Re: [SC-L] informIT: Building versus Breaking

2011-09-05 Thread James Walden
. From: sc-l-boun...@securecoding.org [sc-l-boun...@securecoding.org] on behalf of Steven M. Christey [co...@linus.mitre.org] Sent: 31 August 2011 16:45 To: Sergio 'shadown' Alvarez Cc: Adam Shostack; Secure Code Mailing List Subject: Re: [SC-L] informIT: Building versus Breaking

Re: [SC-L] informIT: Building versus Breaking

2011-09-05 Thread Stephen Craig Evans
Hi Ivan (and Sergio), Maybe I should have clarified my position. I have no problem with security researchers and whitehats that investigate and reverse engineer malware to make the world a better place. I have problems with those that create malware - under the guise of security research -

Re: [SC-L] informIT: Building versus Breaking

2011-09-03 Thread Kevin W. Wall
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Chris Schmidt chrisisb...@gmail.com wrote: On Sep 2, 2011, at 10:44 AM, Goertzel, Karen [USA] goertzel_ka...@bah.com wrote: What we need is to start building software that can fight back. Then we could become part of cyber warfare which is much sexier than

Re: [SC-L] informIT: Building versus Breaking

2011-09-03 Thread Chris Schmidt
On 9/3/2011 11:22 AM, Kevin W. Wall wrote: On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Chris Schmidt chrisisb...@gmail.com wrote: On Sep 2, 2011, at 10:44 AM, Goertzel, Karen [USA] goertzel_ka...@bah.com wrote: What we need is to start building software that can fight back. Then we could become part of

Re: [SC-L] informIT: Building versus Breaking

2011-09-02 Thread Jeffrey Walton
Hi Steve, On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Steven M. Christey co...@linus.mitre.org wrote: While I'd like to see Black Hat add some more defensive-minded tracks, I just realized that this desire might a symptom of a larger problem: there aren't really any large-scale conferences dedicated to

Re: [SC-L] informIT: Building versus Breaking

2011-09-02 Thread Tom Brennan
Ding ding ding... End of first round. insert ring girl with below sign Largest application software security focused event in 2011 - don't miss: http://www.appsecusa.org Sept 20-23 2011 ### Ding ding ding... Now let's get it on Let's keep a professional..debate. Free speech only works

Re: [SC-L] informIT: Building versus Breaking

2011-09-02 Thread Goertzel, Karen [USA]
...@gmail.com Cc: a...@homeport.org; sc-l@securecoding.org Subject: Re: [SC-L] informIT: Building versus Breaking Steve, I think that the problem we have here is classic - defense isnta sexy. I think you could get DHS to sponsor one maybe? I think between some government funds, and some vendor support

Re: [SC-L] informIT: Building versus Breaking

2011-09-01 Thread Steven M. Christey
While I'd like to see Black Hat add some more defensive-minded tracks, I just realized that this desire might a symptom of a larger problem: there aren't really any large-scale conferences dedicated to defense / software assurance. (The OWASP conferences are heavily web-focused; Dept. of

Re: [SC-L] informIT: Building versus Breaking

2011-09-01 Thread Chris Schmidt
I agree on the terminology of whitehat vs. blackhat here Sergio, but in almost every other regard I disagree completely. To design and build proper software and hardware there are a lot of conferences out there, as well as trainings and a huge amount of literature. There are very good books

Re: [SC-L] informIT: Building versus Breaking

2011-09-01 Thread Arian J. Evans
Not many builders go to BlackHat. BlackHat is by Breakers, for Defenders. It is primarily attended by Defenders, with a smaller pool of dedicated Breakers. It is very valuable to our industry to have conferences focused on Breaking. Though they do have Builder and Defender talks. Some of my first

Re: [SC-L] informIT: Building versus Breaking

2011-09-01 Thread Sergio 'shadown' Alvarez
Hi Chris, Thanks for answering my email. There's one thing that I actually believe you people are not following here. Blackhat is a conference to present cutting-edge NEW offensive technologies, methodologies, techniques, etc. It is *not* about talking things there were already presented and

Re: [SC-L] informIT: Building versus Breaking

2011-09-01 Thread Stephen Craig Evans
Sergio, Blackhat IS about breaking stuff, the vendors area offers defense products and services to improve your security. For building stuff (as in development) there are other conferences out there. People go to Blackhat to be aware of what things might go wrong in order to protect better

Re: [SC-L] informIT: Building versus Breaking

2011-09-01 Thread Goertzel, Karen [USA]
: sc-l-boun...@securecoding.org [sc-l-boun...@securecoding.org] on behalf of Steven M. Christey [co...@linus.mitre.org] Sent: 31 August 2011 16:45 To: Sergio 'shadown' Alvarez Cc: Adam Shostack; Secure Code Mailing List Subject: Re: [SC-L] informIT: Building versus Breaking While I'd like to see

Re: [SC-L] informIT: Building versus Breaking

2011-08-31 Thread Sergio 'shadown' Alvarez
Hi gem, I've read your article to see what direction you were willing to take, before jumping into the conversation. Your post was exactly what I thought you were heading to. I disagree with your thought for many reasons. But first I would like to use proper terms so that we don't misuse some