Thanks Mirko,
I already tried to modify the envelopes afterwards but it didn't work,the
main problem is right at the first envelope stage,where the mouth operator
choose which vertex are assigned to upper and lower teeth
With the mouth controls showned in the videos they give you control on the
ove
There are ways of mouth enveloping and controls.
Check this series, parts 13 and 14 should be what you are looking for
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EefTD3m-T28
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Nicolas Esposito <3dv...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm testing a couple of characters facia
Just be sure not to feed it after midnight ;-)
Rob
\/-\/\/
On 8-1-2014 9:01, Nicolas Esposito wrote:
Not sure if FR needs to think about it for a bit, but today the
brushes for wrinkles and mouth works
I have no idea what happened but it works!
2014/1/6 Manny Pa
Not sure if FR needs to think about it for a bit, but today the brushes for
wrinkles and mouth works
I have no idea what happened but it works!
2014/1/6 Manny Papamanos
> I think I had the same issue once.
> It may have been due to topo edits combined with a 'freeze/freezeM" I may
> have done.
I think I had the same issue once.
It may have been due to topo edits combined with a 'freeze/freezeM" I may have
done.
I realized the problem and reverted to a previous scene.
Manny Papamanos
Product Support Specialist
Americas Frontline Technical Support
From: softimage-boun...@listproc.au
the flag makes XSI connect to the FaceRobot workgroup, and all the code to
face robot is in that workgroup. I don't have the time to test it, but in
theory if the workgroup is not present I think it could just do nothing and
fail gracefully. If that doesn't work, actually enabling face robot on t
Angus
From: Alan Fregtman [alan.fregt...@gmail.com]
Sent: 28 October 2013 10:08 PM
To: XSI Mailing List
Subject: Re: FaceRobot
In my experience in the past, it aborted the xsibatch session completely as
soon as the scene was opened and the FR flag noticed. That'
I've never seen that happen. I even tried today. If you can repo that,
report it.
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Alan Fregtman wrote:
> In my experience in the past, it aborted the xsibatch session completely
> as soon as the scene was opened and the FR flag noticed. That's not good.
>
>
>
> O
In my experience in the past, it aborted the xsibatch session completely as
soon as the scene was opened and the FR flag noticed. That's not good.
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Luc-Eric Rousseau wrote:
>
> yeah but even if the scene is "infected", what problem does it cause at
> render time?
yeah but even if the scene is "infected", what problem does it cause at
render time?
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Alan Fregtman wrote:
> Preventing a scene open in batch mode because of the FR flag... was that
> really necessary?
>
> I too was hit by this unpleasant behavior the one time I u
hair.
> Doesn’t happen with using any plugins or renderers.
> Custom properties can get created all over the place, but they don’t
> generally cause trouble, except for the occasional error message.
>
>
>
> *From:* Stephen Blair
> *Sent:* Monday, October 28, 2013 1:16
-To: "softimage@listproc.autodesk.com"
Date: Monday 28 October 2013 at 12:13 PM
To: "softimage@listproc.autodesk.com"
Subject: Re: FaceRobot
given the insidious behaviour of FaceRobot, this should really be given some
thought for the future.
In every studio I went since FaceRob
, October 28, 2013 8:33 AM
To: softimage
Subject: Re: FaceRobot
I think thats the main problem. To get rid of face robot now, one would have to
access every scene and model in the project and delete all the appropriate
property's, and models which in itself is a mammoth task. And if by any chance
matic.
Matt
From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Luc-Eric Rousseau
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 8:26 AM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: FaceRobot
disabling face robot and saving the scene really does r
from files, and in one case last year it prevented one of the
>>> students from using the render farm. No matter what we did it kept coming
>>> back.
>>>
>>> Kind regards
>>>
>>> Angus
>>>
>>> From: Stephen Blair
f the
>> students from using the render farm. No matter what we did it kept coming
>> back.
>>
>> Kind regards
>>
>> Angus
>>
>> From: Stephen Blair
>> Reply-To: "softimage@listproc.autodesk.com" <
>> softimage@
> Reply-To: "softimage@listproc.autodesk.com" <
> softimage@listproc.autodesk.com>
> Date: Monday 28 October 2013 at 2:16 PM
>
> To: "softimage@listproc.autodesk.com"
> Subject: Re: FaceRobot
>
> Disable and save scene. That's it. Is the property r
roc.autodesk.com>"
mailto:softimage@listproc.autodesk.com>>
Subject: Re: FaceRobot
Disable and save scene. That's it. Is the property really is an infection?
On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 7:41 AM, Angus Davidson
mailto:angus.david...@wits.ac.za>> wrote:
Have to agree. For all the good that face
t; Reply-To: "softimage@listproc.autodesk.com" <
> softimage@listproc.autodesk.com>
> Date: Monday 28 October 2013 at 12:13 PM
> To: "softimage@listproc.autodesk.com"
> Subject: Re: FaceRobot
>
>given the insidious behaviour of FaceRobot, this should
istproc.autodesk.com>>
Date: Monday 28 October 2013 at 12:13 PM
To: "softimage@listproc.autodesk.com<mailto:softimage@listproc.autodesk.com>"
mailto:softimage@listproc.autodesk.com>>
Subject: Re: FaceRobot
given the insidious behaviour of FaceRobot, this should rea
ICE was acting like that, people would be on the barricades, raiding
what’s left of Softimage headquarters.
From: gareth bell
Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2013 7:40 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: RE: FaceRobot
oh - and that can be scripted
Application.DisableFaceRobot
oh - and that can be scripted
Application.DisableFaceRobot()
From: garethb...@outlook.com
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: RE: FaceRobot
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 18:20:06 +
Yeah we've had this before. Normally just disabling facerobot (whilst switched
to softimage l
-0400
Subject: Re: FaceRobot
From: stephenrbl...@gmail.com
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Don't you have to disable Face Robot in the
scene?http://usa.autodesk.com/adsk/servlet/ps/dl/item?siteID=123112&id=15241146&linkID=12544120
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Michael Hebe
Don't you have to disable Face Robot in the scene?
http://usa.autodesk.com/adsk/servlet/ps/dl/item?siteID=123112&id=15241146&linkID=12544120
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Michael Heberlein
wrote:
> If deleting the property is enough, you could do this in an
> "siOnBeginSceneSave[As]" event.
>
If deleting the property is enough, you could do this in an
"siOnBeginSceneSave[As]" event.
Am 26.10.2013 21:06 schrieb "Ognjen Vukovic" :
> Hi Philipp,
>
> Not having much luck, the number of scenes is already in the triple digits
> so maybe some automation would solve everything but i have to ta
Hi Philipp,
Not having much luck, the number of scenes is already in the triple digits
so maybe some automation would solve everything but i have to take into
account that the deadline is in three days so i think it would be to risky
now to try anything, i contemplated seriously deleting it from d
hello Ognjen...yup thats nasty. Could you fix it already ? If not: We
batched all infected scenes: opening it, disabling facerobot by deleting
the facerobot custom property, saving and closing it. voila. I recall, that
my first approach was also fiddeling with the workgroup, but with not much
succe
I was considering it but we are in the middle of a project, what are the
chances it will botch something up?
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Luc-Eric Rousseau wrote:
> Try deleting the face robot workgroup from.disk
> Le 2013-10-26 07:40, "Ognjen Vukovic" a écrit :
>
> Is there a way to remove
Try deleting the face robot workgroup from.disk
Le 2013-10-26 07:40, "Ognjen Vukovic" a écrit :
> Is there a way to remove face Robot from a work-group and generally from
> existence?
>
> We are having a awesome time as someone in the early phases of the project
> had it open somewhere in their s
29 matches
Mail list logo
