icy SIG
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] Version 4 of prop-126 PDP Update
I took the liberty of reformatting the message into a consistent font and size.
On Sep 9, 2019, at 02:41 , JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
wrote:
Hi Owen,
El 27/8/19 8:15, "Owen DeLong" escribió:
ig-policy-boun...@lists.apnic.net
[mailto:sig-policy-boun...@lists.apnic.net] On Behalf Of Owen DeLong
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2019 4:57 AM
To: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Cc: Policy SIG
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] Version 4 of prop-126 PDP Update
I took the liberty of reformatting the messa
I took the liberty of reformatting the message into a consistent font and size.
> On Sep 9, 2019, at 02:41 , JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
> wrote:
>
> Hi Owen,
>
>
> El 27/8/19 8:15, "Owen DeLong" mailto:o...@delong.com>>
> escribió:
>
>
>
>
>> On Aug 26, 2019, at 03:05 , JORDI PALET MARTIN
Dear Saturo,
See responses below, in-line.
Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
El 2/9/19 17:37, "Satoru Tsurumaki" escribió:
Dear Colleagues,
I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team.
I would like to share a feedback in our community for prop-126, based
From: sig-policy-boun...@lists.apnic.net
on behalf of JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Sent: Monday, 26 August 2019 6:05 PM
To: Policy SIG
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] Version 4 of prop-126 PDP Update
Hi Javed,
I don’t agree, let me explain why.
The current process only talks about the meeting a
y SIG
Subject: [sig-policy] Version 4 of prop-126 PDP Update
Dear SIG members
A new version of the proposal "prop-126: PDP Update" has been sent to
the Policy SIG for review.
It will be presented at the Open Policy Meeting at APNIC 48 in
Chiang Mai, Thailand on Thursday, 12 Sept
Dear Colleagues,
I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team.
I would like to share a feedback in our community for prop-126, based
on a meeting we organized on 21th Aug to discuss these proposals.
Many participants expressed a supporting for the proposal with reasons
that di
apnic.net
on behalf of JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Sent: Monday, 26 August 2019 6:05 PM
To: Policy SIG
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] Version 4 of prop-126 PDP Update
Hi Javed,
I don’t agree, let me explain why.
The current process only talks about the meeting and the chairs have clearly
indicated tha
plete trust in the current APNIC
> PDP and this community.
>
> Kind regards
> Javed Khan
> MSCE and CCSP
>
> From: sig-policy-boun...@lists.apnic.net
> on behalf of Sumon Ahmed Sabir
> Sent: Friday, 9 August 2019 2:13 AM
> To: Policy SIG
> Subject: [sig-p
community.
Kind regards
Javed Khan
MSCE and CCSP
From: sig-policy-boun...@lists.apnic.net
on behalf of Sumon Ahmed Sabir
Sent: Friday, 9 August 2019 2:13 AM
To: Policy SIG
Subject: [sig-policy] Version 4 of prop-126 PDP Update
Dear SIG members
A new version of the proposal &quo
SIG
Subject: [sig-policy] Version 4 of prop-126 PDP Update
Dear SIG members
A new version of the proposal "prop-126: PDP Update" has been sent to
the Policy SIG for review.
It will be presented at the Open Policy Meeting at APNIC 48 in
Chiang Mai, Thailand on Thursday, 12 Sept
Dear SIG members
A new version of the proposal "prop-126: PDP Update" has been sent to
the Policy SIG for review.
It will be presented at the Open Policy Meeting at APNIC 48 in
Chiang Mai, Thailand on Thursday, 12 September 2019.
Information about earlier versions is available from:
https://www.
12 matches
Mail list logo
