Hi All,
If I set caller-id to user then call to 101 will play the prompt
You call is answered by ACS,Please Enter the extension to that
particular userThis behavior is not seen(will play normal prompt) if
there is no caller-id is set...IMO its not a valid behavior to play the
prompt
On 9/12/2012 2:38 PM, George Niculae wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Kumaran
thiru.venkateshwa...@ttplservices.com wrote:
Hi All,
If I set caller-id to user then call to 101 will play the prompt
You call is answered by ACS,Please Enter the extension to that
particular
On 9/12/2012 2:51 PM, Kumaran wrote:
On 9/12/2012 2:38 PM, George Niculae wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Kumaran
thiru.venkateshwa...@ttplservices.com wrote:
Hi All,
If I set caller-id to user then call to 101 will play the prompt
You call is answered by ACS,Please Enter the
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Kumaran
thiru.venkateshwa...@ttplservices.com wrote:
On 9/12/2012 2:51 PM, Kumaran wrote:
On 9/12/2012 2:38 PM, George Niculae wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Kumaran
thiru.venkateshwa...@ttplservices.com wrote:
Hi All,
If I set caller-id to
I'm confused. Called ID should have nothing to do with it. It would be
looking at the registered line the call is coming from.
i.e. - Why are we trying to fix valid behavior? If I understand properly...
I'm subscriber 200. I set my callerid to 201 and call VM at 101. When I
call VM it should see
If you set caller-id for user and dials 101 then following prompt
will heard You call is answered by ACS,Please Enter the extension
instead of You call is answered by ACS,Please Enter your
PIN.Please this scenario if possible...
Regards,
Kumaran T
On 9/12/2012 5:38 PM, Tony Graziano
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 2:07 PM, David Becker david.bec...@iant.de wrote:
Sorry, accidentally let a piece of a previous patch slip into this one, the
JIRA patch file has been updated to remove that.
Patch looks good, however there is a discussion regarding it - since
it contains db changes it
Sorry, accidentally let a piece of a previous patch slip into this one,
the JIRA patch file has been updated to remove that.
Am 08.08.2011 16:22, schrieb Douglas Hubler:
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 5:03 AM, David Becker david.bec...@iant.de
mailto:david.bec...@iant.de wrote:
The attached
The attached patch is the final version if no further comments arise.
Compared to the previous status the unit tests for the comm server lib
have been adjusted and some minor cleanups are done. The database patch
is in the version 12 target, I assume that's where patches currently go.
--
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 5:03 AM, David Becker david.bec...@iant.de wrote:
The attached patch is the final version if no further comments arise.
Compared to the previous status the unit tests for the comm server lib have
been adjusted and some minor cleanups are done.
thanks david,
can you
On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 11:12 -0500, Gertsvolf, Mark (CAR:9D30) wrote:
I think I see an inconsistency in the CallerID behavior for external
calls.
Assuming I am using gateway A with specify CallerID option, which
translated into wildcard entry for the gateway domain.
A call from
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Scott Lawrence
scott.lawre...@nortel.com wrote:
On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 11:12 -0500, Gertsvolf, Mark (CAR:9D30) wrote:
I think I see an inconsistency in the CallerID behavior for external
calls.
Assuming I am using gateway A with specify CallerID option, which
Scott Lawrence wrote:
Hmmm... I suspect you'll disagree with me, but I think the
right way to resolve that inconsistency is to not rewrite the
caller whose gateway used the proxy domain in its From
header. The intent of the caller-id rewriting was to only
rewrite the addresses of local
-Original Message-
From: sipx-dev-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-dev-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Mark Gertsvolf
Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2009 9:37 AM
To: Scott Lawrence
Cc: sipX-dev
Subject: Re: [sipX-dev] Caller Id rewriting (or not) for non-local callers
Gertsvolf
Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2009 9:37 AM
To: Scott Lawrence
Cc: sipX-dev
Subject: Re: [sipX-dev] Caller Id rewriting (or not) for non-local callers
Scott Lawrence wrote:
Hmmm... I suspect you'll disagree with me, but I think the
right way to resolve that inconsistency
15 matches
Mail list logo
