RE: Re[4]: [sniffer] Large amounts of spam still getting through

2005-10-15 Thread Rick Hogue
ty Or Better Times Ten" "Hot Slot Secrets" "The Incredible Inman's Louisville Trivia Challenge" -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2005 2:10 PM To: Rick Hogue Subject: Re[

Re: Re[2]: [sniffer] Large amounts of spam still getting through

2005-10-15 Thread Scott Fisher
I just assumed it was a defective spamming software. - Original Message - From: "John T (Lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2005 2:10 PM Subject: RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] Large amounts of spam still getting through I wonder is that is s

RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] Large amounts of spam still getting through

2005-10-15 Thread John T (Lists)
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] Large amounts of spam still getting through > > We're seeing the header info in the body problem. It seems to be always > spam. Another way it manifests itself is that Declude can't alter the > Subject line properly. > > The folks at Declude t

Re[4]: [sniffer] Large amounts of spam still getting through

2005-10-15 Thread Pete McNeil
On Saturday, October 15, 2005, 12:33:47 PM, Rick wrote: RH> My only concern is that all of this was being caught by Sniffer before and RH> all of a sudden very little of it is being caught. We are told that they are RH> working on it to get it fixed but we are getting slammed by customers RH> tell

RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] Large amounts of spam still getting through

2005-10-15 Thread Robert Grosshandler
We're seeing the header info in the body problem. It seems to be always spam. Another way it manifests itself is that Declude can't alter the Subject line properly. The folks at Declude tell us that they're aware of it, and that they are just waiting for more "pre altered by Declude" examples to

Re: Re[2]: [sniffer] Large amounts of spam still getting through

2005-10-15 Thread Computer House Support
Hogue" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2005 12:33 PM Subject: RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] Large amounts of spam still getting through My only concern is that all of this was being caught by Sniffer before and all of a sudden very little of it is being caught. We are told that

RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] Large amounts of spam still getting through

2005-10-15 Thread William Van Hefner
nal Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Hogue > Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2005 9:34 AM > To: sniffer@SortMonster.com > Subject: RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] Large amounts of spam still > getting through > > > My only concern

RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] Large amounts of spam still getting through

2005-10-15 Thread Rick Hogue
My only concern is that all of this was being caught by Sniffer before and all of a sudden very little of it is being caught. We are told that they are working on it to get it fixed but we are getting slammed by customers telling us we are not catching any spam. Any help in a solution other than g

Re[2]: [sniffer] Large amounts of spam still getting through

2005-10-15 Thread Pete McNeil
LOL! On Saturday, October 15, 2005, 4:34:09 AM, John wrote: JTL> On a very off topic note, why are we still both up? JTL> John T JTL> eServices For You This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com

RE: [sniffer] Large amounts of spam still getting through

2005-10-15 Thread William Van Hefner
Eureka, CA 95501 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) > Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2005 1:34 AM > To: sniffer@SortMonster.com > Subject: RE: [sniffer] Large amounts of spam still getting through > >

RE: [sniffer] Large amounts of spam still getting through

2005-10-15 Thread John T (Lists)
C > Eureka, CA 95501 > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) > > Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2005 12:41 AM > > To: sniffer@SortMonster.com > > Subject: RE: [sniffer] Lar

RE: [sniffer] Large amounts of spam still getting through

2005-10-15 Thread William Van Hefner
ations, Inc. 555 H Street, Ste. C Eureka, CA 95501 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) > Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2005 12:41 AM > To: sniffer@SortMonster.com > Subject: RE: [sniffer] Large amounts of sp

RE: [sniffer] Large amounts of spam still getting through

2005-10-15 Thread John T (Lists)
ginal Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of William Van Hefner > Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2005 12:22 AM > To: sniffer@SortMonster.com > Subject: RE: [sniffer] Large amounts of spam still getting through > > John, > > I have no clu

RE: [sniffer] Large amounts of spam still getting through

2005-10-15 Thread William Van Hefner
ph > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T (Lists) > Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 12:55 PM > To: sniffer@SortMonster.com > Subject: RE: [sniffer] Large amounts of spam still getting through > > > T

Re: [sniffer] Large amounts of spam still getting through

2005-10-14 Thread David Payer
- Original Message - From: "Colbeck, Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://projects.puremagic.com/greylisting/ My experience with Greylisting is that it is very effective in stopping spam and also other mail as well. Most scripts that send direct will never get through to a greylisted ser

Re: [sniffer] Large amounts of spam still getting through

2005-10-14 Thread Matt
This is a form of graylisting, but instead of returning a temporary SMTP error, it spools the E-mail for processing later. The better way around this is to use two pieces of information and use DNS as the database. You would capture the Mail From and IP address and the Reverse DNS address. O

RE: [sniffer] Large amounts of spam still getting through

2005-10-14 Thread Landry William
ECTED] Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 12:43 PM To: sniffer@SortMonster.com Subject: Re: [sniffer] Large amounts of spam still getting through > getting much better at what they do. When a spammer uses Geocities > links, hijacks real accounts on major providers to send spam through, > and

RE: [sniffer] Large amounts of spam still getting through

2005-10-14 Thread John T (Lists)
Behalf Of Mike Nice > Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 12:43 PM > To: sniffer@SortMonster.com > Subject: Re: [sniffer] Large amounts of spam still getting through > > > getting much better at what they do. When a spammer uses Geocities links, > > hijacks real accounts on major

RE: [sniffer] Large amounts of spam still getting through

2005-10-14 Thread Colbeck, Andrew
CTED] On Behalf Of Mike Nice > Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 12:43 PM > To: sniffer@SortMonster.com > Subject: Re: [sniffer] Large amounts of spam still getting through > > > getting much better at what they do. When a spammer uses Geocities > > links, hijacks real

Re: [sniffer] Large amounts of spam still getting through

2005-10-14 Thread Mike Nice
getting much better at what they do. When a spammer uses Geocities links, hijacks real accounts on major providers to send spam through, and changes their techniques every few hours, it makes it difficult for Sniffer to proactively block them, and the delay between rulebase updates means a del

Re: [sniffer] Large amounts of spam still getting through

2005-10-14 Thread Matt
. Chuck Schick Warp 8, Inc. (303)-421-5140 www.warp8.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 9:08 AM To: Chuck Schick Subject: Re: [sniffer] Large amounts of spam still getting through On Friday, Oct

RE: [sniffer] Large amounts of spam still getting through

2005-10-14 Thread Chuck Schick
: [sniffer] Large amounts of spam still getting through On Friday, October 14, 2005, 10:59:05 AM, Chuck wrote: CS> We are seeing a lot of the drug spam getting through. Anyway that CS> sniffer could start catching these. And yes I am forwarding them CS> all. There are a number of new

Re: [sniffer] Large amounts of spam still getting through

2005-10-14 Thread Pete McNeil
On Friday, October 14, 2005, 10:59:05 AM, Chuck wrote: CS> We are seeing a lot of the drug spam getting through. Anyway that sniffer CS> could start catching these. And yes I am forwarding them all. There are a number of new campaigns launched today with some heavy bandwidth behind them. We hav

[sniffer] Large amounts of spam still getting through

2005-10-14 Thread Chuck Schick
We are seeing a lot of the drug spam getting through. Anyway that sniffer could start catching these. And yes I am forwarding them all. Chuck Schick Warp 8, Inc. (303)-421-5140 www.warp8.com This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructi