Le 7 oct. 2010 à 21:28, Ole Troan a écrit :
...
issues I have with host tunneling:
- how to communicate with native IPv6 nodes on the same network?
The 6a44-S decapsulates IPv6 packets coming from a 6a44 host and, if not
destined to another 6a44 host of its network, forwards them in IPv6, in
Remi,
...
issues I have with host tunneling:
- how to communicate with native IPv6 nodes on the same network?
The 6a44-S decapsulates IPv6 packets coming from a 6a44 host and, if not
destined to another 6a44 host of its network, forwards them in IPv6, in this
case on the same network.
Hello Tomek,
Thanks for your reply.
The redundancy use case described by Med is the applicability scenario we have
in mind too, for the ATFR name option.
I understand the doubts raised, in defining two options to configure similar
parameters, but from a Service Provider's point of view we
Hi Yiu, all,
If there is a real issue with defining two DHCPv6 options (which I don't see),
an alternative would be to define one option with a sub-code field. This field
indicates whether the option carries an IP address or a name option.
Cheers,
Med
De :
End systems in end user networks that connect to the
IPv6 Internet will likely want to configure IPv6 VPNs,
e.g., so that they can securely connect to their home
office networks. Those VPN links must present a 1280
minimum MTU to upper layers, but if they traverse a
link in the path with a
Hi Brian,
I think this is all relative. I discussed internally about software
download. Their answer to me is BIG NO. Reason is SP must run QA tests for
every possible OS/patches combination. Worst is we need to redo this again
when a new patch/upgrade is released. This is far costly than you can
Yiu,
-Original Message-
From: softwires-boun...@ietf.org
[mailto:softwires-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Yiu L. Lee
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 11:36 AM
To: Brian E Carpenter; Ole Troan
Cc: Softwires; v4tov6transit...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Softwires] [v4tov6transition] ISP
HI Yiu,
-Original Message-
From: softwires-boun...@ietf.org
[mailto:softwires-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Yiu L. Lee
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 11:58 AM
To: Templin, Fred L; Brian E Carpenter; Ole Troan
Cc: Softwires; v4tov6transit...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Softwires]
Understood that it is PA in the underlay network space,
and that is all well and good. But, PI in the overlay
network space (instead of PA) is an option that should
be made available to customers.
Maybe if there is enough demand.
Cheers,
Yiu
___
Hi,
2010/10/9 Templin, Fred L fred.l.temp...@boeing.com:
End systems in end user networks that connect to the
IPv6 Internet will likely want to configure IPv6 VPNs,
e.g., so that they can securely connect to their home
office networks. Those VPN links must present a 1280
minimum MTU to upper
10 matches
Mail list logo
