icy SIG
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] Version 4 of prop-126 PDP Update
I took the liberty of reformatting the message into a consistent font and size.
On Sep 9, 2019, at 02:41 , JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
wrote:
Hi Owen,
El 27/8/19 8:15, "Owen DeLong" escribió:
ig-policy-boun...@lists.apnic.net
[mailto:sig-policy-boun...@lists.apnic.net] On Behalf Of Owen DeLong
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2019 4:57 AM
To: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Cc: Policy SIG
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] Version 4 of prop-126 PDP Update
I took the liberty of reformatting the messa
I took the liberty of reformatting the message into a consistent font and size.
> On Sep 9, 2019, at 02:41 , JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
> wrote:
>
> Hi Owen,
>
>
> El 27/8/19 8:15, "Owen DeLong" mailto:o...@delong.com>>
> escribió:
>
>
>
>
>> On Aug 26, 2019, at 03:05 , JORDI PALET MARTIN
Dear Saturo,
See responses below, in-line.
Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
El 2/9/19 17:37, "Satoru Tsurumaki" escribió:
Dear Colleagues,
I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team.
I would like to share a feedback in our community for prop-126, based
From: sig-policy-boun...@lists.apnic.net
on behalf of JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Sent: Monday, 26 August 2019 6:05 PM
To: Policy SIG
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] Version 4 of prop-126 PDP Update
Hi Javed,
I don’t agree, let me explain why.
The current process only talks about the meeting a
Hi Owen,
El 27/8/19 8:15, "Owen DeLong" escribió:
On Aug 26, 2019, at 03:05 , JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
wrote:
Hi Javed,
I don’t agree, let me explain why.
The current process only talks about the meeting and the chairs have clearly
indicated that they take in considerat
Dear Colleagues,
I am Satoru Tsurumaki from Japan Open Policy Forum Steering Team.
I would like to share a feedback in our community for prop-126, based
on a meeting we organized on 21th Aug to discuss these proposals.
Many participants expressed a supporting for the proposal with reasons
that di
apnic.net
on behalf of JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Sent: Monday, 26 August 2019 6:05 PM
To: Policy SIG
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] Version 4 of prop-126 PDP Update
Hi Javed,
I don’t agree, let me explain why.
The current process only talks about the meeting and the chairs have clearly
indicated tha
> On Aug 26, 2019, at 03:05 , JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
> wrote:
>
> Hi Javed,
>
> I don’t agree, let me explain why.
>
> The current process only talks about the meeting and the chairs have clearly
> indicated that they take in consideration the list and the confer. Anyone
> from the communi
Hi Javed,
I don’t agree, let me explain why.
The current process only talks about the meeting and the chairs have clearly
indicated that they take in consideration the list and the confer. Anyone from
the community that dislikes a consensus/non-consensus decision, could create a
trouble
I do not support this proposal as I have complete trust in the current APNIC
PDP and this community.
Kind regards
Javed Khan
MSCE and CCSP
From: sig-policy-boun...@lists.apnic.net
on behalf of Sumon Ahmed Sabir
Sent: Friday, 9 August 2019 2:13 AM
To: Policy SI
11 matches
Mail list logo