> Am 06.04.2018 um 14:12 schrieb Eric Rullens:
>> Dear Philipp,
>>
>> Apologies for bumping into this conversation (and thank you very much
>> for
>> all the work!), but I think the assembler does what it should do.
>>
>> Please consider the following:
>>
>> [â¦]
>>
>>
Am 07.04.2018 um 15:50 schrieb Maarten Brock:
> I see in the stm8-large regression that you fixed it by loading the least
> significant word into x and the most significant byte into a and write
> those to the function pointer location as you need them. Is this an OK
> solution or would you still
> Am 07.04.2018 um 15:50 schrieb Maarten Brock:
>
>> I see in the stm8-large regression that you fixed it by loading the
>> least
>> significant word into x and the most significant byte into a and write
>> those to the function pointer location as you need them. Is this an OK
>> solution or would
Am 07.04.2018 um 18:31 schrieb Maarten Brock:
>> Am 07.04.2018 um 15:50 schrieb Maarten Brock:
>>
>>> I see in the stm8-large regression that you fixed it by loading the
>>> least
>>> significant word into x and the most significant byte into a and write
>>> those to the function pointer location a
> Am 07.04.2018 um 18:31 schrieb Maarten Brock:
>>> Am 07.04.2018 um 15:50 schrieb Maarten Brock:
>>>
I see in the stm8-large regression that you fixed it by loading the
least
significant word into x and the most significant byte into a and write
those to the function pointer lo
