[jira] Resolved: (JSPF-57) dnsjnio asynchronous lookup throws an NPE on late answers (answers received after the internal timeout)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPF-57?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Stefano Bagnara resolved JSPF-57. - Resolution: Fixed dnsjnio has been updated to the 0.9.9 release that fixes this issue. dnsjnio

[jira] Resolved: (JAMES-832) addDeliveryHeader is required for ToMultiRepository or it will try to stire a null message

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Stefano Bagnara resolved JAMES-832. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: (was: Trunk) 3.0

svn commit: r612057 - /james/jspf/trunk/src/test/resources/org/apache/james/jspf/rfc4408-tests.yml

Author: bago Date: Tue Jan 15 01:35:29 2008 New Revision: 612057 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=612057view=rev Log: Update the rfc4408-tests.yml to the latest available from the openspf group. Modified: james/jspf/trunk/src/test/resources/org/apache/james/jspf/rfc4408-tests.yml

svn commit: r612067 - /james/server/trunk/spoolmanager-function/src/main/java/org/apache/james/transport/mailets/ToMultiRepository.java

Author: bago Date: Tue Jan 15 02:09:41 2008 New Revision: 612067 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=612067view=rev Log: Added repositorySelector configuration to ToMultiRepository (JAMES-833). repositorySelectorlocalpart/repositorySelector is the default. full is an alternative valid value.

[jira] Resolved: (JAMES-833) ToMultiRepository doesn't resolve repository_name correctly

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-833?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Stefano Bagnara resolved JAMES-833. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: (was: Trunk) 3.0

basic-user-function vs avalon-user-function

Hi Robert, can you explain why you decided for an ad-hoc function module for org.apache.james.vut.XMLVirtualUserTable and org.apache.james.userrepository.UsersLDAPRepository instead of using the avalon-user-function for them, too? In the svn log I see Created module to home user

Postage for download?

Hi, There doesn't seem to be any download distribution for Postage :(. I suppose that there's no stable release cause maybe it's not mature enough, but there aren't also no Test builds nor Nightly builds - despite the URLs from http://james.apache.org/postage/index.html Thanks in advance,

Re: basic-user-function vs avalon-user-function

On Jan 15, 2008 10:51 AM, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Robert, can you explain why you decided for an ad-hoc function module for org.apache.james.vut.XMLVirtualUserTable and org.apache.james.userrepository.UsersLDAPRepository instead of using the avalon-user-function for

Re: basic-user-function vs avalon-user-function

Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On Jan 15, 2008 10:51 AM, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Robert, can you explain why you decided for an ad-hoc function module for org.apache.james.vut.XMLVirtualUserTable and org.apache.james.userrepository.UsersLDAPRepository instead of using

Re: Postage for download?

On Jan 15, 2008 11:52 AM, Ahmed Mohombe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, There doesn't seem to be any download distribution for Postage :(. I suppose that there's no stable release cause maybe it's not mature enough, but there aren't also no Test builds nor Nightly builds - despite the URLs

Re: basic-user-function vs avalon-user-function

On Jan 15, 2008 1:51 PM, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On Jan 15, 2008 10:51 AM, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Robert, can you explain why you decided for an ad-hoc function module for org.apache.james.vut.XMLVirtualUserTable

Re: basic-user-function vs avalon-user-function

Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On Jan 15, 2008 1:51 PM, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Btw If I am alone with this idea, then no problem. I just wanted to share that IMHO this (that module with 2 classes) makes no sense. i'm not sure that the number of classes should be relevant:

Re: basic-user-function vs avalon-user-function

Am Dienstag, den 15.01.2008, 19:41 +0100 schrieb Stefano Bagnara: Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On Jan 15, 2008 1:51 PM, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Btw If I am alone with this idea, then no problem. I just wanted to share that IMHO this (that module with 2 classes) makes

Re: Postage for download?

Ahmed Mohombe wrote: Hi, There doesn't seem to be any download distribution for Postage :(. I suppose that there's no stable release cause maybe it's not mature enough, but there aren't also no Test builds nor Nightly builds - despite the URLs from http://james.apache.org/postage/index.html

Re: Nightly builds all fail

Bernd Fondermann ha scritto: Hi, I hope this is just me, but all the nightly build artifacts fail when run (while the nightly build process itself seems to work). I don't have enough time to look more deeply into each problem, sorry for that :-/ I just tested the default ant build on my local

Re: basic-user-function vs avalon-user-function

Norman Maurer wrote: Am Dienstag, den 15.01.2008, 19:41 +0100 schrieb Stefano Bagnara: Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: On Jan 15, 2008 1:51 PM, Stefano Bagnara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Btw If I am alone with this idea, then no problem. I just wanted to share that IMHO this (that module with

RE: Nightly builds all fail

Bernd Fondermann wrote: Noel, could you do me a favor please when you find the time and have a look into the stage directory on the build machine. I purged it (rm -rf) and replaced it from SVN. --- Noel - To

Re: Nightly builds all fail

On Jan 16, 2008 4:29 AM, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bernd Fondermann wrote: Noel, could you do me a favor please when you find the time and have a look into the stage directory on the build machine. I purged it (rm -rf) and replaced it from SVN. --- Noel :-) many