On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 17:51 +, Dev Mohanty wrote:
You could also use the APs in repeater mode with the same SSID, if you're
planning to use more then one AP.
no that is no very handy if want some performance, a repeater eats
bandwidth from the AP.
Best for performance
- big
2009/3/6 Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org:
I will continue testing by rebooting the server and booting all the
XOs again, checking presence visibility, but right now they need a
charge, so that will probably have to wait until monday.
OK. Booted the server again, and all XOs, and they all managed
On 3/9/09, Marten Vijn i...@martenvijn.nl wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 17:51 +, Dev Mohanty wrote:
You could also use the APs in repeater mode with the same SSID, if you're
planning to use more then one AP.
no that is no very handy if want some performance, a repeater eats
On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 09:58 +1300, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 12:11 AM, Bryan Berry br...@olenepal.org wrote:
I am worried about the XO's and not the XS.
Now you're starting to see what I've seen :-/ I also worry about your
APs and networking infra -- to support 400
2009/3/9 Bryan Berry br...@olenepal.org:
We will have roughly 8+ AP's. We have found that off-the-shelf AP's can
handle around 60-70 users. But that doesn't still doesn't solve the
problem of the XO's getting bogged down by tons of ejabberd chatter.
DSD: do you have any ideas about this?
On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 22:36 -0400, Daniel Drake wrote:
2009/3/9 Bryan Berry br...@olenepal.org:
We will have roughly 8+ AP's. We have found that off-the-shelf AP's can
handle around 60-70 users. But that doesn't still doesn't solve the
problem of the XO's getting bogged down by tons of
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Bryan Berry br...@olenepal.org wrote:
On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 09:58 +1300, Martin Langhoff wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 12:11 AM, Bryan Berry br...@olenepal.org wrote:
I am worried about the XO's and not the XS.
Now you're starting to see what I've seen :-/ I
