On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 9:11 PM, James Carlson
wrote:
> Sebastien Roy writes:
>> 3. Ability to delete and rename repositories. If you have (2), then you
>> don't necessarily need this, depending on how much infrastructure is
>> used to keep track of repos on the site... Having options to do thi
Sebastien Roy wrote:
> Sounds good, I can't wait for these RFEs to be implemented. :-)
Having spent an age today archiving and deleting repos by hand, neither
can I... ;-)
I'm deleting the clearview repos now, sorry for missing them off the
list - duh! I'll send out a mail when they are gone.
Sebastien Roy wrote:
> I'm just getting around to reading this. Here are some suggestions:
>
> 1. Ability to clone a repository that is hosted on the same site. For
> example it's very wasteful in terms of time and network resources to
> have to transfer all of onnv across the internet twice in
On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 19:20 +, Alan Burlison wrote:
> Sebastien Roy wrote:
>
> > I'm just getting around to reading this. Here are some suggestions:
> >
> > 1. Ability to clone a repository that is hosted on the same site. For
> > example it's very wasteful in terms of time and network res
Sebastien Roy writes:
> 3. Ability to delete and rename repositories. If you have (2), then you
> don't necessarily need this, depending on how much infrastructure is
> used to keep track of repos on the site... Having options to do this
> from the web interface would be very useful (and it looks
One more:
On Wed, 2008-11-19 at 13:50 -0500, Sebastien Roy wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 01:49 -0700, Martin Walsh wrote:
> > http://repo.opensolaris.org
> >
> > The application is a rework of the current SCM console, so most of the
> > functionality is the same. This test release is with a view
On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 01:49 -0700, Martin Walsh wrote:
> http://repo.opensolaris.org
>
> The application is a rework of the current SCM console, so most of the
> functionality is the same. This test release is with a view to getting
> the UI correct, before adding more features to the console.
>
Just an update to let you know that there have been a couple of updates
to the new SCM console at repo.opensolaris.org.
Thanks to those who provided the initial feedback on the application.
Any further comments, suggestions welcome.
Martin
Martin Walsh wrote:
> michelle olson wrote:
>
>> Hi Martin,
>>
>> The changes you've made so far look great, the app is much easier to
>> navigate already. My reply to your question inline below.
>>
>> Martin Walsh wrote:
>>
>>> Mike Kupfer wrote:
>>>
A distinct but related con
michelle olson wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> The changes you've made so far look great, the app is much easier to
> navigate already. My reply to your question inline below.
>
> Martin Walsh wrote:
>> Mike Kupfer wrote:
>>> A distinct but related concern about the Repository link:
>>>
>>> I just got a
Mike Kupfer wrote:
> A distinct but related concern about the Repository link:
>
> I just got around to playing with the testbed, and I thought that the
> behavior of the Repository link was odd. If I just click on it, it
> complains that I haven't selected a repository. Seems like it should be
Mike Kupfer wrote:
>> "Martin" == Martin Walsh writes:
>
> Martin> Project
> Martin> - Leaders
> Martin> - Operations
> Martin> - Repositories (This is just the table of repos)
> Martin> - Repository (This is a repo that has been selected. Note this
> Martin> is always there now. Althoug
Hi Martin,
The changes you've made so far look great, the app is much easier to
navigate already. My reply to your question inline below.
Martin Walsh wrote:
> Mike Kupfer wrote:
>> A distinct but related concern about the Repository link:
>>
>> I just got around to playing with the testbed, and
> "Martin" == Martin Walsh writes:
Martin> The other issues you mentioned should now be fixed/updated and
Martin> are now on repo.opensolaris.org.
Yup, thanks.
Martin> Any suggestions about the action column on the list of
Martin> repositories? Remove completely?
That'd be fine with me.
> "Martin" == Martin Walsh writes:
Martin> Project
Martin> - Leaders
Martin> - Operations
Martin> - Repositories (This is just the table of repos)
Martin> - Repository (This is a repo that has been selected. Note this
Martin> is always there now. Although the naming could be confusing!)
Michelle Olson wrote:
> Martin Walsh wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> [mo-1] I noticed that if I login, I don't have a 'Repositories' link
>>> in the left-navigation. But, after I click on one of the repo links,
>>> the Repositories left-nav link appears. It seems like it should
>>> always appear in the left-n
John Plocher wrote:
> I agree with Danek - your use case seems incomplete. I'd
> add some context, such as: Why would people use this
> app? Who would they be (and would their actions differ based
> on their roles)? What tasks would they have in mind? Where
> would they have been immediately b
Danek Duvall wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 05:54:01PM +0100, Martin Walsh wrote:
>
>>> Searching for nothing? That's an incredibly unintuitive interface.
>> I have added a not in the web interface to inform users of this. The
>> alternative is that we load up the first page of affiliates. B
Mark J. Nelson wrote:
>
> What does Verify actually do?
>
Verifies the integrity of the repository (svnadmin verify
$REPO_PATH.) This is only supported by Subversion.
>
>>> Then it probably shouldn't show up for mercurial repos.
>
>> This has been done.
>
> Why would we support
Danek Duvall wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 02:00:30PM +0100, Martin Walsh wrote:
>
>> I am just thinking further about this point. The reason that their is
>> no repositories link is because repositories are contained within a
>> project. The project page will be the entry point of the appl
Danek Duvall wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:02:55AM +0100, Martin Walsh wrote:
>
>>> Affiliates could have a complete list, too -- are there enough projects
>>> which have enough affiliates to require not printing the list? I searched
>>> for "sch", but it didn't return anything, perahps bec
Danek Duvall wrote:
> Every project has "leaders". This set of users are also have commit
> privileges for all repositories associated with the project (as well as
> being the exact set of users able to edit the project pages). This
> association should be able to be broken, as not all "leaders"
Martin Walsh wrote:
>
>>
>> [mo-1] I noticed that if I login, I don't have a 'Repositories' link
>> in the left-navigation. But, after I click on one of the repo links,
>> the Repositories left-nav link appears. It seems like it should
>> always appear in the left-nav, even at first login. Also,
>
> [mo-1] I noticed that if I login, I don't have a 'Repositories' link in
> the left-navigation. But, after I click on one of the repo links, the
> Repositories left-nav link appears. It seems like it should always
> appear in the left-nav, even at first login. Also, if I click the
> Projec
michelle olson wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> My feedback and a possible bug below.
>
> Martin Walsh wrote:
>> http://repo.opensolaris.org
>>
>> The application is a rework of the current SCM console, so most of the
>> functionality is the same. This test release is with a view to getting the
>> UI co
Martin Walsh wrote:
> Well at the moment it is effectively a repository management app. You
> cannot search projects etc. If a Leader gets redirected to the SCM
> console from the portal,...
I agree with Danek - your use case seems incomplete. I'd
add some context, such as: Why would people u
What does Verify actually do?
>>> Verifies the integrity of the repository (svnadmin verify $REPO_PATH.) This
>>> is only supported by Subversion.
>> Then it probably shouldn't show up for mercurial repos.
> This has been done.
Why would we support svnadmin verify, but not hg verify?
--
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 05:54:01PM +0100, Martin Walsh wrote:
>> Searching for nothing? That's an incredibly unintuitive interface.
>
> I have added a not in the web interface to inform users of this. The
> alternative is that we load up the first page of affiliates. But depending
> on the co
Tom Haynes wrote:
>
>>> Martin Walsh wrote:
>>>
http://repo.opensolaris.org
The application is a rework of the current SCM console, so most of the
functionality is the same. This test release is with a view to getting
the UI correct, before adding more features to the
Danek Duvall wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 02:58:40AM +0900, Jim Grisanzio wrote:
>
>> Martin Walsh wrote:
>>> http://repo.opensolaris.org
>>>
>>> The application is a rework of the current SCM console, so most of the
>>> functionality is the same. This test release is with a view to getting
>>
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 02:00:30PM +0100, Martin Walsh wrote:
> I am just thinking further about this point. The reason that their is
> no repositories link is because repositories are contained within a
> project. The project page will be the entry point of the application,
> when it is depl
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 10:02:55AM +0100, Martin Walsh wrote:
>> Affiliates could have a complete list, too -- are there enough projects
>> which have enough affiliates to require not printing the list? I searched
>> for "sch", but it didn't return anything, perahps because he's a project
>> lead
Martin Walsh wrote:
> http://repo.opensolaris.org
>
> The application is a rework of the current SCM console, so most of the
> functionality is the same. This test release is with a view to getting the UI
> correct, before adding more features to the console.
>
> Bug reports, feedback, etc welcom
>> Martin Walsh wrote:
>>
>>> http://repo.opensolaris.org
>>>
>>> The application is a rework of the current SCM console, so most of the
>>> functionality is the same. This test release is with a view to getting
>>> the UI correct, before adding more features to the console.
>>>
>>> Bug repor
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 02:58:40AM +0900, Jim Grisanzio wrote:
> Martin Walsh wrote:
> > http://repo.opensolaris.org
> >
> > The application is a rework of the current SCM console, so most of the
> > functionality is the same. This test release is with a view to getting
> > the UI correct, before
35 matches
Mail list logo
