Jason Rennie wrote:
I just switched over to debian from redhat, may i reccomend it.
Apart from only needing 3 floppies and an internet connection to do the
install the system runs quite well.
This may be so, but what does it use to do general config. I want
to install my old bj300 to run
On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 08:19:19AM +, Heracles wrote:
[debian]
This may be so, but what does it use to do general config.
vi :)
I don't think there is a big, buggy, bloated, complicated,
do everything badly config program for debian. You could
install linuxconf I guess, but you might
I recently did a little rant about how within two weeks of me playing with
Debian for the first time I had switched 20 RH 6.2 systems across 3
hardware platform (i386,PPC,SPARC) to being all Debian.
The main reaon was Manageability. From a sysadmin point of view,
discovering the Debian way the
On Sun, 03 Dec 2000 21:40:41 chesty wrote:
On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 08:19:19AM +, Heracles wrote:
[debian]
This may be so, but what does it use to do general config.
and yes, I read the Debian Docs that I had available and could not
find mention of a config utility.
vi :)
Craige McWhirter wrote:
As a fairly recent Debian convert (last few months or so) I found that
the installation was the hardest part. Once you could get into the system
and apt-get to your hearts content it was positively dreamy (well, perhaps
"dreamy" is a bit much for an OS!).
My major
Jason commented
Debian tends to lag 6-12 months behind the latest revisions, or
worse.
That is true but unlike most other distrabutions (such as RH) Debian has
fewer bugs in the stable relieses. I have been running a straight from CD
Potato box ever since it became frozen with verry few
That is true but unlike most other distrabutions (such as RH) Debian has
fewer bugs in the stable relieses. I have been running a straight from CD
Potato box ever since it became frozen with verry few problems at all.
Compared to a RH6.2 box i had which i decided to just stick
debian on it
I've got numerous Redhat 6.2 boxes out there at many different clients,
haven't noticed any major problems OSwise on any of them, barring the
standard security concerns - disable wuftp!!
As a distribution, Redhat 6.2 remains my preferred choice, until one of the
Debianites convinces me
On Sun, 3 Dec 2000, Dave Kempe wrote:
That is true but unlike most other distrabutions (such as RH) Debian
has
fewer bugs in the stable relieses. I have been running a straight from
CD
Potato box ever since it became frozen with verry few problems at all.
Compared to a RH6.2 box i had
- Original Message -
From: Jason Stokes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Jason Rennie [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2000 8:42 AM
Subject: Re: [SLUG] Debian Compliment
My major issue with Debian is the infrequency of releases. Not everyone
As a fairly recent Debian convert (last few months or so) I found that
the installation was the hardest part. Once you could get into the system
and apt-get to your hearts content it was positively dreamy (well, perhaps
"dreamy" is a bit much for an OS!).
As both a sysadmin and a user,
Hi all,
I'm part of the way through installing debian potato, from the compact
install and with a net connection (2 Disks !!!).
I'm impressed, i don't think i've had to answer one hard question (well
except the partitioning) and it has all worked flawlessly.
I must say, comapred to my
12 matches
Mail list logo
