Norman Maurer wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 15.01.2008, 19:41 +0100 schrieb Stefano Bagnara:
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Jan 15, 2008 1:51 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Btw If I am alone with this idea, then no problem. I just wanted to
share that IMHO this (that module with 2 classes) makes no sense.
i'm not sure that the number of classes should be relevant: a better
test is whether the module is a logical and cohesive unit. in this
case, i agreed that it is debatable. but it's a code smell rather than
an anti-pattern. i would like to indicate clearly that there's
something not quite right about JAMES 3.0 rather than hiding it.
I don't care if we want to call it anti-pattern, code smell or
differently. I don't like it and I think it is complicating things
instead of making it simpler (that was the original goal).
What's complicated are the inherent dependencies. Making them explicit
is not complicating them, but easier to deal with.
But, again, if *I* am the only one with this vision then this
conversation does not worth our time anymore :-)
We probably just have different styles: you are the more active at the
moment and no one else expressed his opinion. So your way is the right way.
Well, I expressed at least once my great pleasure for the new layout
since it allowed me to build an alternative deployment module which
would otherwise have been much more difficult.
its the time to step in now ( maybe a bit late at all... ) ;-) Sorry if
im so late. I don't like ( maybe its just of my missing understanding of
ant ) the module stuff to much. For me its really not easy to see
sometimes which module contain which stuff etc. I think its cool to make
it easy to develop and replace modules, so the idea is not bad ( well
its maybe really good). I think its probally "my problem", its just hard
to understand all this stuff after i was so inactiv and not was able to
follow all the changes the last months :-/
Maybe there is a way to make it more "easy to use" ?
It needs some time to get used to it. This monolithic block of code is
just too cumbersome to move forward.
Bernd
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
