>
>
>
>
>
> From: Owen DeLong [mailto:o...@delong.com <mailto:o...@delong.com>]
> Sent: Thursday, 1 February 2018 3:00 AM
> To: Skeeve Stevens <mailto:skeeve%2bsigpol...@eintellegonetworks.asia>>
> Cc: Guangliang Pan mailto:g...@apnic.net>>;
> ma
M, Guangliang Pan wrote:
>
> Hi Aftab,
>
>
>
> The number of M&A transfers involved 103/8 address block from 15 April
> 2011 to 14 Sep 2017 is 257.
>
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Guangliang
>
> ==
>
>
>
> *From:* Aftab Siddiqui [mailto:aftab.sid
ject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-123-v001: Modify 103/8 IPv4 transfer policy
[SECURITY=UNCLASSIFIED]
I would argue that 257 probably represents a significant fraction of the
distributed portion of 103/8.
I would be interested if staff can answer what percentage of the issued 103/8
resources have been su
9 Jan 2018 at 06:43 Guangliang Pan > <mailto:g...@apnic.net>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Sanjeev,
>>
>>
>>
>> The number of delegations from 103/8 pool since 29 Jan 2013 (Five years
>> count back from today) to 14 Sep 2017 is 10868. These are the delega
d 103/8 address block from 15 April
>> 2011 to 14 Sep 2017 is 257.
>>
>>
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Guangliang
>>
>> ======
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Aftab Siddiqui [mailto:aftab.siddi...@gmail.com]
>> *Sent:* Monday, 29
com
> <mailto:aftab.siddi...@gmail.com>]
> Sent: Monday, 29 January 2018 8:49 PM
> To: Guangliang Pan mailto:g...@apnic.net>>
> Cc: Sanjeev Gupta mailto:sanj...@dcs1.biz>>;
> mailman_SIG-policy mailto:sig-pol...@apnic.net>>
> Subject: Re: [sig-policy]
11 to 14 Sep 2017 is 257.
>>
>>
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Guangliang
>>
>> ==
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Aftab Siddiqui [mailto:aftab.siddi...@gmail.com]
>> *Sent:* Monday, 29 January 2018 8:49 PM
>> *To:* Guangliang Pan
> Kind regards,
>
> Guangliang
>
> ==
>
>
>
> *From:* Aftab Siddiqui [mailto:aftab.siddi...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, 29 January 2018 8:49 PM
> *To:* Guangliang Pan
> *Cc:* Sanjeev Gupta ; mailman_SIG-policy <
> sig-pol...@apnic.net>
> *Subje
=
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Aftab Siddiqui [mailto:aftab.siddi...@gmail.com]
>> *Sent:* Monday, 29 January 2018 8:49 PM
>> *To:* Guangliang Pan
>> *Cc:* Sanjeev Gupta ; mailman_SIG-policy <
>> sig-pol...@apnic.net>
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [sig-
anjeev Gupta ; mailman_SIG-policy <
> sig-pol...@apnic.net>
>
> *Subject:* Re: [sig-policy] prop-123-v001: Modify 103/8 IPv4 transfer
> policy [SECURITY=UNCLASSIFIED]
>
>
>
> Hi Guangliang,
>
> How many M&A were processed for 103/8 address block from 15 Apri
_SIG-policy
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-123-v001: Modify 103/8 IPv4 transfer policy
[SECURITY=UNCLASSIFIED]
Hi Guangliang,
How many M&A were processed for 103/8 address block from 15 April 2011 to 14
Sep 2017.
On Mon, 29 Jan 2018 at 06:43 Guangliang Pan
mailto:g...@apnic.net>> wro
...@lists.apnic.net] *On Behalf Of *Sanjeev Gupta
> *Sent:* Monday, 29 January 2018 3:34 PM
> *To:* Henderson Mike, Mr
> *Cc:* mailman_SIG-policy
> *Subject:* Re: [sig-policy] prop-123-v001: Modify 103/8 IPv4 transfer
> policy [SECURITY=UNCLASSIFIED]
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
&g
...@lists.apnic.net
[mailto:sig-policy-boun...@lists.apnic.net] On Behalf Of Sanjeev Gupta
Sent: Monday, 29 January 2018 3:34 PM
To: Henderson Mike, Mr
Cc: mailman_SIG-policy
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-123-v001: Modify 103/8 IPv4 transfer policy
[SECURITY=UNCLASSIFIED]
Hi,
I see this as more of a
Hi,
I see this as more of a "do not make policy retroactively". People who
"bought" an "asset" in good faith should not be told it is worth different
now.
I am amenable to changing the cut-off date in Prop-123 to the date it was
sent to the Policy SIG, as that might have given warning to people
Not supported
The proposal should in my opinion be amended to read:
___
Disadvantages:
None Completely negates the purpose of prop-116-v006: Prohibit to transfer IPv4
addresses in
the final /8 block.
___
Regards
Mike
From: sig-policy-boun.
15 matches
Mail list logo
