-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2/26/15 9:40 PM, Masato Yamanishi wrote:
> Owen,
>
> I don't want to discuss too much details since I'm acting chair,
> but I'm afraid that "unique routing policy" is vague and it may
> qualify some usecases that private AS may also work.
Can't ag
Understood your point. Thx.
Regards,
Masato Yamanishi
2015-02-26 18:19 GMT-06:00 Owen DeLong :
> I’m not opposed to qualifying some cases where private AS may also work,
> because in those cases, frankly, I think most organizations will either use
> a private AS rather than go to the trouble of
I’m not opposed to qualifying some cases where private AS may also work,
because in those cases, frankly, I think most organizations will either use a
private AS rather than go to the trouble of applying, or, they may have a good
reason (future plans, etc.) for wanting to get a public AS and not
Owen,
I don't want to discuss too much details since I'm acting chair,
but I'm afraid that "unique routing policy" is vague and it may qualify some
usecases that private AS may also work.
So, what is the definition or understanding for "unique routing policy" in ARIN?
Masato Yamanishi
Feb 26, 2
Yes, I was well aware of that. Is there anything you believe to be incorrect in
my comments as a result? Otherwise, I’m not sure what you are getting at.
I believe a unique routing policy or multiple peers is sufficient justification.
Absent that, I believe that an entity which qualifies for PI
Owen and Usman,
In following comments, did you consider we are discussing "public" AS
numbers?
Since we are discussing "public" AS, we should have some kind of
justifications why it should be globally unique.
Regards,
Masato
2015-02-25 18:39 GMT-06:00 Owen DeLong :
> Usman, since an AS is defi
Hi Skeeve,
I don’t think the current policy mention about subsequent ASN assignment. Every
ASN assignment is requested to meet the multihoming requirement.
For additional ASN requests, the requestors have to provide justification to
show that their new AS is independent to their existing AS. Th
Usman, since an AS is defined as “A collection of prefixes with a common
routing policy”, what would you use one for if not to connect to other
autonomous systems? If you are connecting to a single other autonomous system,
then, arguably it is impossible for your prefixes to have a distinct rout
Agreed... and I certainly don't want to see ASN's being wasted. I am happy
for their to be some restrictions - even costs... but I am willing to see
what the community recommends to avoid potential issues.
...Skeeve
*Skeeve Stevens - Senior IP Broker*
*v4Now - *an eintellego Networks service
ske
ASN is an identifier for an autonomous system - so theoretically speaking, an
ASN should have no dependency on multihoming or single homing
However, what we need is a better way to regulate assignment of ASNs so their
allocation doesn't become wasteful..
Regards,
Usman
> On 26 Feb 2015, at 11:
10 matches
Mail list logo
