At 2011-02-15 17:26:54 +0530, j...@pobox.com wrote:
On 15-Feb-2011, at 2:54 PM, Pranesh Prakash wrote:
This talk of shenanigans and bandwidth conservation reminded me
of Postel's Prescription: “Be liberal in what you accept, and
conservative in what you send”.[1]
I don't see the
On 2/14/11 8:14 AM February 14, 2011, Anand Manikutty wrote:
I see. So you don't know what elasticity of substitution is. Well
then, we have a bigger problem than you not following this particular
argument.
The issue : there is a structure to the arguments here that you are
not following,
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 11:28 AM, Heather Madrone heat...@madrone.com wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elasticity_of_substitution
It's a pretty basic concept, actually, straight out of Economics 2. How
easy/useful is it to substitute one input for another in production? It
would take about
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 11:28:23AM -0800, Heather Madrone wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elasticity_of_substitution
It's a pretty basic concept, actually, straight out of Economics 2. How
Sorry, I don't do pseudosciences. Thanks for the links, still see no
relevance to a simple
Top posting and not trimming due to primitive smart phone interface.
If rate of cognition goes up doesn't ability to predict do so as well? Is
there a combinatorial effect that makes predictability intractable?
-- Charles
On Feb 16, 2011 12:09 PM, Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:31:23AM +1300, Charles Haynes wrote:
Top posting and not trimming due to primitive smart phone interface.
If rate of cognition goes up doesn't ability to predict do so as well? Is
Good point. But we're at a fixed point at the moment, given that
there is no easy way
