On 28.06.2012 14:17, Lee, Yiu wrote: > Hi Woj and Satoru, > > Thanks for spending time to explain MAP to the ML. It really helps to > understand it better. Thanks > > I concur with Maoke's analysis. If the 1:1 mode means giving the CE a > complete IPv4 address (or an IPv4 prefix) in the Rule IPv4 prefix (i.e. > EA-bit=0 and r <= 32) , this is what MAP allows. If 1:1 means explicitly > provisioning PSID in the BR for shared an IPv4 address and PSID isn't > contained in the CE MAP address, AFAIK this is not MAP originally > designed for. > > In the current version of the draft, I found two references: Sorry for interrupting, but which current version do you referring to? There is softwire-map-01 published earlier today with the 1:1 mode removed.
Cheers, Tomek _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list Softwires@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
