BDC
#testparm -v | grep acl
acl compatibility = auto
acl check permissions = Yes
acl group control = No
acl map full control = Yes
force unknown acl user = No
nt acl support =
What does the following command show?
#getent passwd | grep -I UserA
-Original Message-
From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org]
On Behalf Of Abe Lau
Sent: Sunday, July 04, 2010 8:27 PM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: [Samba] Identical user
You need to first make sure that samba is working correctly before trouble
shooting the ftp component.
Are you using samba for windows clients?
The testparm -v should show your current configuration, including which is
the password backend. I do not see any reason to change to the older
Maybe the solution is one of the following
- use winbind, which includes update /etc/nsswitch.conf.This will let
all basic unix services (including ftp) authenticate against your windows
account.
- enabled password sync in samba so that your windows and unix passwords
are in sync. Then
I think I missed part of the conversation, but what would be the purpose
of this feature? (I am not even sure why Windows does this.)
On 07/02/2010 02:15 PM, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 2:05 AM, Atkinson, Robertratkin...@tbs-ltd.co.ukwrote:
Interesting to see you say
Solaris 10 comes with Samba 3.0.x (I think 3.0.35 is the most recent) so no
need to compile it yourself.It includes backported support for zfs
acl's.I have compiled Samab 3.4.x on solaris because I needed better
support for domain trusts with Windows 2003 mode domains.
-Original
What area?
The initial packages should be on the solaris DVD
bash-3.00# pkginfo | grep -i samba
system SUNWsmbacsamba - A Windows SMB/CIFS
fileserver for UNIX (client)
system SUNWsmbarsamba - A Windows SMB/CIFS
fileserver for UNIX
Did you try temporarily commenting out the valid users and write
list lines. That should make it writable by default.If you are
then able to write it suggests that samba is not correctly matching up
the users' groups to the valid users and write list groups.
Although if this were the
What happens if you try to mount a samba share via CIFS from linux (e.g.
smbclient, mount -o cifs ?) Or may be mount the drive in windows with
the net use command.Either way you explicitly set the domain/username.
Do any of the other log files refer to issues with mapping users?
What is
Is this for all users or just some users?
If for some users and not others, does pdbedit -Lv someuser show
anything different?
What happens if you delete and recreate a samba account
e.g.
smbpasswd -x drew
smbpasswd -a drew
On 06/29/2010 06:06 AM, Alastair Sherringham wrote:
Change the file permissions, either via Windows or with unix chmod,
chown etc on the server.. The share perms will not override the file
system permissions.
On 06/29/2010 12:19 PM, c cc wrote:
Hi,
Under our file structure, we have /files/all/departments/. We want
everyone to have access to
Are you use the nss_winbind or winbind_nss files compiled? They may be in
a separate directory or explicitly require make nsswitch command.
-Original Message-
From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org]
On Behalf Of David Boyd
Sent: Friday, June 25,
What version of samba?
The vampire command can be used to pull account info from an NT4
server into a Samba 3.x domain. I am not sure if it can be used against
a Samba 3.x server. I could be wrong. Samba 4 would be a different
situation.
You may be able to copy the samba private and
I might be wrong but couldn't you modify /etc/nsswitch.conf to use
passwd: files winbind
group: files winbind
instead?
IS the Samba server the PDC? Do you have local unix accounts on it?
On 06/25/2010 01:12 AM, L. A. Walsh wrote:
I'm trying to use 'ssh'
domain. I would check the results of net groupmap list. Make
sure that Domain Users and Domain Administrators are mapped.
On 06/25/2010 03:59 PM, Linda W wrote:
Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
IS the Samba server the PDC? Do you have local unix accounts on it?
(yes, yes)..
I might be wrong
I think, by the fundamental nature of how networking protocols work, that
broadcasts do not pass through routers - although with a VPN it may be a
little different.
However, I have the same situation. A Windows server on the host network
shows my home workgroup in the network neighborhood.
You can download talloc and tdb from talloc.samba.org and tdb.talloc.org. I
might configure them both --with-prefix=/usr/local/samba-extras.
LD_LIBRARY_PATH should include /usr/local/samba-extras/lib, while
PKG_CONFIG_PATH should include /usr/local/samba-extras/pkgconfig.
I am not sure if these
Which samba version?
I had Samba 3.0.x on Solaris 10, and winbind able to allocate uids and
gids to users and groups from trusted domain (at least to Windows 2003
domains in mixed mode.) When I switched to a Samba 3.4.x PDC the
allocation of new uids and gids broke.I suspect there is
You should be able to have the unix user listed in multiple unix groups
e.g
cat /etc/passwd
...
marketing:1500:user-1,user-2,user-3
...
If the groups are mapped to windows groups (verify with net groupmap
list) that should be sufficient.
On 06/21/2010 09:54 PM, mrdlnf wrote:
Hi All,
Which samba version?
Are these XP Pro or XP Home machines. If XP Pro, have you tried joining
the machine to the domain?
When you map a drive letter to a samba share from XP, are you using
LocalPC\yourname or Domain\Yourname when specifying credentials?
Are you mapping the drive with
On 06/22/2010 01:55 PM, John Drescher wrote:
An error occurred while reconnecting Z: to \\domain-fs\business
Microsoft Windows Network: The specified network name is no longer available
This connection has not been restored.
Looks like a browsing problem to me. Try to reconnect using ip
and I'm prompted for
login info, specifying domain\username or just username produces the
same results. According to samba and ldap logs, these credentials are
never passed to the server at that time.
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Gaiseric Vandal
gaiseric.van...@gmail.com
are not
using dhcp, or if your dhcp server can not assign wins, you can
statically set it on the XP client.
On 06/22/2010 04:24 PM, delpheye wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Gaiseric Vandal
gaiseric.van...@gmail.com mailto:gaiseric.van...@gmail.com wrote:
On 06/22/2010 01:55 PM
Which platform?
The idmap suggestion seems to make sense. I had the same problem with
member servers until I set up idmap (even though the unix id's were
consistent between all machines.) I did not have a problem though on the
PDC. Is this a domain controller?
-Original Message-
Did you update /etc/nsswitch.conf with
files: winbind
groups: winbind
-Original Message-
From: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org]
On Behalf Of Piotr Sikora
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2010 6:24 AM
To: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: [Samba]
So is the Samba server going to be configured as a member server or a PDC or
a BDC? Are you treating the AD server as just an LDAP server?
You can use an LDAP browser (e.g. Active Directory Studio) to browse the
LDAP structure of an active domain server. I think all the fields you
might need
Add the following to the command
/persistent:yes
You can type net /? to get the possible options. You can also use
windows explorer to map drives.
If the XP machine is joined to a domain you shouldn't need to enter a
user name and password.
On 06/18/2010 03:41 AM, Jelle de Jong
Deutschmann wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jun 2010, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
Is the new machine going to have the same IP address and machine name? I
[...]
I'm aware of that possibility, and in some sense I've done that in the
past. But for this particular hop, I'd prefer to keep the IP and hostname
For an NT4/Samba domain, DNS is not relevant. The XP client will
locate the PDC via netbios. WINS is not essential but definately helps.
On the XP machine, type ipconfig /all and make sure that your XP
machine is configured for the WINS server.
Also, make sure on your XP TCP/IP settings
If you are moving the RAID controller with the disks then it should be
OK. And in that case using RAID5 should be OK for /boot.
You can also, with the 3ware, configure all the disks in a single RAID5
(or maybe RAID5+1 or RAID6), and then use 3ware to create two separate
LUN's (logical
401 - 500 of 695 matches
Mail list logo
