Pete,
If you don't mind, does WeightGate add any noticeable CPU cycles
to run on top of running Sniffer? Thanks for the aid.
Keith Johnson
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 4:57
If you don't mind, does WeightGate add any noticeable
CPU cycles to run on top of running Sniffer? Thanks for the aid.
On a 100,000 emails per day on a 2.8 GHz Xeon, no, it doesn't.
Andrew 8)
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Hello Keith,
Thursday, November 30, 2006, 2:29:18 PM, you wrote:
Pete,
If you don't mind, does WeightGate add any noticeable CPU cycles
to run on top of running Sniffer? Thanks for the aid.
Using weightgate is bound to add some cycles -- loading a new program,
but it is very
Hello Chuck,
If I might jump in here -- you are basically correct but you'll have
to rename ShowMe.exe to the original weightgate name. When it is named
ShowMe.exe it only records the command line parameters in a log file
as a debugging aid.
Second, with that done this should work fine as long
Since this is way off topic (this is not a MD discussion list), I
will just say 2 things (my last reply to this matter).
1. You didn't need the $495 6-user Pro license. A 6-user Standard
licenses was enough to host unlimited gateways (around $120) even
with MessageSniffer support. As for
My suggestion to AltN would be to release a Unlimited gateway only version of
Mdaemon for those of you just using it as a gateway. They could even raise the
price a bit, but make it cheaper than the full Unlimited User version of
Mdaemon, let's say $1,500 per copy. Still a good deal for what
Hi Pete,
I'm trying this new release out on FreeBSD today and after the compile
it seems there are a few missing files (compared to the .2 release).
The one I seen to missing most is sniffer from the Source folder. There
are only 21 file in the .5 release compared to 25 in the .2 release.
Also
Hello Jacques,
Wednesday, November 15, 2006, 11:58:55 AM, you wrote:
Hi Pete,
I'm trying this new release out on FreeBSD today and after the compile
it seems there are a few missing files (compared to the .2 release).
The one I seen to missing most is sniffer from the Source folder. There
MDaemon 9.5 hidden warning:
If anyone is using the 'Gateway' features in MDaemon and plan to upgrade to
9.5, be aware you will now be required to purchase a user license equal to
the number of Gateways.
9.5 no longer offers unlimited gateways :(
--Paul R.
This Mdaemon licensing model has been there since the release of version 9 and
was in the 'whats new' / readme. It prompts you on install/upgrade, if you
have gateways, that the licensing model has changed as well as we ran into this.
- sent via Windows mobile
Samir Jiwani | Vision Strategy
Sniffer Folks,
On Friday, we upgraded the web server that
hostswww.armresearch.com.We
think we have everything ported to the new site correctly, but just in case -
please keep an eye out and let us know if you see any problems.
For example, if you have any trouble finding a page
http://www.armresearch.com./
If you put a . at the end, it comes up with your
Resin Default Home Page. You should specify the default IP address to
redirect to the site as well in case someone uses an odd host
header.
- Original Message -
From:
Karen
Perry
To:
Hello Jonathan,
I've adjusted the server configuration - the default is now the new site.
Thanks for spotting that!
_M
Tuesday, November 14, 2006, 3:26:22 PM, you wrote:
http://www.armresearch.com./
If you put a . at the end, it comes up with your Resin Default Home Page. You
This diary entry over at the Internet Storm Center points to an
increased volume of traffic from probable zombies, and they posit that
the increase in this traffic would coincide with the spam increase that
people are seeing.
http://isc.sans.org/diary.php?storyid=1828
Their graph shows a sharp
Silly
questions: When you run Message Sniffer in persistant mode, how does the
rulebase get reloaded? Is the application checling for updates? or do we
have to restart the service?
David
Hello David,
Monday, November 6, 2006, 9:31:40 PM, you wrote:
Silly questions: When you run Message Sniffer in persistant mode, how does the rulebase get reloaded? Is the application checling for updates? or do we have to restart the service?
The persistent instance reloads
This is list seems broken?
Anyone still getting mail from the Declude Junkmail list?
When you send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], you get this:
Unknown user: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RCPT TO generated following response:
550 Recipient not in route list.
Herb Guenther wrote:
Thanks Andy;
I appreciate
Nope... list is still active. If you're having trouble, I would suggest
calling Declude
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Steve Oren [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Message Sniffer Community sniffer@sortmonster.com
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2006 1:48 PM
Subject: [sniffer] Re: Declude List
Jim,
We have upgraded to 9.51. The plugin works the
same.
Met vriendelijke groet,
ing. Michiel Prins
Small Office Solutions
tt. Vasumweg 24a
1033 SC Amsterdam
the Netherlands
tel. 020-4082627
fax.
It looks like they are grey listing you.
That's the return code our grey listing system uses. On our
servers that grey list, the first time you try to deliver email from a new
address we return the 451 code. You must retry again after 60 seconds, within 24
hours, and your mail will be
we seem to be having a drastic increase the last
couple of hours or so - it's now 12:30 EST - anyone else seeing the same
?
Yeah -
we noticed that the volume has increased by 200 to 300% over the weekend and is
still continuing.
Shaun SturbyTechnical Services
Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Optrics
Engineering | www.Optrics.com
Now, myword choice of 'Retarded' is merely
to illuminate the slowness of Yahoo! in regards to this issue and the severity
of their decision and not to indicate that they are mentally handicapped which
is an accusation for which I have no basis. However, as evidence of this,
please review
With the caveat Yahoo! does not evaluate or guarantee the accuracy of any
Yahoo! Answers content.
That's the way to do it - Punch and Judy
David
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Jonathan Hickman
Sent: 26 October 2006 15:24
To:
I like your new sig, John.
How's this for an addendum?
"Experience is that which you acquire, just after you
needed it."
Andrew 8)
From: Message Sniffer Community
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John T
(Lists)Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 8:13 AMTo:
Message
;)
John T
eServices For You
Life is a succession
of lessons which must be lived to be understood.
Ralph Waldo Emerson
(1802-1882)
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Colbeck, Andrew
Sent: Thursday,
David,
I will test this out to see how well it works. Effectively if my
understanding is correct you can setup a system with Vamsoft, who's function
will be a Spam SMTP gateway?
Regards,
Ali
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Joe
Joe,
We use SmarterMail as our POP3/Web mail interface. It doesn't have all the
features of IMail but they do appear to be more responsive - for now.
In essence our new configuration (still under review and testing) is MX
primary record points to IIS SMTP with ORF (Vamsoft) dealing with first
David Waller wrote: they don't respond to support emails from this
registered user...
Dear David,
I am curious to know if you have an active Service Agreement with Declude?
Among the hundreds of vendors that I deal with, I found their support to be
one of the best. I seldom wait more than
I have an active SA. I've sent support requests twice in the past few
months to support@ and have gotten no response.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Computer House Support [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Message Sniffer Community sniffer@sortmonster.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 25, 2006 9:11
Yes, we do it expires June 2007. Still waiting for a response for a support
email sent on the 4/10/2006 with a kick-up-the-bum reminder sent on the
16/10 - only the initial automated response received so far.
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Hi David,
When I tried to use their ticketing system, I got an automated reply with a
ticket number.
After a lack of response, I called their support line, left a voice mail and
also posted the ticket number to the Declude list - and was told that they
couldn't find my ticket number in their own
Hi,
for discussions on Declude, you need to subscribe to
"Declude.Junkmail" or "Declude.Virus" at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here's their standard trailer line:
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe
Dear Sniffer Folks,
As I mentioned in a previous post, we have been very happy
with the response from Declude Tech Support.
Feel free to use this E-mail address if you need
help: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linda has been very good at responding, and she has given
permission for me to post her
David Barkerhas also been good about
responding, but that's not the issue. We should be able to go through
standard support channels instead of having to remember to redirect support
requests to alternative personnel.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Computer
House Support
To:
For another organization's graph of spam trends as received by them,
check out the updated graphs at TQM cubed:
http://tqmcube.com/tide.php
Their graph shows a sharp uptick at the end of June 2006.
Andrew 8)
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community
[mailto:[EMAIL
Hello Andrew,
Wednesday, October 25, 2006, 1:33:20 PM, you wrote:
For another organization's graph of spam trends as received by them,
check out the updated graphs at TQM cubed:
http://tqmcube.com/tide.php
Their graph shows a sharp uptick at the end of June 2006.
...and a new upward trend
My connection traffic doubled over the course of two weeks. This
started on about the 9th, and seems to have peaked and leveled off last
week. The increase was mostly due to a new brute force spammer (a.k.a.
dictionary attack), but static spam seems to have also increased by
about 20%. I
Hello Filippo,
Tuesday, October 24, 2006, 3:31:15 AM, you wrote:
Hi Pete,
I need only to overwrite the old .exe file with the new to upgrade?
Yes - basically.
Stop processing messages.
Stop your persistent instance (if you have one running).
Rename the new .exe to match your
Please remove [EMAIL PROTECTED] from your subscription list. I have tried
using your email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] but email keeps
bouncing.
Amrit Dhillon
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of GlobalWeb.net Billing
Sent: Tuesday,
My hat's off to any software vendor who offers speed and optimization
improvements!
Thanks,
Mike
- Original Message -
The scanning engine upgrade results in a 2x speed increase that
hopefully will help with the higher volumes we are seeing now.
Declude is not ignoring the problem. David
Barker is aware of it and has responded discussion concerning this problem on
the Declude Junkmail list.
John T
eServices For You
Seek, and ye shall
find!
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community
[mailto:[EMAIL
http://kb.armresearch.com/index.php?title=Message_Sniffer.GettingStarted.Integration
John T
eServices For You
Seek, and ye shall
find!
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Joe Wolf
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006
Hello Pete, since friday our mail server is overwhelmed by a very lot of spam
messages. Because of this the spool of my IMail Server gets full and
it actually get stuck.
Do you have any hint that can help me to fix this problem?
Filippo Palmili
Ciao Filippo
Can you see any pattern of mailfrom, mailto or IP-Address what causes all
this messages in your spool folder?
Telneting to your MX show that you're using Imail 8.05 and I assume in
conjunction with Declude and Sniffer.
It turn's also out that both logos.net and logos.it are not open
Filippo,
We had a similar problem. Due to the huge volumes of spam we found our mail
server becoming less able to deal with email. Imail/Declude/Sniffer is
expensive in processor terms when processing email and we found the best was
to pre-process mail filtering using Greylisting (we used Vamsoft
David,
What sort of database does OFR use adn do you know if the expiration of
address's can be edited?
thanks
dodd
- Original Message -
From: David Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Message Sniffer Community sniffer@sortmonster.com
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 6:14 AM
Subject:
Hello Filippo,
Monday, October 23, 2006, 5:18:02 AM, you wrote:
Hello Pete, since friday our mail server is overwhelmed by a very lot of spam
messages. Because of this the spool of my IMail Server gets full and
it actually get stuck.
Do you have any hint that can help me to fix this
Hello Pete,
witch file (Global.cfg, Virus.cfg) have the AVAFTERJM option?
I'm using Declude 2.06.16 with IMail Server 8.05
Filippo
At 14:45 23/10/2006, you wrote:
Hello Filippo,
Monday, October 23, 2006, 5:18:02 AM, you wrote:
Hello Pete, since friday our mail server is overwhelmed by a very
Dodd,
From what I can tell it's a propriety format although I've not done any
research to validate this.
Greylisting expiration is user controlled. Rejection time for unknown
senders is specified in seconds and recordlife time in hours. Both appear to
be unlimited. See www.vamsoft.com for
We also use ORF by VamSoft on IIS to pre-process.
We do not use the grey listing. We tried it, and it is great at eliminating
spam, but it can delay mail for hours, which is a problems for most email
users.
Instead of grey listing, we have found ORF's tar-pitting very effective.
We set some
I agree with the pre-scanning concept. IMgate, ORF and Alligate are all
good, but it just depends upon your level of comfort with each type of
environment these run in. Each takes several days of fine tuning and
log babysitting (even though the vendors tell you it is plug and play-
it's not).
Hello SNF Folks,
The plan was to hold off until the next major release, however in
light of recent increases in spam traffic we are pushing out a new
version with our faster engine included. All other upgrades are will
wait for the major release ;-)
The scanning engine upgrade results in a 2x
That's good news, Pete.
And with the WeightGate executable and source thrown in at no extra
charge!
Andrew 8)
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 9:26 AM
To: Message Sniffer
Thank you Pete,
We have successfully upgraded to version 2-3.5
Michael Stein
Computer House
- Original Message -
From: Pete McNeil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Message Sniffer Community sniffer@sortmonster.com
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 12:25 PM
Subject: [sniffer] Version 2-3.5 Release
Hello Grant,
Monday, October 23, 2006, 1:04:14 PM, you wrote:
OK to use with MDaemon?
The MDaemon plugin is more efficient than the command line scanner so
that would be a step backward. The MDaemon plugin will be upgraded
with V2-9 which I am working on now. In fact, the MDaemon plugin will
We are now using sniffer 2-3.5 on BSD.
Jacques Brouwers
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 9:26 AM
To: Message Sniffer Community
Subject: [sniffer] Version 2-3.5 Release -- Faster Engine
Hello Jeff,
Monday, October 23, 2006, 4:10:31 PM, you wrote:
This is my first upgrade.
Is it really as easy as unzipping and renaming ??
Yes.
_M
--
Pete McNeil
Chief Scientist,
Arm Research Labs, LLC.
#
This
Hello Computer,
Monday, October 23, 2006, 4:16:16 PM, you wrote:
Hi Jeff,
Be sure to stop the Sniffer services (Persistent) and the Declude services, then rename and replace the Sniffer EXE file, then restart the services.
A much more complete answer :-)
_M
--
Pete McNeil
Thanks, Pete, I have it compiled and running on FreeBSD 6.0 as a
spamassassin plugin. Logs show it is working as expected. Kudos.
-Dan Horne
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 12:26
Kudos Pete! Just wanted to say thanks.
Matt
Pete McNeil wrote:
Hello SNF Folks,
The plan was to hold off until the next major release, however in
light of recent increases in spam traffic we are pushing out a new
version with our faster engine included. All other upgrades are will
wait for
Yes, thanks!
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850.656.2644
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Matt
Sent: Monday, October 23, 2006 6:22 PM
To: Message Sniffer Community
Subject: [sniffer] Re: Version 2-3.5 Release
Hello Alberto,
Monday, October 23, 2006, 4:27:08 PM, you wrote:
Same method for Imail 2006.1 + MxGuard ??
Yes.
_M
--
Pete McNeil
Chief Scientist,
Arm Research Labs, LLC.
#
This message is sent to you because you
I've been seeing a massive increase in spam over the last 2 days getting
through with minimal scores. Could this be due to the drawback of the
filter involved with false positives, or something else?
--
Kirk Mitchell-General Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Keystone Connect
We saw a sudden ~50% increase on July 16th, but only fluctuations and
moderate growth since then. On weekdays we're now at 80% spam, 95% or
better on weekends.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Pete McNeil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Message Sniffer Community sniffer@sortmonster.com
Sent:
I have a moderately large number of domains and accounts that I
protect, and in the past, whenever someone indicated an increase in
spam, my system was always at normal levels and I chalked it up to some
change on the end of the one reporting the issue (such as a nobody
alias or being baptized
We've doubled the amount of spam being HELD in the past 7 weeks and
spam leakage has about doubled as well.
--
Best regards,
Davidmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
#
This message is sent to you because you are
I think I'll bump my sniffer score for experimental so it catches all those
as well.
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850.656.2644
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of David Sullivan
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006
What's going on with the Sniffer settings?
In last days I'm receiving so many spam mails, it looks like the Sniffer
is not working.
Please advise
Thanks
Filippo
Hello Filippo,
Wednesday, October 18, 2006, 11:45:13 AM, you wrote:
What's going on with the Sniffer settings?
In last days I'm receiving so many spam mails, it looks like the Sniffer is not working.
Spam is up significantly all over.
I've checked your account and it is ok.
I myself am seeing an increase in spam
making it through although at the same time I am seeing an increase in caught
spam as well, so I think sniffer seems to be catching spam ok but there appears
to be just more spam in general it has to deal with and thus a few more
slipping through.
anyone getting mailthrough yet?
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850.656.2644
From: Message Sniffer Community
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tech
SupportSent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 3:20 PMTo: Message
Sniffer CommunitySubject: [sniffer] Re: yahoo mail
Matrosity
Hosting wrote: anyone getting
mailthrough yet?
It was suggested that we try this command: telenet
mx1.mail.yahoo.com 25
I have found that this fails about 4 out of 5 times.
If you keep trying it, it will eventually connect. I would sure like to
know what this is.
Anyone
oops I spelled Telnet wrong.
Sorry
- Original Message -
From:
Computer House Support
To: Message Sniffer Community
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 7:50
PM
Subject: [sniffer] Re: yahoo mail
problems
Matrosity
Hosting wrote: anyone getting
Whatever, yahoo.
You can't just admit your system was hosed and actually still is.
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850.656.2644
-Original Message-
From: Yahoo! Customer Support [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 7:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The time and resources spent dealing with this add up to serious cash
I'm thinking class action lawsuit :)
- Original Message -
From: Matrosity Hosting [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Message Sniffer Community sniffer@sortmonster.com
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 8:36 PM
Subject:
HA HA
HO HO
ROFLOL
Do you really think Yahoo and the other big ego head companies care about
us?
It would take a mass amount of paid Yahoo users to make some thing happen.
John T
eServices For You
Seek, and ye shall find!
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community
I'm attaching an old message to this list which may come in
handy. It's from my perspective, which is using Declude and IMail, with
the spam messages in d:\imail\spool\spam and needing to be moved to
d:\imail\spool to be re-scanned. Now that I use a newer version of
Declude, my
Hello Computer,
Monday, October 16, 2006, 11:09:03 PM, you wrote:
Dear Pete,
Sniffer blocked 35,000 messages today, and roughly 7200 of them were blocked by the1174356rule.
Do you think many of these were false positives? Do you know a way of searching through 35,000 Imail messages
Hi Pete,
You're exactly right, but we often get spoiled by
the high quality of your detection rate. It's easy to expect perfection
when it means less work for us g.
Thanks for all you do to keep the quality so
high.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Pete McNeil
To: Message
On Oct 16, 2006, at 5:17 PM, Darin Cox wrote:
Anyone else seeing a sudden increase in FPs? We normally report a
few each day, but we're seeing a 10x increase in FPs for the past
three days.
What particular group, if any, are you seeing them in? The
experimental-abstract (61) category
Im sorry to post this here but we are desperately
looking for opinions quickly as this has becoming a real issue to us and I could
not think of any better place to find truly technical mail server folks J
We seem to be having multiple mail servers on multiple networks having
issues
I would recommend checking your mail server logs for a
more detailed description of the bounce error. You may find that it is a
DNS or spam blacklist issue. www.dnsstuff.com is a good
resource.
Michael SteinComputer House
- Original Message -
From:
Tech
Support
To:
Yes, we're having the same problem
here.
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850.656.2644
From: Message Sniffer Community
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tech
SupportSent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 10:51 AMTo: Message
Sniffer CommunitySubject: [sniffer] yahoo
http://www.dnsreport.com/
is another good site to test your dns/email setup as well.
Jim Matuska Jr.
Computer Tech2, CCNA
Nez Perce Tribe
Information Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Message Sniffer
Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Computer House Support
Thanks, but were not blacklisted and there
are no entries other than message has been deferred L
From: Message Sniffer Community
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Computer House Support
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006
11:54 AM
To: Message
Sniffer Community
Subject:
same here
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850.656.2644
From: Message Sniffer Community
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tech
SupportSent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 11:52 AMTo: Message
Sniffer CommunitySubject: [sniffer] Re: yahoo mail
problems
Thanks, but
We have had this issue intermittently for the last 2 days only on one
mail server.
Tech Support wrote:
I’m sorry to post this here but we are desperately looking for
opinions quickly as this has becoming a real issue to us and I could
not think of any better place to find truly technical
Now that I've looked into it further,yes! Our
E-mails to Yahoo have also been bouncing back as undeliverable with the same
error.
I have sent out a few test messages and will report back
when I have some more info.
Michael SteinComputer House
- Original Message -
From:
Heres what we have found so far
Yahoo is grey listing but instead of
running a centralized GL database each of their servers has its own
A lookup for their MX shows
Mx1.mail.yahoo.com
Mx2.mail.yahoo.com
Mx3.mail.yahoo.com
So your server grabs one of these and does
a lookup
We are running imail.
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850.656.2644
From: Message Sniffer Community
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Computer House
SupportSent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 12:27 PMTo: Message
Sniffer CommunitySubject: [sniffer] Re: yahoo mail
This issue is occurring for us with the
following platforms
Windows with Imail, smartermail Mail
enable
Linux about ½ our cpanel servers
Exchange servers at least 1/3 of
them
From: Message Sniffer Community
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Computer House
I had a similar problem with Hotmail once upon a time; the
details were different, but the remedy was the same.
I run a caching DNS server on my outbound DNS host, so I
simply addeda DNS zone forYahoo.com on it, and populated only enough
MX record information so that I could reliably get
Weird. I found that only certain domains on our
server are having the problem. One domain can successfully send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]but when I try
mail to this addressfrom my domain, it fails.
The other error we are seeing is: rl-recv:
connection reset
Michael SteinComputer House
Telnet to mx1.mail.yahoo.com on port 25
likewise try mx2 3
From: Message Sniffer Community
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Computer House Support
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006
12:44 PM
To: Message
Sniffer Community
Subject: [sniffer] Re: yahoo mail
problems
We were thinking of that approach but we
run dedicated dns servers that are extremely high traffic so we would have to
setup dns on each server as adding the zone to our true dns would cause lookup
issues for other yahoo services
From: Message Sniffer Community
[mailto:[EMAIL
Would you happen to be running Microsoft
DNS server? I ran into something similar a while back with certain dns queries
were corrupted for domains that used certain extended dns queries. It turned
out in our case that our firewalls were removing the ends of the extended dns
packets
mx3 appears to respond
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850.656.2644
From: Message Sniffer Community
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tech
SupportSent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 12:36 PMTo: Message
Sniffer CommunitySubject: [sniffer] Re: yahoo mail
problems
I seem to have no problems with postfix.
Oct 17 10:49:54 smtp postfix/smtp[12057]: E531D1CD02: to=[EMAIL PROTECTED],
relay=mx3.mail.yahoo.com[67.28.113.74]:25, delay=2.5, delays=0.05/0.01/0.4/2,
dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 ok dirdel)
I checked the logs from yesterday also and have not had any
ok, it worked once.
Bill Foresman
Matrosity Hosting
www.matrosity.com
850.656.2644
From: Message Sniffer Community
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity
HostingSent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 1:50 PMTo: Message
Sniffer CommunitySubject: [sniffer] Re: yahoo mail
problems
1001 - 1100 of 2914 matches
Mail list logo
