Ok, so I updated the form a bit:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dFdyeGNhMzlCRWZUdldpMEZlZ1B1YkE6MQ#gid=0
I removed the last question and added the possible answers as a hint to
the what would you like to see question.
I want to release tonight and I would like to publish
Am 18.01.2013 15:14, schrieb Lars Buitinck:
I'm not one for web design, but we usually spell scikit-learn
all-lowercase, and certainly never with a capital L. Also, I prefer
scikit-learn to the scikit-learn, but I'm under the impression
that the French devs on the team prefer the latter ;)
Should in the contributors free time be in the contributors' free time ?
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 8:48 PM, Andreas Mueller
amuel...@ais.uni-bonn.dewrote:
Ok, so I updated the form a bit:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dFdyeGNhMzlCRWZUdldpMEZlZ1B1YkE6MQ#gid=0
I removed
Am 21.01.2013 13:51, schrieb xinfan meng:
Should in the contributors free time be in the contributors' free
time ?
Yes, I think so. Thanks.
--
Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012, HTML5, CSS,
MVC,
Hey Andy - on it now.. Sorry I had some immigration issues this morning..
Will make it shortly
J
2013/1/21 Andreas Mueller amuel...@ais.uni-bonn.de
Am 21.01.2013 13:51, schrieb xinfan meng:
Should in the contributors free time be in the contributors' free
time ?
Yes, I think so.
My github has been refusing to connect, but seems to be working now.. just
slowly..
2013/1/21 Andreas Mueller amuel...@ais.uni-bonn.de
Thanks a lot and sorry for rushing you :-/
--
Master Visual Studio, SharePoint,
Here's the PR with online build :
https://github.com/scikit-learn/scikit-learn/pull/1603
2013/1/21 Jaques Grobler jaquesgrob...@gmail.com
My github has been refusing to connect, but seems to be working now.. just
slowly..
2013/1/21 Andreas Mueller amuel...@ais.uni-bonn.de
Thanks a lot
Hi Leon.
I'd really like to get this finished now.
Could you maybe send me the info to edit the form and get the results?
Thanks,
Andy
On 01/17/2013 02:18 PM, Leon Palafox wrote:
Hello,
I have some sort of form ready in google docs.
Hi all,
I have been delaying joining this discussion because I didn't have enough
mental bandwidth to contribute something useful. Grant submission
deadline is passed, and we have made good progress on the release, so
I can try giving some input.
TL;DR version: do we want to plan for the
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 12:21:24AM +0100, Lars Buitinck wrote:
What we could do is determine a focus for the next release other than
add more features, like:
* implement Python 3 support
* fix outstanding API issues, like sparse matrix support for some estimators.
I agree, but I am not sure
One area I'd like to work on is density estimation: KDE in particular
is an important component of a wide variety of algorithms, and there is
not (to my knowledge) a good flexible scalable KDE implementation
currently in the scipy universe. I think we're well-poised to offer
that, but it
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 09:29:34AM +0100, Andreas Mueller wrote:
I'd really like to get some more feedback from the other core devs about
the survey idea.
What do you think about it?
It's a good idea, but I would make it really clear that the scikit is a
doacracy and the survey is purely
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 05:38:01PM +0100, Andreas Mueller wrote:
For GP: Someone volunteered on the ML recently to take a shot at them.
Let's wait and see, I would say.
GPs are currently not good, but we should really keep them and strive to
improve them: they pop up quite often in machine
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 08:26:21PM +0100, Jaques Grobler wrote:
Regarding the banner, the first screenshot I posted is actually a fixed one
that scrolls along with the page. I like the idea of it being less
disco-intense
but catches your eye as you scroll
I don't really like this idea, as we
Jaques, could you wrap up a PR?
From my perspective the banner is the only thing missing for the
release now.
I'm ambivalent on scrolling / non-scrolling.
Andy
--
Master Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL, ASP.NET, C# 2012,
Hi Andy,
Could you send me a gmail address?SO I can add you as a collaborator in the
form
Leon
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 1:39 AM, Andreas Mueller
amuel...@ais.uni-bonn.dewrote:
Jaques, could you wrap up a PR?
From my perspective the banner is the only thing missing for the
release now.
I'm
2013/1/18 Jaques Grobler jaquesgrob...@gmail.com:
Regarding the banner, the first screenshot I posted is actually a fixed one
that scrolls along with the page. I like the idea of it being less
disco-intense but catches your eye as you scroll
Ok. In that case, +1 for the orange banner, it fits
sending without embedded image.
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 8:56 AM, Satrajit Ghosh sa...@mit.edu wrote:
hi jaques,
looks good. two possible options
1. put it right below the current banner (across the page, below the
logo).
2. change the background to the orange or red. something that brings
Sorry about the embedded one - wasn't thinking there. French weather is
freezing my brain
Here's the image I sent earlier http://i48.tinypic.com/24xgcd0.png
Here's the new one with Satrajit's suggestions
http://i45.tinypic.com/11uztbs.png
2013/1/18 Satrajit Ghosh sa...@mit.edu
sending
Am 18.01.2013 15:06, schrieb Ronnie Ghose:
+1 to a different color. The blue blends in with the bg.
+1
--
Master HTML5, CSS3, ASP.NET, MVC, AJAX, Knockout.js, Web API and
much more. Get web development skills now with
Yeah the first colour was just a random choice :) Was just to get things
going with this
2013/1/18 Andreas Mueller amuel...@ais.uni-bonn.de
Am 18.01.2013 15:06, schrieb Ronnie Ghose:
+1 to a different color. The blue blends in with the bg.
+1
h what about one that does not share color with the scikit webpage at
all. it would look horrible - and as a result stand out
0 - neutral
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Andreas Mueller
amuel...@ais.uni-bonn.dewrote:
Am 18.01.2013 15:06, schrieb Ronnie Ghose:
+1 to a different
How long would the survey take? If it takes less than 2 minutes, then I
think it is better to say a one minute survey instead of a quick survey.
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 10:29 PM, Ronnie Ghose ronnie.gh...@gmail.comwrote:
h what about one that does not share color with the scikit webpage at
@Ronnie - here are some colours that don't really fit the theme versions
pink http://i49.tinypic.com/286zac1.png
cyan http://i50.tinypic.com/ao8d42.png
green http://i46.tinypic.com/2rc05si.png
red http://i50.tinypic.com/nd91le.png
Stil using layout from Satrajit's suggestion here
J
2013/1/18
Am 18.01.2013 15:40, schrieb xinfan meng:
How long would the survey take? If it takes less than 2 minutes, then
I think it is better to say a one minute survey instead of a quick
survey.
Not sure. Take it and we will know ;)
@xinfan - good question :) Not sure how long it would take yet - but I'll
make a note of that
2013/1/18 Jaques Grobler jaquesgrob...@gmail.com
@Ronnie - here are some colours that don't really fit the theme versions
pink http://i49.tinypic.com/286zac1.png
cyan
+1 red or green since they stick out really obviously
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Jaques Grobler jaquesgrob...@gmail.comwrote:
@Ronnie - here are some colours that don't really fit the theme versions
pink http://i49.tinypic.com/286zac1.png
cyan http://i50.tinypic.com/ao8d42.png
green
Question 7:
Question mark.
I'm not sure question 7 is needed in its current form. If the options
were broad concepts like Coding quality, Integration with other
libraries, scalability, efficiency, then the question would work.
As it stands, this question is answered by the above
hi jaques,
here is a quick fiddle to play around with the markup/colors. i just used
twitter bootstrap's alert css embedded it in a div after the header.
http://jsfiddle.net/Fgc39/
cheers,
satra
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Jaques Grobler jaquesgrob...@gmail.comwrote:
@Ronnie - here are
Btw, if we do keep 7 in some form, it should be checkbox, not a radio
button.
--
Master HTML5, CSS3, ASP.NET, MVC, AJAX, Knockout.js, Web API and
much more. Get web development skills now with LearnDevNow -
350+ hours of
2013/1/18 Jaques Grobler jaquesgrob...@gmail.com:
@Ronnie - here are some colours that don't really fit the theme versions
pink http://i49.tinypic.com/286zac1.png
cyan http://i50.tinypic.com/ao8d42.png
green http://i46.tinypic.com/2rc05si.png
red http://i50.tinypic.com/nd91le.png
-1, all of
For the 1.0 release, I would concentrate on machine learning classics,
essentially supervised and unsupervised learning methods (i.e. the
methods for which our API is robust and well-tested). I would keep
structured prediction, semi-supervised learning, active learning or
anything that requires
http://jsfiddle.net/Fgc39/1/
all controlled via the css 'alert'.
cheers,
satra
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Lars Buitinck l.j.buiti...@uva.nl wrote:
2013/1/18 Jaques Grobler jaquesgrob...@gmail.com:
@Ronnie - here are some colours that don't really fit the theme versions
pink
2013/1/18 Mathieu Blondel math...@mblondel.org:
Modules I would consider for removal are gaussian processes,
semi-supervised learning and HMMs. We could move them to a
scikit-learn-bleeding-edge repository.
+1 for getting rid of the HMMs; I never liked their API, and the
MultinomialHMM in
Am 18.01.2013 17:25, schrieb Lars Buitinck:
2013/1/18 Mathieu Blondel math...@mblondel.org:
Modules I would consider for removal are gaussian processes,
semi-supervised learning and HMMs. We could move them to a
scikit-learn-bleeding-edge repository.
+1 for getting rid of the HMMs; I never
+1 for removing HMM from 1.0 I would still like them accessible somewhere
though.
+1 for semi-supervised to be kept in 1.0 release. It doesn't seem very
developed. Seems self-explanatory.
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Andreas Mueller
amuel...@ais.uni-bonn.dewrote:
Am 18.01.2013 17:25,
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 1:38 AM, Andreas Mueller
amuel...@ais.uni-bonn.de wrote:
I don't see the problem with semi-supervised algorithm actually. The API
is pretty straight-forward
and there are well-established algorithms like self-taught learning.
The API feels natural and is flexible but
Regarding the banner, the first screenshot I posted is actually a fixed one
that scrolls along with the page. I like the idea of it being less
disco-intense
but catches your eye as you scroll
2013/1/18 Mathieu Blondel math...@mblondel.org
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 1:38 AM, Andreas Mueller
On 19 January 2013 06:47, Satrajit Ghosh sa...@mit.edu wrote:
hi jaques,
in that case i like it (so it stays always on the top of the screen. i
would still recommend for something simpler perhaps without the shading,
just an outline of the box.
cheers,
satra
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at
Hi all.
Leon, did you set up a Forms already?
Do we have any more ideas for questions?
I think we should start voting on them if we want to get it ready for
the release.
Cheers,
Andy
--
Master Visual Studio,
Hello,
I have some sort of form ready in google docs.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dFdyeGNhMzlCRWZUdldpMEZlZ1B1YkE6MQ
Let me know your suggestions
Leon
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:13 PM, Andreas Mueller
amuel...@ais.uni-bonn.dewrote:
Hi all.
Leon, did you set up a
Looks good.. should there perhaps be an 'other' tickbox for the first
question (maybe with a textbox to specify?) - or is that overkill?
also, shouldn't TI be IT? Only Texas Instruments and non english version of
IT comes to mind for me.. I mind be being dumb here :D
Thanks for doing this
Hi Leon.
Looks good, thanks :)
Maybe some others have some ideas for questions?
I think we might get more out of people if we have more multiple choice
or radio buttons,
as these are way easier to click.
Maybe we could also have something about priorities, like which of the
following should
2013/1/17 Leon Palafox leonoe...@gmail.com:
Hello,
I have some sort of form ready in google docs.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dFdyeGNhMzlCRWZUdldpMEZlZ1B1YkE6MQ
For the first question:
- Self taught
- I am still at high school
+ add hobbyist as a third option to
Sure, I can do that
Regards,
J
2013/1/17 Andreas Mueller amuel...@ais.uni-bonn.de
Hi Leon.
Looks good, thanks :)
Maybe some others have some ideas for questions?
I think we might get more out of people if we have more multiple choice or
radio buttons,
as these are way easier to click.
:* Re: [Scikit-learn-general] Roadmap / Scope
** **
Hello,
** **
I have some sort of form ready in google docs.
** **
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/viewform?formkey=dFdyeGNhMzlCRWZUdldpMEZlZ1B1YkE6MQ
** **
Let me know your suggestions
** **
Leon
Hey everybody.
I'd really like to get some more feedback from the other core devs about
the survey idea.
What do you think about it?
Also, if we do it, it would be great if we could find one of the core
devs to oversee it and see that it
gets on the website in time and everything.
I should
Hey Andy
I really like the idea of the survey. It would definitely help focus the
project better considering it's rapid growth..
It's a good way to stay up to speed with which features people would like
to see and would
actually use, and which ones aren't used much. The ones that aren't used
Hi Jaques.
Thanks for volunteering. I was actually thinking more about a banner
that people can't overlook ;)
But if you make it flashy enough in the sidebar, that would also be ok,
I guess.
Anyhow, before any serious work gets done, I'd like to hear the opinion
of Mathieu, Lars, Alex, Gael,
Banner would be nice too.. open to any suggestions there ..
Regards
2013/1/14 Andreas Mueller amuel...@ais.uni-bonn.de
Hi Jaques.
Thanks for volunteering. I was actually thinking more about a banner
that people can't overlook ;)
But if you make it flashy enough in the sidebar, that would
A survey would be quite helpful to make a detailed roadmap. Maybe we can
also put the survey on somewhere machine learning guys gather like Kaggle.
I wanna share some thoughts on adding new algorithms. More and more papers
are published for machine learning, and plenty of new algorithms are
Hi everyone.
I am pretty psyched that I got so much feedback :)
I think planning for a road towards 1.0 and also beyond would be good.
Thanks Gilles for sharing your insights.
They match quit well what I had in mind :)
Also, I think getting an idea about the userbase would be great - though
it
+1 on those suggestions
My impression is the core value of sklearn is being readily useful to
practitioners of machine learning algorithms. We shouldn't be afraid to
deprecate modules that aren't being used. I think much of the core effort
will be in making the library more internally consistent,
Am 11.01.2013 11:13, schrieb Olivier Grisel:
+1 We need to come up with a survey form using google doc's form (now
renamed to google drive forms) and advertise it here and over our
social networks.
http://google.about.com/od/toolsfortheoffice/ss/forms_googledoc.htm
Why not surveymonkey? I
Hey Guys, I'll be happy to start a draft.
So far I have the following questions:
1. How many users do we actually have? a few dozens? hundreds? thousands?
(I think this will be a bit tricky)
2. What is your Academic Background (CS Related/Non CS related (Biology,
Physics, etc))
3. What is your
I love the survey idea. I'd like to add some free text fields around how
do you use sklearn, what would you like to see in sklearn. Having
restricted questions is good, but the text may give us some answers we
weren't expecting.
On Jan 11, 2013 9:44 PM, Leon Palafox leonoe...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/1/11 Andreas Mueller amuel...@ais.uni-bonn.de:
Am 11.01.2013 11:13, schrieb Olivier Grisel:
+1 We need to come up with a survey form using google doc's form (now
renamed to google drive forms) and advertise it here and over our
social networks.
Am 11.01.2013 11:43, schrieb Leon Palafox:
Hey Guys, I'll be happy to start a draft.
So far I have the following questions:
1. How many users do we actually have? a few dozens? hundreds?
thousands? (I think this will be a bit tricky)
2. What is your Academic Background (CS Related/Non CS
Hi everybody.
Long and general mail coming on.
TL;DR version: do we want to plan for the future?
Today I read this blog post on the scope of open source projects:
http://brianegranger.com/?p=249
It made me dig up an old mail draft I wrote after reading a post by Gael:
I am +1 on a plan, since it's helpful for newbies like myself in
orienting themselves, and helps focus developer effort.
That said, the breadth of this project is pretty amazing, and it's
probably a good idea to keep classifiers which are up-and-coming in
academia available. I guess I'm voting
On 11 January 2013 10:21, Lars Buitinck l.j.buiti...@uva.nl wrote:
2013/1/10 Andreas Mueller amuel...@ais.uni-bonn.de:
I wanted to ask: should we try to make plans? We get a lot of PRs and
have more and more contributors and I think it might be nice
if we had some form of road map to give
2013/1/11 Lars Buitinck l.j.buiti...@uva.nl:
2013/1/10 Andreas Mueller amuel...@ais.uni-bonn.de:
I wanted to ask: should we try to make plans? We get a lot of PRs and
have more and more contributors and I think it might be nice
if we had some form of road map to give everything a bit more
Hi all,
One component of a good roadmap would be to make sure we emphasize good
implementations of fundamental ML algorithms. One area I'd like to work
on is density estimation: KDE in particular is an important component of
a wide variety of algorithms, and there is not (to my knowledge) a
2013/1/11 Vlad Niculae zephy...@gmail.com:
I completely agree with everyone regarding 1.0 and I really think we should
make a clear list of issues for this (just saying API is pretty vague).
However there is life after the 1.0, and I think Andy's message was more
about that kind of long-term
64 matches
Mail list logo
