On 2012-11-14, Lon Willett wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 13:51:54 +0100
> Mitja Muženič wrote:
I don't know how it is with other operating systems but it's safe to
presume that unless your OS actively sets the CPU to the high speed
state your net6501-50 and net6501-70 units will be
Am 14.11.2012 20:31, schrieb Lon Willett:
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 13:51:54 +0100
> Mitja Muženič wrote:
I don't know how it is with other operating systems but it's safe to
presume that unless your OS actively sets the CPU to the high speed
state your net6501-50 and net6501-70 units w
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 13:51:54 +0100
Mitja Muženič wrote:
>>> I don't know how it is with other operating systems but it's safe to
>>> presume that unless your OS actively sets the CPU to the high speed
>>> state your net6501-50 and net6501-70 units will be severely
>>> underclocked.
So linux has b
Hi Herbert & List,
Sounds like there might be a CPU clock programming issue, I'll look into
it and fix it asap, should just be a comBIOS update.
Best Regards,
Soren Kristensen
CEO & Chief Engineer
Soekris Engineering, Inc.
Herbert J. Skuhra wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 13:51:54 +0100
> Mit
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 13:51:54 +0100
Mitja Muženič wrote:
> So the current situation is:
> OpenBSD 5.1 and earlier - no Enhanced Speedstep control for
> net6501-50 and 6501-70, so they only run at 600MHz.
> OpenBSD 5.2 - Enhanced Speedstep control for net6501-50 and 6501-70,
> but the initial disp
> >> On 2011-12-14, Josh wrote:
> >> > Is there any way to improve the network throughput under OpenBSD?
> >>
> >> Some more information came to light...
> >> Here's a workaround until it can be fixed:
> >>
> >> sysctl hw.setperf=0
> >> sysctl hw.setperf=100
> >
> > Actually just the latter one is
> > current snapshot until 5.2 is released in November.
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-
> > > From: soekris-tech-boun...@lists.soekris.com [mailto:soekris-
> > tech-
> >
> > > boun...@lists.soekris.com] On Behalf Of
om: soekris-tech-boun...@lists.soekris.com [mailto:soekris-tech-
> boun...@lists.soekris.com] On Behalf Of Josh
> Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2012 11:26 AM
> To: soekris-tech@lists.soekris.com
> Cc: Mitja Muženič; Stuart Henderson
> Subject: Re: [Soekris] Soekris 6501-70 / 6501-50 Network Throughput
un...@lists.soekris.com [mailto:soekris-tech-
> > boun...@lists.soekris.com] On Behalf Of Josh
> > Sent: Friday, July 06, 2012 6:16 AM
> > To: soekris-tech@lists.soekris.com
> > Cc: Mitja Muženič; Stuart Henderson
> > Subject: Re: [Soekris] Soekris 6501-70 / 6501-50 Network
]
> Sent: Friday, July 06, 2012 9:45 AM
> To: Mitja Muženič
> Cc: Josh; soekris-tech@lists.soekris.com; Stuart Henderson
> Subject: Re: [Soekris] Soekris 6501-70 / 6501-50 Network Throughput
> under Debian / OpenBSD
>
> What happens for systems which do not support hw.setperf in 5
soekris.com
> > Cc: Mitja Muženič; Stuart Henderson
> > Subject: Re: [Soekris] Soekris 6501-70 / 6501-50 Network Throughput
> > under Debian / OpenBSD
> >
> > Hello,
> > I have difficulties getting the command to work:
> > soekris~# sysctl hw.setperf=100
> >
2012 6:16 AM
> To: soekris-tech@lists.soekris.com
> Cc: Mitja Muženič; Stuart Henderson
> Subject: Re: [Soekris] Soekris 6501-70 / 6501-50 Network Throughput
> under Debian / OpenBSD
>
> Hello,
> I have difficulties getting the command to work:
> soekris~# sysctl hw.setpe
nt: Thursday, July 05, 2012 1:21 PM
>>> To: soekris-tech@lists.soekris.com
>>> Subject: Re: [Soekris] Soekris 6501-70 / 6501-50 Network Throughput
>>> under Debian / OpenBSD
>>>
>>> Replying to an old(ish) post.
>>>
>>> On 2011-12-14,
; To: soekris-tech@lists.soekris.com
>> Subject: Re: [Soekris] Soekris 6501-70 / 6501-50 Network Throughput
>> under Debian / OpenBSD
>>
>> Replying to an old(ish) post.
>>
>> On 2011-12-14, Josh wrote:
>> > Is there any way to improve the network t
> -Original Message-
> From: soekris-tech-boun...@lists.soekris.com [mailto:soekris-tech-
> boun...@lists.soekris.com] On Behalf Of Stuart Henderson
> Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2012 1:21 PM
> To: soekris-tech@lists.soekris.com
> Subject: Re: [Soekris] Soekris 6501-70
Replying to an old(ish) post.
On 2011-12-14, Josh wrote:
> Is there any way to improve the network throughput under OpenBSD?
Some more information came to light...
Here's a workaround until it can be fixed:
sysctl hw.setperf=0
sysctl hw.setperf=100
Hello list,
Just wanted to share some tests I ran recently.
OpenBSD 5.0 i386 was freshly installed and no tuning has been done.
Default PF rules activated after install (see attached ruleset)
Debian 6.0.3 i386 with i686 kernel was as well installed without any
tuning. No firewall (iptables etc.) r
17 matches
Mail list logo
