Re: [sig-policy] prop-132-v001 AS0 for Bogons

Hi Andrew, Good suggestion, it makes more sense and very well noted. I will made the change accordingly. Let me see if any other suggestions comes out later today otherwise I will update the policy. Regards, Aftab A. Siddiqui On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 10:13 AM Andrew Dul wrote: > Hello! > On 8/

Re: [sig-policy] prop-132-v001 AS0 for Bogons

Hi Owen, Just to give you an example, all unallocated address space from 103/8 are under APNIC's management unless they were transferred to other RIRs and then reclaimed by that RIR due to whatever reason. This policy covers all unallocated address space under APNIC's management and asking APNIC to

Re: [sig-policy] prop-132-v001 AS0 for Bogons

Hello! On 8/15/2019 5:00 PM, Aftab Siddiqui wrote: Hi Andrew, On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 5:10 PM Owen DeLong mailto:o...@delong.com>> wrote: Looks like IETF wants the global BOGONs to be attested by IANA rather than by an RIR from what you quoted. Yes, for resources no

Re: [sig-policy] prop-132-v001 AS0 for Bogons

Hi Andrew, > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 5:10 PM Owen DeLong wrote: > >> Looks like IETF wants the global BOGONs to be attested by IANA rather >> than by an RIR from what you quoted. >> > > Yes, for resources not allocated by IANA or marked as Reserved But IANA > has nothing to do with resources al

Re: [sig-policy] prop-132-v001 AS0 for Bogons

Since we are talking about bigots, other than Unallocated space in RIR inventory, I’m not sure how you would consider a bogota to be within any particular RIRs jurisdiction. As such, I was under the impression from the policy proposal that the intent was for APNIC to issue AS0 ROAs for global b

Re: [sig-policy] prop-132-v001 AS0 for Bogons

On 8/15/2019 12:19 AM, Aftab Siddiqui wrote: Hi Owen, On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 5:10 PM Owen DeLong > wrote: Looks like IETF wants the global BOGONs to be attested by IANA rather than by an RIR from what you quoted. Yes, for resources not allocated by IANA or m

Re: [sig-policy] prop-132-v001 AS0 for Bogons

Hi Owen, On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 5:10 PM Owen DeLong wrote: > Looks like IETF wants the global BOGONs to be attested by IANA rather than > by an RIR from what you quoted. > Yes, for resources not allocated by IANA or marked as Reserved But IANA has nothing to do with resources allocated to RIRs

Re: [sig-policy] prop-132-v001 AS0 for Bogons

Looks like IETF wants the global BOGONs to be attested by IANA rather than by an RIR from what you quoted. Any reason APNIC feels the need to usurp that process? Owen > On Aug 14, 2019, at 21:58 , Aftab Siddiqui wrote: > > Hi Owen, > Thanks for your response, sorry for replying late though.