Re: [sfc-dev] Nominating David Suarez as ODL SFC committer

+1 From: sfc-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org [mailto:sfc-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org] On Behalf Of Brady Johnson Sent: Friday, April 20, 2018 1:15 AM To: sfc-dev opendaylight Subject: [sfc-dev] Nominating David Suarez as ODL SFC committer Hello, I

Re: [sfc-dev] NSH Proxy with SFC103?

For ovs, it is enough, you need to change Vagrantfile. From: Miguel Angel M. [mailto:m.angel...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, May 12, 2017 5:51 PM To: Yang, Yi Y <yi.y.y...@intel.com>; sfc-dev@lists.opendaylight.org Subject: Re: [sfc-dev] NSH Proxy with SFC103? Thanks Yi for your prompt ans

Re: [sfc-dev] NSH Proxy with SFC103?

sfc104 also can support NSH proxy by using ovs or ovs DPDK. $ ./run_demo.sh --nshproxy ovs or $ ./run_demo.sh --nshproxy ovs_dpdk From: sfc-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org [mailto:sfc-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org] On Behalf Of M Angel Sent: Friday, May 12, 2017 4:55 AM To:

Re: [sfc-dev] Problem with vxlan-gpe interface in ovs2.6

Brady, thanks for your notification, so now nettvirt can work with sfc together, right? From: Brady Allen Johnson [mailto:brady.allen.john...@ericsson.com] Sent: Thursday, May 4, 2017 10:39 PM To: mb...@suse.com; Yang, Yi Y <yi.y.y...@intel.com> Cc: sfc-dev@lists.opendaylight.org Subje

Re: [sfc-dev] Problem with vxlan-gpe interface in ovs2.6

, 2017 4:30 AM To: Yang, Yi Y <yi.y.y...@intel.com> Cc: sfc-dev@lists.opendaylight.org Subject: Problem with vxlan-gpe interface in ovs2.6 Hello Yi Yang, We are using your docker image docker-ovs:yyang to test stuff in ODL-SFC Carbon. Today we found out that packets sent through an vxlan-gpe

Re: [sfc-dev] OVS installation issue with NSH patch

ovs 2.5 only can be built on Linux kernel 3.10 to 4.3. From: sfc-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org [mailto:sfc-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org] On Behalf Of Kiruthiga R Sent: Friday, April 21, 2017 1:20 PM To: sfc-dev@lists.opendaylight.org Subject: [sfc-dev] OVS installation issue with NSH

Re: [sfc-dev] SFC Demo 104

You can directly change common/setup_sfc.py in sfc104 demo to try it, flows are not completely cleaned up when you remove classifiers. From: Dinesh Kumar [mailto:dinesh.ku...@openet.com] Sent: Friday, April 7, 2017 10:41 PM To: Yang, Yi Y <yi.y.y...@intel.com>; sfc-dev@lists.opendaylig

Re: [sfc-dev] SFC Demo 104

Hi, Dinesh You can login to every classifier, sf or sff VMs to check. $ . env.sh $ vagrant ssh classifier1 $ vagrant ssh classifier2 $ vagrant ssh sf1 $ vagrant ssh sff1 You can check if sff and sf are handling packets by cmds "ovs-ofctl -Oopenflow13 dump-flows" and "cat vxlan_tool.log",

Re: [sfc-dev] Is anybody using Service Function Groups?

Personally I think it is useful if a SF in SFG broke, in that case sfc should select another SF in this SFG, I’m not sure if current sfc can do so. A Contextream guy Shlomi did this, maybe he can tell us how they are using this. From: sfc-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org

Re: [sfc-dev] SFC project to contribute to the community

I remember a guy from HPE mentioned they implemented service function chaining by using mac, when ODL SFC can support different data plane therefore different service function chaining implementation, Now it can implement service function chaining by MPLS label, VLAN tag and NSH, so the

Re: [sfc-dev] [ovsdb-dev] ovs nsh patches have been ported into ovs 2.6.1

Thanks Andre, it is much better ☺ From: Andre Fredette [mailto:afrede...@redhat.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2016 10:21 PM To: Yang, Yi Y <yi.y.y...@intel.com> Cc: Jamo Luhrsen <jluhr...@gmail.com>; netvirt-...@lists.opendaylight.org; sfc-dev@lists.opendaylight.org; ovsd

Re: [sfc-dev] [ovsdb-dev] ovs nsh patches have been ported into ovs 2.6.1

Thanks Jamo, I know how to enable it now. -Original Message- From: Jamo Luhrsen [mailto:jluhr...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2016 8:56 AM To: Yang, Yi Y <yi.y.y...@intel.com>; Andre Fredette <afrede...@redhat.com> Cc: netvirt-...@lists.opendaylight.

Re: [sfc-dev] ovs nsh patches have been ported into ovs 2.6.1

Andre, thank you for your information, It is the first time for me to know this, can you share us how we can enable not-use-conntrack option for this? I want to try it. From: Andre Fredette [mailto:afrede...@redhat.com] Sent: Monday, December 5, 2016 11:09 PM To: Yang, Yi Y <yi.y.y...@intel.

Re: [sfc-dev] Welcome you to try sfc104 demo

--Original Message- From: Manuel Buil [mailto:manuel.b...@ericsson.com] Sent: Friday, December 2, 2016 12:40 AM To: Yang, Yi Y <yi.y.y...@intel.com>; 'sfc-dev@lists.opendaylight.org' <sfc-dev@lists.opendaylight.org> Cc: Brady Allen Johnson <brady.allen.john...@ericsson.com>;

Re: [sfc-dev] ODL SFF Creation Issue

Hi, Sam and Anil Aricent guys are trying NetVirt and SFC integration, but I think NetVirt isn't ready for this so far, I remember Anil had a demo for this, can you tell them how they do this? From: sfc-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org [mailto:sfc-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org] On

Re: [sfc-dev] Potential bug in NSH patch for OVS

.@ericsson.com> Cc: Manuel Buil <manuel.b...@ericsson.com>; Yang, Yi Y <yi.y.y...@intel.com>; sfc-dev@lists.opendaylight.org; Georgios Paraskevopoulos (geo...@intracom-telecom.com) <geo...@intracom-telecom.com>; Georg Schmuecking <georg.schmueck...@ericsson.com>; Lászl

Re: [sfc-dev] Potential bug in NSH patch for OVS

Manuel, I have sent an email about this in ovs-discussion mailing list. Let us wait for their feedback. From: Manuel Buil [mailto:manuel.b...@ericsson.com] Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2016 4:21 PM To: Yang, Yi Y <yi.y.y...@intel.com> Cc: sfc-dev@lists.opendaylight.org; Georgios Paraskevo

Re: [sfc-dev] Welcome you to try sfc104 demo

] On Behalf Of Yang, Yi Y Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2016 2:57 PM To: Manuel Buil <manuel.b...@ericsson.com>; 'sfc-dev@lists.opendaylight.org' <sfc-dev@lists.opendaylight.org> Subject: Re: [sfc-dev] Welcome you to try sfc104 demo Hi, Manuel Finally I found the root cause, netconf chan

Re: [sfc-dev] Welcome you to try sfc104 demo

enumeration { +enum user-defined; +enum device-advertised; +} +} } } -Original Message- From: Manuel Buil [mailto:manuel.b...@ericsson.com] Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2016 5:16 PM To: Yang,

Re: [sfc-dev] Potential bug in NSH patch for OVS

2016 8:24 PM To: Yang, Yi Y <yi.y.y...@intel.com> Cc: sfc-dev@lists.opendaylight.org; Georgios Paraskevopoulos (geo...@intracom-telecom.com) <geo...@intracom-telecom.com> Subject: RE: Potential bug in NSH patch for OVS Hi Yi Yang, Compute1 has both ports, vxlangpe controlled by

Re: [sfc-dev] [genius-dev] can someone of you sfc & genius integration guys draft several slides for this integration effort?

Thanks Faseela, can you send that sample application with Genius integrated to me? That will be very helpful to me . From: Faseela K [mailto:faseel...@ericsson.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 12:38 PM To: Yang, Yi Y <yi.y.y...@intel.com>; sfc-dev@lists.opendaylight.org Cc:

Re: [sfc-dev] Potential bug in NSH patch for OVS

, November 23, 2016 8:24 PM To: Yang, Yi Y <yi.y.y...@intel.com> Cc: sfc-dev@lists.opendaylight.org; Georgios Paraskevopoulos (geo...@intracom-telecom.com) <geo...@intracom-telecom.com> Subject: RE: Potential bug in NSH patch for OVS Hi Yi Yang, Compute1 has both ports, vxlangpe contr

Re: [sfc-dev] Potential bug in NSH patch for OVS

Then the SFF in compute1 should have two vlxan ports, one (vxlangpe) is controlled by SFC, another (vxlan) is controlled by netvirt, so it should be SFC's issue but not ovs' issue. From: Manuel Buil [mailto:manuel.b...@ericsson.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 4:34 PM To: Yang, Yi Y

[sfc-dev] can someone of you sfc & genius integration guys draft several slides for this integration effort?

Hi, folks I saw we have had many changes for genius, but so far sfc is not ready for genius yet, can someone of you sfc & genius integration guys draft several slides for this integration effort? I believe that everyone of us needs to know what services sfc should register to genius and what

Re: [sfc-dev] Potential bug in NSH patch for OVS

support this, right? Classifier2 must have VxLAN-gpe port for this in compute2. From: Manuel Buil [mailto:manuel.b...@ericsson.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 1:12 AM To: Yang, Yi Y <yi.y.y...@intel.com> Cc: sfc-dev@lists.opendaylight.org; Georgios Paraskevopoulos (geo...@intracom-telec

Re: [sfc-dev] Cherry-pick fix to Boron, was Re: Welcome you to try sfc104 demo

Brady, yes, will check if it is ok. -Original Message- From: Brady Allen Johnson [mailto:brady.allen.john...@ericsson.com] Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 8:02 PM To: Yang, Yi Y <yi.y.y...@intel.com>; Manuel Buil <manuel.b...@ericsson.com>; sfc-dev@lists.opendaylight.org Sub

Re: [sfc-dev] Welcome you to try sfc104 demo

Manuel, I don't know why, it looks like Netconf server can't be started normally. -Original Message- From: Manuel Buil [mailto:manuel.b...@ericsson.com] Sent: Friday, November 18, 2016 5:47 PM To: Yang, Yi Y <yi.y.y...@intel.com> Cc: sfc-dev@lists.opendaylight.org Subject: RE: W

Re: [sfc-dev] Welcome you to try sfc104 demo

[mailto:manuel.b...@ericsson.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2016 7:06 PM To: Yang, Yi Y <yi.y.y...@intel.com>; 'sfc-dev@lists.opendaylight.org' <sfc-dev@lists.opendaylight.org> Subject: RE: Welcome you to try sfc104 demo Hi Yi Yang, I found something which might be a bug. In the script run_de

Re: [sfc-dev] Welcome you to try sfc104 demo

: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 5:16 PM To: Yang, Yi Y <yi.y.y...@intel.com>; sfc-dev@lists.opendaylight.org Subject: RE: Welcome you to try sfc104 demo Hi Yi Yang, Using the latest build of Carbon branch works :). I will now try ovs-dpdk. Any requirements here? For example, I guess I need t

Re: [sfc-dev] Welcome you to try sfc104 demo

please switch to SFC master for this demo. -Original Message- From: Manuel Buil [mailto:manuel.b...@ericsson.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 2:02 AM To: Yang, Yi Y <yi.y.y...@intel.com>; sfc-dev@lists.opendaylight.org Subject: RE: Welcome you to try sfc104 demo Hi, Thanks for the

[sfc-dev] Welcome you to try sfc104 demo

Hi, folks Brady has merged sfc104 demo into sfc master, so each of you can try sfc104 demo, please let me know if you encounter any issue. $ cat sfc-demo/sfc104/README.md SFC104 Demo === Overview SFC103 demo is docker container based, so you have no way to run it if you will

Re: [sfc-dev] Deprecating SFC, SFP, and RSP symmetric fields

y.allen.john...@ericsson.com] Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 8:47 PM To: Swati Deshpande <swati.deshpa...@serro.com>; Yang, Yi Y <yi.y.y...@intel.com> Cc: Diego Jesus Granados Lopez <diego.jesus.granados.lo...@ericsson.com>; sfc-dev@lists.opendaylight.org; Tim Rozet <tro...@

Re: [sfc-dev] SF dataplane set port bug

IANA has assigned it, other services or applications can’t abuse it. https://www.iana.org/assignments/service-names-port-numbers/service-names-port-numbers.xhtml?=86 From: VictorVu [mailto:minowa...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 8, 2016 3:22 PM To: Yang, Yi Y <yi.y.y...@intel.com>;

Re: [sfc-dev] SF dataplane set port bug

To: Yang, Yi Y <yi.y.y...@intel.com>; Brady Johnson <bradyallenjohn...@gmail.com> Cc: sfc-dev opendaylight <sfc-dev@lists.opendaylight.org> Subject: Re: [sfc-dev] SF dataplane set port bug Hi Yang, I don't think the problem is within the SF/sfc-agent, because as you can see in the

Re: [sfc-dev] SF dataplane set port bug

Hi, Victor Try this one patch. From: sfc-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org [mailto:sfc-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org] On Behalf Of VictorVu Sent: Sunday, November 6, 2016 12:38 PM To: Brady Johnson Cc: sfc-dev opendaylight

Re: [sfc-dev] SF dataplane set port bug

This should be sfc-agent (sfc-py) issue, we recommend you use 6633 or 4790, 4790 is VxLAN-gpe port IETF has allocated. From: sfc-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org [mailto:sfc-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org] On Behalf Of VictorVu Sent: Sunday, November 6, 2016 12:38 PM To: Brady Johnson

Re: [sfc-dev] [mdsal-dev] Real problem or misleading exception with mandatory

I also ever encountered this issue, but current master (without this fix) can work without any problem, I'm wondering why "presence" can fix this, isn't this yang-tools issue? Any augmentation should be optional but not mandatory. Does every augmentation need to add "presence"? I see many

Re: [sfc-dev] Regarding NSP set as 0x04

The original patch supports VxLAN-gpe + NSH, but current ovs doesn’t allow this, so we have to add Ethernet header, this is a workaround. Hard code is just to avoid misuse, current version is VxLAN-gpe+Eth+NSH only, no other choice. From: sfc-dev-boun...@lists.opendaylight.org