On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 06:02:47PM +0200, Tadej Janež wrote:
Another very convincing argument why we want to move away from SF is the
behavior of their new owner:
We'd all like to move away from SF. There is just work to do for this,
and so far nobody has been able to free time.
G
On Fri, 2013-08-30 at 11:52 +0200, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
We'd all like to move away from SF. There is just work to do for this,
and so far nobody has been able to free time.
No problem, I understand. I just shared this as I didn't know if you
were already convinced or not.
Best regards,
On 08/29/2013 08:55 AM, Eustache DIEMERT wrote:
+1
Apart form the ml and binaries hosting, is there other stuff from SF
we rely on ?
The website unfortunately :-/
--
Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Andreas Mueller
amuel...@ais.uni-bonn.dewrote:
On 08/29/2013 08:55 AM, Eustache DIEMERT wrote:
+1
Apart form the ml and binaries hosting, is there other stuff from SF
we rely on ?
The website unfortunately :-/
On a related note, I noticed recently
For the website I believe we could host it on github directly [1] as it's
100% static I believe.
Maybe all the binaries could go there too.
[1] http://pages.github.com/
2013/8/29 Mathieu Blondel math...@mblondel.org
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Andreas Mueller amuel...@ais.uni-bonn.de
On 29 August 2013 09:31, Eustache DIEMERT eusta...@diemert.fr wrote:
For the website I believe we could host it on github directly [1] as it's
100% static I believe.
Github doesn't support redirection and we need those for the different
version of the websites. Moving to github isn't an
Mmm not sure what you mean by redirection, but it seems we can setup a
custom domain with Github Pages :
https://help.github.com/articles/setting-up-a-custom-domain-with-pages
FWIW
2013/8/29 Nelle Varoquaux nelle.varoqu...@gmail.com
On 29 August 2013 09:31, Eustache DIEMERT
On 08/29/2013 11:00 AM, Nelle Varoquaux wrote:
On 29 August 2013 09:31, Eustache DIEMERT eusta...@diemert.fr
mailto:eusta...@diemert.fr wrote:
For the website I believe we could host it on github directly [1]
as it's 100% static I believe.
Github doesn't support redirection and
These cannot replace our current setup. We could/should think about
changing our setup, but that requires work. The two most important aspect
are that the home page http://scikit-learn.org points to the stable
documentation, and that the stable and 0.14 are valid links. The first
point is starting
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 09:07:08AM +0200, Andreas Mueller wrote:
They are also on pypi:
https://pypi.python.org/pypi?:action=displayname=scikit-learnversion=0.14.1
Good point. I think that we can probably get rid of SF and rely on pypi.
We will however have to unhide previous binaries.
Gaël
It's about redirecting /dev and /stable to the appropriate fixed paths.
Actually I remember that this has been looked into, I vaguely remember a
thread a while back.
I think the problem is that we couldn't move to github while keeping all
the old links and looking the same in the eyes of the
Mmm not sure what you mean by redirection,
URL rewrites. Have a look at our .htaccess. There are a lot of things
going on that make the website seemless.
G
--
Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013,
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 12:16:37PM +0200, Andreas Mueller wrote:
I think never really looked into that.
I heard this claim a couple of times but never got any real facts.
Have a look at our .htaccess. You'll understand the problem quite
quickly.
Github doesn't support url rewrites.
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 01:19:24PM +0300, Vlad Niculae wrote:
It's about redirecting /dev and /stable to the appropriate fixed paths.
Actually I remember that this has been looked into, I vaguely remember a
thread a while back.
I think that the new build layout is a step forward in
On 08/29/2013 12:21 PM, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 12:16:37PM +0200, Andreas Mueller wrote:
I think never really looked into that.
I heard this claim a couple of times but never got any real facts.
Have a look at our .htaccess. You'll understand the problem quite
On 08/29/2013 12:18 PM, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 09:07:08AM +0200, Andreas Mueller wrote:
They are also on pypi:
https://pypi.python.org/pypi?:action=displayname=scikit-learnversion=0.14.1
Good point. I think that we can probably get rid of SF and rely on pypi.
We will
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 01:27:45PM +0200, Andreas Mueller wrote:
Why can't we just put the content of the stable website in the main
folder and the dev website in this folder?
This is the way it used to be, but the risk is to run into collisions.
However, we could move the main index.html one
On 08/29/2013 01:30 PM, Andreas Mueller wrote:
On 08/29/2013 01:27 PM, Andreas Mueller wrote:
On 08/29/2013 12:21 PM, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 12:16:37PM +0200, Andreas Mueller wrote:
I think never really looked into that.
I heard this claim a couple of times
+ have a symlink from /stable to / (or do a rewrite there and remove
stable later on).
I don't think that github will support that. Do you know that for a fact?
That would solve most of our problems.
G
--
Learn the
On 08/29/2013 01:35 PM, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 01:27:45PM +0200, Andreas Mueller wrote:
Why can't we just put the content of the stable website in the main
folder and the dev website in this folder?
This is the way it used to be, but the risk is to run into collisions.
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 01:35:02PM +0200, Andreas Mueller wrote:
Sorry, I meant redirect, not rewrite. Btw, github pages use jekyll,
which supports automatic rewrites of directories.
OK, that might be a way forward. Anybody interested in prototyping
this?
Gaël
2013/8/29 Andreas Mueller amuel...@ais.uni-bonn.de:
I'd favor the redirect /stable to / solution to the redirect / to
stable solution, but both have their pros and cons.
Collisions are possible, but only if we have a subfolder on the website
called dev, 0.14 (or any other X.X),
which I would
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 01:47:26PM +0200, Andreas Mueller wrote:
As far as I understood (90% certainty), github supports automatic
redirects via jekyll (it will generate loads of /stable/auto_examples/..
files that redirect to /auto_examples/...).
I am perfectly happy to drop the
On 08/29/2013 01:55 PM, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
Collisions are possible, but only if we have a subfolder on the website
called dev, 0.14 (or any other X.X),
It's not only about collisions, it's also that I find the URL more
explicit.
I'd be fine with either one.
I won't have time to work on it
2013/8/29 Gael Varoquaux gael.varoqu...@normalesup.org:
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 01:47:26PM +0200, Andreas Mueller wrote:
As far as I understood (90% certainty), github supports automatic
redirects via jekyll (it will generate loads of /stable/auto_examples/..
files that redirect to
On Thu, 2013-08-29 at 12:18 +0200, Gael Varoquaux wrote:
Good point. I think that we can probably get rid of SF and rely on pypi.
Another very convincing argument why we want to move away from SF is the
behavior of their new owner:
Dice, the new owners, strongly encourage the top projects to
Hey everybody.
I was just alerted by Sean Voilante that
1) there was no tarball for 0.14.1 on sourceforge
2) the tarball for 0.14.a1 was 100mb.
It seems someone (me?) forgot to upload the tarballs.
I fixed the 0.14.a1 on pypi, but apparently not on sourceforge.
I was just wondering if it is
27 matches
Mail list logo
