Hi,
This message initiates a two weeks long DHC WG adoption call on:
Title: DHCPv4 over DHCPv6 Source Address Option
Pages: 9
Date: 2017-02-01
Document: draft-fsc-softwire-dhcp4o6-saddr-opt-07
Link: tools.ietf.org/html/draft-fsc-softwire-dhcp4o6-saddr-opt-07
This document initially started as
I have reviewed draft-ietf-softwire-multicast-prefix-option-11 and have
one significant and several minor comments.
Major issues:
1. The DHCPv6 option format. The format used (3 prefixes stuffed in a
single option) are not the preferred way to convey this kind of
information. This format is
On 13.07.2016 11:01, Ian Farrer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This email commences a two week period for comments relating to the adoption
> of the following drafts by the Softwire Working Group concluding on 27th July.
>
> draft-boucadair-softwire-dslite-yang-04
>
Oops, that slipped under the radar for while.
I'd like to bring up to DHC attention a document that goes through WGLC
in Softwires. This is a document that specifies provisioning mechanism
for MAP, lw4over6 and possibly other IPv4/IPv6 transition technologies.
It defines 8 DHCPv6 options. Some of
Hi,
I just wanted to bring up this draft to DHC WG attention. There's a
draft that started WGLC in Softwires today. Please comment on it.
Tomek
Original Message
Subject: [Softwires] Working group last call for
draft-ietf-softwire-multicast-prefix-option-03
Date: Tue, 26 Mar
On 25.02.2013 11:17, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories.
This draft is a work item of the Softwires Working Group of the IETF.
Title : DHCPv6 Options for Mapping of Address and Port
Author(s)
On 24.08.2012 16:16, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
directories.
This draft is a work item of the Softwires Working Group of the IETF.
Title : DHCPv6 Options for Mapping of Address and Port
Author(s)
On 24.07.2012 15:10, Rémi Després wrote:
Hi, Tomek,
Hi Remi. hi all,
Since you are the known DHCP expert in Softwire concerning stateless
Thank you for your kind words. I just know DHCPv6 a bit, but I
definitely don't consider myself an expert in stateless solutions.
solutions, could you
On 06.07.2012 06:33, Suresh Krishnan wrote:
Hi all,
This call is being initiated to determine whether there is WG
consensus towards adoption of draft-mdt-softwire-map-dhcp-option-03 as a
softwire WG draft. Please state whether or not you're in favor of the
adoption by replying to this
On 06.07.2012 06:33, Suresh Krishnan wrote:
Hi all,
This call is being initiated to determine whether there is WG
consensus towards adoption of draft-mdt-softwire-map-dhcp-option-03 as a
softwire WG draft. Please state whether or not you're in favor of the
adoption by replying to this
Dear chairs, dear group,
Some time after Paris it was decided that MAP should be adopted as a WG
item. I assume that the general agreement is that this decision covers
its companion document that specifies provisioning mechanism over DHCPv6
as well.
After Paris meeting work on DHCPv6 options
On 28.06.2012 14:17, Lee, Yiu wrote:
Hi Woj and Satoru,
Thanks for spending time to explain MAP to the ML. It really helps to
understand it better. Thanks
I concur with Maoke's analysis. If the 1:1 mode means giving the CE a
complete IPv4 address (or an IPv4 prefix) in the Rule IPv4
On 27.06.2012 14:21, Tom Taylor wrote:
An old cartoon I once saw, making fun of ISDN IIRC, showed a single
socket on the outside of the wall, connected to a rat's-nest of
connections on the inside. This seems apt for the present enterprise.
Regarding cartoons, I believe this one is relevant as
On 04.04.2012 23:14, Alain Durand wrote:
Dear Softwire wg members:
=
Question 1: Do you agree that the wg should put EITHER 4rd-U OR MAP (as a
whole) on the standard track,
the other being published as experimental or
14 matches
Mail list logo
