Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Jan 15, 2008 10:51 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Robert,
can you explain why you decided for an ad-hoc function module for
org.apache.james.vut.XMLVirtualUserTable
and
org.apache.james.userrepository.UsersLDAPRepository
instead of using the avalon-user-function for them, too?
dependency management
In the svn log I see "Created module to home user implementations
without dependencies", but I don't understand what are the
"dependencies" that avalon-user-function has and that
basic-user-function doesn't want.
As far as I can tell the 2 classes above makes use of avalon stuff the
same way the org.apache.james.vut.JDBCVirtualUserTable or other classes
from avalon-user-function do...
the classes contain avalon glue code but avalon is not essential to
their function
The 2 reasons above IMHO do not justify the added work to mantain one
more module.
Btw If I am alone with this idea, then no problem. I just wanted to
share that IMHO this (that module with 2 classes) makes no sense.
Thank you for the fast reply,
Stefano
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
