On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 09:06:03AM +0200, Andreas Mueller wrote:
> > Structured prediction in sklearn was one of the outcomes from the survey.
> > Would it be a better idea to send people to pystruct, rather than
> > implement it here?
> I think so.
I think so to.
> We decided that structured p
skstruct?
In french it translates to "c'est quoi ce truc?" :)
--
Olivier
--
See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics
Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics
Isolate
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Andreas Mueller
wrote:
>
> About naming it scikit-struct: is there any requirement to become a scikit?
> Also: is there much benefit - pandas seems to be doing quite well
> without the brand ;)
>
My suggestion was half a joke :). But I find it a little bit disappo
2013/7/12 Andreas Mueller
> On 07/12/2013 01:26 AM, Robert Layton wrote:
> > Structured prediction in sklearn was one of the outcomes from the survey.
> > Would it be a better idea to send people to pystruct, rather than
> > implement it here?
> >
> I think so. We decided that structured predicti
2013/7/12 Andreas Mueller :
> On 07/12/2013 09:23 AM, Vlad Niculae wrote:
>> The requirements are definitely the blocking thing here. Not just the
>> dependency on cvxopt but also the inference packages and the fact they
>> need to be built manually. The api is sklearn-ish enough even with
>> list
On 07/12/2013 09:23 AM, Vlad Niculae wrote:
> The requirements are definitely the blocking thing here. Not just the
> dependency on cvxopt but also the inference packages and the fact they
> need to be built manually. The api is sklearn-ish enough even with
> lists-of-lists.
>
The API, yes, but th
The requirements are definitely the blocking thing here. Not just the
dependency on cvxopt but also the inference packages and the fact they
need to be built manually. The api is sklearn-ish enough even with
lists-of-lists.
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 10:06 AM, Andreas Mueller
wrote:
> On 07/12/201
On 07/12/2013 01:26 AM, Robert Layton wrote:
> Structured prediction in sklearn was one of the outcomes from the survey.
> Would it be a better idea to send people to pystruct, rather than
> implement it here?
>
I think so. We decided that structured prediction was out of scope for
sklearn, right
You should have named the project scikit-struct :)
Mathieu
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Robert Layton wrote:
> Structured prediction in sklearn was one of the outcomes from the survey.
> Would it be a better idea to send people to pystruct, rather than
> implement it here?
>
>
> On 12 July 2
Structured prediction in sklearn was one of the outcomes from the survey.
Would it be a better idea to send people to pystruct, rather than implement
it here?
On 12 July 2013 03:12, Andreas Mueller wrote:
> Hey everybody.
> This is spam about my "new" project pystruct.
> Pystruct is my shot at
Hey everybody.
This is spam about my "new" project pystruct.
Pystruct is my shot at creating an easy-to-use structured prediction library
in the spirit of scikit-learn.
I just created a mailing list at
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/pystruct
The documentation is at http://pystruct.github
11 matches
Mail list logo
