Re: [RCSE] JR blues

So what you are saying is Apple should make a radio :-) "D.O. Darnell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Can't argue with the weight or power consumption of a STY. Those early NSC processors and EPROMS are pretty power hungry. I'm glad you like your JR. However, The point I was trying to make,

Re: [RCSE] JR blues

Can't argue with the weight or power consumption of a STY. Those early NSC processors and EPROMS are pretty power hungry. I'm glad you like your JR. However, The point I was trying to make, albeit poorly, was that reverting to a 20-year old problem (channel to channel mixing only ) is

RE: [RCSE] JR blues

Wow, not sure where to start. I guess life for you is so nice that you have to stir some controversy in order to feel alive? :) I guess all I can do is look at my personal experience and say that when I am at out field and there happens to be a problem with a radio in terms of programming, i

Re: [RCSE] "JR Aero Tow Today? - And you - beautiful day in Alabama

In a message dated 5/31/2008 11:52:20 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: You? Gordy, Beautiful flying day in Lilian, AL. With the help of Gerry Baxter, I have been converting the SBXC to the 2.4 system. Today was the day for the flight tests after going as far as

Re: [RCSE] JR PC data transfer

Hopefully somebody that knows what they're doing. Getting the bugs out may be the reason the release date keeps getting pushed back. Rob Davis wrote: I wonder who's doing the software dev? Any idea? Rob RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscr

RE: [RCSE] "JR/Specktrum 2.4 Stuff, Bet You Didn't Know This!"

or any part of the contents to any other person. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ira Faberman Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 7:55 AM To: soaring Subject: Re: [RCSE] "JR/Specktrum 2.4 Stuff, Bet You Didn't Know Thi

Re: [RCSE] "JR/Specktrum 2.4 Stuff, Bet You Didn't Know This!"

If you guys don't stop this constant bickering about latency on 2.4GHz I will be forced to actually measure it. Any takers?

Re: [RCSE] "JR/Specktrum 2.4 Stuff, Bet You Didn't Know This!"

If you guys can't stop this constant bickering, you will force me to actually measure and report the true latency. (I have the technology). Any takers?

Re: [RCSE] "JR/Specktrum 2.4 Stuff, Bet You Didn't Know This!"

Not everyone will notice a difference. Where you are most likely to notice the difference will be in launch where you might notice this at the top of the launch. Especially on smaller, lighter models where the timing on the zoom is much quicker. And on landings where you'll save a little ti

RE: [RCSE] "JR/Specktrum 2.4 Stuff, Bet You Didn't Know This!"

ation. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 3:13 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Soaring@airage.com Subject: RE: [RCSE] "JR/Specktrum 2.4 Stuff, Bet You Didn't Know This!" Gordy, I guess what all th

Re: [RCSE] "JR/Specktrum 2.4 Stuff, Bet You Didn't Know This!"

Gordy, Old news, but I am glad you decided to finally read the manuals... :) On 4/18/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Gordy, > > > I guess what all this means is that the TX trnansmits your screw-ups > faster to the plane? > > Gee, now everyone will see the plane swerve fast

RE: [RCSE] "JR/Specktrum 2.4 Stuff, Bet You Didn't Know This!"

Gordy, I guess what all this means is that the TX trnansmits your screw-ups faster to the plane? Gee, now everyone will see the plane swerve faster left and right as it approaches the spot. I'm glad I got the new 9303. Chris > Original Message > Subject: [RCSE] "JR/Specktru

RE: [RCSE] JR 9303 Flap Programming Question

OK to set the Trailing edge in flight modes all you do is switch to the FM you want and push the little trimmers on the top face of the 9303 the direction you want the ailerons and flaps to go in that FM. These are the ones on either side of the JR logo. That's all there is to it. Once you switch b

Re: [RCSE] JR 9303 Flap Programming Question

You also need to set the flapern mix. Its just above the flap rate. Set the values to +100 and you should see them work. -- Original message -- From: "Chris Rose" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I just got a 9303 for an incredible price, and have run into a wall > trying t

RE: [RCSE] JR Receivers for Sale

The 700 and the 549 are spoken for. I still have the 2 perfectly good JR 610M (it should have been 610M instead of 600M in the first post). These are very small, light full range receivers. Thanks. Bruce Twining -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

Re: [RCSE] JR DS 368 BB Servo Arms

Bob, The 368s use a standard JR output shaft size. Almost any JR arm will work.   Let me know what length you need. I usually have them in stock     Johnny     - Original Message - From: Bob Johnson To: soaring@airage.com Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 6:34 PM S

Re: [RCSE] JR DS 368 BB Servo Arms

hi, you need DU-BRO #674   Dave Hauchwww.git-r-built.com - Original Message - From: Bob Johnson To: soaring@airage.com Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2006 7:34 PM Subject: [RCSE] JR DS 368 BB Servo Arms I am in need of a longer arm than the ones that are

Re: [RCSE] JR XP8103 TX Sold!

TX is sold. Thanks for looking. Tom Watson wrote: JR 8103 w/digital trims, no module. RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only forma

RE: [RCSE] JR 9303

JR transmitters are positive shift. This is not the transmitter module, but it is in the encoder before the module. You can actually modify the JR transmitters by adding a phase shifter. I have done this for my 8303's. MD is mode 2 (the normal way we fly these days). -Original Message-

Re: [RCSE] JR 368 BB Servos

The case size is slightly different. The servo is just a little bit higher. I haven't taken them apart to see if case tops can be swapped or anything like that. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i believe the 368BB just replaced the standard DS368. Dave Hauch www.git-r-built.com - Original Messa

Re: [RCSE] JR 368 BB Servos

i believe the 368BB just replaced the standard DS368. Dave Hauch www.git-r-built.com - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 4:54 PM Subject: [RCSE] JR 368 BB Servos The ever-popular JR 368 servo now has a ball bearing cousin. I have a coupl

Re: [RCSE] JR Scan select receiver feedback

  I installed mine in my 115 inch Playboy old timer (built by Ed Whyte of Whytewings fame) and climbed to 2000 feet (as reported by the German lady).  No problem with range or electric motor.  Looks like a solid performer.   Don RichmondSan Diego, CA (Virginia Beach, VA today)[EMAIL PRO

Re: [RCSE] JR Scan select receiver feedback

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am looking for feedback on the new JR R720 Scan select receiver. Anybody been using in in thermal duration planes? Pro or cons in operation? Thanks, S Gibson RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL

RE: [RCSE] JR 770 RX's?????

Hey Todd, the 770 RX is just fine, I am flying 5 of them. Do not let one guy with an issue make you change. Do your range check and it is good, you are fine. Marc Gellrt Sent with Wireless Sync from Verizon Wireless Original Message From: "Todd Larsen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 6/

Re: [RCSE] JR 770 RX's?????

Todd, You needn't worry about the R770. It is a very, very good receiver, tried and trusted for many years by many avid model sailplane pilots. I probably have over 20 of the things and have used them in slopers, molded TD ships, woodies, pylon racers, park flyers - you name it. I've ne

RE: [RCSE] JR 770 RX's?????

Todd, Why do feel the 770 is flawed? The 790 and 720 ScanSelect receivers are just the natural progression of the JR receiver line. These receivers eliminate the need for crystals which can be easily damaged if miss-handled or dropped. Regards, JD -Original Message- From: Todd Larsen [

Re: [RCSE] JR Synth rx - in a Duck

Butch - Original Message - From: "Michael Lachowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "James V. Bacus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 8:22 PM Subject: Re: [RCSE] JR Synth rx - in a Duck Been flying R2000's for a while. It's ni

Re: [RCSE] JR Synth rx - in a Duck

Been flying R2000's for a while. It's nice to not worry about xtals any more. Or course, the R790 will be nice for the smaller models and to save a little weight compared to the 10 channel RX. For all the transmitter impaired, you can also get a R720 FM RX from JR. Same form factor as R700

Re: [RCSE] JR Synth rx - in a Duck

At 06:22 PM 6/23/2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Being a JR product I'm betting that it will work pretty well. Yup! ;-) Those who say that 2 meters suck are missing something. They are different. They don't have the same L/D, granted. But my unlimited ships don't have near the roll ra

RE: [RCSE] JR Scanning receiver info

Diniz Subject: RE: [RCSE] JR Scanning receiver info John, Can you send me a link that will point me to more info on these little gems? -Sheldon- PS: Sorry I won't be able to renew acquaintances at the Nats this year...I've had to withdraw due to project deadlines at my "real&quo

Re: [RCSE] JR Tx

Is it legal (FCC) to use one that old? > A friend of mine has an old JR MAX PCM Tx (from the > 70's?) and was looking for an instruction manual. ANy > idea where he can find one?? > TIA > > AJ > BSS, KY RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" re

Re: [RCSE] JR 770 receiver problems...

Les Did you by chance try on a different model setting. If you have transfered any of the data from 1 xmitter to another it may have corrupted the data. I have heard of this happening before. Its odd they just quit working as they are a very good receiver. I would just try another model setup

RE: [RCSE] JR RS6UL receiver full range?

I've used the 610s in several full range applications without any issues. Used one from time to time in my Paragon, flew that to the limits of my vision (which is fair, and that's a big ship). I also fly one in a 2-meter Allegro, and I've had no problems with that (using a handlaunch-type lacqu

RE: [RCSE] JR Aerotow date

Sorry for my error. It is May31st through June 4th. JD -Original Message- From: Jim Deck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mon 1/23/2006 4:20 PM To: RCSE Cc: Subject: [RCSE] JR Aerotow date I thought that the JR

Re: [RCSE] JR Aerotow date

Jim, You are correct, June 1-4, not sure what happened to John's note, but that is what I have on the calendar. Marc RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages

RE: [RCSE] Jr R700 rx in contest environment?

I flew an R700 in a 2M Organic for several Nationals. I did not have any problem. And I know that normally means 15-18 transmitters all on at the same time. When someone has a problem with an FM RX and a Transmitter with poor range, sometimes it is tuning. I know some guys who had problems with

RE: [RCSE] Jr R700 rx in contest environment?

additional R649 Rx's, I've got 2 for sale. gv -Original Message- From: Jim Laurel Subject: Re: [RCSE] Jr R700 rx in contest environment? My view is that no FM receiver is suitable for a contest environment... I fly only the JR R770, R649 and the R2000 synth... RCSE-List fa

Re: [RCSE] Jr R700 rx in contest environment?

"eye_rc_soar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 9:30 AM Subject: Re: [RCSE] Jr R700 rx in contest environment? My view is that no FM receiver is suitable for a contest environment. I once got a glitch so nasty with my R700 once that I crashed a new Image 2

Re: [RCSE] Jr R700 rx in contest environment?

My view is that no FM receiver is suitable for a contest environment. I once got a glitch so nasty with my R700 once that I crashed a new Image 2m. The DSR receivers are pretty unreliable in my view as well. I once put a Berg6 GIII in a Pike Superior and watched in horror as control slow

Re: [RCSE] JR 9303

Thanks guys, looks like its Johnny Berlin. - Original Message - From: Marta Zavala To: soaring@airage.com Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 6:02 AM Subject: [RCSE] JR 9303 Whats the best price out there right now on the 9303? thanks,Walter

Re: [RCSE] JR Data Safe feedback

It works for me. It's pretty simple - really nothing more than just saving your configurations to individual files. Horizon has updated the software so that it now works with the 9303 tx. -Jim On Jan 1, 2006, at 8:27 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I would like some

Re: [RCSE] JR Data Safe feedback

It works...I wish it had a USB interface instead of that stupid serial port dongle, but other than that it's fine. When I first began using the 10X, a couple of guys e-mailed me templates that dropped right in. Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like some feedback from pilots who are usin

Re: [RCSE] JR Tx Module For Sale

It sold in 9 minutes! Mike On Nov 1, 2005, at 9:06 PM, Michael Conte wrote: Brand new Ch43 Tx Module. $25 Shipped Mike Las Vegas, NV RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that subscribe and unsu

RE: [RCSE] JR

Johnny Berlin - R/C Hangar -Original Message- From: david alchin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 9:09 PM To: soaring Subject: [RCSE] JR I'm in the market to purchase a 9303 JR Radio who has one David david alchin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Why Wait? Move to EarthLi

Re: [RCSE] JR Aerotow Photos

Deal. Can you make our aerotow? BTW - All the pictures of me look like I'm participating in some bizarre Sailplane Stations of the Cross tableau. Lee - Original Message - From: "James V. Bacus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 10:19

Re: [RCSE] JR Aerotow Photos

OK Lee, you better watch out when I have a camera in hand... (I don't know why, but they asked Jimbo and I to take our hats off while getting photographed, I see no one else got asked to do it that way. It might be some sort of initiation thing or something...) 8-) Thanks to all the JR peop

Re: [RCSE] JR Synthesizer Module

Guys, Johnny Berlin has it, help out the guy who is on site! Hobby Barn in Effingham... - Original Message - From: "Robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, August 15, 2005 3:37 PM Subject: [RCSE] JR Synthesizer Module > JR Synthesizer Module appears to be available at the Horizo

RE: [RCSE] JR 610 Rx

thanks for the responses! Dana

Re: [RCSE] JR Module

Thanks, Regis. you're right, i don't have the recent module.  but, i've been offered a 388 module on 19 by one of the people on the RCSE, on loan for just shipping. The soaring community is the best. Danaregis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The newer JR Tx modules have replaceable crystals. Your 388 p

RE: [RCSE] JR Tx charging plug (was: JR Service rocks)

have painted themselves into a corner... -l -Original Message- From: glide [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 4:38 PM To: soaring@airage.com Subject: RE: [RCSE] JR Service rocks When I first of JR years ago, I was surprise about the center negative charge plug

RE: [RCSE] JR Service rocks

06981 -Original Message- From: Dan Kitching [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 11:36 AM To: soaring@airage.com Subject: Re: [RCSE] JR Service rocks Fortunately for me, I've only ever owned one brand of transmitter that used that type of charge plug. I have a JR 9303 for play

Re: [RCSE] JR Service rocks

Fortunately for me, I've only ever owned one brand of transmitter that used that type of charge plug. I have a JR 9303 for playing in the air (8103 before that), and a JR XR3 for playing on the ground. Changing them to suit your standardized charge lead(s) might be a good idea. Dan Chuck

Re: [RCSE] JR Service rocks

I did a dumb thing the other day and plugged the wrong set of charge cables into my 9303 transmitter. I found out that this can damage more than the fuse. Center negative! Just one of the reasons I gave up on JR many years ago. Instead of worrying about all this, why not just rewire the

Re: [RCSE] JR Service rocks

Center negative! Just one of the reasons I gave up on JR many years ago. Of course I was still flying single stick transmitters at the time and only bought the JR to have a two stick transmitter because everybody on my cross country team were two stick fliers. Chuck Anderson At 06:37 AM 6/1

Re: [RCSE] JR Service rocks

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >I did a dumb thing the other day and plugged the wrong set of charge cables >into my 9303 transmitter. I found out that this can damage more than the >fuse. I'd like to know how that's possible. The power switch ought to be a double-throw type that switches the bat

RE: [RCSE] JR Aero tow Reply

own here one of these days:) Ron -Original Message- From: Lex Mierop [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 3:52 PM To: 'James V. Bacus'; soaring@airage.com Subject: RE: [RCSE] JR Aero tow Reply Shows that you've never been to the IHLGF. We had Engla

Re: [RCSE] JR Aero tow Reply

ys going man on man in some tough conditions. 6 heats per round, 10 rounds, 3 more for the fly off. JE -- Erickson Architects John R. Erickson, AIA > From: "James V. Bacus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 17:58:33 -0500 > To: soaring@airage.com > Subject:

RE: [RCSE] JR Aero tow Reply

---Original Message- From: James V. Bacus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 1:57 PM To: soaring@airage.com Subject: Re: [RCSE] JR Aero tow Reply Nice write up Jack, there was a guy from Canada as well. And of course the two guys from Japan doing the video show. I would

RE: [RCSE] JR Aero tow Reply

-l -Original Message- From: James V. Bacus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 1:57 PM To: soaring@airage.com Subject: Re: [RCSE] JR Aero tow Reply Nice write up Jack, there was a guy from Canada as well. And of course the two guys from Japan doing the video sh

Re: [RCSE] JR Aero tow Reply

1005 miles, 17 hours driving for me. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think Taht ther was a guy from Germany, Guys from California, As well. -- Jack Strother Granger, IN LSF 2948 LSF Level V #117 LSF Official 1996 - 2004 CSS Gold -- Original message -- >

Re: [RCSE] JR Aero tow Reply

Nice write up Jack, there was a guy from Canada as well.  And of course the two guys from Japan   doing the video show. I would say it was the most cosmopolitan event I have ever been to. At 03:51 PM 6/8/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think Taht ther was a guy from Germany, Guys from Californi

Re: [RCSE] Jr Aero tow PAge 3

Wow Jack,   What a nice write-up.  I want to go, and I don't even have a scale glider !!   Jon  

Re: [RCSE] JR Aero tow page 2

Great story Jack. I would love to attend one of these events, but from Calgary it would be days of driving one way. Although we are setting up to tow really big stuff (we towed in the mid eighties), hosting an event where there is myself and a few others in the whole of western Canada makes it

Re: [RCSE] JR Aerotow prompts a question

I seem to recall when Airtronics also sold aircraft... RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note that subscribe and unsubscribe messages must be sent in text only format with MIME turned off. Email sent

RE: [RCSE] JR Aerotow prompts a question

TED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 10:40 AM > To: Jim Deck; RCSE > Subject: Re: [RCSE] JR Aerotow prompts a question > > - Original Message - > From: "Jim Deck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > JR/Horizon has raised it's profile to t

Re: [RCSE] JR Aerotow prompts a question

- Original Message - From: "Jim Deck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Witnessing the 3rd JR Aerotow and reliving the experiences with the many > fine photos posted leads me to ask a question directed at other major radio > makers -- just what have YOU done for US lately? >Thanks to JR - keep

Re: [RCSE] JR Aerotow

On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Steve Meyer wrote: How does one make a MOV play at twice the size? A little small at 1280x1024. On Windows Ctrl-2 is double size and Ctrl-3 fills the screen. Arne RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMA

Re: [RCSE] JR Aerotow

Looked like fun. How does one make a MOV play at twice the size? A little small at 1280x1024. Steve At 10:29 PM 6/6/2005, James V. Bacus wrote: I downloaded the digital video off of my Sony handycam onto my Mac and played around with iMovieHD for a few hours and here is what I mixed together

Re: [RCSE] JR Aerotow

I downloaded the digital video off of my Sony handycam onto my Mac and played around with iMovieHD for a few hours and here is what I mixed together from the JR Aerotow flightline. I still may make a few more videos with other shots I caught... 8-) http://www.jimbacus.net/soaring/JR_Aerotow_

Re: [RCSE] JR Aerotow

Picture Gallery is now online at: http://www.jimbacus.net/soaring/JR_Aerotow_2005/index.html At 11:46 PM 6/4/2005, you wrote: WOW. Dudes, this was too cool. Just got back from two solid days of flying. I have a lot of photos and video, but I wanted to make a post this evening while I am

RE: [RCSE] JR Aerotow

From: Dr Danny C Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 8:39 PM > To: soaring@airage.com > Subject: Re: [RCSE] JR Aerotow > > Who care's if it's scale > > It is more fun having the tow plane do roll's one way while you do > opp

Re: [RCSE] JR Aerotow

Who care's if it's scale It is more fun having the tow plane do roll's one way while you do opposite roll's and It's even more fun doing an inverted aero tow with the glider and the tug anyway ...( If you ask Johnny real nice he will let you do just that) Really, if you hang the glider be

Re: [RCSE] JR Aerotow

Ok, First up, to be in the air in a hurry is best for safety, second if you have 10 pilots in line to go, who cares for a scale tow or descent. Get them up! And being scale? Is a 2meter Fox behind a 130in towplane "scale"? Not, but is is tons of fun. Peter" --- Begin Message --- Hi all, W

Re: [RCSE] JR Aerotow

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Why try and pretend that a toy plane is the same as full scale anyway? Right! Also, why call it a model? Most of the r/c gliders we fly are not models of anything. They're not meant to imitate something larger, they're merely meant to look cool and fly. Yet we miscall t

Re: [RCSE] JR Aerotow

Big ones. At 02:14 PM 5/31/2005, D Hauch wrote: > Hence why it's called JR Aero Tow. I see no wording of scale. :-) what kind of planes do you fly at this event Steven ? :-) dh > > > Steven Meyer > SOAR > LSF IV > > > At 10:55 AM 5/31/2005, Chuck Anderson wrote: > >But it's not scale. > >

Re: [RCSE] JR Aerotow

> Hence why it's called JR Aero Tow. I see no wording of scale. :-) what kind of planes do you fly at this event Steven ? :-) dh > > > Steven Meyer > SOAR > LSF IV > > > At 10:55 AM 5/31/2005, Chuck Anderson wrote: > >But it's not scale. > > > >Chuck Anderson > > > >At 10:39 AM 5/31/2005, you

Re: [RCSE] JR Aerotow

Hence why it's called JR Aero Tow. I see no wording of scale. :-) Steven Meyer SOAR LSF IV At 10:55 AM 5/31/2005, Chuck Anderson wrote: But it's not scale. Chuck Anderson At 10:39 AM 5/31/2005, you wrote: And it's

Re: [RCSE] JR Aerotow

But it's not scale. Chuck Anderson At 10:39 AM 5/31/2005, you wrote: And it's much easier to see... 8-) Jim (Nats 2004 graduate of the Johnny Berlin school of vertical towing while tug is rolling) At 10:08 AM 5/31/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Vertical tow doesn't put anywhere near the s

Re: [RCSE] JR Aerotow

And it's much easier to see...  8-) Jim (Nats 2004 graduate of the Johnny Berlin school of vertical towing while tug is rolling) At 10:08 AM 5/31/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Vertical tow doesn't put anywhere near the stress on a plane that a winch launch does.    Jim Downers Grove, IL Member

Re: [RCSE] JR Aerotow

I knew I get you guys on the keyboards with that remark.  :-)   dh     > the sites to experience is "Johnny Vertical Tow Berlin"..i don't get the vertical tow, thought this was scale ?  we should make this a F3b day.  :-)dh

Re: [RCSE] JR Aerotow

Vertical tow doesn't put anywhere near the stress on a plane that a winch launch does.    Why try and pretend that a toy plane is the same as full scale anyway? If you want to fly something that looks like a full scale sailplane then go to the full scale airport and take a ride. Scale...sheesh.  

Re: [RCSE] JR Aerotow

i can bring my sighting devices, thought f3b was expensive before! :-) Dave Hauch www.git-r-built.com - Original Message - From: "D Hauch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 10:12 AM Subject: Re: [RCSE] JR Aerotow > > the sites to experience i

Re: [RCSE] JR Aerotow

> the sites to experience is "Johnny Vertical Tow Berlin".. i don't get the vertical tow, thought this was scale ? we should make this a F3b day. :-) dh RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send "subscribe" and "unsubscribe" requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please note th

Re: [RCSE] JR gear on Ham band?

> I'm in doubt about a couple of claims that were made here about FCC rules concerning 6 meter r/c radios: > 1. Lex Mierop says that 50 Mhz can only be used for aircraft, not cars, boats, or robots. There are no restrictions as to what type of model can be controlled on 50 mHz. > 2. Chuck Anders

RE: [RCSE] JR gear on Ham band?

Looks like I have to retract my statement. I do believe I know where I got the mistaken idea from. When I bought my 50 MHz module after I got my ticket, the JR packaging had a nice bright red sticker on it that says "For Model Aircraft use only". I also need to check my 9303 box, which I bought

Re: [RCSE] JR gear on Ham band?

On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 12:39:10AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | I'm in doubt about a couple of claims that were made here about FCC rules | concerning 6 meter r/c radios: | | 1. Lex Mierop says that 50 Mhz can only be used for aircraft, not cars, | boats, or robots. I don't believe this.

Re: [RCSE] JR gear on Ham band?

On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 06:26:45PM -1000, glide wrote: | Oops, I meant "sentiment" not sediment . ... | I kind of have the same sediment as Mike. Sentiment, sediment ... it all falls to the bottom! | I'm hoping that the synthesizer transmitters will keep most people | on 72 MHz and the present p

Re: [RCSE] JR gear on Ham band?

I'm in doubt about a couple of claims that were made here about FCC rules concerning 6 meter r/c radios: 1. Lex Mierop says that 50 Mhz can only be used for aircraft, not cars, boats, or robots. 2. Chuck Anderson says that you can't allow someone to use your 6 meter r/c radio while you supervise

RE: [RCSE] JR gear on Ham band?

Oops, I meant "sentiment" not sediment . All the best, Al -Original Message- From: glide [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 6:22 PM To: soaring@airage.com Subject: RE: [RCSE] JR gear on Ham band? I kind of have the same sediment as Mike. I am very fort

RE: [RCSE] JR gear on Ham band?

EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 3:09 PM To: soaring@airage.com Subject: Re: [RCSE] JR gear on Ham band? Doug McLaren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Also, nobody else can legally fly your plane if it uses the ham bands, >unless they're also a ham operator. I don'

Re: [RCSE] JR gear on Ham band?

At 08:08 PM 5/26/2005, you wrote: The way I see it, it's not third-party traffic, it's you being the control operator. I believe it's perfectly legal so long as you're there watching, and if someone is flying your plane then you almost certainly will be. (It IS a handy excuse to say "no you can'

Re: [RCSE] JR gear on Ham band?

Doug McLaren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Also, nobody else can legally fly your plane if it uses the ham bands, >unless they're also a ham operator. I don't think you can even use a >buddy box unless both people are hams. (I think the law specifically >prohibits third party traffic with R/C on

Re: [RCSE] JR gear on Ham band?

Lex Mierop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >There is one misconception that keeps coming up about the 6 meter ham band. >The 6 meter band plan reserves the 50 MHz frequencies for aircraft use only. >The 53.x MHz frequencies are open to ground use as well as air. I can't find any evidence of that. The

RE: [RCSE] JR gear on Ham band?

There is one misconception that keeps coming up about the 6 meter ham band. The 6 meter band plan reserves the 50 MHz frequencies for aircraft use only. The 53.x MHz frequencies are open to ground use as well as air. -l KG6SXO RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send

Re: [RCSE] JR gear on Ham band?

On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 01:26:07PM -0700, Jim Laurel wrote: | Anyway, it seems to me that one way to avoid these channel conflicts | would be to start using HAM band. You're just trading some dangers for other dangers. Rather than being at risk of guys who don't take 72 mhz frequency control ser

Re: [RCSE] JR gear on Ham band?

Hey Jim, I am very pleased with my JR 9303 on ham band. Note also that all the receivers except PCM stuff use the same shift so will work well with each other. I am currently running JR, Futaba and FMA receivers with the same JR transmitter. On the other hand, there is no way to change a 72 MHz

Re: [RCSE] JR battery connector for 9303

8303? From: Jon Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 6:07 AM To: Lydon, Matthew (NBC Universal); RCSE Subject: Re: [RCSE] JR battery connector for 9303 www.radicalrc.com <http://www.radicalrc.com> specifi

RE: [RCSE] JR battery connector for 9303

Mahalo for all the responses to my question and my apologies to the OP for high jacking the thread.   Best regards,   Al Battad – WH6VE AMA #506981

RE: [RCSE] JR battery connector for 9303

It is the “new white JR connector,” even though it says it is for the XP8103 or XP8303…  J   Cameron     From: glide [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 12:30 PM To: 'RCSE' Subject: RE: [RCSE] JR battery connector for 9303   I went to the

Re: [RCSE] JR battery connector for 9303

white “t” connector but is it the same as the white “t” connector for the 8303? From: Jon Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 6:07 AM To: Lydon, Matthew (NBC Universal); RCSE Subject: Re: [RCSE] JR

  1   2   3   >