Hi Jordi,
Thanks for your patience with this.
We have some stats (from the last 15 years) for members with ISP industry type
who have received at least one portable IPv4 allocation and IPv6 assignment:
2005: 1
2008: 2
2011: 2
2012: 1
2013: 4
2014: 8
2015: 3
2016: 13
2017: 12
2018: 13
2019: 102
Hi Jordi,
Generally speaking - when a LIR (such as an ISP) receives an allocation, they
can use those IPs for their infrastructure as well as for their customers.
While most LIRs do this, we have received IP assignment requests for reasons
such as multihoming their new POPs.
Once we make an
Hi Sunny,
I'm mainly interested in the assignments to ISP infrastructure, as the others
are different cases, and clearly are "end-users". The point is to understand if
there is really a need for ISPs to get additional assignments, why they can't
do it already from their own allocation.
Any
Hi Jordi,
On 24/02/2020 1:39 pm, Srinivas (Sunny) Chendi wrote:
>>
>> One more request for the secretariat. Could you please provide stats
>> on the number of ISP (not end-users) assignments, for example in the
>> last 12-15 years, in order to understand if this is a real requirement?
>
>
Hi Sunny, all,
Let me try to clarify.
2.2.3 mention "address space that is delegated to an LIR" ... "for specific use
within the Internet infrastructure they operate". Let's put aside, for the
moment, the end-user case.
If you read 9.2. Initial IPv6 allocations and 10.0. IPv6 assignments,
Hello Jordi,
On 22/02/2020 2:20 pm, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After my previous response to Owen, I can't find anymore any the text in the
> actual policy (neither guidelines) about assignments. So, I'm wondering if I
> was wrong, or it has been removed at some point and I
Hi Jordi,
On 21/02/2020 3:20 pm, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> Thanks Bertrand,
>
> I’m fine as well with this option. Repeating it here:
>
> "Assigned address space is address space that is delegated to an LIR, or
> end-user, for specific, documented purposes and exclusive use within the
>
my mobile.
From: sig-policy-boun...@lists.apnic.net
on behalf of JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2020 1:20:59 PM
To: mailman_SIG-policy
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-133: Clarification on Sub-Assignments
Hi all,
After my previous response to Owen, I can't find a
PM
To: mailman_SIG-policy
Subject: Re: [sig-policy] prop-133: Clarification on Sub-Assignments
Hi all,
After my previous response to Owen, I can't find anymore any the text in the
actual policy (neither guidelines) about assignments. So, I'm wondering if I
was wrong, or it has been removed
Hi all,
After my previous response to Owen, I can't find anymore any the text in the
actual policy (neither guidelines) about assignments. So, I'm wondering if I
was wrong, or it has been removed at some point and I don't recall it ... Could
the secretariat point out to the specific text
Hi Owen,
APNIC policy allows ISPs to get, in addition to the allocation, an assignment
for their infrastructure.
I don’t think this is needed and I recall it doesn’t longer exist in other
RIRs. May be is something else to consider and to amend as well.
The issue we are having, is
Assigned address space isn’t generally delegated to LIRs,… It’s generally
delegated to end-users. Address space delegated to LIRs may then be reassigned
by the LIR to itself for internal purposes.
Unless there’s a case where an LIR is receiving an assignment instead of an
allocation, I think
Thanks Bertrand,
I’m fine as well with this option. Repeating it here:
"Assigned address space is address space that is delegated to an LIR, or
end-user, for specific, documented purposes and exclusive use within the
infrastructure they operate and may not be sub-assigned".
Could the
13 matches
Mail list logo
