On 2019-05-10 02:01, Paul Koning wrote:
On May 9, 2019, at 7:55 PM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
On 2019-05-10 01:46, Paul Koning wrote:
On May 9, 2019, at 3:20 PM, Hittner, David T [US] (MS)
wrote:
(It's been a long time since I've played with SMAC on wireless. I did get it to
work, but it
> On May 9, 2019, at 7:55 PM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
>
> On 2019-05-10 01:46, Paul Koning wrote:
>>> On May 9, 2019, at 3:20 PM, Hittner, David T [US] (MS)
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> (It's been a long time since I've played with SMAC on wireless. I did get
>>> it to work, but it wasn't worth the
On 2019-05-10 01:43, Paul Koning wrote:
On May 9, 2019, at 3:15 PM, Henry Bent wrote:
There is such a thing as promiscuous mode for 802.11, though its usage is
generally considered to be for harmful purposes and I don't think a discussion
of it here is appropriate.
It's no more
On 2019-05-10 01:46, Paul Koning wrote:
On May 9, 2019, at 3:20 PM, Hittner, David T [US] (MS)
wrote:
(It's been a long time since I've played with SMAC on wireless. I did get it to
work, but it wasn't worth the pain to me, so I upgraded to DECNET/OSI
non-compatibility mode.)
IIRC, when
> On May 9, 2019, at 3:20 PM, Hittner, David T [US] (MS)
> wrote:
>
> (It's been a long time since I've played with SMAC on wireless. I did get it
> to work, but it wasn't worth the pain to me, so I upgraded to DECNET/OSI
> non-compatibility mode.)
>
> IIRC, when you start DECNET IV, it
> On May 9, 2019, at 3:15 PM, Henry Bent wrote:
>
> There is such a thing as promiscuous mode for 802.11, though its usage is
> generally considered to be for harmful purposes and I don't think a
> discussion of it here is appropriate.
It's no more inappropriate for Wifi than it is for
I successfully configured DECnet over IP using MultiNet. I'd guess you
have MultiNet on another system, with whom you'd like to speak DECnet,
so it shouldn't be hard.
On 5/9/2019 12:51 PM, Jonathan Welch wrote:
It has been a considerable time since I have done any networking work
-- would
On Thursday, May 9, 2019 at 12:20 PM, David Hittner wrote:
[...]
> IIRC, when you start DECNET IV, it sends a broadcast packet to see if there
> is an
> address collision with the hard-coded DECNET IV address before it changes the
> MAC to the DECNET IV MAC.
Actually, this is a feature of the
Jonathan,
MultiNet includes a feature to tunnel DECnet over IP. We did that many years
ago. You will need to run MultiNet on both ends of the virtual circuit.
Depending on the topology of your DECnet, it may also be that at least one of
your DECnet nodes may have to be a DECnet area router.
On Thursday, May 9, 2019 at 12:52 PM, Jonathan Welch wrote:
> It has been a considerable time since I have done any networking work
> -- would you get me going in the right direction for setting up NAT on
> Windows?
There is nothing host specific about this. You get the basics with:
sim>
It has been a considerable time since I have done any networking work
-- would you get me going in the right direction for setting up NAT on
Windows?
On 5/9/19, Mark Pizzolato wrote:
> On Thursday, May 9, 2019 at 9:54 AM, Jonathan Welch wrote:
>> I just moved to a wired connection and now am
There is another potential solution for DECNET IV packet transmission over
IP-only wireless, but it requires two computers: set up an IP tunnel between
your wireless PC and a PC on the wired network, and shove the DECNET packets
through the IP tunnel letting the tunnel wrap/unwrap the DECNET
On 2019-05-09 21:20, Hittner, David T [US] (MS) wrote:
(It's been a long time since I've played with SMAC on wireless. I did get it to
work, but it wasn't worth the pain to me, so I upgraded to DECNET/OSI
non-compatibility mode.)
IIRC, when you start DECNET IV, it sends a broadcast packet to
On 2019-05-09 21:15, Henry Bent wrote:
There is such a thing as promiscuous mode for 802.11, though its usage
is generally considered to be for harmful purposes and I don't think a
discussion of it here is appropriate. If you want to do such a thing
you will need to be careful in your
(It's been a long time since I've played with SMAC on wireless. I did get it to
work, but it wasn't worth the pain to me, so I upgraded to DECNET/OSI
non-compatibility mode.)
IIRC, when you start DECNET IV, it sends a broadcast packet to see if there is
an address collision with the hard-coded
On 2019-05-09 20:14, Hittner, David T [US] (MS) wrote:
There probably isn't a way to set the host network device's MAC address so that
won't get you there.
If you are privileged enough, SMAC can set the MAC address on Windows. Google "smac
change mac address".
Not that it helps much,
There is such a thing as promiscuous mode for 802.11, though its usage is
generally considered to be for harmful purposes and I don't think a
discussion of it here is appropriate. If you want to do such a thing you
will need to be careful in your selection of a wireless interface, and
googling is
On 2019-05-09 19:30, Mark Pizzolato wrote:
On Thursday, May 9, 2019 at 9:54 AM, Jonathan Welch wrote:
I just moved to a wired connection and now am having success. Good point
about walking before running.
I'm on npcap 0.994 current as of last night.
I turned off DECNET to eliminate one
Repeat after me: WiFi is not ethernet... :-)
What you are trying to do essentially does not work. simh is essentially
trying to set the interface in promiscuous mode, and fake a second mac
address on the interface. This works just fine on ethernet, but it does
not at all work on WiFi, where
On Thursday, May 9, 2019 at 11:14 AM, David T Hittner wrote:
> > There probably isn't a way to set the host network device's MAC address so
> that won't get you there.
>
> If you are privileged enough, SMAC can set the MAC address on Windows.
> Google "smac change mac address".
Thanks for that
On Thursday, May 9, 2019 at 9:54 AM, Jonathan Welch wrote:
> I just moved to a wired connection and now am having success. Good point
> about walking before running.
>
> I'm on npcap 0.994 current as of last night.
>
> I turned off DECNET to eliminate one source of possible trouble. It would
I just moved to a wired connection and now am having success. Good
point about walking before running.
I'm on npcap 0.994 current as of last night.
I turned off DECNET to eliminate one source of possible trouble. It
would be nice to have it on at some point in the future.
sim> sho ver
On Thursday, May 9, 2019 at 7:00 AM, Jonathan Welch wrote:
> The vms systems on our campus are about to be shut down. My former
> boss and I would like to still have access to our files, so I've moved
> an image of a vax system disk into simh.
>
> He is a networking expert and I am no slouch,
Have you tried running over a wired connection, rather than a wireless
connection? You might also try running SIMH under a Linux VM.
Zane
> On May 9, 2019, at 7:00 AM, Jonathan Welch wrote:
>
> The vms systems on our campus are about to be shut down. My former
> boss and I would like to
The vms systems on our campus are about to be shut down. My former
boss and I would like to still have access to our files, so I've moved
an image of a vax system disk into simh.
He is a networking expert and I am no slouch, but neither of us can
figure out why we cannot establish any kind of
25 matches
Mail list logo
