Re: [silk] Privacy, By Design

2011-04-01 Thread Alaric Snell-Pym
On 03/30/11 19:30, J. Andrew Rogers wrote: If it is not possible to usefully anonymize data, of what use is a policy which states that all data must be anonymous? If a person actively puts their personal data in the public domain, intentionally or unintentionally, how is one supposed to

Re: [silk] Privacy, By Design

2011-04-01 Thread Kunal Kapoor
scary .. but logical, alaric On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 2:29 PM, Alaric Snell-Pym ala...@snell-pym.org.ukwrote: On 03/30/11 19:30, J. Andrew Rogers wrote: If it is not possible to usefully anonymize data, of what use is a policy which states that all data must be anonymous? If a person

Re: [silk] Privacy, By Design

2011-03-30 Thread Carey Lening
Nishant: Great topic! My one and only (slightly self-interested) recommendation is that you also not forget the lawyers ... PbD is a big deal (or is developing into one), and one of the hallmarks for successful implementation is including all the diverse groups together to develop best privacy

Re: [silk] Privacy, By Design

2011-03-30 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
] On Behalf Of Carey Lening Sent: 30 March 2011 10:29 To: silklist@lists.hserus.net; Carey Lening Subject: Re: [silk] Privacy, By Design Nishant: Great topic! My one and only (slightly self-interested) recommendation is that you also not forget the lawyers ... PbD is a big deal

Re: [silk] Privacy, By Design

2011-03-30 Thread J. Andrew Rogers
On Mar 29, 2011, at 9:58 PM, Carey Lening wrote: My one and only (slightly self-interested) recommendation is that you also not forget the lawyers ... PbD is a big deal (or is developing into one), and one of the hallmarks for successful implementation is including all the diverse groups

Re: [silk] Privacy, By Design

2011-03-30 Thread Lawnun
I actually disagree. There's a strong divide between what's mathematically possible, and what' happening on a day-to-day basis. Ignoring the 'bureaucratic factions' (which I guess is geek for lawyers and policy nerds?) misses the nuance in the system. You gotta remember -- we're dealing with

Re: [silk] Privacy, By Design

2011-03-30 Thread Chetan Nagendra
, 30 Mar 2011 00:58:52 -0400 Subject: Re: [silk] Privacy, By Design Nishant: Great topic! My one and only (slightly self-interested) recommendation is that you also not forget the lawyers ... PbD is a big deal (or is developing into one), and one of the hallmarks for successful implementation

Re: [silk] Privacy, By Design

2011-03-30 Thread J. Andrew Rogers
On Mar 30, 2011, at 2:20 AM, Lawnun wrote: I actually disagree. There's a strong divide between what's mathematically possible, and what' happening on a day-to-day basis. Ignoring the 'bureaucratic factions' (which I guess is geek for lawyers and policy nerds?) misses the nuance in the

[silk] Privacy, By Design

2011-03-29 Thread Nishant Shah
Hi All, Before the mighty brains get distracted by the India-Pakistan match and its aftermaths, here is a quick request for help. One of the projects that we at the Centre for Internet and Society are engaged in right now, is trying to conceptualise and understand how Privacy is shaped in India,

Re: [silk] Privacy, By Design

2011-03-29 Thread Udhay Shankar N
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Nishant Shah itsnish...@gmail.com wrote: One of the projects that we at the Centre for Internet and Society are engaged in right now, is trying to conceptualise and understand how Privacy is shaped in India, at the intersections of law, technology and cultural

Re: [silk] Privacy, By Design

2011-03-29 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
. -Original Message- From: silklist-bounces+suresh=hserus@lists.hserus.net [mailto:silklist-bounces+suresh=hserus@lists.hserus.net] On Behalf Of Udhay Shankar N Sent: 30 March 2011 10:24 To: silklist@lists.hserus.net Subject: Re: [silk] Privacy, By Design On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 9

Re: [silk] Privacy, By Design

2011-03-29 Thread Nishant Shah
Hi Udhay, Thanks for the suggestions. Off the top of my head, and restricting myself only to members of this list, Suresh Ramasubramanian, Nandakumar Saravade, Ponnurangam Kumaraguru. Awesome... I am going to bug all the list members with my right to spam :) Malavika is already involved

Re: [silk] Privacy, By Design

2011-03-29 Thread Nishant Shah
Hey Suresh, Thanks for the questions. Sometimes these things are so embedded in the head, one forgets that things are not always as clear in words. Who would the technology actors in the city be, according to you, Nishant? With technology actors, we are trying to address people who are in the

Re: [silk] Privacy, By Design

2011-03-29 Thread Mahesh Murthy
A large part of what one of my companies does is social listening - the real time tracking of what people are saying about brands or issues, with sentiment scores, visibility indices and the like. Perhaps there's an interesting angle in the corporate (and not just governmental) effort to track

Re: [silk] Privacy, By Design

2011-03-29 Thread Nishant Shah
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Mahesh Murthy mahesh.mur...@gmail.comwrote: A large part of what one of my companies does is social listening - the real time tracking of what people are saying about brands or issues, with sentiment scores, visibility indices and the like. Mahesh, I am

Re: [silk] Privacy, By Design

2011-03-29 Thread Venkat Mangudi
On Wednesday 30 March 2011 09:56 AM, Nishant Shah wrote: a discussion. If somebody comes to your mind, can you please connect me with them, or give me their contact information (with their consent, naturally) so that I can start a conversation with them? Kiran Jonnalagadda, Gautam John, me.

Re: [silk] Privacy, By Design

2011-03-29 Thread Nishant Shah
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Venkat Mangudi s...@venkatmangudi.comwrote: On Wednesday 30 March 2011 09:56 AM, Nishant Shah wrote: a discussion. If somebody comes to your mind, can you please connect me with them, or give me their contact information (with their consent, naturally) so