Hi Robert,
can you explain why you decided for an ad-hoc function module for
org.apache.james.vut.XMLVirtualUserTable
and
org.apache.james.userrepository.UsersLDAPRepository
instead of using the avalon-user-function for them, too?
In the svn log I see "Created module to home user implementations
without dependencies", but I don't understand what are the
"dependencies" that avalon-user-function has and that
basic-user-function doesn't want.
As far as I can tell the 2 classes above makes use of avalon stuff the
same way the org.apache.james.vut.JDBCVirtualUserTable or other classes
from avalon-user-function do...
I don't like too much to have a function for *2* almost *unrelated*
classes. At a first overview that's what I call antipattern of the
modularization, but it is possible that I'm missing the point behind
that choice.
Thank you,
Stefano
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
