It works, thanks alot for the tip
the only problem now is having QOS enforcements(and limits) without
associations.
On 20/10/2017 10:28, Chris Samuel wrote:
On Friday, 20 October 2017 9:53:06 AM AEDT Lachlan Musicman wrote:
Latest version of sssd can take short
On Friday, 20 October 2017 9:53:06 AM AEDT Lachlan Musicman wrote:
> Latest version of sssd can take shortnames and search through domains.
I'm not sure if that works though if you've got two different people with the
same username in different domains though.
cheers,
Chris
--
Christopher Sa
On 19 October 2017 at 20:37, Chris Samuel wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 19 October 2017 7:41:37 PM AEDT Nadav Toledo wrote:
>
> > running : id -u domain_name\\username , does return its uid
>
> So your system is not finding users as just "username", but instead only as
> domain_name\\username which is
On Thursday, 19 October 2017 7:41:37 PM AEDT Nadav Toledo wrote:
> running : id -u domain_name\\username , does return its uid
So your system is not finding users as just "username", but instead only as
domain_name\\username which is probably not ideal.
You probably want to see if you can find
Re: [slurm-dev] Re: Qos limits associations and AD auth Re:
[slurm-dev] Re: Qos limits associations and AD auth I found a hint,
running sacctmgr show problem:
Cluster Account User Problem
-- -- --
domain_name
Re: [slurm-dev] Re: Qos limits associations and AD auth also running
with sudo both slurmctrld and slurmdbd
perhaps i should "sudo su -" first?
On 19/10/2017 11:17, Douglas Jacobsen wrote:
Are they both running as the same user? (They need to to trust each
other&
Re: [slurm-dev] Re: Qos limits associations and AD auth yeah,
slurmuser=slurmduser=root
On 19/10/2017 11:17, Douglas Jacobsen wrote:
Are they both running as the same user? (They need to to trust each
other's messages)
On Oct 19, 2017 01:12, "Nadav Toledo&q
Are they both running as the same user? (They need to to trust each
other's messages)
On Oct 19, 2017 01:12, "Nadav Toledo" wrote:
> slurmdbd and slurmctrld are on the same machine...
>
> sacctmgr list clusters format=cluster,controlhost,controlport
>ClusterControlHost ControlPort
>
slurmdbd and slurmctrld are on the same machine...
sacctmgr list clusters format=cluster,controlhost,controlport
Cluster ControlHost ControlPort
-- ---
imageproc+ 127.0.0.1 6817
Its still beta stage for testing, so
On Thursday, 19 October 2017 4:43:13 PM AEDT Nadav Toledo wrote:
> so adding manually only works if I dont restart slurmctrld...
That usually points to a communication problem for slurmdbd trying to tell the
slurmctld about these changes via an RPC.
What does this say?
sacctmgr list clusters
Hey chris,
Problem is, even adding a user : sacctmgr create user
domain_name\\user_name account=research
restarting slurmctrld and trying to run a job with the above user :
srun bash, resulting in:
slurmctld: error: User 243309139 not found
slurmctld: _job_create: invalid acc
On 18/10/17 16:27, Nadav Toledo wrote:
> about B:ן¿½ The reason is I dont want to manually adding each user to
> the slurm database (sacctmgr create user...)
I'm afraid you don't really have an option there, if you want to use the
slurmdbd limits then you're going to need to add the users to the
Re: [slurm-dev] Re: Qos limits associations and AD auth Hey Benjamin,
I am sorry english is not my mother language, so I barely understand
what you wrote
can you explain when you have more time?
Thanks, Nadav
On 18/10/2017 17:59, Benjamin LIPERE wrote:
Sorry, bad Phone typo
Sorry, bad Phone typo
Le 18 oct. 2017 08:07, "Benjamin LIPERE" a
écrit :
Wellington, for security, first wrong starting. HPC not secure. Except if
you have à 10pers team. I hope that at list you put thé cluster behind a
router firewall in à militarisation zone. If you d'idées not second score
in
Wellington, for security, first wrong starting. HPC not secure. Except if
you have à 10pers team. I hope that at list you put thé cluster behind a
router firewall in à militarisation zone. If you d'idées not second score
in your ass, Man. Also thé third screw is that you let ssh access to not
trust
Re: [slurm-dev] Re: Qos limits associations and AD auth can you
ellaborate what exactly you mean by web portal?
at the moment users are logging to login server via ssh with their AD
credentials, these creds are being auth against AD via pbis-open
What do you suggest I add to these
Yo. Put à freaking Web portail, if you add this to thé cluster you and your
student will have to manage it. The will get bad habit of it. Or installé à
singularity cluster. You Can code all this in à afternoon easy.
Le 18 oct. 2017 07:35, "Nadav Toledo" a
écrit :
> Sorry for all the wierd symbol
Qos limits associations and AD auth Sorry for all the wierd symbols, I
was copying the code from linux terminal
here is the clean code(I hope):
if ((accounting_enforce & ACCOUNTING_ENFORCE_QOS)
&& assoc_ptr
&& !admin
&& (!assoc_ptr->usage->valid_qos
|| !bit_test(assoc_ptr->
You Can use AD, but it is bothersome in Many ways. Use à Web portail for
manage your users.
Le 18 oct. 2017 07:25, "Nadav Toledo" a
écrit :
> Hey everyone,
> I am working at a university and we trying to setup a slurm cluster for
> courses and research.
> for the courses we would like to enforce
19 matches
Mail list logo
