RE: Re: accurev provider

2009-04-03 Thread Rodriguez, Pedro
vious version (if this is what you meant by "effect of the new URL syntax"). In fact, I was only able to use the plugin release with Accurev after Grant contribution. Pedro Original Message Subject: Re: accurev provider Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 01:56:19 +1100 From: Br

Re: accurev provider

2009-04-01 Thread Grant Gardner
I faxed in the CLA today. Also uploaded a new version to the JIRA that fixes a few bugs under Windows. Grant. On Wed, 1 Apr 2009 01:56:19 +1100, Brett Porter wrote: > Do the authors of the original provider, or other users here, have an > opinion on this? I like that it is more complete (func

Re: accurev provider

2009-03-31 Thread Brett Porter
censes/icla.txt) Thanks! - Brett On 07/03/2009, at 12:50 PM, Grant Gardner wrote: Hi, I've got my AccuRev provider to a point where both the release plugin and Continuum are working (for me). Includes unit tests and tck tests for all the implemented commands. How do I go about contributi

Re: accurev provider

2009-03-17 Thread Grant Gardner
> - Brett > > On 07/03/2009, at 12:50 PM, Grant Gardner wrote: > >> >> >> Hi, I've got my AccuRev provider to a point where both the release >> plugin >> and Continuum are working (for me). >> >> Includes unit tests and tck tests

Re: accurev provider

2009-03-08 Thread Brett Porter
/2009, at 12:50 PM, Grant Gardner wrote: Hi, I've got my AccuRev provider to a point where both the release plugin and Continuum are working (for me). Includes unit tests and tck tests for all the implemented commands. How do I go about contributing the code?. Grant. -- Brett Port

Re: accurev provider

2009-03-06 Thread Grant Gardner
Hi, I've got my AccuRev provider to a point where both the release plugin and Continuum are working (for me). Includes unit tests and tck tests for all the implemented commands. How do I go about contributing the code?. Grant.

Re: accurev provider

2009-01-13 Thread Mark Struberg
> Via the command line. fine, just 2 make sure that we don't get license troubles. LieGrue, strub --- Ivan Luzyanin schrieb am Di, 13.1.2009: > Von: Ivan Luzyanin > Betreff: Re: accurev provider > An: scm-dev@maven.apache.org > Datum: Dienstag, 13. Januar 2009, 12:04 &g

Re: accurev provider

2009-01-13 Thread Ivan Luzyanin
we have no license problems > anymore. > > Grant, I've not yet looked at the accurev code, but how does it invoke the > SCM? Via API or via command line? > > LieGrue, > strub > > > --- ggardner schrieb am Di, 13.1.2009: > >> Von: ggardner >> Be

Re: accurev provider

2009-01-13 Thread Mark Struberg
t the accurev code, but how does it invoke the SCM? Via API or via command line? LieGrue, strub --- ggardner schrieb am Di, 13.1.2009: > Von: ggardner > Betreff: Re: accurev provider > An: scm-dev@maven.apache.org > Datum: Dienstag, 13. Januar 2009, 11:14 > Thanks, I wanted an

Re: accurev provider

2009-01-13 Thread ggardner
>> >> Hi all, >> >> I've been working on extending the AccuRev provider implementation >> to be >> fully compatible with the maven release plugin. >> (ie update, status, checkin, tag, checkout, add) >> >> I think I'm pretty close w

Re: accurev provider

2009-01-12 Thread Jason van Zyl
If you got code then you need to accompany it with complete tests or we're likely not to look at it. On 12-Jan-09, at 4:51 AM, ggardner wrote: Hi all, I've been working on extending the AccuRev provider implementation to be fully compatible with the maven release plugin.

accurev provider

2009-01-12 Thread ggardner
Hi all, I've been working on extending the AccuRev provider implementation to be fully compatible with the maven release plugin. (ie update, status, checkin, tag, checkout, add) I think I'm pretty close with the necessary commands implemented and the tck tests passing against